Clincosm LogoSign in Get a demo

Passive Vertebral Mobilization and Propriocemptive Neuromuscular Techniques in Mechanical Neck Pain

Sponsor
Isra University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03813680
Collaborator
(none)
90
Enrollment
3
Arms
30
Actual Duration (Months)

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of Passive Vertebral Mobilization (PVM) and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Techniques (PNF) in reducing pain, disability and improving quality of life in patients with Mechanical Neck Pain.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Passive Vertebral Mobilization
  • Other: PNF exercise
  • Other: Routine Physiotherapy
 N/A

Detailed Description

Neck Pain is very common and is now considered a public health issue. It poses significant health and economic burden, being a frequent cause of disability. A significant proportion of direct health care costs associated with neck disorders are attributable to visits to health care providers, to sick leave, and to the related loss of productive capacity. Mechanical neck pain affects between 45-54% of people in the general population .This can result in severe pain and disability. Mechanical neck pain described as a reduction in the mobility of cervical spinal segment is often the focus of manipulative physical therapy interventions. Most neck pain is not attributed to diseases but rather caused by muscular and postural condition. The cervical pain is a mechanical problem .It is therefore sense that a mechanical treatment works better than pharmacological treatment.

Cervical spine often impairs flexibility of key muscles related to cervical spine . Stretching exercise is beneficial for increasing flexibility as well as muscle performance.

The normal function of cervical spine is complex and requires a large variety of activities to be coordinated in order for an individual to perform daily activities with the least amount of strain and potential injury. When the dysfunction develops in the cervical spine, a chain reaction may develop which can affect the whole neck and even the entire body.

Commonly used approaches to treatment include rest, therapeutic massage, application of physical agents like heat, cold, TENS, and ultrasonic various types of mobilizations, manipulations (by physical therapists, chiropractors, osteopaths and others), therapeutic exercises, postural care and off course medication and surgical interventions. However, studies of their effectiveness have generally been short-term and inconclusive. The aim of the study is to compare which treatment either Passive Vertebral Mobilization or Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, whether itself or in combination, is more effective and beneficial in the treatment of mechanical neck pain.

Several studies have been reported to determine the effectiveness of manual therapy/ passive vertebral mobilization but with largely inconclusive results. However there are few studies if any to compare PNF exercise with PVM in terms of their effectiveness. PNF are simple and requiring low level expertise as compare to PVM.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
90 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomized Control TrialRandomized Control Trial
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison Between Passive Vertebral Mobilization and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Techniques in Managing Pain and Disability in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 20, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 22, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: PVM group

This group included 30 participants. Passive vertebral mobilization was given along with routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care

Other: Passive Vertebral Mobilization
Posteroanterior glides was given to cervical spine using Maitland method along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care
Other Names:
  • Spinal mobilization

    • Other: Routine Physiotherapy
    Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care
    Other Names:
  • Routine Physical therapy (RPT)

    		•
    Active Comparator: PNF group

    This group included 30 participants. PNF exercise in the form of diagonal pattern neck movements was along with routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care

    Other: PNF exercise
    The subjects was given PNF exercises comprising PNF diagonal patterns for neck along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care
    Other Names:
  • Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

    • Other: Routine Physiotherapy
    Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care
    Other Names:
  • Routine Physical therapy (RPT)

    		•
    Active Comparator: RPT(Routine Physiotherapy) group

    This group included 30 participants.Routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care.

    Other: Routine Physiotherapy
    Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care
    Other Names:
  • Routine Physical therapy (RPT)

    		•

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Visual Analog Scale (PAIN) [4 weeks]

      changes from baseline. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm horizontal line, with 0 presenting No pain and 10 representing Worst Pain.

    2. ROM of Cervical spine (Flexion) [4 weeks]

      changes from baseline

    3. ROM of Cervical spine (Extension) [4 weeks]

      changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position

    4. ROM of Cervical spine (rotation rightward) [4 weeks]

      changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position

    5. ROM of Cervical spine (rotation leftward) [4 weeks]

      changes from baseline. Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position

    6. ROM of Cervical spine (Side bending Right) [4 weeks]

      changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position

    7. ROM of Cervical spine (Side bending Left) [4 weeks]

      changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position

    8. Neck Flexors Muscle endurance [4 weeks]

      changes from baseline. Neck Flexion holding time in supine lying position was measured in seconds with the help of stop watch.

    9. NDI (neck Disability Index) [4 weeks]

      changes from baseline NDI is self rated index to measure pain and disability due to neck pain. Neck disability index consists of 10 questions addressing functional activities. There are 6 potential responses for each item, ranging from no disability (0) to total disability (5).The NDI is scored from 0 to 50 with higher score indication greater disability.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 65 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with mechanical neck pain having limited range of motion and muscle spasm and difficulty function between 18 to 60 years of age
    Exclusion Criteria:

    • Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis or other systemic disease

    • Patients with cancer of the cervical spine

    • Patients with history of fracture of spine

    • Patients with any congenital anomaly of Cervical spine

    • Patients having whiplash disorder with in last four weeks

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Isra University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Muhammad Ashfaq, Isra University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Muhammad Ashfaq, Principal Investigator, Isra University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03813680
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 1402-PhD-003
    First Posted:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 11, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Muhammad Ashfaq, Principal Investigator, Isra University
    Mechanical Neck Pain
    Passive Vertebral Mobilization
    Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Techniques (PNF)
    Quality of Life
    Disability
    Pain
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:
    Neck Pain

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 11, 2021