Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling-reposition to Treat Idiopathic Macular Holes

Sponsor
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03020459
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
30.9
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To compare the morphologic and functional outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling-reposition versus peeling in idiopathic macular holes

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: peeling-reposition
  • Procedure: peeling
  • Drug: Brilliant Blue G
  • Other: postoperative posture
  • Device: Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system
N/A

Detailed Description

This randomized clinical trial will be performed at a single center. Eligible patients with idiopathic macular holes will be equally randomized to internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling-reposition group or ILM peeling group through computer-aided random allocation.

A standard 3-port pars plana vitrectomy was performed by a single surgeon using the Constellation 23 gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, USA).After posterior vitreous detachment was achieved, peeling of the ILM was performed by an end gripping forceps with the assistance of Brilliant Blue G. In ILM peeling-reposition group, the peeled ILM flap is flatten back to peeled area with assistance of perfluoro-n-octane. In ILM peeling group, a round shape with 2.5 to 3.5 disc diameter of ILM is peeled. This is followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange. Patients are encouraged to maintain a face-down position for two weeks postoperatively in two groups.

Postoperative measurements of BCVA and spectral domain optical coherence tomography(SD-OCT) are conducted at 1,3 and 6-month follow-up visits by independent masked observers. Macular light sensitivity and fixation stability are determined with microperimetry at 1,3, and 6 months of follow-up. Mf-ERG, M-score chart and VFQ-25 chart are performed 1,3, and 6 months of follow-up.

Comparison of BCVA, anatomical closure were primarily performed between the two groups. Then, the morphologic changes of inner retina and the functional parameters measured from microperimetry, Mf-ERG, M-score chart, VFQ-25 chart were analyzed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling-reposition Versus Peeling in Idiopathic Macular Holes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 30, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: peeling-reposition

After dying with Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) with the help of Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX), the intervention of "peeling-reposition" was used to peel and unfold the ILM. And the postoperative posture would be prone position in two weeks for all patients after the operation.

Procedure: peeling-reposition
After dying with Brilliant Blue G (BBG, Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany), a horizontal ILM strip is peeled off in inferior quadrant of macular area. Then the ILM was peeled from inferior to superior area continuously. The" ILM roll " was unfolded with assistance of perfluoro-n-octane (PFO). Finally, the position of the fixed ILM flap is adjusted under PFO bubble using flute needle or forceps.This was followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange using 14% perfluoropropane gas.Patients are introduced to maintain facedown position for two weeks postoperatively.

Drug: Brilliant Blue G
We intravitreal injected 0.1ml of Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) to dye ILM before ILM peeling.
Other Names:
  • BBG
  • Other: postoperative posture
    Patients of both two groups need to keep prone position for two weeks after the operation.

    Device: Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system
    All surgical procedures are operated on the Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX).

    Active Comparator: peeling

    After dying with Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) with the help of Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system, the intervention of "peeling" was used to grasped ILM with end-gripping forceps. And the postoperative posture would be prone position in two weeks for all patients after the operation.

    Procedure: peeling
    After dying with Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany), a horizontal ILM strip is peeled off in inferior quadrant of macular area. Then, the strand of ILM was peeled off radially from the foveal center to vascular arcade. In result, a round -shaped with 2.5-3.5 disc diameter ILM -peeled area was created.This was followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange using 14% perfluoropropane gas. Patients are encourage to maintain facedown position for two weeks postoperatively.

    Drug: Brilliant Blue G
    We intravitreal injected 0.1ml of Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) to dye ILM before ILM peeling.
    Other Names:
  • BBG
  • Other: postoperative posture
    Patients of both two groups need to keep prone position for two weeks after the operation.

    Device: Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system
    All surgical procedures are operated on the Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX).

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA) [Pre-operation and 6 months after operation]

      Change from baseline BCVA at 6 months after operation, examined with snellen chart.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Close rate of macular holes [1 month after operation]

      Observed from optical coherence tomography

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Morphologic changes of inner retina [1,3,6 months after operation]

      Dimpling observed from optical coherence tomography

    2. Central retinal thickness change [Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation]

      Measured by software in optical coherence tomography

    3. Mean foveal light sensitivity change [Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation]

      Measured by microperimetry

    4. Fixation stability change [Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation]

      Measured by microperimetry

    5. Multifocal electroretinogram(Mf-ERG) change [pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation]

      An objective measurement of retinal functions

    6. M-chart score change [Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation]

      M-horizontal score and M-vertical score

    7. Visual function questionnaire-25(VFQ-25) score change [Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation]

      A questionnaire consisted of 25 visual function questions concerning life quality

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    50 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • The patients are diagnosed as macular hole by optical coherence tomography.

    • Age ranges from 50 to 80 years.

    • The patients have indication for surgery.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Traumatic macular hole.

    • Combined with serious epiretinal membrane.

    • Combined with diabetic retinopathy, hypertensive retinopathy.

    • Combined with other ocular diseases, such as keratitis,uveitis,retinal vasculitis.

      • 6.0 diopters or more of spherical equivalent, 26mm or more of axial length.
    • History of intraocular surgery.

    • Presence of staphyloma.

    • Other ocular diseases that could influence macular microstructure or visual function

    Exit criteria:
    • For reposition group, the patients will exit the research if the peeled ILM cannot reposition successfully.

    • Due to adverse events, especially severe adverse events, the researchers consider withdrawal of patients based on concerns of safety and ethics;

    • Drop out;

    • The patients voluntarily withdraw the informed consent;

    • Serious violation of the study protocol due to the subjects or investigators' reasons;

    • Other reasons that the researchers believe for quitting the study.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China 200000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Peiquan Zhao, PhD, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03020459
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • XH-16-049
    First Posted:
    Jan 13, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    May 13, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2019
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 13, 2021