Evaluation Study of a Management Strategy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Sponsor
AstraZeneca (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00842387
Collaborator
(none)
2,370
66
11
35.9
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this project is to compare the GERD clinical outcomes in patients where a structured pathway using the GerdQ questionnaire is implemented compared with the clinical outcomes of those treated without this implementation.

This is a European project with 5 participating countries (Austria, Italy, Norway, Spain and Sweden). Due to different characteristics regarding the actual management of this disease in the 5 countries, each country had the flexibility to introduce design differences and changes in the study protocol.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    In Norway, it is developed as a clinical trial where a new structured pathway in the diagnosis and treatment of GERD is compared to the ordinary clinical pathway consisting of the endoscopic/pH-metry approach in patients referred from primary care to GI specialists.

    In Italy, it is a PCP-level, cluster randomized, controlled trial comparing a structured clinical pathway versus usual care in patients with GERD. The implementation consists of training sessions on the clinical pathway with the selected PCPs (Implementation Group).

    In Sweden, it is a cluster-randomised interventional study performed within daily clinical practice for the purpose of assessing the effect of the implementation of the structured clinical pathway in patients identified as having GERD. The participating PCCs will be randomised (1:1) to implement the structured clinical pathway or handling the patients according to local clinical routines.

    In Austria and Spain, it is a cluster-randomized study to be developed within daily clinical practice for the purpose of assessing the effect of the implementation of the structured clinical pathway on GERD patients . The evaluation study will take place subsequent to a prior implementation of a clinical pathway. The implementation consists of a detailed explanation by training-materials about the clinical pathway in a selected randomized pool of PCCs. The implementation that will be evaluated is outside of the study procedures; it is the physician's decision whether to apply it or not.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Anticipated Enrollment :
    2370 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Evaluation Study of a Management Strategy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
    Study Start Date :
    Jan 1, 2009
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Dec 1, 2009

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    1

    Patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD, managed according to a new structured and implemented pathway

    2

    Patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD, managed according to usual clinical practice.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Control of symptoms based on results of GerdQ, need of treatment change and % of patients requiring referral to a specialist (Austria and Italy). [up to 8 weeks]

    2. Treatment response and symptomatic control (Norway) [up to 8 weeks]

    3. Symptom relief and patient satisfaction with treatment (Spain) [up to 8 weeks]

    4. Symptom relief measured by RDQ (Sweden) [5 months +/- 4 weeks]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Use and consumption of healthcare resources (all countries). Physicians adherence to the clinical pathway (Austria, Spain) and intrinsic characteristics of the physicians/PCC that may affect this adherence (Austria) [Up to 8 weeks, except for Sweden: 5 months +/- 4 weeks]

    2. Percentage of patients referred to specialists (Spain). Health status based on EQ-5D measure (Norway, Sweden). Work productivity based on the WPAI-GERD questionnaire (Norway, Sweden) [Up to 8 weeks, except for Sweden: 5 months +/- 4 weeks]

    3. Sweden: Persisting symptoms according to GerdQ, Treatment changes, Reason(s) for the patient consultation at visit 1. To explore other GERD related symptoms, To describe patients' experience of treatment/care given during the study. [5 months +/- 4 weeks]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of GERD (heartburn or regurgitation as prevailing symptoms) of any severity

    • Patient able to understand and complete the questionnaires

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Alarm symptoms (Dysphagia/odynophagia, anorexia, anaemia, unintentional weight loss, abdominal mass, upper GI bleeding)

    • If the patient is participating in any clinical trial, he/she cannot take part on this study

    • Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes the patient's participation in the study difficult

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Research Site Amstetten Austria
    2 Research Site Baden Austria
    3 Research Site Bludenz Austria
    4 Research Site Bregenz Austria
    5 Research Site Feldbach Austria
    6 Research Site Gmunden Austria
    7 Research Site Graz Austria
    8 Research Site Gross Gerungs Austria
    9 Research Site Innsbruck Austria
    10 Research Site Kitzbuhel Austria
    11 Research Site Klagenfurt Austria
    12 Research Site Krems Austria
    13 Research Site Kufstein Austria
    14 Research Site Leibnitz Austria
    15 Research Site Leoben Austria
    16 Research Site Linz Austria
    17 Research Site Mattersburg Austria
    18 Research Site Mistelbach Austria
    19 Research Site Murzzuschlag Austria
    20 Research Site Neunkirchen Austria
    21 Research Site Neusiedl Austria
    22 Research Site Perg Austria
    23 Research Site Schwaz Austria
    24 Research Site St. Veit Austria
    25 Research Site Steyr Austria
    26 Research Site Villach Austria
    27 Research Site Vocklabruck Austria
    28 Research Site Volkermarkt Austria
    29 Research Site Wels Austria
    30 Research Site Zell Austria
    31 Research Site Brescia Italy
    32 Research Site Aalesund Norway
    33 Research Site Arendal Norway
    34 Research Site Bergen Norway
    35 Research Site Bodo Norway
    36 Research Site Haugesund Norway
    37 Research Site Kristiansund Norway
    38 Research Site Levanger Norway
    39 Research Site Molde Norway
    40 Research Site Mosjoen Norway
    41 Research Site Orkdal Norway
    42 Research Site Oslo Norway
    43 Research Site Tynset Norway
    44 Research Site Valencia Spain
    45 Research Site Arlov Sweden
    46 Research Site Dalby Sweden
    47 Research Site Falkoping Sweden
    48 Research Site Farsta Sweden
    49 Research Site Goteborg Sweden
    50 Research Site Helsingborg Sweden
    51 Research Site Karlshamn Sweden
    52 Research Site Kristianstad Sweden
    53 Research Site Kungsangen Sweden
    54 Research Site Lulea Sweden
    55 Research Site Lund Sweden
    56 Research Site Malmo Sweden
    57 Research Site Munkedal Sweden
    58 Research Site Nordstan(Goteborg) Sweden
    59 Research Site Partille Sweden
    60 Research Site Pitea Sweden
    61 Research Site Skanor Sweden
    62 Research Site Sodertalje Sweden
    63 Research Site Solna Sweden
    64 Research Site Stockholm Sweden
    65 Research Site Trollhattan Sweden
    66 Research Site Vannas Sweden

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • AstraZeneca

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Mónica Tafalla, MD, Medical DepartmentAstraZeneca Spain

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00842387
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • NIS-GEU-DUM-2008/1
    First Posted:
    Feb 12, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 23, 2009
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2009

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Dec 23, 2009