Scapulo-Thoracic Mobilization Compared to IASTM in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

Sponsor
Riphah International University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05475405
Collaborator
(none)
32
1
2
12
2.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

SCAPULO-THORACIC MOBILIZATION COMPARED TO IASTM IN PATIENTS WITH MECHANICAL NECK PAIN

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: scapulothoracic mobilization
  • Other: IASTM
N/A

Detailed Description

Mechanical neck pain is common musculoskeletal condition that causes work disabilities and is not self-limiting. One of the main causes for mechanical neck pain is forward head posture, which is common and but not ideal posture adopted by many workers and students who presents with head being anterior to the shoulder. Imbalances in the normal muscle function reported in such patients with inhibited deep neck flexors, serratus anterior and rhomboids and tightened pectoralis, upper trapezius and levator scapula.

Neck and scapula have some common muscle attachments and abnormal loads on cervical or thoracic spine change the biomechanics of muscles present in these regions, which eventually cause trigger points Management of scapulo-thoracic joint focuses on correcting posture, restoring flexibility of the scapula including the pectoralis minor, levator scapulae, rhomboids, mobilization and soft tissue techniques.

IASTM is ergonomically designed stainless steel tool, and has recently gained much popularity for elevating pain, reducing trigger points and improving ROMs because it has deeply penetrating power as compared to mobilization through hand. This technique works by both along the mobilizing muscle fibers or parallel to the muscle fibers.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
32 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
32 Participants were recruited in the study and divided into two groups. Group A was given intervention Scapulothoracic mobilization and Group B with IASTM.32 Participants were recruited in the study and divided into two groups. Group A was given intervention Scapulothoracic mobilization and Group B with IASTM.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Scapulo-Thoracic Mobilization Compared to IASTM in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 30, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Scapulothoracic mobilization along with conventional physical therapy for mechanical neck pain.

conventional physical therapy: Scapulothoracic mobilization: Patient in prone lying position. The left hand of the physical therapist lifts the scapula to distract from the thoracic wall while the right hand mobilizes and stretches the inferior muscle groups attached to the scapula.

Other: scapulothoracic mobilization
Patient in prone lying position. The left hand of the physical therapist lifts the scapula to distract from the thoracic wall while the right hand mobilizes and stretches the inferior muscle groups attached to the scapula.

Active Comparator: IASTM with conventional physical therapy for mechanical neck pain

Conventional Physical Therapy: IASTM (Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Technique): Patient sitting or prone lying Restrictions and myofascial adhesions assessed prior to treatment fanning strokes at 45 degree angles to skin be applied using the tool

Other: IASTM
Restrictions and myofascial adhesions should be assessed prior to treatment along both sides using IASTM tool and a lubricant. Once restrictions are assessed, fanning strokes at 45 degree angles to skin should be applied using the tool. This technique should be performed for 20 seconds parallel to the muscle fibers and 20 seconds perpendicular to the muscle fibers for each muscle group in scapulothoracic region. Total time for IASTM application is 10 mints. Upon completing all this patient should be given a home plan consisting of 2 different self-stretches targeting levator scapulae and upper trapezius
Other Names:
  • Instrument assisted Soft tissue mobilization.
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale [3 weeks]

      Changes from baseline Numeric pain Rating Scale is used to objectively assess musculoskeletal pain as marked by the patient. It is a 10 point scale from 0 to 10. 0 depicts no pain at all and 10 shows worst pain ever felt. It was measured at baseline, at 3rd session after 6th weeks of the intervention.

    2. NDI (neck disability index) [3 weeks]

      The questionnaire has 10 items concerning pain and activities of daily living including personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work status, driving, sleeping and recreation. The measure is designed to be given to the patient to complete, and can provide useful information for management and prognosis of those with neck pain

    3. Goniometer [3 weeks]

      goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits rotation of an object to a definite position

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 40 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age group 18 to 40 years

    • Both gender groups

    • Non radiating neck pain

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • History of cervical and thoracic spine surgery

    • Vertibro-basilar insufficiency

    • Sign of serious pathology like malignancy

    • Signs of systemic inflammatory disorder

    • Patient with diagnosed hypertension

    • (scapular area pathology)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Pakistan Railway General Hospital Rawalpindi Punjab Pakistan 46010

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Riphah International University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Muhammad Affan Iqbal, PhD*, Riphah International University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Riphah International University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05475405
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • RIPHAH/RCRS/REC/Letter-01073
    First Posted:
    Jul 26, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 26, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Riphah International University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 26, 2022