REACH PC: Early Integrated Telehealth Versus In-Person Palliative Care for Patients With Lung Cancer

Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03375489
Collaborator
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (Other), Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (Other)
1,250
23
2
78.6
54.3
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This research study is evaluating ways to provide palliative care to patients who have recently been diagnosed with lung cancer and their families.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Telehealth
  • Other: In-person PC
N/A

Detailed Description

Patients with serious cancers, like advanced lung cancer, often experience physical symptoms, such as pain or shortness of breath. In addition, both patients and their loved ones (family and friends) often feel worried or sad about the cancer diagnosis.

Research has shown that early involvement of a team of clinicians that specialize in lessening (or "palliating") many of these distressing physical and emotional symptoms and in helping patients and their families cope with a serious illness improves patients' and their loved ones' experience with their cancer. This team is called "palliative care," and consists of physicians and advanced practice nurses (or "nurse practitioners") who work closely and collaboratively with the oncology team to care for the participant and the participant's loved ones. Research shows that when the palliative care team works closely with the oncology team to care for patients with advanced cancer, they have better symptom control, quality of life, and mood, and their loved ones feel less distressed. the investigators call this model of care, "early integrated palliative care."

While the investigators know that having palliative care clinicians work closely with the oncology team is helpful for patients and their loved ones, many patients do not have access to these specialists because hospitals and cancer clinics lack enough staff and because some patients and family members live in distant regions that make attending clinic visits difficult and expensive. One way to overcome these barriers is to have patients meet with palliative care clinicians using secure video-conferencing technology.

The purpose of this study is to determine if meeting with a palliative care clinician through video-conferencing is just as beneficial for patients and their families as meeting with a palliative care clinician in person. Specifically, this study will compare these two different strategies for meeting with the palliative care clinician. The first strategy is to schedule the participant to meet with the palliative care clinician regularly each month in person at the clinic. The investigators call this strategy "In-person palliative care."

The second strategy is to schedule the participant to meet with the palliative care clinician regularly each month using secure video-conferencing, such as through a smart phone or tablet computer. If the participant do not have this form of technology, the investigators will provide it for the participant. The investigators call this strategy "telehealth palliative care." The primary goals of this study are to learn if telehealth palliative care is just as effective as in-person palliative care for improving quality of life, mood symptoms, and satisfaction with care for patients with advanced lung cancer and their families.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
1250 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Comparative Effectiveness of Early Integrated Telehealth Versus In-Person Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 15, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Telehealth

Patients will meet with the PC clinician in person within four weeks of enrollment Subsequent visits with the PC clinician will be conducted with the patients in their home or other location using video at least every four weeks Patients may be scheduled to meet with the PC clinician in the clinic if requested by the patient or a clinician

Other: Telehealth
Teleconference meeting with the palliative care team. Palliative care is a medical specialty focused on lessening (or "palliating") patients' symptoms and helping patients and their families cope with a serious illness

Active Comparator: In Person PC

Patients will be scheduled for their first In-person PC visit within four weeks of enrollment and then at least every four weeks thereafter until the patient is no longer coming into the clinic PC visits will be scheduled on the same day as an oncology visit if possible

Other: In-person PC
In person meeting with the palliative care team. Palliative care is a medical specialty focused on lessening (or "palliating") patients' symptoms and helping patients and their families cope with a serious illness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Patient quality of life (QOL) as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L) [24 Weeks]

    To determine whether telehealth PC is equivalent to in-person PC for improving patients' quality of life as measured by the FACT-L

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Patient communication about end-of-life (EOL) care preferences as measured by patient self-report of communication about their wishes if they were dying [up to 5 years]

    To determine whether telehealth PC is equivalent to in-person PC with respect to patient-clinician communication about EOL care preferences as measured by patient self-report of communication about their wishes if they were dying

  2. Length of stay in hospice as collected per medical record review [up to 5 years]

    To determine whether telehealth PC is equivalent to in-person PC with respect to length of stay in hospice per medical record review

  3. Rates of caregiver participation in PC visits will be measured as per PC clinician documentation [up to 5 years]

    To assess the superiority of telehealth versus in-person PC on caregiver participation in PC visits as per PC clinician documentation

  4. Patient satisfaction as measured by the Satisfaction with Care Delivery Questionnaire [up to 48 weeks]

    To assess the superiority of telehealth versus in-person PC on patient satisfaction as measured by the Satisfaction and Care Delivery Questionnaire

  5. Caregiver satisfaction as measured by the Satisfaction with Care Delivery Questionnaire [up to 48 weeks]

    To assess the superiority of telehealth versus in-person PC on caregiver satisfaction as measured by the Satisfaction and Care Delivery Questionnaire

  6. Patient quality of life (QOL) as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-Lung) [up to 48 weeks]

    To evaluate whether telehealth PC is equivalent to in-person PC for improving patients' quality of life as measured by the FACT-L

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Patient coping as measured by the Brief Cope [up to 48 weeks]

    To compare coping strategies in patients assigned to telehealth versus in-person PC as measured by the Brief Cope

  2. Patient prognostic understanding as measured by the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire (PTPQ) [up to 48 weeks]

    To compare prognostic understanding in patients assigned to telehealth versus in-person PC as measured by the PTPQ

  3. Caregiver prognostic understanding as measured by the Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire (PTPQ) [up to 48 weeks]

    To compare prognostic understanding in caregivers of patients assigned to telehealth versus in-person PC as measured by the PTPQ

  4. Caregiver quality of life (QOL) as measured by the Caregiver Oncology QOL Questionnaire [up to 48 weeks]

    To compare the effect of telehealth versus in-person PC on caregivers' QOL as measured by the Caregiver Oncology QOL Questionnaire

  5. Caregiver mood as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [up to 48 weeks]

    To compare the effect of telehealth versus in-person PC on caregivers' mood as measured by the HADS

  6. Patient mood as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [up to 48 weeks]

    To compare the effect of teleheatlh versus in-person PC on patients' mood as measured by the HADS

  7. Patient depression as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [up to 48 weeks]

    To compare the effect of telehealth versus in-person PC on patients' depression as measured by the PHQ-9

  8. Health care utilization [Through study completion, average of 18 months]

    To compare the effect of telehealth versus in-person PC on emergency department visits, hospital admissions, chemotherapy administration at the end of life, and hospice service use

  9. Quality of patient death as measured by the After Death Assessment [Up to 6 months after patient death]

    To compare the effect of telehealth versus in-person PC on caregiver perceptions of quality of patient death

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient Eligibility Criteria

  • Diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer being treated with non-curative intent, and informed of advanced disease within the prior twelve weeks

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status from 0 (asymptomatic) to 3 (symptomatic and in bed >50% of the day)

  • The ability to read and respond to questions in English or Spanish

  • Receiving primary cancer care at one of the participating sites

  • Age > or = 18 years

  • Lives in a state where their institutions' palliative care clinicians are licensed to practice

  • Caregiver Eligibility Criteria

  • Relative or friend who is identified by the patient participant and lives with the patient or has contact with them at least twice per week.

  • The ability to read and respond to questions in English or Spanish

  • Age > or = 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient Exclusion Criteria

  • Already receiving outpatient PC or hospice services

  • Cognitive or psychiatric conditions as determined by the treating oncologist to prohibit study consent or participation

  • Caregiver Exclusion Criteria --Cognitive or psychiatric conditions as determined by the treating oncologist to prohibit study consent or participation

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama United States 35294
2 City of Hope Los Angeles California United States 91010
3 University of California - San Francisco San Francisco California United States 94121
4 University of Colorado Aurora Colorado United States 80045
5 Emory University Atlanta Georgia United States 30322
6 Northwestern University School of Medicine Chicago Illinois United States 60611
7 Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois United States 60612
8 University of Kansas Medical Center Westwood Kansas United States 66205
9 Johns Hopkins Medicine Baltimore Maryland United States 21201
10 Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts United States 02114
11 Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts United States 02215
12 University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan United States 48109
13 Mayo Clinic in Rochester Rochester Minnesota United States 55905
14 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health Lebanon New Hampshire United States 03756
15 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina United States 27514
16 Wake Forest University Winston-Salem North Carolina United States 27157
17 Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio United States 44195
18 Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19111
19 Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee United States 37204
20 University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas United States 78712
21 UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas United States 75390
22 University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia United States 22908
23 University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin United States 53792

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Temel, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jennifer Temel, MD, Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03375489
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 17-484
  • R-1609-35995
First Posted:
Dec 18, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Mar 25, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Jennifer Temel, MD, Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 25, 2022