Preventing Malaria During Pregnancy in Epidemic-prone Areas.

Sponsor
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00142207
Collaborator
Ministry of Health, Uganda (Other)
4,775
1
3
36
132.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of three alternative strategies for the prevention of malaria during pregnancy in an epidemic-prone area of low transmission in the East African Highlands.

The strategies being compared are:
  • intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPT-SP)

  • an insecticide treated net (ITN), and

  • intermittent preventive treatment with SP plus an ITN

In addition to the main individually-randomised trial, outcome data was subsequently also gathered on pregnant women whose houses where sprayed with indoor residual insecticides (IRS) as part of a non-randomised district-wide control programme to compare the impact of IRS with the three intervention arms.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Intermittent preventive treatment:sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
  • Device: Insecticide-treated mosquito bed net
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Susceptibility to malaria infection during pregnancy and the severity of clinical manifestation are determined by the level of pre-pregnancy immunity, which depends on intensity and stability of malaria transmission. Most intervention trials to prevent malaria during pregnancy have been conducted in areas of intense transmission. The results of trials conducted in high-transmission areas may not be applicable to low transmission areas, where malaria is less frequent but the risk of spontaneous abortion and stillbirth is very high in women of all parities due to lack of sufficient malaria immunity. Routine chemoprophylaxis is generally not recommended in areas of unstable malaria transmission. However, intermittent treatment with an effective anti-malarial drug may be beneficial, especially during periods of malaria transmission. Little work has been carried out amongst pregnant women living in areas of low and unstable transmission in Africa. No data are available on the cost-effectiveness of malaria control in low transmission settings.

This study will compare the efficacy and cost effectiveness of three preventive strategies for the control of malaria during pregnancy in low-transmission settings. The study is located in Kabale district, a highland area in SW Uganda.

Women attending antenatal care are randomised to receive either:
  • intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPT-SP)

  • an insecticide treated net (ITN), or

  • intermittent preventive treatment with SP and an ITN. It is hypothesized that when combined with IPT-SP, the additional impact of ITNs by reducing exposure may be greatest where the intensity of transmission is low.

In addition to the main individually-randomised trial, outcome data was subsequently also gathered on pregnant women whose houses where sprayed with indoor residual insecticides (IRS) as part of a non-randomised district-wide control programme to compare the impact of IRS with the three intervention arms.

The study aims to identify the most effective intervention strategies suited to areas characterised by low and unstable transmission. Research findings should be applicable to other hypoendemic areas of the East African highlands.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
4775 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
The Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Malaria Prevention in Pregnancy in an Area of Low and Unstable Transmission in Kabale, Uganda: Use of Intermittent Preventive Treatment and Insecticide-treated Nets.
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2004
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2007
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2007

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: 1

Drug: Intermittent preventive treatment:sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine

Drug: Intermittent preventive treatment:sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
Two doses given twice during pregnancy (once in the second trimester, and once in the third trimester). Oral medication in tablet form: single daily dose given on each occasion

Active Comparator: 2

Device: Insecticide-treated mosquito bed net

Device: Insecticide-treated mosquito bed net
Insecticide-treated mosquito bed net

Active Comparator: 3

Combination of Drug + Device: Drug: Intermittent preventive treatment:sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine Device: Insecticide-treated mosquito bed net

Drug: Intermittent preventive treatment:sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
Two doses given twice during pregnancy (once in the second trimester, and once in the third trimester). Oral medication in tablet form: single daily dose given on each occasion

Device: Insecticide-treated mosquito bed net
Insecticide-treated mosquito bed net

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. mean birthweight [April 2004-Jan 2007]

  2. prevalence of low birthweight [April 2004 - Jan 2007]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. maternal anaemia - mean Hb at gestational age 36 weeks, prevalence of Hb<100g/L at gestational age 36 weeks [Feb 2003 - Jan 2007]

  2. spontaneous abortions [Feb 2003 - Jan 2007]

  3. stillbirths [April 2003-Jan 2007]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Pregnant women whose pregnancies are at <27 weeks gestation at first antenatal booking

  • Permanent resident in study area

  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Late presentation: pregnancies more than 26 weeks gestation at first antenatal booking

  • Severe anaemia (Hb<70g/L) on enrolment

  • Previous reaction to a sulfa-drug (e.g. sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, septrin)

  • History of severe skin reaction to any drug

  • Current (or history) of severe disease (e.g. hepatitis, jaundice, TB, AIDS)

Withdrawal Criteria:
  • Withdrawal of consent

  • Women developing severe anaemia (Hb<70g/L)during pregnancy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Kabale District Health Services (antenatal clinics at selected sites) Kabale Kabale District Uganda

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Ministry of Health, Uganda

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard H Ndyomugyenyi, MBChB, PhD, Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Uganda
  • Principal Investigator: Sian E Clarke, PhD, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, UK
  • Principal Investigator: Pascal Magnussen, MD, DBL - Institute for Health Research and Development, Denmark
  • Principal Investigator: Kristian Schultz Hansen, PhD, DBL - Institute for Health Research and Development, Denmark

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Brian Greenwood, Professor, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00142207
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ITDCVG32
First Posted:
Sep 2, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Jan 12, 2017
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2017
Keywords provided by Brian Greenwood, Professor, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 12, 2017