VERNACULAR: BARD® The VENOVO™ Venous Stent Study for Treatment of Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease

Sponsor
C. R. Bard (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02655887
Collaborator
(none)
170
21
1
52.5
8.1
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The BARD® Venovo™ Venous Stent Study is a non-randomized clinical study intended to collect confirmatory evidence of the safety and effectiveness of the Venous Stent for the treatment of iliofemoral occlusive disease.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: VENOVO™ Venous Stent
N/A

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm clinical study of the VENOVO ™ Venous Stent for the treatment of iliofemoral occlusive disease. The study will be conducted at a maximum of 35 investigational sites ("sites") in the United States, and Europe and Australia/New Zealand. Enrollment will continue until a maximum of one hundred seventy (170) subjects are treated with the VENOVO™ Venous Stent, which is an estimated three-hundred forty (340) consecutive subjects in a non-randomized fashion. It is assumed that approximately 50% of the treated subjects will be U.S. subjects. Clinical follow-up for all treated subjects will be performed at hospital discharge, 30-days, and 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-months post-index procedure.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
170 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The BARD® VENOVO™ Venous Stent Study - A Prospective, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Study of the Treatment of Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease - an Assessment for Effectiveness and Safety (VERNACULAR)
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 15, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 19, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: VENOVO™ Venous Stent.

Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent

Device: VENOVO™ Venous Stent
VENOVO™ Venous stent placement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Participants With Primary Patency of the Venous Stent at 12 Months Post-Index Procedure [12 months post-index procedure]

    Primary patency rate at 12 months post-index procedure evaluated against a literature-derived Performance Goal (PG) of 74%. Primary patency defined as: freedom from Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR); freedom from thrombus occlusion and stenosis > 50% as measured by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS). Please note that both the primary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoint are considered co-primary endpoints. That is, both endpoints need to be significant to claim the study as successful.

  2. Number of Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Events (MAEs) [30 days post-index procedure]

    Freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) defined as: Target Vessel Revascularization; Device and/or procedure related death; Major amputation of target limb; Pulmonary Embolism which is clinically important; Vascular injury requiring surgical/endovascular intervention; Embolization /migration of stent; Device or procedure related acute DVT involving the treated limb. Please note that both the primary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoint are considered co-primary endpoints. That is, both endpoints need to be significant to claim the study as successful.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) From Baseline to 12 Months [Evaluation at 12 months post-index procedure]

    The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) system includes 10 clinical descriptions (pain, varicose veins, venous edema, skin pigmentation, inflammation, induration, number of active ulcers, duration of active ulceration, size of active ulceration. and level of compliance with medical compression therapy), scored from 0 to 3 (total possible score, 30) with 0 means absent, 1 means mild, 2 means moderate and 3 means severe. Total VCSS is the sum of all VCSS assessment scores from categories for a given time point. Twelve-month data is the change between baseline score and 12-month follow-up score. Results calculated for Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects. Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a level of pain less than that experienced at baseline.

  2. Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline to 12 Months [Evaluation at 12 months post-index procedure]

    The Quality of Life (QoL) assessment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIC-20) is a 20-item questionnaire which provides a global index and an outline of 4 QoL dimensions - pain (4 items), physical (4 items), psychological (9 items) and social (4 items). Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 5. A low score corresponds to greater patient comfort. Total CIVIQ-20 score is the sum of all 20-item scores The score of each dimension was obtained by adding up the scores of each constituent item within that dimension. Twelve-month data is the change between baseline score and 12-month follow-up score. Results calculated for evaluable ITT subjects. Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a better QoL than that experienced at baseline.

  3. Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of CEAP at 30 Days, 6 Months, and 12 Months Post Procedure [Evaluation through 30 day, 6 months and 12 months post index procedure]

    Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification is a system that describes a doctor's physical exam findings for vein problem(s), the cause of the problem(s), the location in the leg, and the mechanism responsible for the manifestation of the vein problem. For Clinical classification, the clinical components indicates disease severity, ranging from none (0 points) to active ulcers (6 points).For each category of Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classifications, at each time point, frequency of each category is reported. Subsequent clinical study reports will present CEAP at 24 and 36-months follow-up. Changes from baseline measures to given time points are presented. Lower mean scores represent an improvement from baseline measure.

  4. Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Technical Success [At time of Index Procedure]

    Acute technical success is defined as successful deployment of stent(s) to intended target with adequate lesion coverage as assessed by the Investigator.

  5. Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Procedure Success (ITT Subjects) [Less than 30 days post index procedure]

    Technical success is defined as no major adverse events experienced between index procedure and discharge

  6. Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Lesion Success (ITT Subjects) [At the conclusion of index procedure]

    Lesion Success is defined as the attainment of less or equal to 50% residual stenosis at the conclusion of the index procedure.

  7. Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (ITT Subjects) [Evaluation throrugh 30 day, 6 months and 12 months post index procedure]

    Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) through 30 days is specific to the first revascularization procedure of the target lesion.

  8. Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) (ITT Subjects) [Evaluation through 30 days, 6 months and 12 months post index procedure]

    Freedom from Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) is defined as the first revascularization procedure of the target vessel, as determined by an Independent Core Lab. Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) and Freedom from TVR results are the same through the 12 month analysis as all TLRs were also TVRs in this case.

  9. Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants Without Device Stent Fracture at 12 Months Follow-Up [Evaluation at 12 months post-index procedure]

    Stents were evaluated at the 12 month follow-up for fracture analysis. Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. The subject provides written informed consent using an Informed Consent Form approved by Ethics Committee/ Institutional Review Board for the site.

  2. Subject agrees to comply with the protocol-mandated follow-up procedures and visits.

  3. The subject is a male or non-pregnant female ≥ 18 years old with an expected lifespan sufficient to allow for completion of all study procedures.

  4. The subject has symptomatic (non-malignant) venous outflow obstruction in iliofemoral "venous segments".

  5. The subject has symptomatic venous outflow obstruction (non-malignant) in iliofemoral venous segments(Clinical-Etiology-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) "C" ≥ 3 or VCSS pain score of ≥ 2).

  6. The subject is able and willing to comply with any required medication regimen.

  7. The reference vessel diameters are between 7mm and 19 mm.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Subject is unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent, or is unable or unwilling to conform to the study protocol follow-up procedures and visits.

  2. Subject is or plans to become pregnant during the study.

  3. Subject has contralateral disease of the common femoral vein, external iliac vein, common iliac vein, or any combination thereof and does not meet the venous outflow obstruction requirement or has a malignant obstruction.

  4. The subject is asymptomatic, has a CEAP "C" <3, or a VCSS pain score of <2.

  5. The subject has a venous obstruction that extends into the inferior vena cava (IVC) or below the level of the lesser trochanter.

  6. The subject has a known uncorrectable bleeding diathesis or active coagulopathy.

  7. The subject has a known allergy or sensitivity to Nickel or Titanium or intolerance to antiplatelet, anticoagulant or thrombolytic medications medications required per the protocol

  8. The subject has a known allergy or sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.

  9. The subject has any planned surgical interventions within 30 days prior to, or within 30 days after the planned study procedure.

  10. The subject has a lesion or occlusion which cannot be traversed with a guidewire.

  11. The subject has had prior stenting in the target vessel.

  12. The subject has iliofemoral venous segments unsuitable for treatment with available sizes of study devices.

  13. The subject has another medical condition, which may cause him/her to be non-compliant with the protocol, confound the data interpretation, or is associated with a life expectancy insufficient to allow completion of study procedures and follow ups.

  14. The subject is currently participating in an investigational drug, biologic, or another device study.

  15. The subject is currently on dialysis or has a serum creatinine ≥2.5mg/dl.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Vascular Breakthroughs, LLC Darien Connecticut United States 06820
2 Yale University New Haven Connecticut United States 06520
3 Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation Davenport Iowa United States 52803
4 Metro Health Hospital Wyoming Michigan United States 49519
5 Cox Medical Centers Springfield Missouri United States 65807
6 Mount Sinai Medical Center New York New York United States 10029
7 North Carolina Heart and Vascular Raleigh North Carolina United States 27607
8 Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons Austin Texas United States 78746
9 Centra Health, Inc., dba Stroobants Cardiovascular Center Lynchburg Virginia United States 24501
10 Sentara Medical Group Virginia Beach Virginia United States 23542
11 Lake Washington Vascular, PLLC Bellevue Washington United States 98004
12 CAMC Health Education and Research Institute Charleston West Virginia United States 25304
13 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Camperdown New South Wales Australia 2050
14 JMLS Medical Services PTY LTDT/A PERTH INST. of VASCULAR RESEARCH Perth Western Australia Australia 6009
15 Uniklinik RWTH Aachen Germany 52074
16 Klinikum Arnberg Arnsberg Germany 59755
17 Universitaets-Herrzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen Bad Krozingen Germany 79189
18 University Hospital Galway Gaillimh Ireland H91 YR71
19 MUMC Maastricht Maastricht Netherlands 6202 AZ
20 Fundacion de investigacion HM Hospitales Madrid Spain 28660
21 Guy's & St. Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom SE1 7EH

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • C. R. Bard

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Dake, MD, Lead Principal Investigator

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
C. R. Bard
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02655887
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BPV-14-007
First Posted:
Jan 14, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Feb 4, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Keywords provided by C. R. Bard
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details The study was activated at 25 investigational sites in the U.S., Europe and Australia. First subject was enrolled June 15, 2016, and the last subject on May 1, 2017. Approximately 60% of subjects are in the U.S.
Pre-assignment Detail Three U.S. sites were activated, but did not consent subjects. A fourth site enrolled 1 subject who was lost to follow-up after discharge (site closed). Fifty-eight (58) screen failures reported and three (3) eligible subjects were not treated with the device. In total, 170 subjects were treated with VENOVO.
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 170
COMPLETED 156
NOT COMPLETED 14

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Overall Participants 170
Age, Customized (Count of Participants)
< 65 years
125
73.5%
≥ 65 years
45
26.5%
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
107
62.9%
Male
63
37.1%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
Hispanic or Latino
12
7.1%
Not Hispanic or Latino
158
92.9%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
Asian
4
2.4%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
Black or African American
9
5.3%
White
156
91.8%
More than one race
0
0%
Unknown or Not Reported
1
0.6%
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
Netherlands
8
4.7%
United States
100
58.8%
Ireland
4
2.4%
United Kingdom
8
4.7%
Australia
5
2.9%
Germany
34
20%
Spain
11
6.5%
Cardiovascular Disease (Count of Participants)
Stroke
4
2.4%
Angina
5
2.9%
Hypertension
55
32.4%
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
15
8.8%
Myocardial Infarction (MI)
6
3.5%
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
3
1.8%
Cardiomyopathy
3
1.8%
Vascular Heart Disease
2
1.2%
Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
92
54.1%
May-Thurner Syndrome
102
60%
Venous Valve Disease
12
7.1%
Varicosis
133
78.2%
Dyslipidemia
47
27.6%
Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)
18
10.6%
Atrial Fibrillation (A-FIB)
6
3.5%
Arrhythmia (other than A-FIB)
8
4.7%
Renal Disease (Count of Participants)
Chronic Kidney Disease
4
2.4%
Acute Renal Insufficiency
1
0.6%
Uremia
1
0.6%
Disease Category (Count of Participants)
Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS)
93
54.7%
Non-Thrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions (NIVL)
77
45.3%
Number of Target Lesions (Count of Participants)
1
154
90.6%
2
16
9.4%
Number of Study Devices Used (Count of Participants)
1 Study Device
122
71.8%
2 Study Devices
47
27.6%
3 Study Devices
1
0.6%
Target Limb (Count of Participants)
Right Leg
28
16.5%
Left Leg
142
83.5%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Primary Patency of the Venous Stent at 12 Months Post-Index Procedure
Description Primary patency rate at 12 months post-index procedure evaluated against a literature-derived Performance Goal (PG) of 74%. Primary patency defined as: freedom from Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR); freedom from thrombus occlusion and stenosis > 50% as measured by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS). Please note that both the primary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoint are considered co-primary endpoints. That is, both endpoints need to be significant to claim the study as successful.
Time Frame 12 months post-index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT subjects. 25 subjects were excluded from the denominator due to discontinuation or other reasons prior to 12 month follow-up visit.
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 145
Count of Participants [Participants]
128
75.3%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Comments Hypothesis: H0 :Primary patency rate at 12 months post-index procedure from the overall VENOVO Venous Stent (BVS) patients (PTS and NIVL combined) is at most as good as that of the PG. Ha: Primary patency rate at 12 months post-index procedure from the overall VENOVO Venous Stent (BVS) patients (PTS and NIVL combined) is better than that of PG.
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority
Comments PG of 74%, which was set at 10% (non-inferiority margin) below the weighted mean of primary patency (PP2) rate at 12 month at a combination of 55% (PTS) subjects at primary patency rate of 77.1% and 45% (NIVL) subjects at primary patency rate of 93.4%. When taking into consideration both co-primary efficacy and safety endpoints, with 138 BVS subjects, the overall study power is at least 85%*99%=84%.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0001
Comments
Method Weighted Z-statistics
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Weighted Z-statistics
Estimated Value 88.3
Confidence Interval (1-Sided) 90%
82.4 to
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Primary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Description Freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) defined as: Target Vessel Revascularization; Device and/or procedure related death; Major amputation of target limb; Pulmonary Embolism which is clinically important; Vascular injury requiring surgical/endovascular intervention; Embolization /migration of stent; Device or procedure related acute DVT involving the treated limb. Please note that both the primary effectiveness and the primary safety endpoint are considered co-primary endpoints. That is, both endpoints need to be significant to claim the study as successful.
Time Frame 30 days post-index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT subjects. Results adjudicated by CEC. MAEs that occurred prior to day 30 of each subject's follow-up were counted as failures toward primary safety (n= 11). Those subjects were considered not evaluable and not included in the denominator for the primary safety endpoint (total evaluable = 170 subjects).
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 170
Count of Participants [Participants]
159
93.5%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Comments Hypothesis: H0: The primary safety endpoint absence from event rate in the VENOVO Venous Stent (BVS) through 30 day at most as large as that of the PG. Ha: The primary safety endpoint absence from event rate in the VENOVO Venous Stent (BVS) through 30 day is better than that of the PG.
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority
Comments The primary safety endpoint was evaluated against the PG of 89% which was set at 10% (non-inferiority margin) below the literature-derived average freedom from MAE rate at 30 day of 99%. A one-side p-value is derived based on an exact binomial test. When taking into consideration both co-primary efficacy and safety endpoints, with 138 BVS subjects, the overall study power is at least 85%*99%=84%.
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0322
Comments
Method Exact binomial test
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Exact binomial test
Estimated Value 93.5
Confidence Interval (1-Sided) 90%
89.5 to
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) From Baseline to 12 Months
Description The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) system includes 10 clinical descriptions (pain, varicose veins, venous edema, skin pigmentation, inflammation, induration, number of active ulcers, duration of active ulceration, size of active ulceration. and level of compliance with medical compression therapy), scored from 0 to 3 (total possible score, 30) with 0 means absent, 1 means mild, 2 means moderate and 3 means severe. Total VCSS is the sum of all VCSS assessment scores from categories for a given time point. Twelve-month data is the change between baseline score and 12-month follow-up score. Results calculated for Intent-to-Treat (ITT) subjects. Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a level of pain less than that experienced at baseline.
Time Frame Evaluation at 12 months post-index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis.(n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 155
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Scores on a scale]
-1.7
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Comments H0: The distribution at the 12-month follow-up remains unimproved compared to baseline. Ha: The distribution shifts toward lower (less pain) classes.
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.001
Comments this p value is < 0.001.
Method t-test, 2 sided
Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Endpoint With Hypothesis Testing: Index of Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline to 12 Months
Description The Quality of Life (QoL) assessment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIC-20) is a 20-item questionnaire which provides a global index and an outline of 4 QoL dimensions - pain (4 items), physical (4 items), psychological (9 items) and social (4 items). Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 5. A low score corresponds to greater patient comfort. Total CIVIQ-20 score is the sum of all 20-item scores The score of each dimension was obtained by adding up the scores of each constituent item within that dimension. Twelve-month data is the change between baseline score and 12-month follow-up score. Results calculated for evaluable ITT subjects. Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a better QoL than that experienced at baseline.
Time Frame Evaluation at 12 months post-index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Evaluable ITT subjects were included in this analysis. (n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 153
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Scores on a scale]
-15.7
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.001
Comments p value is < 0.001
Method t-test, 2 sided
Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Index of CEAP at 30 Days, 6 Months, and 12 Months Post Procedure
Description Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification is a system that describes a doctor's physical exam findings for vein problem(s), the cause of the problem(s), the location in the leg, and the mechanism responsible for the manifestation of the vein problem. For Clinical classification, the clinical components indicates disease severity, ranging from none (0 points) to active ulcers (6 points).For each category of Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classifications, at each time point, frequency of each category is reported. Subsequent clinical study reports will present CEAP at 24 and 36-months follow-up. Changes from baseline measures to given time points are presented. Lower mean scores represent an improvement from baseline measure.
Time Frame Evaluation through 30 day, 6 months and 12 months post index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis. (n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 170
30 day post procedure
-1.1
(1.26)
6 months post procedure
-1.3
(1.34)
12 months post procedure
-1.5
(1.33)
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Technical Success
Description Acute technical success is defined as successful deployment of stent(s) to intended target with adequate lesion coverage as assessed by the Investigator.
Time Frame At time of Index Procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 170
Count of Participants [Participants]
170
100%
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Acute Procedure Success (ITT Subjects)
Description Technical success is defined as no major adverse events experienced between index procedure and discharge
Time Frame Less than 30 days post index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 170
Count of Participants [Participants]
168
98.8%
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Lesion Success (ITT Subjects)
Description Lesion Success is defined as the attainment of less or equal to 50% residual stenosis at the conclusion of the index procedure.
Time Frame At the conclusion of index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 170
Count of Participants [Participants]
170
100%
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (ITT Subjects)
Description Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) through 30 days is specific to the first revascularization procedure of the target lesion.
Time Frame Evaluation throrugh 30 day, 6 months and 12 months post index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
(n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 170
30 day post procedure
164
96.5%
6 months post procedure
161
94.7%
12 months post procedure
151
88.8%
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) (ITT Subjects)
Description Freedom from Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) is defined as the first revascularization procedure of the target vessel, as determined by an Independent Core Lab. Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) and Freedom from TVR results are the same through the 12 month analysis as all TLRs were also TVRs in this case.
Time Frame Evaluation through 30 days, 6 months and 12 months post index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
(n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 170
30 days post procedure
164
96.5%
6 months post procedure
161
94.7%
12 months post procedure
151
88.8%
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Endpoint Without Hypothesis Testing: Number of Participants Without Device Stent Fracture at 12 Months Follow-Up
Description Stents were evaluated at the 12 month follow-up for fracture analysis. Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis.
Time Frame Evaluation at 12 months post-index procedure

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Evaluable ITT subjects are included in this analysis. (n) varies in relation to the number of evaluable subjects. Accordingly, the (n) for each period may be different from the overall (N) reported in the Participant Flow section.
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
Measure Participants 137
No Device Stent Fracture at 12 months
137
80.6%
Device Stent Fracture at 12 months
0
0%

Adverse Events

Time Frame Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) are presented during the 12-month follow-up period. All AEs were reviewed by the CEC and a total of 129 events were adjudicated as per the committee charter. Results for ITT subjects are reported for both SAEs and AEs. AEs that occurred through 395 days for each subject are included.
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Arm/Group Description Implant of the VENOVO™ Venous Stent VENOVO™ Venous Stent: VENOVO™ Venous stent placement
All Cause Mortality
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 4/170 (2.4%)
Serious Adverse Events
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 44/170 (25.9%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Haemorrhagic Anaemia 3/170 (1.8%) 3
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Angina pectoris 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Angina unstable 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Cardiac failure congestive 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Coronary artery disease 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Gastrointestinal disorders
Coeliac artery stenosis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Diverticular perforation 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Rectal haemorrhage 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Umbilical hernia 1/170 (0.6%) 1
General disorders
Chest discomfort 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Death 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Device occlusion 3/170 (1.8%) 3
Local swelling 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Oedema peripheral 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Thrombosis in device 6/170 (3.5%) 6
Vessel puncture site haematoma 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Vessel puncture site pain 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity 0/170 (0%) 0
Infections and infestations
Arthritis bacterial 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Cellulitis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Clostridium difficile infection 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Erysipelas 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Pneumonia 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Urinary tract infection 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Laceration 0/170 (0%) 0
Procedural pain 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Vascular pseudoaneurysm 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Rectal cancer metastatic 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Uterine leiomyoma 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Nervous system disorders
Status epilepticus 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Psychiatric disorders
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Panic attacks 0/170 (0%) 0
Psychotic disorder 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Renal and urinary disorders
Heamaturia 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Renal artery arteriosclerosis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Renal impairment 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Cystocele 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Epistaxis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Pneumonia aspiration 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Diabetic neuropathis ulcer 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Rash maculo-papular 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Deep vein thrombosis 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Iliac vein occlusion 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Pelvic vein occlusion 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Peripheral artery thrombosis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Post-thrombotic syndrome 0/170 (0%) 0
Venous insufficiency 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Venous stenosis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
VENOVO™ Venous Stent.
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 63/170 (37.1%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Leukopenia 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Angina pectoris 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Coronary artery disease 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Myocardial infraction 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Palpitation 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Eye disorders
Endocrine ophthalmopathy 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Abdominal pain lower 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Abdominal tenderness 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Constipation 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Diverticulum 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Gingival bleeding 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Mouth haemorrhage 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Nausea 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Rectal polyp 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Toothache 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Vomiting 2/170 (1.2%) 2
General disorders
Adverse drug reaction 4/170 (2.4%) 4
Fatigue 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Hernia 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Induration 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Injection site discoloration 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Injection site discomfort 3/170 (1.8%) 3
Injection site haematoma 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Injection site induration 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Injury associated with device 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Local swelling 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Non-cardiac chest pain 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Oedema peripheral 3/170 (1.8%) 3
Thrombosis in device 4/170 (2.4%) 4
Vessel puncture site haematoma 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Vessel puncture site haemorrhage 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Vessel puncture site pain 4/170 (2.4%) 4
Vessel puncture site swelling 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Clostridium difficile colitis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Lower respiratory tract infection 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Nasopharyngitis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Oesophageal candidiasis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Parotitis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Urinary tract infection 4/170 (2.4%) 4
Vaginal infection 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Viral infection 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Cystitis radiation 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Excoriation 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Laceration 3/170 (1.8%) 3
Limb injury 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Meniscus injury 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Muscle strain 3/170 (1.8%) 3
Nerve injury 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Post procedural discomfort 5/170 (2.9%) 5
Procedural pain 11/170 (6.5%) 11
Upper limb fracture 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Investigations
International normalised ratio increased 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia 8/170 (4.7%) 8
Back pain 7/170 (4.1%) 7
Bursitis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Limb discomfort 3/170 (1.8%) 3
Musculoskeletal chest pain 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Musculoskeletal discomfort 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Osteoarthritis 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Pain in extremity 6/170 (3.5%) 6
Rhabdomyolysis 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Benign neoplasm of bladder 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Prostate cancer recurrent 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Uterine leiomyoma 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Headache 4/170 (2.4%) 4
Hypoaesthesia 4/170 (2.4%) 4
Meralgia paraesthetica 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Paraesthesia 4/170 (2.4%) 4
Sciatica 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Syncope 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status change 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Panic attack 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Nephrolithiasis 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Renal failure acute 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Urinary incontinence 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Urinary retention 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Pelvic pain 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Vaginal haemorrhage 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Varicose veins pelvic 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Dyspnoea 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Epistaxis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Haemoptysis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Pulmonary embolism 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Upper-airway cough syndrome 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blister 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Decubitus ulcer 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Dermal cyst 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Rash 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Rash generalized 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Rash macular 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Skin disorder 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Skin ulcer 3/170 (1.8%) 3
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis 3/170 (1.8%) 3
Haematoma 2/170 (1.2%) 2
Orthostatic hypotension 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Peripheral artery stenosis 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Post thrombotic syndrome 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Thrombophlebitis superficial 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Varicose vein 7/170 (4.1%) 7
Vasospasm 1/170 (0.6%) 1
Venous insufficiency 6/170 (3.5%) 6
Venous stenosis 1/170 (0.6%) 1

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

Prior to PI publication of site results, sponsor requires publication of multi-centers results.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Megan Hill
Organization Becton Dickinson (BPV)
Phone 480-350-6468
Email Megan.Hill@bd.com
Responsible Party:
C. R. Bard
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02655887
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BPV-14-007
First Posted:
Jan 14, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Feb 4, 2021
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2021