PALOMA: Comparison of Therapies Before Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Higher Risk MDS and Oligoblastic AML

Sponsor
GWT-TUD GmbH (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04061239
Collaborator
(none)
150
27
2
61.4
5.6
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To compare the event-free survival at 2 years of CPX-351 vs. conventional care regimens before allogeneic blood cell transplantation as first line treatment in patients with higher risk MDS and oligoblastic AML.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) is considered the only potentially curative treatment option for MDS patients and is therefore often considered the standard treatment for mainly higher-risk MDS patients up to the age of 75 years. One common approach to "bridge" higher-risk MDS from the time of diagnosis to transplantation is a treatment with hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine due to its anticipated low toxicity profile. Alternative strategies are intensive 7+3 chemotherapy with anthracycline and cytarabine or direct and immediate transplantation. By this strategy the time interval for donor search can be significantly prolonged leading to a higher proportion of success.Nevertheless, not every patient initially eligible for transplantation undergoes this procedure subsequently. A direct prospective comparison of different therapeutic approaches as outlined above versus CPX-351 prior to alloHCT has not been performed so far and is subject of the PALOMA trial. We hypothesize that CPX-351 will lead to higher and more durable response rates including a more favourable safety profile and long-term outcome compared to currently used conventional care regimens approaches prior to alloHCT.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
150 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Primary Comparison of Liposomal Anthracycline Based Treatment Versus Conventional Care Strategies Before Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Higher Risk MDS and Oligoblastic AML
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 19, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: CPX-351 Arm

CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation with a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin. It will be administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion. The treatment includes up to 2 cycles of induction as follows: 1 x CPX-351 1st induction: daunorubicin 44 mg/m² and cytarabine 100 mg/m² in liposomes on days 1, 3, and 5 1 x CPX-351 2nd induction: daunorubicin 44 mg/m² and cytarabine 100 mg/m² in liposomes on days 1 and 3 Each induction cycle will last 28 days. Depending on the type and extent of response as well as toxicity, the patient may continue on to consolidation therapy after induction or be discontinued from the treatment phase and transferred directly to alloHCT, if applicable. CPX-351 consolidation is with daunorubicin 29 mg/m² and cytarabine 65 mg/m² in liposomes on days 1 and 3. For patients < 60 years up to 3 consolidation cycles and for patients ≥ 60 years up to 2 consolidation cycles are allowed.

Drug: CPX-351
CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation with a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin. It will be administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion.
Other Names:
  • Vyxeos
  • Other: CCR Arm

    The conventional care regimens (CCR) arm has 2 options according to the discretion of the investigator: conventional "7+3" cytarabine/daunorubicin chemotherapy regimen treatment with s.c. Azacitidine

    Drug: Daunorubicin
    Daunorubicin is commercially available as a powder for reconstitution in 20 mg vials. In this trial, daunorubicin should be administered as an IV infusion over 60 min.

    Drug: Cytarabine
    Cytarabine is commercially available as vials/bottles for preparation of diluted infusion solution. Cytarabine will be administrated intravenously. In this trial, cytarabine is administered as a continuous infusion.

    Drug: Azacitidine
    Azacitidine at 75mg/m² for 7 days. Patients should receive a minimum of 2 and up to 6 cycles.
    Other Names:
  • Vidaza
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. 2-year EFS in both arms [2 years]

      To compare the event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years of CPX-351 vs. CCR before allogeneic blood cell transplantation (alloHCT) as first line treatment in patients with higher risk MDS and oligoblastic AML.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Response rate [2 years]

      To compare best and overall response rate of CPX-351 vs. CCR according to AML-ELN and MDS-IWG criteria

    2. Toxicity Assessment [2 years]

      To compare the safety and tolerability of CPX-351 vs. CCR measured by NCI CTCAE v5.0

    3. Proportion of patients proceeding to alloHCT [2 years]

      To compare the effects of CPX-351 vs. CCR on the proportion of patients proceeding to alloHCT

    4. Minimal residual disease [2 years]

      To compare the effect of CPX-351 vs. CCR on minimal residual disease which will be assessed at all times of bone marrow puncture

    5. Patient's quality of life [2 years]

      To compare the effect of CPX-351 vs. CCR on the quality of life. It will be measured using the EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 75 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Male and female adult patients, 18-75 years of age

    • Diagnosis of high risk MDS including oligoblastic non-proliferative (WBC <13 Gpt/l) AML up to 29% of bone marrow blasts

    • Availability of BM blast count from central morphology

    • Bone marrow blasts ≥ 5%

    • IPSS score intermediate or high

    • alloHCT intended within the next 6 months

    • ECOG performance status of 0 or 1

    • Signed informed consent

    • Laboratory values fulfilling the following:

    • Serum creatinine < 2.0 mg/dL

    • Serum total bilirubin < 2.0 mg/dL

    • Serum alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase < 3 times the ULN

    • Cardiac ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% by echocardiography

    • Contraception:

    • Female subjects of childbearing potential† must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception for at least 2 months prior to the first dose of CPX-351 and consent of female patients to use a medically acceptable method of contraception throughout the entire study period and for 6 months following the last dose of CPX-351. Medically acceptable methods of contraception that may be used by the patient include abstinence, diaphragm and spermicide, intrauterine device (IUD), condom and vaginal spermicide, hormonal contraceptives (patients must be stable on hormonal contraceptives for at least the prior 3 months), surgical sterilization, or post-menopausal (≥2 years of amenorrhea). Medically acceptable methods of contraception that may be used by the male partner of a female patient are condom and spermicide or vasectomy (>6 months prior to Day-1) and are to be used throughout the entire study period and for 6 months following the last dose of CPX-351.

    • Male patients must be willing to refrain from sperm donation for 6 months following the last dose of CPX-351 and must use adequate contraception throughout the entire study period and for 6 months following the last dose of CPX-351.

    • Combined oral contraceptive pills are not recommended. It is recommended that during the study two medically accepted methods of contraception (e.g. as hormonal contraceptive methods along with a condom) apply.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with history of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) (defined as a history of essential thrombocytosis or

    • polycythemia vera, or idiopathic myelofibrosis prior to the diagnosis of AML) or combined MDS/MPN are not eligible.

    • WHO-2016 defined AML entities: AML with t(15;17), PML-RARA; AML with t(8;21), RUNX1-RUNX1T1, AML with inv(16)/t(16;16), CBFβ-MYH11; AML with biallelic CEBPA mutation; AML with mutated FLT3 or NPM1.

    • Clinical evidence of active CNS leukemia.

    • Patients with a "currently active" second malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancers. Patients are not considered to have a "currently active" malignancy if they have completed therapy and are considered by their physician to be at less than 30% risk of relapse within one year.

    • Any major surgery or radiation therapy within four weeks prior screening.

    • Patients with prior treatment of either CPX-351, hypomethylating agents, cytarabine or intensive chemotherapy for high-risk MDS or AML.

    • Patients with prior cumulative anthracycline exposure of greater than 368 mg/m2 daunorubicin (or equivalent).

    • Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality or psychiatric illness that would prevent obtaining informed consent.

    • Patients with myocardial impairment of any cause (e.g. cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, significant valvular dysfunction, hypertensive heart disease, and congestive heart failure) resulting in heart failure by New York Heart Association Criteria (NYHA Class III or IV staging).

    • Active or uncontrolled infection. Patients with an infection receiving treatment (antibiotic, antifungal or antiviral treatment) may be entered into the study but must be afebrile and hemodynamically stable for ≥72 hrs.

    • Current evidence of invasive fungal infection (blood or tissue culture); patients with recent fungal infection must have a subsequent negative cultures to be eligible; known HIV (new testing not required) or evidence of active hepatitis B or C infection (with rising transaminase values).

    • Hypersensitivity to cytarabine, daunorubicin or liposomal products.

    • History of Wilson's disease or other copper-metabolism disorder.

    • Female patients who are pregnant or lactating.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen GmbH Linz Austria 4020
    2 Uniklinikum Salzburg - Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg Austria 5020
    3 Universitätsklinikum Aachen Aachen Germany 52074
    4 Universitätsklinikum Augsburg Augsburg Germany 86156
    5 Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch GmbH Berlin Germany 13125
    6 Universitätsklinikum Bonn (UKB) Bonn Germany 53127
    7 Klinikum Chemnitz-gGmbH Chemnitz Germany 09113
    8 Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden Dresden Germany 01307
    9 Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany 40225
    10 Universitätsklinikum Essen Essen Germany 45122
    11 Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder) GmbH Frankfurt Germany 15236
    12 Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany 60590
    13 Universitätsklinikum Halle Halle Germany 06120
    14 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Hannover Germany 30625
    15 Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany 69120
    16 Universitätsklinikum Jena Jena Germany 07740
    17 Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein gGmbH Koblenz Germany 56068
    18 Universitätsklinikum Köln Köln Germany 50937
    19 Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR Leipzig Germany
    20 Universitätsmedizin Mannheim Mannheim Germany 68167
    21 Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München München Germany 81675
    22 Universitätsklinikum Münster Münster Germany 48149
    23 Klinikum Nürnberg Nürnberg Germany 90419
    24 Universitätsmedizin Rostock Rostock Germany 18055
    25 Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus Stuttgart Stuttgart Germany 70376
    26 Universitätsklinikum Tübingen Tübingen Germany 72076
    27 Universitätsklinikum Ulm Ulm Germany 89081

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • GWT-TUD GmbH

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Uwe Platzbecker, Prof., Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    GWT-TUD GmbH
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04061239
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • PALOMA
    First Posted:
    Aug 19, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 19, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 19, 2021