Efficacy Study to Evaluate Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film in Opioid-Experienced Subjects
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine if buprenorphine hydrochloride (HCl) buccal film is effective in treating opioid-experienced subjects, with moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP), who require continuous around-the-clock (ATC) pain relief for an extended period of time.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Buccal Film Twice Daily Dosing |
Drug: Placebo
Matching Placebo Buccal Film twice daily
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film Twice Daily Dosing |
Drug: Buprenorphine
Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film at doses ranging from 150-900 mcg twice daily
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Average Daily Pain Intensity Scores [Baseline, week 12]
Change in pain intensity = average of daily pain scores from the last 7 days prior to week 12 visit - average of daily pain scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. Average pain intensity over the last 24 hours was rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of Participants With Response to Treatment (Responder) Using NRS Scale [Prior to open-label titration to week 12 in double-blind treatment]
Responders are subjects who achieve a relative reduction in pain intensity from the start of open-label titration to week 12 in double-blind treatment. Average pain intensity over the last 24 hours was rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
- Number of Subjects With Opioid Rescue Medication Use [Week 1 to Week 12]
Use of analgesic rescue medication recorded in subject diary
- Time to Optimal Dose of Open-label Study Medication [Up to 8 weeks in open-label titration]
Overall time to reach the "optimum" dose of study medication required to progress to double-blind treatment
- Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure in the Double-blind Treatment Phase (up to 12 Weeks) [Baseline to treatment failure or end of double-blind treatment phase (up to 12 weeks)]
Treatment failure is defined as study discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or discontinuation due to adverse events in the double-blind treatment phase.
- Patient Global Impression of Change [Week 12]
Subjects assessed their change in activity limitations as they relate to their painful condition since beginning treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire, a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (no change [or condition has got worse]) to 7 (a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that made all the difference)
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [Baseline, week 12]
Subjects assess disability due to back pain using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) consisting of 24 statements of disability. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked, ranging from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater disability.
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Medical Outcome Score Sleep Subscale [Baseline, Week 12]
Medical Outcomes Score (MOS) Sleep Scale uses 12 items to measure 6 dimensions of sleep (sleep disturbance, somnolence, sleep adequacy, snoring, awaken short of breath or headache, and quantity of sleep/optimal sleep) and an overall sleep problems index score. The scores of the dimensions (except quantity of sleep/optimal sleep) and of the sleep problem index range on a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores reflecting more of the attribute implied by the name (eg, greater sleep disturbance, greater adequacy of sleep).
- Medical Outcomes Score Sleep Subscale - Quantity of Sleep/Optimal Sleep [Week 12]
Medical Outcomes Score (MOS) Sleep scale uses 12 items to measure 6 dimensions of sleep (sleep disturbance, somnolence, sleep adequacy, snoring, awaken short of breath or headache, and quantity of sleep/optimal sleep) and an overall sleep problems index score. The quantity of sleep dimension is the average number of hours of sleep per night reported and optimal sleep is when the number of hours of sleep is ≥7.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Diagnosis of moderate to severe low back pain for ≥6 months
-
Treating CLBP with a stable daily maintenance dose of ATC opioid analgesic medication equivalent to ≥30 mg and ≤160 mg morphine sulfate equivalents (MSE) per day for ≥4 weeks. (Additional as needed [PRN] analgesic rescue medications permitted on top of the stable daily maintenance dose of ≥30 mg MSE opioid analgesic, but must be included in the total daily MSE calculation and in combination with the stable daily maintenance dose not to exceed 160 mg MSE per day)
-
Stable health, as determine by Principal Investigator
-
Females are practicing abstinence, using a medically acceptable form of contraception, or post-menopausal, biologically sterile, or surgically sterile for more than 1 year
-
Willing and able to comply with all protocol required visits and assessments
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Current cancer related pain or received chemotherapy within 6 months of screening
-
Subjects with history of other chronic painful conditions
-
Reflex sympathetic dystrophy or causalgia, acute spinal cord compression, cauda equina compression, acute nerve root compression, meningitis, or discitis
-
Allergy or contraindications of any opioid or acetaminophen
-
Surgical procedure for relief of pain within 6 months
-
Hypokalemia or clinically unstable cardiac disease, including: unstable atrial fibrillation, symptomatic bradycardia, unstable congestive heart failure, or active myocardial ischemia
-
QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) of ≥450 milliseconds on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
-
History of long QT syndrome or a family member with this condition
-
Moderate to severe hepatic impairment
-
Moderate to severe renal impairment
-
Current or past history of alcohol abuse
-
Positive urine toxicology screen for drug of abuse
-
History or abnormalities on physical exam, vital signs, electrocardiogram, or laboratory values
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Parkway Medical Center | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | 35215 |
2 | Haleyville Clinical Research LLC | Haleyville | Alabama | United States | 35565 |
3 | Horizon Research Group. Inc / Alabama Orthopedice | Mobile | Alabama | United States | 36608 |
4 | Arizona Research Center | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | 85023 |
5 | Global Research | Anaheim | California | United States | 92804 |
6 | Catalina Research Institute, LLC | Chino | California | United States | 91710 |
7 | Synergy Clinical Research Center of Escondido | Escondido | California | United States | 92025 |
8 | RX Clinical Research, Inc. | Garden Grove | California | United States | 92843 |
9 | Adam D. Karns, MD | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90036 |
10 | Stamford Therapeutics Consortium | Stamford | Connecticut | United States | 06905 |
11 | Century Clinic Research | Daytona Beach | Florida | United States | 32117 |
12 | Avail Clinical Research, LLC | Deland | Florida | United States | 32720 |
13 | Florida Health Center | Ft. Lauderdale | Florida | United States | 33312 |
14 | Eastern Research, Inc. | Hialeah | Florida | United States | 33013 |
15 | Florida Institute of Medical Research | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32257 |
16 | Drug Study Institute | Jupiter | Florida | United States | 33458 |
17 | Health Awareness, Inc. | Jupiter | Florida | United States | 33458 |
18 | FPA Clinical Research | Kissimmee | Florida | United States | 34741 |
19 | Try Research, Inc. | Maitland | Florida | United States | 32751 |
20 | NEMA Research, Inc. | Naples | Florida | United States | 34108 |
21 | Compass Research, LLC | Orlando | Florida | United States | 32806 |
22 | Peninsula Research, Inc. | Ormond Beach | Florida | United States | 32174 |
23 | Gold Coast Research, LLC | Plantation | Florida | United States | 33317 |
24 | Progressive Medical Research | Port Orange | Florida | United States | 32127 |
25 | Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc. | Tampa | Florida | United States | 33603 |
26 | Palm Beach Research Center | West Palm Beach | Florida | United States | 33409 |
27 | National Pain Research Institute, LLC | Winter Park | Florida | United States | 32789 |
28 | Atlanta Research Center | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30319 |
29 | River Birch Research Alliance, LLC | Blue Ridge | Georgia | United States | 30513 |
30 | Drug Studies America | Marietta | Georgia | United States | 30060 |
31 | Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC | Marietta | Georgia | United States | 30060 |
32 | Taylor Research, LLC | Marietta | Georgia | United States | 30060 |
33 | Georgia Pain & Spine Care & Better Health Clinical Research | Newnan | Georgia | United States | 30265 |
34 | Clinical Investigations Specialists, Inc. | Gurnee | Illinois | United States | 60031 |
35 | MediSphere Medical Research, LLC | Evansville | Indiana | United States | 47714 |
36 | Integrated Clinical Trial Services, Inc | West Des Moines | Iowa | United States | 50265 |
37 | International Clinical Research Institute, Inc. | Overland Park | Kansas | United States | 66210 |
38 | Willis-Kinghton Physician Network / River Cities International Pain Specialist | Bossier City | Louisiana | United States | 71111 |
39 | Clinical Trials Management, LLC | Metairie | Louisiana | United States | 70006 |
40 | Best Clinical Trials, LLC | New Orleans | Louisiana | United States | 70115 |
41 | River Cities Clinical Research Center | Shreveport | Louisiana | United States | 71105 |
42 | MedVadis Research Corp. | Watertown | Massachusetts | United States | 02472 |
43 | Great Lakes Research Group, Inc. | Bay City | Michigan | United States | 48706 |
44 | The Center for Clinical Trials | Biloxi | Mississippi | United States | 39531 |
45 | Office of Robert Kaplan, DO | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States | 89119 |
46 | Comprehensive Clinical Research | Berlin | New Jersey | United States | 08009 |
47 | Long Island Gastrointestinal Research Group | Great Neck | New York | United States | 11023 |
48 | Upstate Clinical Research Associates | Williamsville | New York | United States | 14221 |
49 | PharmQuest, LLC | Greensboro | North Carolina | United States | 27408 |
50 | The Center for Clinical Research | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | 27103 |
51 | Plains Medical Clinic, LLC | Fargo | North Dakota | United States | 58104 |
52 | Clinical Inquest Center, Ltd | Beavercreek | Ohio | United States | 45432 |
53 | New Horizons Health Research | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | 45242 |
54 | Prestige Clinical Research | Franklin | Ohio | United States | 45005 |
55 | Health Research Institute | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | 73109 |
56 | Neuropsychiatric Research Center Research | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | 73109 |
57 | Brandywine Clinical Research | Downingtown | Pennsylvania | United States | 19335 |
58 | Altoona Center for Clinical Research | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | United States | 16635 |
59 | Health Concepts | Rapid City | South Dakota | United States | 57702 |
60 | FutureSearch Clinical Trials | Austin | Texas | United States | 78731 |
61 | KRK Medical Research | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75230 |
62 | Future Search Trials of Dallas, LP | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75231 |
63 | Advanced Clinical Research of Houston | Houston | Texas | United States | 77062 |
64 | Clinical Trial Network | Houston | Texas | United States | 77074 |
65 | Innovative Clinical Trials | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
66 | Highland Clinical Research | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States | 84124 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- BioDelivery Sciences International
Investigators
- Study Director: Andrew Finn, PharmD, BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- EN3409-307
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Of 1656 subjects screened, 938 subjects entered an analgesic taper phase and 1 subject was eligible to bypass the analgesic taper phase; a total of 815 subjects progressed to the open-label (OL) titration phase. Subjects who completed the open-label titration phase (511) were eligible for randomization in the double-blind (DB) treatment phase. |
Arm/Group Title | OL Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine hydrochloride (HCl) buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for up to 8 weeks in the open-label titration period | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period |
Period Title: Open-label Titration Phase | |||
STARTED | 815 | 0 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 511 | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 304 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Open-label Titration Phase | |||
STARTED | 0 | 254 | 257 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 206 | 147 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 48 | 110 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 243 | 248 | 491 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
211
86.8%
|
206
83.1%
|
417
84.9%
|
>=65 years |
32
13.2%
|
42
16.9%
|
74
15.1%
|
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ] | |||
Median (Full Range) [years] |
53.0
|
55.0
|
54.0
|
Gender (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
130
53.5%
|
136
54.8%
|
266
54.2%
|
Male |
113
46.5%
|
112
45.2%
|
225
45.8%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
243
100%
|
248
100%
|
491
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Average Daily Pain Intensity Scores |
---|---|
Description | Change in pain intensity = average of daily pain scores from the last 7 days prior to week 12 visit - average of daily pain scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. Average pain intensity over the last 24 hours was rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). |
Time Frame | Baseline, week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on ITT population; all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication. One (1) subject did not receive double-blind study medication and an additional 19 subjects from 1 site were excluded from the population. |
Arm/Group Title | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period |
Measure Participants | 243 | 248 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
0.88
(1.785)
|
1.92
(1.867)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film, DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.00001 |
Comments | P value was adjusted using weighted z-test (CHW). | |
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | -0.98 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.32 to -0.64 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Number of Participants With Response to Treatment (Responder) Using NRS Scale |
---|---|
Description | Responders are subjects who achieve a relative reduction in pain intensity from the start of open-label titration to week 12 in double-blind treatment. Average pain intensity over the last 24 hours was rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). |
Time Frame | Prior to open-label titration to week 12 in double-blind treatment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on ITT population; all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication. One (1) subject did not receive double-blind study medication and an additional 19 subjects from 1 site were excluded from the population. |
Arm/Group Title | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period |
Measure Participants | 243 | 248 |
Responders with ≥30% pain reduction |
156
64.2%
|
76
30.6%
|
Responders with ≥50% pain reduction |
96
39.5%
|
42
16.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film, DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Comments | Responders with ≥30% pain reduction | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |
Comments | Stratified by stratum (dose level) |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film, DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Comments | Responders with ≥50% pain reduction | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |
Comments | Stratified by Stratum (Dose Level) |
Title | Number of Subjects With Opioid Rescue Medication Use |
---|---|
Description | Use of analgesic rescue medication recorded in subject diary |
Time Frame | Week 1 to Week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on ITT population; all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication. One (1) subject did not receive double-blind study medication and an additional 19 subjects from 1 site were excluded from the population. |
Arm/Group Title | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period |
Measure Participants | 243 | 248 |
Week 1 (n=242, 246) |
215
88.5%
|
228
91.9%
|
Week 2 (n=234, 204) |
202
83.1%
|
185
74.6%
|
Week 3 (n=229, 189) |
197
81.1%
|
172
69.4%
|
Week 4 (n=229, 179) |
191
78.6%
|
164
66.1%
|
Week 5 (n=222, 162) |
186
76.5%
|
147
59.3%
|
Week 6 (n=219, 161) |
185
76.1%
|
146
58.9%
|
Week 7 (n=213, 154) |
178
73.3%
|
140
56.5%
|
Week 8 (n=210, 152) |
177
72.8%
|
137
55.2%
|
Week 9 (n=207, 146) |
173
71.2%
|
129
52%
|
Week 10 (n=205, 145) |
172
70.8%
|
130
52.4%
|
Week 11 (n=203, 144) |
172
70.8%
|
130
52.4%
|
Week 12 (n=201, 141) |
166
68.3%
|
128
51.6%
|
Title | Time to Optimal Dose of Open-label Study Medication |
---|---|
Description | Overall time to reach the "optimum" dose of study medication required to progress to double-blind treatment |
Time Frame | Up to 8 weeks in open-label titration |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on randomized subjects in the Safety population; all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and were randomized into double-blind treatment |
Arm/Group Title | OL Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for up to 8 weeks in the open-label titration period |
Measure Participants | 511 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [days] |
24.5
(11.70)
|
Title | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure in the Double-blind Treatment Phase (up to 12 Weeks) |
---|---|
Description | Treatment failure is defined as study discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or discontinuation due to adverse events in the double-blind treatment phase. |
Time Frame | Baseline to treatment failure or end of double-blind treatment phase (up to 12 weeks) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on ITT population; all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication. One (1) subject did not receive double-blind study medication and an additional 19 subjects from 1 site were excluded from the population. |
Arm/Group Title | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period |
Measure Participants | 243 | 248 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
9.9
4.1%
|
29.4
11.9%
|
Title | Patient Global Impression of Change |
---|---|
Description | Subjects assessed their change in activity limitations as they relate to their painful condition since beginning treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire, a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (no change [or condition has got worse]) to 7 (a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that made all the difference) |
Time Frame | Week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) population; randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind medication and had at least 1 post-dose assessment on PRO measures. Subjects from 1 site excluded from population (19). Includes only participants with PGIC assessment at week 12 (n=231 buprenorphine and n=230 placebo). |
Arm/Group Title | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period |
Measure Participants | 231 | 230 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
4.5
(1.86)
|
3.2
(1.98)
|
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire |
---|---|
Description | Subjects assess disability due to back pain using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) consisting of 24 statements of disability. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked, ranging from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater disability. |
Time Frame | Baseline, week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on PRO population; randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and had at least 1 post-dose assessment on PRO measures. Subjects from 1 site are excluded from the population (19). Includes only participants with RMDQ assessment at week 12 (n=225 buprenorphine and n=231 placebo). |
Arm/Group Title | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period |
Measure Participants | 225 | 231 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
0.5
(5.03)
|
1.6
(5.63)
|
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Medical Outcome Score Sleep Subscale |
---|---|
Description | Medical Outcomes Score (MOS) Sleep Scale uses 12 items to measure 6 dimensions of sleep (sleep disturbance, somnolence, sleep adequacy, snoring, awaken short of breath or headache, and quantity of sleep/optimal sleep) and an overall sleep problems index score. The scores of the dimensions (except quantity of sleep/optimal sleep) and of the sleep problem index range on a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores reflecting more of the attribute implied by the name (eg, greater sleep disturbance, greater adequacy of sleep). |
Time Frame | Baseline, Week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on PRO population; randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and had at least 1 post-dose assessment on PRO measures. Subjects from 1 site are excluded from the population (19). Includes only participants with MOS assessment at week 12 (n=231 buprenorphine and n=230 placebo). |
Arm/Group Title | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period |
Measure Participants | 231 | 230 |
Sleep problems index |
-0.36
(7.857)
|
-1.37
(8.359)
|
Sleep disturbance |
-0.93
(10.739)
|
-3.54
(12.038)
|
Somnolence |
0.20
(12.927)
|
-0.38
(15.301)
|
Sleep adequacy |
0.13
(17.924)
|
3.61
(18.326)
|
Snoring |
0.87
(18.630)
|
-2.78
(15.945)
|
Awaken short of breath or headache |
0.52
(17.288)
|
-4.26
(19.628)
|
Title | Medical Outcomes Score Sleep Subscale - Quantity of Sleep/Optimal Sleep |
---|---|
Description | Medical Outcomes Score (MOS) Sleep scale uses 12 items to measure 6 dimensions of sleep (sleep disturbance, somnolence, sleep adequacy, snoring, awaken short of breath or headache, and quantity of sleep/optimal sleep) and an overall sleep problems index score. The quantity of sleep dimension is the average number of hours of sleep per night reported and optimal sleep is when the number of hours of sleep is ≥7. |
Time Frame | Week 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Analysis based on PRO population; randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and had at least 1 post-dose assessment on PRO measures. Subjects from 1 site are excluded from the population (19). Includes only participants with MOS assessment at week 12 (n=231 buprenorphine and n=230 placebo). |
Arm/Group Title | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 μg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period | Placebo buccal film applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind treatment period |
Measure Participants | 231 | 230 |
Quantity of Sleep/Optimal Sleep ≥7 |
75
30.9%
|
81
32.7%
|
Quantity of Sleep/Optimal Sleep <7 |
156
64.2%
|
149
60.1%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From informed consent at screening through 14 days after last dose in the double-blind treatment phase (up to 26 weeks) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Analysis based on Safety population; all enrolled subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the respective period (open-label titration and double-blind treatment) | |||||
Arm/Group Title | OL Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film | |||
Arm/Group Description | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 µg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for up to 8 weeks in the open-label titration period | Buprenorphine HCl buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 µg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind titration period | Placebo buccal film, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, or 900 µg, applied to the buccal mucosa every 12 hours for 12 weeks in the double-blind titration period | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
OL Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
OL Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 14/810 (1.7%) | 4/254 (1.6%) | 4/256 (1.6%) | |||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
Angina pectoris | 1/810 (0.1%) | 2 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Atrial flutter | 0/810 (0%) | 0 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 1/256 (0.4%) | 1 |
Coronary artery disease | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Myocardial infarction | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Tachycardia | 0/810 (0%) | 0 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 1/256 (0.4%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Abdominal pain upper | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Ileus | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Pancreatitis relapsing | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
General disorders | ||||||
Chest pain | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Impaired healing | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Non-cardiac chest pain | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||
Cholecystitis | 0/810 (0%) | 0 | 1/254 (0.4%) | 1 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Abscess limb | 0/810 (0%) | 0 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 1/256 (0.4%) | 1 |
Cellulitis | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 1/254 (0.4%) | 1 | 2/256 (0.8%) | 2 |
Kidney infection | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Pneumonia | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Pneumonia staphylococcal | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||
Arthropod bite | 0/810 (0%) | 0 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 1/256 (0.4%) | 1 |
Pulmonary contusion | 0/810 (0%) | 0 | 1/254 (0.4%) | 1 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||
Dehydration | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Dysarthria | 0/810 (0%) | 0 | 1/254 (0.4%) | 1 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Transient ischaemic attack | 0/810 (0%) | 0 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 1/256 (0.4%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Venous insufficiency | 1/810 (0.1%) | 1 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
OL Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | DB Placebo Film | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 268/810 (33.1%) | 42/254 (16.5%) | 49/256 (19.1%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Constipation | 67/810 (8.3%) | 73 | 7/254 (2.8%) | 8 | 2/256 (0.8%) | 2 |
Nausea | 136/810 (16.8%) | 167 | 19/254 (7.5%) | 19 | 19/256 (7.4%) | 19 |
Vomiting | 54/810 (6.7%) | 63 | 14/254 (5.5%) | 15 | 6/256 (2.3%) | 6 |
General disorders | ||||||
Drug withdrawal syndrome | 10/810 (1.2%) | 10 | 9/254 (3.5%) | 9 | 25/256 (9.8%) | 25 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Dizziness | 42/810 (5.2%) | 47 | 2/254 (0.8%) | 2 | 2/256 (0.8%) | 2 |
Headache | 54/810 (6.7%) | 61 | 6/254 (2.4%) | 6 | 8/256 (3.1%) | 8 |
Somnolence | 41/810 (5.1%) | 54 | 0/254 (0%) | 0 | 0/256 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
PI and Institution reserve the right to publish and present the results of the work performed provided that Institution and/or PI submits a copy of any proposed publication to Sponsor's agent for review and comment at least 90 days in advance of its presentation or submission for publication. In addition, if Sponsor's agent requests, Institution and/or PI will withhold publication or presentation for an additional 60 days to allow for establishing and preserving its proprietary rights.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Clinical Trial Coordinator |
---|---|
Organization | Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
Phone | |
clinicalsite.inquiries@endo.com |
- EN3409-307