Memory Rehabilitation by Means of Working Memory Training in Combination With a Recollection Training

Sponsor
University of Oldenburg (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02790151
Collaborator
(none)
36
1
2
23
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Memory deficits after brain damage are common and there is still a need for evaluated therapy methods. In this study we compare two therapeutic interventions and investigate whether therapy effects can be found on neuropsychological tests and on a test measuring memory in everyday life.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Standard Therapy
  • Behavioral: Experimental Intervention
N/A

Detailed Description

In the interventiongroup a computerbased working memory training is combined with a recollection training (repitition-lag procedure). The patients in the active control group undergo the standard memory therapy that is normally provided in the rehabilitation centre (with a focus on the acquisition and execution of different memory strategies, e.g. the spaced retrieval method). The patients in both groups are tested on different neuropsychological tests before and after nine hours of therapy. Additionally, a test is conducted that assesses memory in everyday life.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
36 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Memory Rehabilitation by Means of Working Memory Training in Combination
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Therapy

Learning and practicing memory strategies

Behavioral: Standard Therapy
Learning and practicing Memory strategies

Experimental: Experimental Intervention

Computerbased working memory training and Recollection training

Behavioral: Experimental Intervention
Computerbased Working Memory Training in Combination with a Recollection Training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Test to assess change in memory performance in everyday life [baseline and 9 hours]

    The test includes different single tasks that measure memory in everyday life e.g. Story recall (Subtest 6 from the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test) Outcome measure: Total number of points

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Outcome change in different neuropsychological tests [baseline and 9 hours]

    Tests for verbal memory, working memory, prospective memory, attention and word fluency (Composite scores built from raw scores)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • brain injury

  • memory deficits (performance below average in the California Verbal Learning Test in learning trial 1 or 5, sfr or lfr)

Exclusion Criteria:
  • severe amnesia (less than 2 words in sfr of the CVLT), dementia, sensory or motor aphasia, impaired vision, insufficient German language skills, lack of patient's consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Rehabilitationszentrum GmbH Oldenburg Deutschland Germany 26131

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Oldenburg

Investigators

  • Study Director: Helmut Hildebrandt, Prof. Dr., Universität Oldenburg

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Kim Merle Richter, MSc Psychologie, University of Oldenburg
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02790151
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • UOLDENBURG
First Posted:
Jun 3, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Oct 18, 2016
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2016
Keywords provided by Kim Merle Richter, MSc Psychologie, University of Oldenburg
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 18, 2016