Memory Rehabilitation by Means of Working Memory Training in Combination With a Recollection Training
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Memory deficits after brain damage are common and there is still a need for evaluated therapy methods. In this study we compare two therapeutic interventions and investigate whether therapy effects can be found on neuropsychological tests and on a test measuring memory in everyday life.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
In the interventiongroup a computerbased working memory training is combined with a recollection training (repitition-lag procedure). The patients in the active control group undergo the standard memory therapy that is normally provided in the rehabilitation centre (with a focus on the acquisition and execution of different memory strategies, e.g. the spaced retrieval method). The patients in both groups are tested on different neuropsychological tests before and after nine hours of therapy. Additionally, a test is conducted that assesses memory in everyday life.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Standard Therapy Learning and practicing memory strategies |
Behavioral: Standard Therapy
Learning and practicing Memory strategies
|
Experimental: Experimental Intervention Computerbased working memory training and Recollection training |
Behavioral: Experimental Intervention
Computerbased Working Memory Training in Combination with a Recollection Training
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Test to assess change in memory performance in everyday life [baseline and 9 hours]
The test includes different single tasks that measure memory in everyday life e.g. Story recall (Subtest 6 from the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test) Outcome measure: Total number of points
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Outcome change in different neuropsychological tests [baseline and 9 hours]
Tests for verbal memory, working memory, prospective memory, attention and word fluency (Composite scores built from raw scores)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
brain injury
-
memory deficits (performance below average in the California Verbal Learning Test in learning trial 1 or 5, sfr or lfr)
Exclusion Criteria:
- severe amnesia (less than 2 words in sfr of the CVLT), dementia, sensory or motor aphasia, impaired vision, insufficient German language skills, lack of patient's consent
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rehabilitationszentrum GmbH | Oldenburg | Deutschland | Germany | 26131 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Oldenburg
Investigators
- Study Director: Helmut Hildebrandt, Prof. Dr., Universität Oldenburg
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- UOLDENBURG