Needle-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy With Fluorescein and Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer in Patients With Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules

Sponsor
Mayo Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05556525
Collaborator
(none)
118
2
2
15.2
59
3.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This clinical trial compares the addition of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) and fluorescein to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) with EBUS TBNA alone for the diagnosis of lung cancer in patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules. EBUS TBNA is a diagnostic procedure that can be used to sample lung tissue. nCLE is a novel high-resolution imaging technique that uses a laser light to create real-time microscopic images of tissues. It can be integrated into needles allowing real-time cancer detection during endoscopy. Fluorescein is an imaging agent that can be used to visualize tissue. Using nCLE and fluorescein in combination with EBUS TBNA may be more effective in diagnosing lung cancer than using EBUS TBNA alone.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Fluorescein
  • Device: Image-Guided Needle Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy
  • Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
N/A

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
  1. To compare the first-pass diagnostic yield of the sequential needle passes (rapid on-site evaluation [ROSE]) between the robotic-nCLE-TBNA arm and the robotic-guided arm in peripheral pulmonary nodule (PPNs).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
  1. To compare the per-patient diagnostic yield (cumulative pass diagnostic yield: cumulative number of passes until five cumulated passes) of robotic-nCLE-guided TBNA to that of robotic-guided TBNA in PPNs.

  2. To compare the proportion of patients with lung cancer treatment in the robotic-nCLE-guided TBNA arm to that of the robotic-guided TBNA arm in PPNs.

  3. To compare the proportion of patients with follow-up (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS]) or transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) or TBNA procedures in the robotic-nCLE-guided TBNA arm to that of the robotic-guided TBNA arm in PPNs.

  4. To compare the number of passes needed to obtain a final diagnosis of robotic-nCLE-guided TBNA to that of robotic-guided TBNA in PPNs.

  5. To assess the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV], accuracy) of the sequential cumulative nCLE passes and the sequential cumulative ROSE passes using the final diagnosis as a reference.

  6. To assess the feasibility by obtaining adequate confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) video footage in > 80% of the PPN punctures.

VII. To assess the safety of nCLE imaging, as defined by:

VIIa. The number and frequency of all adverse events (AE)/serious adverse events (SAE) from the start of the procedure until end of 12-month follow-up; VIIb. The number and frequency of nCLE procedure-related AE/SAE from the start of the procedure until end of 12-month follow-up.

  1. To assess the reproducibility of nCLE criteria to the reference standard. Three nCLE characteristics for the detection of malignancy were identified during Wijmans et al. study:

VIIIa. Dark enlarged pleomorphic cells; VIIIb. Dark cell clusters consist of overlapping cell structures ('dark clumps') and; VIIIc. Continuous movement of the cells in one direction ('directional streaming').

  1. To create an nCLE image atlas for malignant characteristics in PPNs.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo robotic EBUS TBNA on study.

ARM II: Patients undergo EBUS TBNA, nCLE, and receive fluorescein intravenously (IV) on study.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
118 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Raters will be blinded to patient history and cytologic/pathologic diagnosis.
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
nCLE Guided Randomized Controlled Trial for Lung Cancer Diagnosis
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Feb 15, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 23, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 23, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm I (EBUS TBNA)

Patients undergo robotic EBUS TBNA on study.

Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
Undergo EBUS TBNA
Other Names:
  • EBUS-TBNA
  • Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
  • Experimental: Arm II (EBUS TBNA, nCLE, fluorescein)

    Patients undergo EBUS TBNA, nCLE, and receive fluorescein IV on study.

    Other: Fluorescein
    Given IV

    Device: Image-Guided Needle Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy
    Undergo nCLE

    Procedure: Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
    Undergo EBUS TBNA
    Other Names:
  • EBUS-TBNA
  • Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. First-pass diagnostic yield [Up to 2 years]

      Calculated as the proportion of patients for which first-pass transbronchial needle aspiration during bronchoscopic procedure yielded a definitive diagnosis out of the total number of patients that have received a diagnostic procedure.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Per-patient diagnostic yield [Up to 2 years]

      Calculated as the proportion of patients in whom the bronchoscopic procedure yielded a definitive diagnosis out of the total number of patients that have received a diagnostic procedure. Per patient diagnostic yield of each bronchoscopic procedure will be calculated, and the accuracy of each technique using the final/definitive diagnosis as the reference. The diagnostic yield and accuracy for each method will be compared.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Clinical impact of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) [Up to 2 years]

      Assessed by determining the proportion of patients with a correct change in definitive diagnosis and the associated change in management plan with nCLE. Overall diagnostic and therapeutic management proportion differences in the two arms will be compared using a chi-square test. Differences between the two arms regarding the specific diagnostic and therapeutic management categories will be compared using McNemar's test.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    21 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • = 21 years of age

    • Suspected PPN

    • Nodule size in computed tomography (CT) between 8 mm and 30 mm (largest dimension)

    • Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) consent document

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Inability or non-willingness to provide informed consent

    • Failure to comply with the study protocol

    • Patients with known allergy for fluorescein or risk factors for an allergic reaction

    • Use of beta-blocker within 24 hours before the start of the bronchoscopic procedure

    • Possibly pregnant, pregnant or breastfeeding women

    • Patients with hemodynamic instability

    • Patients with refractory hypoxemia

    • Patients with a therapeutic anticoagulant that cannot be held for an appropriate interval before the procedure

    • Patients who are unable to tolerate general anesthesia according to the anesthesiologist

    • Patient undergoing chemotherapy

    • INTRA-OPERATIVE EXCLUSION/STOPPING CRITERIA:

    • The lesions are unable to be localized/confirmed by bronchoscopy

    • The procedure will be terminated if the patient develops a significant procedural complication as determined by the treating physician

    • The procedure will be terminated if the patient develops hemodynamic instability as determined by the treating physician

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Mayo Clinic in Florida Jacksonville Florida United States 32224-9980
    2 Mayo Clinic in Rochester Rochester Minnesota United States 55905

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Mayo Clinic

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Sebastian Fernandez-Bussy, Mayo Clinic

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Mayo Clinic
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05556525
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • MKT_2021_lung_01
    • NCI-2022-07660
    First Posted:
    Sep 27, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 6, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2023
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 6, 2023