Medication Adherence in Individuals With Epilepsy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
There is an urgent need to understand the psychological and situational factors that influence medication adherence in individuals with epilepsy. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC, 2010) about 2.5 million people in the United States have epilepsy and one third of them still have seizures despite receiving treatment. With proper medication, an estimated 60-70% of individuals with new onset epilepsy become, and remain, seizure free (Kwan & Brodie, 2000). Despite the success of medical treatment of epilepsy, many patients do not receive these benefits due to inadequate adherence to medication (Meyer et al., 2010). And, as with other chronic medical conditions, estimates suggest that between 30% and 60% of patients with epilepsy are not adherent with their drug regimens (Green & Simons Morton, 1988; Leppik, 1990; Jones et al., 2006). Poor adherence may be the most important cause of poorly controlled epilepsy (Gomes et al., 1998). Stanaway et al. (1985) found that 31% of seizures were precipitated by nonadherence to medication.
Questions regarding adherence are theoretically informed by Fisher et al. (2006)'s Information Motivation Behavioral Skills (IMB) model. While originally developed to describe, predict, and inform interventions for antiretroviral treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), this study applies the model to epilepsy for the first time. In addition, this study intends to produce an accurate description of how individuals with epilepsy manage their medication adherence by identifying current self regulation strategies (immediate adherence behaviors, preparatory behaviors, and barrier management strategies) and their situational determinants. Situational determinants can explain some of the fluctuations in medication adherence. Patients who are motivated to take their medications might still show inconsistent medication adherence. For example, patients might miss good opportunities to take their medication or fail to anticipate unexpected barriers such as a spontaneous dinner with friends or a bout of depression. Therefore, the study will take particular care to investigate situational cues such as good opportunities for adherence (e.g., taking medication with regular meals or before brushing teeth) and expected and unexpected barriers. Preparatory behaviors and their cues are also of interest in this study: Some patients use facilitators (such as physical or electronic reminder systems, electronic pill bottles and pill boxes) to ensure adequate medication adherence. Social support can serve a similar function of reminding patients to take their medication. To address these questions, the investigators plan to explore how individual regulation and social support influence medication adherence in patients with epilepsy. The specific aims of the proposed research are:
-
To test the hypothesis that there will be a main effect of information, motivation and behavioral skills, on adherence behavior, and that a mediation model will show that information and motivation effects are partially mediated through behavioral skills.
-
To identify self regulation strategies and their situational cues (good opportunities, facilitators, and barriers) for medication adherence among individuals with epilepsy to better describe best practices and challenges.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Raw Count of Number of Days of Medication Nonadherence [Enrollment]
The primary outcome of this study is medication adherence as measured by self report with a 4 day recall adherence questionnaire (Chesney, Ickovics, Chambers, et al., 2000). The total number of Nonadherence days were counted, then divided by the total number of days for all participants.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Score on Barriers to Medication Adherence [Enrollment]
The Chesney Adherence Questionnaire will be used to measure side effects, drug use and other barriers to medication adherence. The items pertaining to barriers to medication adherence were assessed the same day as enrollment and have a four-week recall period.
- Score of Psychosocial Predictors of Adherence [Enrollment]
The Fisher IMB (Information-Seeking, Motivation and Behavior) adherence questionnaire will measure what psychosocial factors that act as predictive of medication adherence. The items pertaining to barriers to medication adherence were assessed the same day as enrollment and have a twelve month recall period.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with Epilepsy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age (under 18, over 65)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Columbia University Morningside Campus | New York | New York | United States | 10027 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Columbia University
- Epilepsy Foundation
- University of Nebraska
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Niall Bolger, PhD, Columbia University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- AAAI1597
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Study Sample |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Adults with self-reported epilepsy. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 140 |
COMPLETED | 140 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Study Sample |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Adults with self-reported epilepsy. |
Overall Participants | 140 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
38.51
(11.72)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
87
62.1%
|
Male |
53
37.9%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
140
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Raw Count of Number of Days of Medication Nonadherence |
---|---|
Description | The primary outcome of this study is medication adherence as measured by self report with a 4 day recall adherence questionnaire (Chesney, Ickovics, Chambers, et al., 2000). The total number of Nonadherence days were counted, then divided by the total number of days for all participants. |
Time Frame | Enrollment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Adults with self-reported epilepsy. |
Arm/Group Title | Study Sample |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Adults with self-reported epilepsy. |
Measure Participants | 140 |
Number [% of nonadherence days] |
28
|
Title | Score on Barriers to Medication Adherence |
---|---|
Description | The Chesney Adherence Questionnaire will be used to measure side effects, drug use and other barriers to medication adherence. The items pertaining to barriers to medication adherence were assessed the same day as enrollment and have a four-week recall period. |
Time Frame | Enrollment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Score of Psychosocial Predictors of Adherence |
---|---|
Description | The Fisher IMB (Information-Seeking, Motivation and Behavior) adherence questionnaire will measure what psychosocial factors that act as predictive of medication adherence. The items pertaining to barriers to medication adherence were assessed the same day as enrollment and have a twelve month recall period. |
Time Frame | Enrollment |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | It was an observational study where none of the participants were at risk during the study hence the meaning of "0" Total Number of Participants at Risk. | |
Arm/Group Title | Study Sample | |
Arm/Group Description | Adults with self-reported epilepsy. | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Study Sample | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Study Sample | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Study Sample | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/0 (NaN) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Marie Chesaniuk |
---|---|
Organization | Columbia University |
Phone | 212-854-0127 |
mc3333@columbia.edu |
- AAAI1597