Enhancing Abilities in Amputees and Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Through Restoration of Sensory Feedback
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Many amputees suffer from Phantom Limb Pain (PLP), a condition where painful perceptions arise from the missing limb. Leg amputees wear prostheses that do not provide any sensory feedback, apart from the stump-socket interaction. Increased physical effort associated with prosthesis use as well as discomfort often lead to rejection of artificial limbs. Additionally, the perception of the missing limb and its brain representation, do not match-up with what amputees see (the prosthesis) and this is made worse by the absence of sensory feedback. Therefore, re-establishing the sensory flow of information between the subject's brain and the prosthetic device is extremely important to avoid this mismatch, which creates inadequate embodiment. This study focuses on improving functional abilities and decreasing PLP in amputees thanks to the use of a system able to generate a sensory feedback (SF), which will be provided with a non-invasive electrical stimulation (ES). First, the possibility of enhancing the performance in different functional tasks thanks to the use of SF will be explored. Furthermore, it will be evaluated if SF enhances the prosthesis embodiment and helps restoring a multisensory integration (visuo-tactile), potentially providing also a pain relief. Once tested this system on amputees, also people with peripheral neuropathy and sensory loss will be recruited. Diabetic patients can suffer from symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN), which is a common complication caused by prolonged glucose unbalanced levels that lead to nerve damage. Non-invasive ES has been proposed and used as a therapy to treat the chronic pain conditions. In particular, TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) is a type of non-invasive ES, which is able to activate large diameter afferent fibers. The gate control theory of pain states that these large diameter fibers inhibit central nociceptive transmission with a resultant decrease in pain perception. Therefore, also these patients will be recruited to see whether adding a non-invasive SF can enhance their functional motor abilities while diminishing their pain.
The subjects will perform a pool of the following tasks, depending on their residual abilities: motor tasks (walking on ground level and on stairs), cognitive tasks (dual tasks), subjective evaluation of prosthesis weight and description of sensations from ES.
Some tasks will be performed in Virtual Reality environments with and without an active stimulation.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: experimental group amputees or diabetics receiving intervention |
Device: Sensory Feedback
Subjects will receive a sensory feedback provided by electrical stimulation
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change from baseline in Visual Analogue scale for pain throughout the study [one month before the study, 2 weeks before the study, immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervento, after tasks with and without sensory feedback, 2 weeks after last intervention, 1 month after last intervention]
Subjects will complete VAS scale to measure pain level (from 0 to 10, 10 is worst pain immaginable)
- Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Ground Reaction Forces [during motor tasks up to 3 weeks]
GRF will be assessed during motor perfomances of the subjects
- Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Centre of Mass and Pressure [during motor tasks up to 3 weeks]
CoM and CoP will be assessed during motor perfomances of the subjects
- Change from baseline and between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Vo2 consumption [during motor tasks up to 3 weeks]
metabolic consumption is going to be measured with mobile spiroergometry and compared after walking with and without sensory feedback
- Change from baseline between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Embodiment [immediately after sessions up to 3 weeks]
Embodiment will be measured with questionnaires (from -3 to +3, +3 totally agrees; two questions are from 1 to 10 (to measure vividness, where 10 is max vividness) and from 1 to 100 (to measure prevalence, where 100 is max duration of the embodiment feeling))
- Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Visual Analogue scale for confidence [immediately after sessions up to three weeks]
Subjects will complete VAS scale to measure confidence level (from 0 to 10, where 10 is max confidence)
- Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Joint torque [during motor tasks up to three weeks]
kinematic measurement
- Change in Proprioceptive drift between different conditions [Immediately after sessions in Virtual Reality up to three weeks]
To measure embodiment subjects will be asked after VR sessions to indicate where they feel their leg without looking at the limb in real world. This is a measure of embodiment.
- Change in Telescoping measures between different conditions [Immediately after sessions in Virtual Reality up to three weeks]
To measure embodiment subjects will be asked after VR sessions to indicate how long they feel their leg without looking at the limb in real world. This is a measure of embodiment.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experiences Scales [Immediately before intervention]
Subjects will fill the TAPES to measure their satisfaction with the prosthesis (Scores range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating greater levels of adjustment)
- Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders [one week before first session and one week after last session]
QoL will be assessed through questionnaires to see if the intevention had impact on this aspect (All Neuro-QOL banks and scales are scored such that a high score reflects more of what is being measured)
- Amputee Mobility Predictor [Immediately before the intervention]
Subjects will perform AMPRO to assess K level (scores range from 0 to 47, correspoding to levels of mobility from 1(K1) to 4(K4), where 4 is the best level of mobility)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
transfemoral amputation or transtibial amputation or knee disarticulation or diabetic peripheral neuropathy
-
the subject should be healthy other than the amputation and the diabetic neuropathy and in the range of 18-70 years old
-
the subject should be able to comfortably walk, sit and stand alone
Exclusion Criteria:
-
cognitive impairment
-
pregnancy
-
Prior or current psychological diseases such as borderline, schizophrenia, Depression or Maniac Depression
-
acquired brain injury with residual impairment
-
excessive sensitivity or pain to electrical stimulation with surface electrodes
-
cybersickness
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ETH Zurich | Zürich | Switzerland | 8006 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- ETH Zurich
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Abbott CA, Malik RA, van Ross ER, Kulkarni J, Boulton AJ. Prevalence and characteristics of painful diabetic neuropathy in a large community-based diabetic population in the U.K. Diabetes Care. 2011 Oct;34(10):2220-4. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1108. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
- Antfolk C, D'Alonzo M, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F, Cipriani C. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Jan;10(1):45-54. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.68. Review.
- Archer AG, Watkins PJ, Thomas PK, Sharma AK, Payan J. The natural history of acute painful neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983 Jun;46(6):491-9.
- Bruce D, Hunter M, Peters K, Davis T, Davis W. Fear of falling is common in patients with type 2 diabetes and is associated with increased risk of falls. Age Ageing. 2015 Jul;44(4):687-90. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv024. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
- Burke MJ, Roman V, Wright V. Bone and joint changes in lower limb amputees. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Jun;37(3):252-4.
- Charkhkar H, Shell CE, Marasco PD, Pinault GJ, Tyler DJ, Triolo RJ. High-density peripheral nerve cuffs restore natural sensation to individuals with lower-limb amputations. J Neural Eng. 2018 Oct;15(5):056002. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aac964. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
- Chow DH, Cheng CT. Quantitative analysis of the effects of audio biofeedback on weight-bearing characteristics of persons with transtibial amputation during early prosthetic ambulation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000 May-Jun;37(3):255-60.
- Clippinger FW, Seaber AV, McElhaney JH, Harrelson JM, Maxwell GM. Afferent sensory feedback for lower extremity prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Sep;(169):202-6.
- Crea S, Edin BB, Knaepen K, Meeusen R, Vitiello N. Time-Discrete Vibrotactile Feedback Contributes to Improved Gait Symmetry in Patients With Lower Limb Amputations: Case Series. Phys Ther. 2017 Feb 1;97(2):198-207. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150441.
- Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Vance CGT, Liebano RE, Amrit AS, Bush HM, Lee KS, Lee JE, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain, fatigue and hyperalgesia while restoring central inhibition in primary fibromyalgia. Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2554-2562. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.043. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
- Dosen S, Markovic M, Strbac M, Belic M, Kojic V, Bijelic G, Keller T, Farina D. Multichannel Electrotactile Feedback With Spatial and Mixed Coding for Closed-Loop Control of Grasping Force in Hand Prostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Mar;25(3):183-195. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2550864. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
- Kumar D, Alvaro MS, Julka IS, Marshall HJ. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Effectiveness of electrotherapy and amitriptyline for symptomatic relief. Diabetes Care. 1998 Aug;21(8):1322-5.
- Kumar D, Marshall HJ. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: amelioration of pain with transcutaneous electrostimulation. Diabetes Care. 1997 Nov;20(11):1702-5.
- Lotze M, Moseley GL. Role of distorted body image in pain. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007 Dec;9(6):488-96. Review.
- Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9. Review.
- Naschitz JE, Lenger R. Why traumatic leg amputees are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases. QJM. 2008 Apr;101(4):251-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm131. Epub 2008 Feb 16. Review.
- Oddo CM, Raspopovic S, Artoni F, Mazzoni A, Spigler G, Petrini F, Giambattistelli F, Vecchio F, Miraglia F, Zollo L, Di Pino G, Camboni D, Carrozza MC, Guglielmelli E, Rossini PM, Faraguna U, Micera S. Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans. Elife. 2016 Mar 8;5:e09148. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09148.
- Petrini FM, Bumbasirevic M, Valle G, Ilic V, Mijović P, Čvančara P, Barberi F, Katic N, Bortolotti D, Andreu D, Lechler K, Lesic A, Mazic S, Mijović B, Guiraud D, Stieglitz T, Alexandersson A, Micera S, Raspopovic S. Sensory feedback restoration in leg amputees improves walking speed, metabolic cost and phantom pain. Nat Med. 2019 Sep;25(9):1356-1363. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0567-3. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
- Petrini FM, Valle G, Bumbasirevic M, Barberi F, Bortolotti D, Cvancara P, Hiairrassary A, Mijovic P, Sverrisson AÖ, Pedrocchi A, Divoux JL, Popovic I, Lechler K, Mijovic B, Guiraud D, Stieglitz T, Alexandersson A, Micera S, Lesic A, Raspopovic S. Enhancing functional abilities and cognitive integration of the lower limb prosthesis. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Oct 2;11(512). pii: eaav8939. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav8939.
- Rognini G, Petrini FM, Raspopovic S, Valle G, Granata G, Strauss I, Solcà M, Bello-Ruiz J, Herbelin B, Mange R, D'Anna E, Di Iorio R, Di Pino G, Andreu D, Guiraud D, Stieglitz T, Rossini PM, Serino A, Micera S, Blanke O. Multisensory bionic limb to achieve prosthesis embodiment and reduce distorted phantom limb perceptions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;90(7):833-836. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318570. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
- Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Gait Posture. 2000 Sep;12(1):34-45. Review.
- Tan DW, Schiefer MA, Keith MW, Anderson JR, Tyler J, Tyler DJ. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Oct 8;6(257):257ra138. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008669.
- 2019-N-97