A Study of Intra-operative Autologous Retropubic Urethral Sling on Urinary Control After Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01821209
Collaborator
(none)
203
1
2
25
8.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Placement of an autologous retropubic urethral sling at the time of robot assisted radical prostatectomy will improve the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Placement of sling
N/A

Detailed Description

This is a phase 2 single blinded study of patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy who are randomized to placement of an autologous retropubic urethral sling or not. Placement of a retropubic urethral sling will involve dissection and harvesting of the right and left vas deferens, which will be taken out of the body by the bed side assistant who will suture the two vas deferens together in a side to side fashion with the smaller of the two vas deferens placed in the middle of the larger one. A single 3-0 V-lock suture on a CV23 needle will be placed through one end of the vas sling and then passed into the body by the bed side assistant. The sling will then be placed on the rectum below the site of the vesicourethral anastamosis and the anastamosis will be completed. The sling will then be placed around the vesicourethral anastomosis, suspended to the pubic symphysis and tensioned to allow elevation of the vesicourethral anastomosis. There are four surgeons working at both trial sites who will be involved in performing the radical prostatectomy and sling placement on trial patients. All surgeons have had significant experience in performing radical prostatectomy (> 100 cases each). To ensure sufficient experience in the placement of urethral slings, each surgeon (other than the principle investigator, who has placed over 200 slings) will undergo a training period of 5 patients with sling placement under the proctoring of the principal investigator prior to accrual of the first trial patient from the individual surgeon. All patients will be characterized with respect to age, ethnicity, BMI, prostate size, amount of nerve sparing, preoperative urinary function, surgeon, serum PSA, and tumor characteristics. Prostate size and tumor characteristics will be attained at histological assessment of the prostate specimen by the pathology department. Preoperative urinary function will be assessed by EPIC and IPSS questionnaires at baseline. The amount of nerve sparing will be assessed by the surgeon performing the radical prostatectomy after the prostate dissection is complete. Each side will be assessed separately as complete, partial or no nerve sparing. Stratification will be based upon age at enrollment (<65 years vs. >65 years). For each of the 2 strata patients will be randomized to placement of a sling or not, serving as the control group, on a one to one basis with the assignment determined using a computer software program. Randomization assignment of the planned procedure will be balanced using a fixed block design. Consecutively identified patients undergoing RARP and meeting eligibility criteria for the trial will be approached for involvement in this trial. Patients and study personnel will be blinded as to which patients received slings. Surgeons performing the individual procedures cannot be blinded to the procedure, but will not know the randomization assignment until the prostate dissection is completed and the procedure reaches the stage of sling placement. A sealed envelope containing the randomization assignment of the patient to the sling or non-sling group will be placed at the operating room front desk by the research coordinator prior to the start of surgery. This envelope will not be opened until the prostate is removed. A unique identifying number, that has no association with randomization allocation, will be assigned to each trial patient. These numbers will be placed on envelopes to match them to patients to avoid any confusion on days where multiple trial patients may be undergoing radical prostatectomy. Furthermore, surgeons will not be involved in attaining any outcome data from patients and therefore should not cause any bias to the study outcomes. Investigators expect accrual of 5 patients every week; therefore, investigators estimate that it will take approximately 37 weeks to complete the study accrual of 182 evaluable patients.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
203 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Study of Intra-operative Autologous Retropubic Urethral Sling on Urinary Control After Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Control

Standard robot assisted radical prostatectomy

Experimental: Sling

Placement of sling at time of robot assisted radical prostatectomy

Procedure: Placement of sling
Placement of a retropubic urethral sling will involve dissection and harvesting of the right and left vas deferens, which we will be taken out of the body by the bed side assistant who will suture the two vas deferens together in a side to side fashion with the smaller of the two vas deferens placed in the middle of the larger one. A single 3-0 V-lock suture on a CV23 needle will be placed through one end of the vas sling and then passed into the body by the bed side assistant. The sling will then be placed on the rectum below the site of the vesicourethral anastamosis and the anastamosis will be completed. The sling will then be placed around the vesicourethral anastomosis, suspended to the pubic symphysis and tensioned to allow elevation of the vesicourethral anastomosis.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pad use [6 months]

    The primary objective of this study is to compare the proportion of people requiring 0 pads per day 6 months after RARP in men with and without sling placement. Patients will also be assessed at 1 and 3 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Time to zero pads [6 months]

    Determine if there is a difference in median time to continence defined as not requiring any pad post-surgery between those with and without a sling.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Additional pad use outcomes at one and three months [3 months]

    2.1 Compare the proportion of patients with and without sling placement who use at most 1 pad per day after RARP. Patients will be assessed to determine the frequency at 1, 3 and 6 months. 2.3 Determine if urinary quality of life as measured by a change from baseline in the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) urinary domain scores differ between sling and non-sling patients at 1, 3 and 6 months 2.4 Determine if urinary obstructive symptoms as measured by a change from baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) differ between sling and non-sling patients at 1, 3 and 6 months 2.5 Determine if there is a difference in urinary retention at 3 months after surgery between sling and non sling patients.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
45 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Newly diagnosed patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy at UCSF

  • Histologically defined adenocarcinoma of the prostate

  • English or Spanish speaking patients with the ability to provide informed written consent and willingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol

  • Age 40-75 year

Exclusion Criteria:
  • ยท Patients should not have received any radiation or hormonal therapy prior to surgery for any purpose

  • Any prior prostate surgery

  • No current or previous history of urinary incontinence requiring chronic pad use or treatments for urinary incontinence

  • Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents

  • Any condition that compromises compliance with the objectives and procedures of this protocol, as judged by the principal investigator

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California United States 94143-1695

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of California, San Francisco

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University of California, San Francisco
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01821209
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SLING2013
First Posted:
Mar 29, 2013
Last Update Posted:
May 27, 2015
Last Verified:
May 1, 2015
Keywords provided by University of California, San Francisco
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 27, 2015