Optimal Postoperative Pain Management After Lung Surgery (OPtriAL)

Sponsor
Maxima Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05491239
Collaborator
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (Other), Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) (Other), Radboud UMC (Other)
450
1
3
32
14

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Adequate pain control after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection is important to improve postoperative mobilisation, recovery, and to prevent pulmonary complications. So far, no consensus exists on optimal postoperative pain management after VATS anatomic lung resection.

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the reference standard for postoperative pain management following VATS. Although the analgesic effect of TEA is clear, it is associated with patient immobilisation, bladder dysfunction and hypotension which may result in delayed recovery and longer hospitalisation. These disadvantages of TEA initiated the development of unilateral regional techniques for pain management. The most frequently used techniques are continuous paravertebral block (PVB) and single-shot intercostal nerve block (ICNB).

The investigators hypothesize that using either PVB or ICNB is non-inferior to TEA regarding postoperative pain and superior regarding quality of recovery (QoR). Signifying faster postoperative mobilisation, reduced morbidity and shorter hospitalisation, these techniques may therefore reduce health care costs and improve patient satisfaction.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Thoracic epidural analgesia
  • Procedure: Continuous regional paravertebral block
  • Procedure: Single shot intercostal nerve block
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
450 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This is a multi-centre randomised three-arm trial comparing continuous PVB, single-shot ICNB and TEA in a 1:1:1 ratio in patients who will undergo a VATS anatomic lung resection. We use a non-inferiority design with respect to the outcome measure 'pain' and a concomitant superiority design regarding 'quality of recovery'.This is a multi-centre randomised three-arm trial comparing continuous PVB, single-shot ICNB and TEA in a 1:1:1 ratio in patients who will undergo a VATS anatomic lung resection. We use a non-inferiority design with respect to the outcome measure 'pain' and a concomitant superiority design regarding 'quality of recovery'.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Masking Description:
As the analgesic strategies highly differ in nature (with or without percutaneous catheter) and/or postoperative care (mobility with or without prerequisites, urinary catheter placement), blinding for the randomised strategy is unfeasible.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Optimal Postoperative Pain Management After Lung Surgery (OPtriAL): Multi-centre Randomised Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Thoracic epidural analgesia

See intervention description

Procedure: Thoracic epidural analgesia
After correct placement of the epidural catheter, a local anaesthetic (ropivacaine, levobupivacaine or bupivacaine) will be started and, according to in house protocols, an opioid will be added to the epidural solution. A provisional stop of the administration of the epidural infusion is planned after 48 hours (on the second postoperative day).

Experimental: Continuous regional paravertebral block

See intervention description

Procedure: Continuous regional paravertebral block
The PVB catheter is placed under general anaesthesia at the beginning of the VATS procedure under direct thoracoscopic vision. The level of the PVB catheter placement is chosen at the intercostal space of the largest incision (mostly thoracic level 4 or 5). Under direct thoracoscopic vision, the surgeon inserts a Touhy needle. The tip of the needle is observed beneath the pleural surface thoracoscopically. Injection of about 2 mL ropivacaine 7.5mg/mL will create subpleural hydrodissection to reach the adequate paravertebral plane for placement of the catheter. The PVB catheter is subsequently placed under direct thoracoscopic vision and left next to the sympathetic chain in the paravertebral space. Next, a bolus of ropivacaine (total amount 20 mL including the given amount for hydrodissection) is given through the catheter. Postoperatively, a ropivacaine 2 mg/mL pump for continuous infusion is given with an infusion rate of 8-14 ml/hour.

Experimental: Single shot intercostal nerve block

See intervention description

Procedure: Single shot intercostal nerve block
At the end of the surgery a single shot ICNB will be placed at 9 levels (thoracic level 2 to 10) with 2-3mL local anaesthetics per intercostal space under direct thoracoscopic vision. The injection site will be chosen just lateral from the sympathetic trunk. This group will have no analgesic catheters for continuous analgesia. No mobility restrictions are instructed in this group.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain scores [Postoperative day 0-2]

    Proportion of pain scores ≥4 as assessed by the numerical rating scale (NRS) (measured from 0 until 10; lowest value signifying no pain and highest value signifying worst pain)

  2. Quality of Recovery (QoR) [Postoperative day 1-2]

    QoR measured with the QoR-15 questionnaire on postoperative 1 and 2 (maximum score of 150, the higher the score the better the outcome)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. cumulative use of opioids and analgesics [Postoperative day 0 until 3 as well as the use and dosage of opioid use at the follow-up period 2-3 weeks after the operation]

    total opioid and non-opioid consumption as supplementary analgesic requirement

  2. postoperative complications [until 2-3 weeks of follow-up]

    according to the Clavien-Dindo classification;

  3. hospitalisation [30 postoperative days]

    defined as the total number of days in hospital after the surgical intervention (including readmissions within the first 30 postoperative days), the following standardised discharge criteria after surgery will be applied in all participating hospitals: normal intake of nutrition, independent mobility, absence of fever (<38 °C), and no presence of chest tube;

  4. patient satisfaction [Postoperative day 0 until 3]

    5-point Likert scale: not at all satisfied, slightly satisfied, neutral, very satisfied and extremely satisfied

  5. degree of mobility [Postoperative day 0 until 3]

    4-point scale: on the bed (1), to the chair (2), to the toilet (3), outside the patient's hospital room(4)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult patients (>18 years)

  • Patients referred for anatomic lung resection (pneumonectomy, (bi)lobectomy or segmentectomy for either benign or malignant disease) with the intention of performing it by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS)

  • Patients should be able to provide informed consent and fill out questionnaires in Dutch language.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with contra-indications for TEA or PVB (infection at skin site, increased intracranial pressure, non-correctable coagulopathy, bridging indication for therapeutic anticoagulation (CHADS-VASc ≥ 8), sepsis and mechanical spine obstruction) or allergic reactions to local anaesthetics will be excluded.

  • Patients chronically using opioids for reasons not related to the operation will be excluded from the study since postoperative baseline opioid requirement will be higher and TEA remains the preferred technique for these patients.

  • In case the lung surgeon estimates the operation to be performed through a thoracotomy instead of VATS/RATS

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Maxima MC Veldhoven Netherlands 5504 DB

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Maxima Medical Center
  • ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
  • Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • Radboud UMC

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Louisa Spaans, Coordinating Investigator, MD, Maxima Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05491239
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NL75375.041.20
First Posted:
Aug 8, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Aug 8, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 8, 2022