Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis for Cancer Pain

Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04801082
Collaborator
(none)
54
1
2
49
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Many cancer patients suffer from intractable pain and which is often suboptimally controlled by even strong opioid analgesics. Coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is procedure which intended to permanently destroy the nociceptive pathway that transmits the pain caused by the tumour. It can be with different approaches, such as percutaneously guided by fluoroscopy, echo-endoscopically or surgically with endoscopic approach being the more popular one in many centers equipped with echo-endoscopic services. The effect of CPN has been well established by some retrospective series. The overall response rate to CPN ranges from 70-90%, however, the analgesic effect is limited and up to roughly around 3 months. It is believed that the short-lasting analgesic effect is related to incomplete neurolysis by absolute alcohol injection.

Recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of coeliac plexus has been introduced as another mode of CPN. So far, only one small single center randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggesting superior performance in favour to CPN using RFA. This result has to be validated and by a RCT with larger sample size. In addition, data concerning the quality of life (QOL) improvement and cost-effectiveness need to be further elucidated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to perform a RCT to look into these issues.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Alcohol injection
  • Device: Radiofrequency Ablation
Phase 4

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of EUS-CPN by chemical ablation using alcohol injection versus by radiofrequency ablation in patients with cancer pain related to intra-abdominal malignancy. This is a randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this new treatment approach.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
54 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis for Cancer Pain: Chemical Versus Radiofrequency Ablation
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 31, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: EUS-CPB

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Block

Drug: Alcohol injection
Chemical ablation is performed by injection of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, followed by 10 mL of 98% dehydrated alcohol using a 22G FNA needle (Cook and Olympus)
Other Names:
  • Chemical Ablation
  • Active Comparator: EUS-CPA

    Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Radiofrequency Ablation

    Device: Radiofrequency Ablation
    coeliac plexus is identified and punctured with 19G EUSRA RFA needle with 10W-30W of energy for 10-50s bilaterally or unilaterally depends on individual anatomical characteristics.
    Other Names:
  • RFA
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change of pain score [4 weeks after the procedure]

      change of pain score at 4th week after the procedure (by VAS score)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change of pain score [2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks]

      change of pain score (Visual Analog Score) after the procedure

    2. Analgesic requirement [Up to 100 months (From the date of procedure until the date of death from any cause)]

      decrease in analgesic requirement

    3. Technical success rate [1 day]

      technical success rate

    4. Clinical success rate [Through study completion, an average of 2 year]

      decrease in pain level by 30% from the pre-procedural baseline

    5. Duration of procedure [Up to 1 hour]

      time from injection of pre-medication to procedure last observation recording at the procedure suite

    6. Time to pain score drop by 50% [Through study completion, an average of 2 year]

      Time to Visual Analog Score drop by 50%

    7. Short term complication rate [Up to 1 week]

      complication rate

    8. Long term complication rate [Through study completion, an average of 2 year]

      complication rate

    9. Hospital length of stay [Up to 100 months]

      Hospital length of stay

    10. Health status (Quality of life) [2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks]

      The Short Form (36) Health Survey

    11. Quality of life (QOL) in patients with pancreatic cancer [2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks]

      PAN-26 questionnaire

    12. Quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients [2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks]

      QLQ-C30 questionnaire

    13. Cost-effectiveness [Through study completion, an average of 2 year]

      Total cost ($) of the treatment

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age ≥18 year-old

    • Patients who give informed consent to the study

    • Suboptimal pain control with regular analgesics

    • Inoperable cancer of pancreas, biliary system and liver (both primary or secondary)

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients who refuse to give consent

    • Patients aged <18 years

    • EUS not possible due to:

    • Problem related to scope insertion such as trismus, stenosis of the upper GI tract

    • Coagulopathy with INR >1.5 or platelet count < 70

    • Low oxygen saturation or extreme blood pressure render endoscopic procedure unsafe

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong 000000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • The University of Hong Kong

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Ka Wing Ma, MBBS, MS, The University of Hong Kong

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Dr. Ma Ka Wing, Clinical Assistant Professor, The University of Hong Kong
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04801082
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 202009185043
    First Posted:
    Mar 16, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 22, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Dr. Ma Ka Wing, Clinical Assistant Professor, The University of Hong Kong
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 22, 2021