The Effect of Mediclore as an Anti-adhesion Agent and Safety in Full-endoscopic Spine Surgery: a Preliminary Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare efficacy and safety of Mediclore as anti-adhesion agent in patient who undergo endoscopic lumbar discectomy. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
-
efficacy (patient-reported outcomes, epidural fibrosis)
-
safety (complications) Participants will received Mediclore at surgical site after finish the operation in experimental group and normal saline in control group.
Researchers will compare to see if experimental group have better patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after surgery with no different in complications rate.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
This study is a randomized clinical trial arrange in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Participant will be randomly assigned into 2 groups by computer-generated sequence. Patients based-line characteristic data, patient-reported outcomes (VAS back/leg, ODI and EQ-5D) and a results of straight leg raising test will be collected. Participant will undergo a endoscopic lumbar discectomy by a singer spine surgeon. In experimental group, 1.5 CC. of Mediclore (poloxamer-based thermosensitive anti-adhesive agent) will be applied in after finish the operation. In control group normal saline 1.5 CC. will be applied instead.
Participants will proceed to regular follow-up protocol which include 1, 3 and 6 months visit at out-patient department. All of the PROs and a result of a straight leg raising test will be collected at each visit. MRI will be performed at 3 month after the surgery. The amount of epidural fibrosis will be evaluated according to Ross's method.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Mediclore After finish the operation, Mediclore group will be applied 1.5 CC of Mediclore at the surgical site. Mediclore is a Poloxamer-based thermosensitive anti-adhesive agent which is in a liquid solution and transform to a gel-state after being in a body temperature. |
Drug: Mediclore
After finish the operation, Mediclore group will be applied 1.5 CC of Mediclore at the surgical site. Mediclore is a Poloxamer-based thermosensitive anti-adhesive agent which is in a liquid solution and transform to a gel-state after being in a body temperature.
|
| Placebo Comparator: Control After finish the operation, Control group will be applied 1.5 CC of normal saline at the surgical site. |
Drug: Normal Saline
After finish the operation, Control group will be applied 1.5 CC of normal saline at the surgical site.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Visual Analogue Score for Leg pain (VAS Leg) [3 month after surgery]
The VAS Leg consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('the worst pain in a lifetime'). The patient was asked to rate their current pain level by pointing the mark on the line.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Visual Analogue Score for Leg and Back pain (VAS Leg, Back) [1, 3 and 6 month after surgery (for VAS Back) and 1 and 6 month after surgery (for VAS Leg)]
The VAS Leg and Back consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('the worst pain in a lifetime'). The patient was asked to rate their current pain level by pointing the mark on the line.
- Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [1, 3 and 6 month after surgery]
The ODI consists of 10 questions to assess the function in daily activities living, in which the responses are presented as 6-point Likert scales. Scores range from 0% (no disability) to 100% (most severe disability).
- EQ-5D-5L [1, 3 and 6 month after surgery]
The EQ-5D-5L has 2 parts. In the first part, consist of 5 questions to assess the function in daily activities living, in which the responses are presented as 5 level (1 means no problems to 5 means extreme problems). The digits for the five questions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The results will interpreted with the country specific utility score (Thailand) and reported as three decimal digit range from 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 1 (the best health you can imagine).
- Epidural Fibrosis [3 month after surgery]
Evaluation of epidural fibrosis by method proposed by Ross et al (1999) by MRI. From MRI axial cut, A surgical intervertebral level will be marked as level 3, 2 adjacent cephalic image will be marked as level 1 and 2. 2 adjacent caudad level will be marked as level 4 and 5. Then each image will be separated into 4 quadrant. Fibrosis will be graded on a scale of 0-4 for each quadrant at each imaging slice encompassing the operative level: 0 = no/trace scar; 1 = > 0-25% of quadrant filled with scar; 2 = 25-50% of quadrant filled with scar; 3 = 50-75% of quadrant filled with scar; 4 = > 75% of quadrant filled with scar. The highest grade of epidural fibrosis from any image will represent the degree of epidural ficrosis.
- Complication rate [peri-operation, 1, 3 and 6 month after surgery]
- Straight leg raising test [1, 3 and 6 month after surgery]
Straight leg raising test will be performed at each visit. Results will be recorded as negative or positive. If positive, the degree that make a test positive will be also recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Lumbar disc herniated patients
-
Failed proper conservative treatment more than 6 months
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Previous history of lumbar spine surgery OR lumbar epidural steroid injection
-
Infection OR malignancy
-
Allergic to any given components
-
Lactation and pregnency
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital | Pathum Wan | Bangkok | Thailand | 10330 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, Egnatchik JG, Yu YJ, Clabeaux DE, Hyland AH. Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg. 2002 Jan;96(1 Suppl):34-44. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.96.1.0034.
- Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Chang Y, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: five-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 May 15;26(10):1179-87. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200105150-00017.
- BenDebba M, Augustus van Alphen H, Long DM. Association between peridural scar and activity-related pain after lumbar discectomy. Neurol Res. 1999;21 Suppl 1:S37-42. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1999.11741025.
- Du X, Wu L, Yan H, Jiang Z, Li S, Li W, Bai Y, Wang H, Cheng Z, Kong D, Wang L, Zhu M. Microchannelled alkylated chitosan sponge to treat noncompressible hemorrhages and facilitate wound healing. Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 5;12(1):4733. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24972-2.
- Gerszten PC, Moossy JJ, Flickinger JC, Welch WC. Low-dose radiotherapy for the inhibition of peridural fibrosis after reexploratory nerve root decompression for postlaminectomy syndrome. J Neurosurg. 2003 Oct;99(3 Suppl):271-7. doi: 10.3171/spi.2003.99.3.0271.
- Guner D, Asik I, Ozgencil GE, Peker E, Erden MI. The Correlation of Epidural Fibrosis with Epiduroscopic and Radiologic Imaging for Chronic Pain after Back Surgery. Pain Physician. 2021 Dec;24(8):E1219-E1226.
- Hajosch R, Suckfuell M, Oesser S, Ahlers M, Flechsenhar K, Schlosshauer B. A novel gelatin sponge for accelerated hemostasis. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 Aug;94(2):372-379. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31663.
- Hansson E, Hansson T. The cost-utility of lumbar disc herniation surgery. Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):329-37. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0131-y. Epub 2006 May 9.
- Hosseini S, Niakan A, Dehghankhalili M, Dehdab R, Shahjouei S, Rekabdar Y, Shaghaghian E, Shaghaghian A, Ghaffarpasand F. Effects of adhesion barrier gel on functional outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation surgery; A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Heliyon. 2021 Jun 11;7(6):e07286. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07286. eCollection 2021 Jun.
- Ivanic GM, Pink PT, Schneider F, Stuecker M, Homann NC, Preidler KW. Prevention of epidural scarring after microdiscectomy: a randomized clinical trial comparing gel and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. Eur Spine J. 2006 Sep;15(9):1360-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0120-1. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
- Ivanic GM, Pink TP, Homann NC, Scheitza W, Goyal S. The post-discectomy syndrome. Aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001 Oct;121(9):494-500. doi: 10.1007/s004020100289.
- Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G. Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Nov 15;24(22):2313-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199911150-00005.
- Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RC, Petrie JL, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, deTribolet N. Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. ADCON-L European Study Group. Neurosurgery. 1996 Apr;38(4):855-61; discussion 861-3.
- Tosteson AN, Skinner JS, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Andersson GB, Berven S, Grove MR, Hanscom B, Blood EA, Weinstein JN. The cost effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation over two years: evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2108-15. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e318182e390.
- Wang H, Sun W, Fu D, Shen Y, Chen YY, Wang LL. Update on biomaterials for prevention of epidural adhesion after lumbar laminectomy. J Orthop Translat. 2018 Mar 7;13:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2018.02.001. eCollection 2018 Apr.
- Zhao YF, Zhao JY, Hu WZ, Ma K, Chao Y, Sun PJ, Fu XB, Zhang H. Synthetic poly(vinyl alcohol)-chitosan as a new type of highly efficient hemostatic sponge with blood-triggered swelling and high biocompatibility. J Mater Chem B. 2019 Mar 21;7(11):1855-1866. doi: 10.1039/c8tb03181a. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
- 66