Cognitive Effects of Inhalational Versus Intravenous General Anesthesia in the Elderly

Sponsor
Duke University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00788008
Collaborator
US Department of Veterans Affairs (U.S. Fed)
200
2
2
61
100
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to determine if post-operative cognition will be better if the general anesthesia for surgery is done with an inhaled (gas through a breathing tube) or intravenous (medicine injected in the IV) general anesthetic technique.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane vs. TIVA with propofol
N/A

Detailed Description

A prospective randomized pre-test post-test design will be used. After obtaining informed consent, patients will be randomized to either: 1) Inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane or 2) Total intravenous anesthesia(TIVA) with propofol. Randomization will be stratified by surgical type so that this variable is equally distributed between the treatment groups. All patients will be maintained at a standard depth of anesthesia (40-60) using a Bispectral Index (BIS®) monitor. Normocarbia will be maintained in the operating room using capnography monitoring. Normothermia will be maintained throughout the procedure.

The anesthesia team providing care for these patients will be able to choose the premedication and muscle relaxant for the anesthetic technique. Patient controlled anesthesia or regional anesthetic techniques may be used for post-operative analgesia at the discretion of the anesthesia team providing care for these patients. Anesthesia will be induced with intravenous propofol and fentanyl in all patients, unless contraindicated. Patients will be mechanically ventilated with air/oxygen. Temperature will be maintained > 35º C and ventilation will be adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2) at 35 ± 5 mmHg. Mean arterial pressure will be maintained ≥ 75% of baseline or ≥ 60 mmHg, whichever is greater, in both groups. After induction of anesthesia, the maintenance anesthesia will consist of either:

  1. Inhalational anesthesia group - isoflurane will be used for maintenance of anesthesia. Intravenous fentanyl and/or remifentanil will be used for supplementary analgesia. These agents will be administered to maintain a normal depth of anesthesia using the BIS® monitor and traditional signs of anesthetic depth.

  2. TIVA group - propofol and opioid infusions (fentanyl or remifentanil) will be used for the maintenance of anesthesia. The infusions will be adjusted to maintain a normal depth of anesthesia using the BIS® monitor along with traditional signs of anesthetic depth.

All subjects will undergo pre-operative neurocognitive testing within two weeks of their surgery, and at 3 months post-surgery. The persistence versus resolution of cognitive deficits over time will be determined with a 1 year post-surgical follow-up assessment. Pre- to post-test change scores will be compared across groups on primary and secondary outcome variables (see below) while controlling for relevant demographic variables (age, education, sex).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Does Inhalational Anesthesia Accelerate Postoperative Cognitive Decline?
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: 1

Inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane

Drug: inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane vs. TIVA with propofol
variable depending upon patient
Other Names:
  • Diprivan
  • Active Comparator: 2

    total intravenous anesthesia with propofol

    Drug: inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane vs. TIVA with propofol
    variable depending upon patient
    Other Names:
  • Diprivan
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Neurocognitive Performance (Z-score) [3 months post operatively]

      Mean change on composite scores (z-score) for memory and executive function measures. Memory measures: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised. Executive function measures: the Trail Making Test (Army, 1944), Digit-symbol substitution and Symbol Search subtests of the Processing Speed Index of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III; Wechsler, 1997) and the Controlled Oral Word Association subtest of the Multilingual Aphasia Examination. The outcomes were constructed as summed z-score composites. They are scaled as standard deviations. Thus, a score of 0 was central on each composite, and 95% of the scores would fall within -2.0 and +2.0. While there is no minimum or maximum value is rare for any score (<1%) to fall outside the -3.0 to +3.0 range. Higher scores (and thus positive change value) indicate an improvement of function.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    65 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • patients (aged 65 years or older) scheduled for elective spine or major joint replacement (total hip or total knee arthroplasty) at Duke University Medical Center or the Durham VA Medical Center
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • not fluent in English and able to comprehend the English language

    • have severe visual or auditory handicaps

    • Carry a diagnosis of dementia or score < 18 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as calculated from the Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) (see D4 below)

    • have allergies to eggs, propofol, isoflurane, fentanyl, remifentanil, or pregabalin

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina United States 27710
    2 VAMC Durham North Carolina United States 27710

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Duke University
    • US Department of Veterans Affairs

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Terri G Monk, MD, Duke University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Duke University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00788008
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Pro00010070
    First Posted:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 26, 2015
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Keywords provided by Duke University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail 200 patients were consented. One person dropped out prior to baseline testing.
    Arm/Group Title Isoflurane Propofol
    Arm/Group Description Inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 98 101
    COMPLETED 98 101
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Isoflurane Propofol Total
    Arm/Group Description Inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 98 101 199
    Age (years) [Mean (Full Range) ]
    Mean (Full Range) [years]
    73.38
    73.13
    73.25
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    32
    32.7%
    39
    38.6%
    71
    35.7%
    Male
    66
    67.3%
    62
    61.4%
    128
    64.3%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    98
    100%
    101
    100%
    199
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Change in Neurocognitive Performance (Z-score)
    Description Mean change on composite scores (z-score) for memory and executive function measures. Memory measures: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised. Executive function measures: the Trail Making Test (Army, 1944), Digit-symbol substitution and Symbol Search subtests of the Processing Speed Index of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III; Wechsler, 1997) and the Controlled Oral Word Association subtest of the Multilingual Aphasia Examination. The outcomes were constructed as summed z-score composites. They are scaled as standard deviations. Thus, a score of 0 was central on each composite, and 95% of the scores would fall within -2.0 and +2.0. While there is no minimum or maximum value is rare for any score (<1%) to fall outside the -3.0 to +3.0 range. Higher scores (and thus positive change value) indicate an improvement of function.
    Time Frame 3 months post operatively

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Isoflurane Propofol
    Arm/Group Description Inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol
    Measure Participants 98 101
    Memory measures
    .09
    -.20
    Executive Function measures
    -.42
    .01

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Only unexpected adverse events that were related to the study were collected.
    Arm/Group Title Isoflurane Propofol
    Arm/Group Description Inhalational anesthesia with isoflurane Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol
    All Cause Mortality
    Isoflurane Propofol
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Isoflurane Propofol
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/98 (0%) 0/101 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Isoflurane Propofol
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/98 (0%) 0/101 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Deborah Attix, PhD
    Organization Duke University Medical Center
    Phone 919-668-2846
    Email deborah.koltai@dm.duke.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Duke University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00788008
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Pro00010070
    First Posted:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 26, 2015
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2015