Effectiveness of Facet Joint Infiltration in Low Back Pain
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of facet joint infiltration with corticosteroids in the treatment of low back pain due to facet joint osteoarthritis.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
Sixty subjects with diagnostic of facet joint syndrome will be enrolled in the study.
They were randomized into experimental and control groups. The experimental group will be submitted to intra-articular infiltration of six facet joints. The control group will be submitted to intramuscular injection of six lumbar paravertebral points. After the randomization, all subjects will be assessed by an investigator blinded to the groups. The assessment will be taken just before the interventions (T0) and them 7 , 30 , 90 and 180 days after the interventions. The following assessment instruments will be used: pain visual analogical scale (VAS) (0-10cm), pain visual analogical scale during extension of the spine (VAS E) (0-10cm), Likert scale for improving (0-5), percentage scale of subjective improving perception(0-100%), Rolland-Morris questionnaire (0-24), short health survey questionnaire (SF36), accountability of medications taken for back pain: analgesics and non-steroidal antiinflammatories (NSAIDs).
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: facet joint infiltration The experimental group will be submitted to intra-articular infiltration of six facet joints (L3/L4;L4/L5;L5/S1 bilaterally) with triamcinolone hexacetonide |
Drug: Cortisone
intraarticular infiltration with 1ml of triamcinolone hexacetonide versus intramuscular injection with 1 ml of triamcinolone acetonide
|
Active Comparator: intramuscular injection The control group which were submitted to triamcinolone acetonide intramuscular injection of six lumbar paravertebral points |
Drug: Cortisone
intraarticular infiltration with 1ml of triamcinolone hexacetonide versus intramuscular injection with 1 ml of triamcinolone acetonide
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- pain visual analogic scale [baseline]
pain visual scale graduated from zero to ten
- pain visual analogic scale [4 weeks]
pain visual analogic scale graduated 0--10
- pain visual analogic scale [12 weeks]
pain visual analogic scale graduated 0--10
- pain visual analogic scale [24 weeks]
pain visual analogic scale graduated 0--10
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Rolland Morris questionnaire [baseline]
assess functional capacity
- Rolland Morris questionnaire [4 weeks]
assess functional capacity
- Rolland Morris questionnaire [12 weeks]
assess functional capacity
- Rolland Morris questionnaire [24 weeks]
assess functional capacity
- SF-36 questionnaire [baseline]
assess quality of life
- SF-36 questionnaire [4 weeks]
assess quality of life
- SF-36 questionnaire [12 weeks]
assess quality of life
- SF-36 questionnaire [24 weeks]
assess quality of life
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
low back pain up to 3 months
-
pain on back extension
-
radiologic findings of facet joint osteoarthritis
Exclusion Criteria:
-
other causes of back pain
-
fibromyalgia
-
diabetes, arterial hypertension or glaucoma not well controlled
-
patients with contrast allergy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sao Paulo federal University | Sao Paulo | SP | Brazil | 04023-062 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Federal University of São Paulo
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Luiza Ribeiro, doctor, Sao Paulo Federal University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- FUSao Paulo