Decision Aid for the Improvement of Decision-Making in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Sponsor
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04946279
Collaborator
Oregon Health and Science University (Other)
100
2
2
58.7
50
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This clinical trial refines and tests the effect of a decision aid in improving decision-making in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with cancer want to be informed about their diagnoses, treatment procedures and goals of treatment. They also seek active roles in decision-making. Shared decision-making (SDM) is the process of clinician and patient jointly participating in a health decision after discussing the options, benefits and harms, and considering the patient's values, preferences, and circumstances. SDM can improve patient involvement in decision making, satisfaction, health care quality, and quality of life. Decision aids can improve patient knowledge, create more realistic outcome expectations; reduce decisional conflict, distress, depression and uncertainty; and improve physician-patient communication and quality of life, compared with no decision aid. This trial's main aim is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a decision aid in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
  1. Refine a conversation tool among patients with lung cancer by conducting prototype testing in an iterative process.

  2. Conduct a trial at two comprehensive cancer treatment centers representing academic and Veterans Affairs medical centers.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive the conversation tool.

ARM II: Patients receive usual care.

Patients in both arms are followed up within 4-8 weeks after baseline to complete a second questionnaire.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Improving Decision-Making Encounters in Lung Cancer (I DECide): A Low-Literacy Conversation Tool
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 7, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (conversation tool)

Patients receive the conversation tool.

Other: Informational Intervention
Receive conversation tool

Other: Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies - Baseline and follow-up questionnaires

Active Comparator: Arm II (usual care)

Patients receive usual care.

Other: Best Practice
Receive usual/standard of care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
  • Other: Questionnaire Administration
    Ancillary studies - Baseline and follow-up questionnaires

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Feasibility of the conversation tool [At enrollment]

      The number of patients enrolled divided by the number of patients offered enrollment.

    2. Acceptability of the conversation tool [At enrollment]

      Use the Ottawa Acceptability Tool to determine acceptability of the conversation tool.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Anxiety [From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks]

      Assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

    2. Decisional conflict [At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks]

      Assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale.

    3. Decisional Regret [At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks]

      Assessed using the Decisional Regret Scale.

    4. Perceived involvement in care [At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks]

      Assessed using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale.

    5. Shared decision-making quality [At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks]

      Assessed using the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire.

    6. Decision making involvement [From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks]

      Assessed using the Control Preferences Scale.

    7. Self-efficacy [From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks]

      Assessed using the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale.

    8. Values-treatment concordance [From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks]

      Assessed using electronic medical record (EMR).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • PART I: Completed treatment for suspected or confirmed stage I-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

    • PART I: English fluency

    • PART II: Undergoing diagnostic work-up for suspected stage I-IV NSCLC

    • PART II: English fluency

    • PART II: > 6-month life expectancy

    • PART II: Score of > 3 on the 6-Item Screener for Cognitive Impairment

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 OHSU Knight Cancer Institute Portland Oregon United States 97239
    2 Portland VA Medical Center Portland Oregon United States 97239

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
    • Oregon Health and Science University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Donald Sullivan, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Donald R Sullivan, MD, MA, MCR, Principal Investigator, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04946279
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • STUDY00020688
    • NCI-2021-05887
    • STUDY00020688
    First Posted:
    Jun 30, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 9, 2022
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2022
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 9, 2022