Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Canine Retraction

Sponsor

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman (Other)

Overall Status

Completed

CT.gov ID

NCT04968327

Collaborator

(none)

Enrollment

Location

Arms

7.9

Actual Duration (Months)

1.3

Patients Per Site Per Month

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

the study aimed to clinically evaluate the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement, as evaluated by its effect on the rate of canine retraction.

Condition or Disease	Intervention/Treatment	Phase
Malocclusion	Other: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) Other: Conventional canine retraction	N/A

Detailed Description

Ten adult patients requiring maxillary first premolars' extraction were enrolled in this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

Micro-osteoperforations were randomly assigned to one side of the maxillary arch at the canine-premolar region, and the contralateral side served as the control.

Mini-screws were used for anchorage reinforcement, and canine retraction was performed using nickel-titanium closed coil springs, delivering a force of 150 grams per side.

The primary outcome was the measurement of canine retraction rate throughout the study period from digital dental models obtained every 3 weeks.

The secondary outcome was the detection of possible canine tipping during retraction.

Study Design

Study Type:

Interventional

Actual Enrollment :

10 participants

Allocation:

Randomized

Intervention Model:

Parallel Assignment

Intervention Model Description:

split-mouthsplit-mouth

Masking:

Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Primary Purpose:

Treatment

Official Title:

Effect of Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Canine Retraction; A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Actual Study Start Date :

Jan 1, 2017

Actual Primary Completion Date :

Aug 18, 2017

Actual Study Completion Date :

Aug 30, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Micro-osteoperforations	Other: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) MOPs included shallow perforations of the buccal cortical plate surrounding the tooth that requires orthodontic tooth movement, with no flap reflection was performed using a surgical bur using the special calibrated device called PROPEL Other: Conventional canine retraction using nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil-springs delivering a force of 150 grams per side
Active Comparator: Canine retraction	Other: Conventional canine retraction using nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil-springs delivering a force of 150 grams per side

Arm

Intervention/Treatment

Experimental: Micro-osteoperforations

Other: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs)

MOPs included shallow perforations of the buccal cortical plate surrounding the tooth that requires orthodontic tooth movement, with no flap reflection was performed using a surgical bur using the special calibrated device called PROPEL

Other: Conventional canine retraction

using nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil-springs delivering a force of 150 grams per side

Active Comparator: Canine retraction

Other: Conventional canine retraction

using nickel-titanium (NiTi) closed coil-springs delivering a force of 150 grams per side

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

Rate of canine retraction [12 weeks]
measurements were recorded from digital dental models every 3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Measurment of canine tipping [12 weeks]
Tipping of the maxillary canine during retraction was also evaluated from digital dental models

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:

15 Years to 20 Years

Sexes Eligible for Study:

All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

Inclusion Criteria:

healthy systemic condition with no chronic diseases
no previous orthodontic treatment
adequate oral hygiene
have a healthy periodontium
signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

have a chronic disease
previous orthodontic treatment
poor oral hygiene or periodontal conidition

Contacts and Locations

Locations

	Site	City	State	Country	Postal Code
1	Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry	Alexandria		Egypt

Sponsors and Collaborators

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.

Responsible Party:

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman, Assistant lecturer of DPH and Clinical statistician, Alexandria University

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT04968327

Other Study ID Numbers:

Canine retraction2020

First Posted:

Jul 20, 2021

Last Update Posted:

Jul 20, 2021

Last Verified:

Jul 1, 2021

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Malocclusion

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 20, 2021