SimHBB: Implementation of HBB Training With Facilitators That Have Undergone Simulation Methodology Training

Sponsor
Mbarara University of Science and Technology (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03256591
Collaborator
University of Calgary (Other)
100
1
2
38
2.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) implementation is associated with reduction in neonatal deaths and reduction in fresh stillbirths. HBB has successfully integrated some aspects of simulation into an educational curriculum that teach the management of neonatal emergencies in resource-constrained countries.

Simulation based training brings special advantages and may enhance HBB training. Critical elements of simulation such as enhanced realism and post-event debriefing may carry potential to strengthen HBB training to attain maximum impact. However, evidence for the effectiveness of this combined approach is limited.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: HBB facilitators with simulation training
N/A

Detailed Description

Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) implementation is associated with reduction in neonatal deaths and reduction in fresh stillbirths. HBB has successfully integrated some aspects of simulation into an educational curriculum that teach the management of neonatal emergencies in resource-constrained countries.

High levels of physical, emotional and conceptual realism are important features of simulation-based learning that impact learning outcomes. Formal debriefing is characterized as the most important element of simulation based education. Structured feedback in a safe learning environment provides the opportunity for learning of clinically relevant material. Guided reflection transfers the responsibility for learning to the participants and solidifies knowledge, skills and behaviors for transfer to clinical practice.

Simulation based training brings special advantages and may enhance HBB training. Critical elements of simulation such as enhanced realism and post-event debriefing may carry potential to strengthen HBB training to attain maximum impact. However, evidence for the effectiveness of this combined approach is limited.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine if the implementation of a simulation facilitator training program for HBB compared with no facilitator training in simulation is superior in terms of the acquisition of knowledge, acute care skills, and teamwork skills of pre-service medical students. Investigators will randomly randomly assign study participants to either intervention or control arm in a 1:1 ratio.Investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine if the implementation of a simulation facilitator training program for HBB compared with no facilitator training in simulation is superior in terms of the acquisition of knowledge, acute care skills, and teamwork skills of pre-service medical students. Investigators will randomly randomly assign study participants to either intervention or control arm in a 1:1 ratio.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Masking Description:
No masking will be done
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
A Comparison of the Implementation of HBB Training Using Facilitators With and Without Simulation Methodology Training
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 30, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2018
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: HBB plus simulation training

Participants receive training from facilitators for HBB training with simulation skills

Other: HBB facilitators with simulation training
HBB training from facilitators with simulation skills. Standard HBB facilitators do not have simulation skills

No Intervention: Control

Participants receive training from facilitators for HBB training without simulation skills

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Knowledge [Change in knowledge scores at 6 months from Baseline]

    The primary outcome for this analysis is level of knowledge. For each course, learners will be assessed at baseline and at course-end to determine their knowledge via multiple choice test. Scores out of 100% will be computed

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Clinical skills [Change in clinical skills at 6 months from baseline]

    The clinical skills outcome (via short neonatal resuscitation simulation scenario - HBB OSCE B). HBB OSCE B assessment will be conducted by the facilitator.

  2. Facilitator debriefing skills [Change in facilitator skills at 6 months from baseline]

    Facilitator debriefing skills will be assessed using the OSAD. OSAD assessments will be conducted by a pre-trained rater who will rate facilitator performance in real time.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Only trained facilitators are eligible to participate

  • Must hold a Faculty position or are a health care provider at KIU Teaching Hospital in western Uganda

  • Are engaged in teaching health students.

  • Participating medical students are those enrolled at KIU Teaching Hospital in western Uganda

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Faculty and hospital workers who are not engaged in teaching health students.

  • Medical students not enrolled at KIU Teaching Hospital, western Uganda

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Kampala International University Ishaka Bushenyi Uganda 256

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Mbarara University of Science and Technology
  • University of Calgary

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Santorini Data, MD, Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Mbarara University of Science and Technology
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03256591
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • MUST 21/06-16c
First Posted:
Aug 22, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Apr 17, 2018
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2018
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 17, 2018