Immunogenicity, Safety and 1 Year Persistence of Antibodies After Either One or Two Doses of Meningococcal ACWY Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Children 2 Through 10 Years of Age.

Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01682876
Collaborator
(none)
715
19
4
19.7
37.6
1.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study was designed to conduct a comparative trial to further evaluate the safety, immunogenicity and antibody persistence of two doses of Novartis MenACWY conjugate vaccine, given 2 months apart, versus one dose of Novartis MenACWY conjugate vaccine in children 2 through 10 years of age.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Biological: MenACWY-CRM
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
715 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multi-Center Study Comparing Immunogenicity, Safety and 1 Year Persistence of Antibodies After Either One or Two Doses of Novartis Meningococcal ACWY Conjugate Vaccine, Administered to Healthy Children 2 to 10 Years of Age.
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 7, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 2, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 30, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: 2 through 5 years (1 Vac) MenACWY-CRM 1

Subjects 2 through 5 years received one vaccination of MenACWY-CRM

Biological: MenACWY-CRM
The investigational meningococcal (groups A, C, Y, and W-135 vaccine) oligosaccharide diphtheria CRM197 conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM) was administered intramuscularly in the nondominant arm

Active Comparator: 2 through 5 years (2 Vac) MenACWY-CRM 2

Subjects 2 through 5 years received two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM

Biological: MenACWY-CRM
The investigational meningococcal (groups A, C, Y, and W-135 vaccine) oligosaccharide diphtheria CRM197 conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM) was administered intramuscularly in the nondominant arm

Placebo Comparator: 6 through 10 years (1 Vac) MenACWY-CRM 3

Subjects 6 through 10 years received one vaccination of MenACWY-CRM

Biological: MenACWY-CRM
The investigational meningococcal (groups A, C, Y, and W-135 vaccine) oligosaccharide diphtheria CRM197 conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM) was administered intramuscularly in the nondominant arm

Active Comparator: 6 through 10 years (2 Vac) MenACWY-CRM 4

Subjects 6 through 10 years received two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM

Biological: MenACWY-CRM
The investigational meningococcal (groups A, C, Y, and W-135 vaccine) oligosaccharide diphtheria CRM197 conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM) was administered intramuscularly in the nondominant arm

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Non-inferiority of Two Vaccinations Versus One Vaccination of MenACWY-CRM, by Age Cohort, as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects With hSBA Seroresponse Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, at 1 Month After Last Vaccination [One Month After Last Vaccination ( day 86)]

    Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of subjects with overall seroresponse and associated 2-sided 97.5% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval (CI), directed against N. meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, by serum bactericidal assay using human complement (hSBA) at 1 month after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM given two months apart. Seroresponse is defined as: a. postvaccination hSBA titer ≥1:8 for subjects with a prevaccination hSBA titer <1:4; b. for subjects with a prevaccination hSBA ≥1:4, an increase of at least four times of the prevaccination hSBA titer.

  2. Superiority of Two Vaccinations Versus One Vaccination of MenACWY-CRM, by Age Cohort, as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects With hSBA Seroresponse Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, at 1 Month After Last Vaccination [One Month After Last Vaccination (day 86)]

    Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of subjects with overall seroresponse and associated 2-sided 95% CI, directed against N. meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, by hSBA at 1 month after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM. Seroresponse -postvaccination hSBA titer ≥1:8 for subjects with a prevaccination hSBA titer <1:4 and for subjects with a prevaccination hSBA ≥1:4, an increase of at least four times of the prevaccination hSBA titer.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of Subjects With hSBA Titer ≥1:8, Directed Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y At One Month After One or Two Vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM [One Month After Last Vaccination (day 86)]

    Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of subjects who achieved hSBA titer ≥1:8 and associated 95% CI, at one month after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM.

  2. Geometric Mean Titers of Subjects, Directed Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y At One Month After One or Two Vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM [One Month After Last Vaccination (day 86)]

    Immunogenicity was measured as hSBA geometric mean titers (GMTs) and 95% CI against N. meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, one month after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM.

  3. Percentage of Subjects With hSBA Titer ≥1:8, Directed Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y At One Year After One or Two Vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM [One year after one vaccination or two vaccinations (day 422).]

    Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of subjects with hSBA titer ≥1:8 and associated 95% CI at one year after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM.

  4. Geometric Mean Titers of Subjects, Directed Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y At One Year After One or Two Vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM [One year after one vaccination or two vaccinations (day 422).]

    Immunogenicity was measured as hSBA GMTs and 95% CI against N. meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y at one year after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM.

  5. Number of 2 to 5 Years-Old Subjects Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse Events After Any Vaccination [From Days 1-7 after each vaccination]

    Safety was assessed as the number of 2 to 5 years-old subjects who reported solicited local and systemic adverse events from day 1 up to and including day 7 after one or two vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM

  6. Numbers of 6 to 10 Years-Old Subjects Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse Events After Any Vaccination [From Days 1-7 after each vaccination]

    Safety was assessed as the number of 6 to 10 years-old subjects who reported solicited local and systemic adverse events from day 1 up to and including day 7 after one or two vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM

  7. Number of Subjects Who Reported Selected AEs After Any Vaccination [Day 1 to Day 86]

    Safety was assessed as the number subjects who reported Selected AEs from day 1 up to day 86 after one or two vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM

  8. Number of Subjects Who Reported Selected AEs After Any Vaccination [Day 1 to Day 422]

    Safety was assessed as the number subjects who reported Selected AEs from day 1 up to day 422 after one or two vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
2 Years to 10 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Healthy children, 2 to 10 years of age who have up to date routine childhood vaccination, according to U.S. ACIP recommendations
Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Unwilling or unable to give written informed assent or consent to participate in the study.

  2. Perceived to be unreliable or unavailable for the duration of the study period.

  3. Previous confirmed or suspected disease caused by N. meningitidis.

  4. Previously immunized with a meningococcal vaccine (licensed or investigational).

  5. Receipt of any investigational or non-registered product within 30 days prior to enrolment or who expect to receive an investigational drug or vaccine prior to the completion of the study.

  6. Receipt or plan to receive any vaccines within 30 days before and after administration of each dose of the study vaccine.

(certain exceptions influenza vaccines apply)

  1. Significant acute infection within the 7 days prior to enrolment or body temperature of 38°C or greater within 3 days prior to enrolment.

  2. Previous serious acute, chronic or progressive disease, epilepsy or any progressive neurological disease or history of Guillain-Barre syndrome.

  3. History of any anaphylaxis, serious vaccine reactions, or allergy to any vaccine components

  4. Impairment/alteration of immune function, either congenital or acquired or resulting from (for example):

  • receipt of immunosuppressive therapy,

  • receipt of immunostimulants,

  • receipt of parenteral immunoglobulin preparation, blood products, and/or plasma derivatives.

  1. Known bleeding diathesis, or any condition that may be associated with a prolonged bleeding time.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 GSK Investigational Site Birmingham Alabama United States 35205
2 GSK Investigational Site Sacramento California United States 95822
3 GSK Investigational Site Lake Mary Florida United States 32746
4 GSK Investigational Site Marietta Georgia United States 30062
5 GSK Investigational Site Woodstock Georgia United States 30189
6 GSK Investigational Site Council Bluffs Iowa United States 51503
7 GSK Investigational Site Louisville Kentucky United States 40291
8 GSK Investigational Site Metairie Louisiana United States 70006
9 GSK Investigational Site Niles Michigan United States 49120
10 GSK Investigational Site Stevensville Michigan United States 49127
11 GSK Investigational Site Bellevue Nebraska United States 68005
12 GSK Investigational Site Fremont Nebraska United States 68025
13 GSK Investigational Site Omaha Nebraska United States 68134
14 GSK Investigational Site Johnson City New York United States 13790
15 GSK Investigational Site Cleveland Ohio United States 44121
16 GSK Investigational Site Cleveland Ohio United States 44122
17 GSK Investigational Site Austin Texas United States 78705
18 GSK Investigational Site Fort Worth Texas United States 76135
19 GSK Investigational Site West Jordan Utah United States 84088

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • GlaxoSmithKline

Investigators

  • Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01682876
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 205238
  • V59_57
  • 2011-004421-27
First Posted:
Sep 11, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Jun 14, 2019
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2019
Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Subjects were enrolled at 22 locations
Pre-assignment Detail All enrolled subjects were included in the trial.
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 176 183 180 176
COMPLETED 155 163 169 157
NOT COMPLETED 21 20 11 19

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac) Total
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 176 183 180 176 715
Age (year) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [year]
3.5
(1.1)
3.6
(1.2)
7.8
(1.4)
7.8
(1.4)
5.7
(2.5)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
84
47.7%
88
48.1%
97
53.9%
87
49.4%
356
49.8%
Male
92
52.3%
95
51.9%
83
46.1%
89
50.6%
359
50.2%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Non-inferiority of Two Vaccinations Versus One Vaccination of MenACWY-CRM, by Age Cohort, as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects With hSBA Seroresponse Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, at 1 Month After Last Vaccination
Description Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of subjects with overall seroresponse and associated 2-sided 97.5% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval (CI), directed against N. meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, by serum bactericidal assay using human complement (hSBA) at 1 month after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM given two months apart. Seroresponse is defined as: a. postvaccination hSBA titer ≥1:8 for subjects with a prevaccination hSBA titer <1:4; b. for subjects with a prevaccination hSBA ≥1:4, an increase of at least four times of the prevaccination hSBA titer.
Time Frame One Month After Last Vaccination ( day 86)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on the primary per-protocol (PP) dataset, i.e. the subjects who received the vaccine correctly; provided evaluable serum samples at the relevant time points; and had no major protocol violations as defined prior to analysis.
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 136 144 153 142
MenA(N=135,143,152,142)
94
75
89
77
MenC(N=131,140,149,142)
92
65
93
73
MenW(N=128,135,148,138)
75
61
58
54
MenY(N=128,133,148,142)
91
64
89
60
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Non-inferiority of seroresponse of two vaccinations vs.one vaccination for age cohort (2 to 5 years of age) for MenA
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Comments Noninferiority was demonstrated for 2 to 5 years of age group if the lower limit of the 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in seroresponse rate between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule (2-dose schedule minus the 1-dose schedule) was greater than -10% for MenA
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine Group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 19
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
10 to 28.9
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Non-inferiority of seroresponse of two vaccinations vs. one vaccination for age cohort (2 to 5 years of age) for MenC
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Comments Noninferiority was demonstrated for 2 to 5 years of age group if the lower limit of the 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in seroresponse rate between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule (2-dose schedule minus the 1-dose schedule) was greater than -10% for MenC
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine Group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 27
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
16.9 to 37.7
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Non-inferiority of seroresponse of two vaccinations vs. one vaccination for age cohort (2 to 5 years of age) for MenW
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Comments Noninferiority was demonstrated for 2 to 5 years of age group if the lower limit of the 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in seroresponse rate between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule (2-dose schedule minus the 1-dose schedule) was greater than -10% for MenW
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine Group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 14
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
1.4 to 26.7
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Non-inferiority of seroresponse of two vaccinations vs. one vaccination for age cohort (2 to 5 years of age) for MenY
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Comments Noninferiority was demonstrated for 2 to 5 years of age group if the lower limit of the 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in seroresponse rate between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule (2-dose schedule minus the 1-dose schedule) was greater than -10% for Men Y
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine Group differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 27
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
15.6 to 37.6
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac), 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Non-inferiority of seroresponse of two vaccinations vs. one vaccination for age cohort (6 to 10 years of age) for MenA
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Comments Noninferiority was demonstrated for 6 to 10 years of age group if the lower limit of the 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in seroresponse rate between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule (2-dose schedule minus the 1-dose schedule) was greater than -10% for MenA
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccines Group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
1.7 to 21.3
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac), 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Non-inferiority of seroresponse of two vaccinations vs. one vaccination for age cohort (6 to 10 years of age) for MenC
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Comments Noninferiority was demonstrated for 6 to 10 years of age group if the lower limit of the 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in seroresponse rate between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule (2-dose schedule minus the 1-dose schedule) was greater than -10% for MenC
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccines Group differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 19
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
9.9 to 29.2
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac), 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Non-inferiority of seroresponse of two vaccinations vs. one vaccination for age cohort (6 to 10 years of age) for MenW
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Comments Noninferiority was demonstrated for 6 to 10 years of age group if the lower limit of the 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in seroresponse rate between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule (2-dose schedule minus the 1-dose schedule) was greater than -10% for MenW
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccines Group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 4
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
-8.6 to 17.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac), 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Non-inferiority of seroresponse for two vaccinations vs. one vaccination for age cohort (6 to 10 years of age) for MenY
Type of Statistical Test Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Comments Noninferiority was demonstrated for 6 to 10 years of age group if the lower limit of the 2-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in seroresponse rate between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule (2-dose schedule minus the 1-dose schedule) was greater than -10% for MenY
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccines Group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 29
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
18.4 to 40
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
2. Primary Outcome
Title Superiority of Two Vaccinations Versus One Vaccination of MenACWY-CRM, by Age Cohort, as Measured by the Percentage of Subjects With hSBA Seroresponse Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, at 1 Month After Last Vaccination
Description Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of subjects with overall seroresponse and associated 2-sided 95% CI, directed against N. meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, by hSBA at 1 month after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM. Seroresponse -postvaccination hSBA titer ≥1:8 for subjects with a prevaccination hSBA titer <1:4 and for subjects with a prevaccination hSBA ≥1:4, an increase of at least four times of the prevaccination hSBA titer.
Time Frame One Month After Last Vaccination (day 86)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on the FAS dataset - All subjects in the exposed dataset who provided evaluable serum samples whose assay results were available for at least 1 serogroup on day 1 and 1 post baseline visit.
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 159 165 172 163
MenA(N=158,163,171,163)
95
77
89
79
MenC(N=154,157,167,162)
93
65
93
75
MenW(N=150,154,167,159)
75
61
57
52
MenY(N=150,153,167,163)
90
62
89
60
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Superiority for age cohort (2 through 5 years of age) for MenA was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 2-sided (1-2α) % CI for seroresponse increase between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule was above 10% for MenA
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine Group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 98.75%
9.1 to 28
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Superiority for age cohort (2 through 5 years of age) for MenC was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 2-sided (1-2α) % CI for seroresponse increase between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule was above 10% for MenC
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine Group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 28
Confidence Interval () 98.75%
17.1 to 38.7
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Superiority for age cohort (2 through 5 years of age) for MenW was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 2-sided (1-2α) % CI for seroresponse increase between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule was above 10% for MenW
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine Group differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 14
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 98.75%
1 to 27.1
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Superiority for age cohort (2 through 5 years of age) for MenY was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 2-sided (1-2α) % CI for seroresponse increase between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule was above 10% for MenY
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine groups Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 28
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 98.75%
16.2 to 39.3
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac), 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Superiority for age cohort (6 through 10 years of age) for MenA was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 2-sided (1-2α) % CI for seroresponse increase between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule was above 10% for MenA
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine groups differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 98.75%
1 to 21.2
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac), 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Superiority for age cohort (6 through 10 years of age) for MenC was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 2-sided (1-2α) % CI for seroresponse increase between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule was above 10% for MenC
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine Group differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 97.5%
9.5 to 27.1
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac), 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Superiority for age cohort (6 through 10 years of age) for MenW was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 2-sided (1-2α) % CI for seroresponse increase between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule was above 10% for MenW
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine Group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 98.75%
-8.4 to 18.8
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac), 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Comments Superiority for age cohort (6 through 10 years of age) for MenY was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 2-sided (1-2α) % CI for seroresponse increase between the 2-dose vaccination schedule and the 1-dose vaccination schedule was above 10% for MenY
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Vaccine group Differences at Day 86
Estimated Value 29
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 98.75%
17 to 39.6
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Subjects With hSBA Titer ≥1:8, Directed Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y At One Month After One or Two Vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM
Description Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of subjects who achieved hSBA titer ≥1:8 and associated 95% CI, at one month after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM.
Time Frame One Month After Last Vaccination (day 86)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on the primary PP dataset.
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 136 144 153 142
MenA(N=135,143,152,142)
95
76
91
80
MenC(N=131,140,149,142)
98
76
99
89
MenW(N=128,135,148,138)
99
92
99
96
MenY(N=128,133,148,142)
96
69
96
73
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Geometric Mean Titers of Subjects, Directed Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y At One Month After One or Two Vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM
Description Immunogenicity was measured as hSBA geometric mean titers (GMTs) and 95% CI against N. meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, one month after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM.
Time Frame One Month After Last Vaccination (day 86)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on the primary PP dataset
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 136 144 153 142
MenA(N=135,143,152,142)
68
21
67
36
MenC(N=131,140,149,142)
146
22
165
67
MenW(N=128,135,148,138)
191
104
169
95
MenY(N=128,133,148,142)
70
15
76
26
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Subjects With hSBA Titer ≥1:8, Directed Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y At One Year After One or Two Vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM
Description Immunogenicity was measured as the percentage of subjects with hSBA titer ≥1:8 and associated 95% CI at one year after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM.
Time Frame One year after one vaccination or two vaccinations (day 422).

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on the persistence PP dataset
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 136 144 153 142
MenA(N=122,131,142,130)
30
11
30
20
MenC(N=123,128,141,130)
61
41
81
55
MenW(N=121,127,139,130)
92
91
94
90
MenY(N=121,122,140,130)
67
57
75
65
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Geometric Mean Titers of Subjects, Directed Against N. Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y At One Year After One or Two Vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM
Description Immunogenicity was measured as hSBA GMTs and 95% CI against N. meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y at one year after one vaccination or two vaccinations of MenACWY-CRM.
Time Frame One year after one vaccination or two vaccinations (day 422).

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on the persistence PP dataset
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 136 144 153 142
MenA(N=122,131,142,130)
4.72
2.66
4.66
3.56
MenC(N=123,128,141,130)
10
7.03
24
15
MenW(N=121,127,139,130)
49
39
64
47
MenY(N=121,122,140,130)
14
9.88
20
13
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of 2 to 5 Years-Old Subjects Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse Events After Any Vaccination
Description Safety was assessed as the number of 2 to 5 years-old subjects who reported solicited local and systemic adverse events from day 1 up to and including day 7 after one or two vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM
Time Frame From Days 1-7 after each vaccination

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on the safety dataset i.e. the subjects in the exposed population who provided postvaccination safety data.
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 176 182
Erythema(N=173,175)
25
11
Induration(N=173,175)
19
7
Tenderness (N=174,175)
84
79
Change in Eating Habits(N=173,175)
26
30
Sleepiness(N=173,175)
49
46
Irritability(N=173,175)
51
50
Body Temperature >=38.0(N=174,175)
9
12
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced erythema in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 2.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.17 to 4.53
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced induration in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 2.75
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.18 to 6.36
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced tenderness in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.85 to 1.34
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced change in eating habits in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 0.88
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.54 to 1.42
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced sleepiness in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.08
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.76 to 1.52
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced irritability in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.74 to 1.43
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced fever (≥38 °C) in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 0.75
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.33 to 1.74
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Numbers of 6 to 10 Years-Old Subjects Who Reported Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse Events After Any Vaccination
Description Safety was assessed as the number of 6 to 10 years-old subjects who reported solicited local and systemic adverse events from day 1 up to and including day 7 after one or two vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM
Time Frame From Days 1-7 after each vaccination

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on the safety dataset
Arm/Group Title 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 180 175
Erythema(N=178,166)
23
15
Induration(N=178,166)
24
15
Pain(N=178,166)
106
78
Loss of Appetite(N=177,166)
27
14
Nausea(N=177,165)
29
21
Fatigue(N=177,166)
44
25
Myalgia(N=177,165)
63
43
Arthralgia(N=177,165)
20
9
Headache(N=177,165)
55
28
Body Temperature>=38.0(N=178,166)
11
9
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced erythema in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.43
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.77 to 2.65
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced induration in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.49
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.81 to 2.74
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced pain in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.27
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.04 to 1.55
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced loss of appetite in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.81
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.98 to 3.33
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced nausea in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.29
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.77 to 2.17
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced fatigue in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.65
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.06 to 2.57
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced myalgia in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.37
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.99 to 1.89
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced arthralgia in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 2.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.97 to 4.42
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced headache in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.83
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.22 to 2.74
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac), 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac)
Comments The safety of two vaccine groups was compared by calculating risk ratio of the proportions of subjects who experienced fever (≥38 °C) in the two doses versus in the one dose of MenACWY-CRM
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
Comments
Method
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
Estimated Value 1.14
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.48 to 2.68
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Subjects Who Reported Selected AEs After Any Vaccination
Description Safety was assessed as the number subjects who reported Selected AEs from day 1 up to day 86 after one or two vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM
Time Frame Day 1 to Day 86

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on Safety Set Unsolicited AEs
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 179 179 181 174
SAEs
1
0
0
0
At least possibly related SAEs
0
0
0
0
Medically attended AEs
50
55
46
46
At least possibly related medically attended AEs
0
3
1
1
AEs resulting in premature withdrawal
0
0
0
1
Deaths
0
0
0
0
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Subjects Who Reported Selected AEs After Any Vaccination
Description Safety was assessed as the number subjects who reported Selected AEs from day 1 up to day 422 after one or two vaccination(s) of MenACWY-CRM
Time Frame Day 1 to Day 422

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Analysis was done on safety set
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac)
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination
Measure Participants 179 179 181 174
Medically attended AEs
103
101
95
97
At least possibly related medically attended AEs
1
4
1
2
AEs resulting in premature withdrawal
0
0
0
1
SAEs
2
1
1
1
Deaths
0
0
0
0

Adverse Events

Time Frame Throughout study period
Adverse Event Reporting Description Serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from day 1 to study termination/early termination.
Arm/Group Title 2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac) Total
Arm/Group Description Subjects 2-5 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 2-5 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Subjects 6-10 years of age received two MenACWY-CRM vaccinations Subjects 6-10 years of age received one MenACWY-CRM vaccination Total Population
All Cause Mortality
2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac) Total
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac) Total
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 2/179 (1.1%) 1/179 (0.6%) 1/181 (0.6%) 1/174 (0.6%) 5/713 (0.7%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
IMMUNE THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA 0/179 (0%) 1/179 (0.6%) 0/181 (0%) 0/174 (0%) 1/713 (0.1%)
Infections and infestations
OTITIS MEDIA 1/179 (0.6%) 0/179 (0%) 0/181 (0%) 0/174 (0%) 1/713 (0.1%)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DEHYDRATION 1/179 (0.6%) 0/179 (0%) 0/181 (0%) 0/174 (0%) 1/713 (0.1%)
Nervous system disorders
PETIT MAL EPILEPSY 1/179 (0.6%) 0/179 (0%) 0/181 (0%) 0/174 (0%) 1/713 (0.1%)
Psychiatric disorders
INTERMITTENT EXPLOSIVE DISORDER 0/179 (0%) 0/179 (0%) 0/181 (0%) 1/174 (0.6%) 1/713 (0.1%)
OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANT DISORDER 0/179 (0%) 0/179 (0%) 0/181 (0%) 1/174 (0.6%) 1/713 (0.1%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ASTHMA 0/179 (0%) 0/179 (0%) 1/181 (0.6%) 0/174 (0%) 1/713 (0.1%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
DERMATITIS ALLERGIC 1/179 (0.6%) 0/179 (0%) 0/181 (0%) 0/174 (0%) 1/713 (0.1%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
2 Through 5 Years (2 Vac) 2 Through 5 Years (1 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (2 Vac) 6 Through 10 Years (1 Vac) Total
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 148/179 (82.7%) 142/179 (79.3%) 153/181 (84.5%) 133/174 (76.4%) 576/713 (80.8%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER 4/179 (2.2%) 6/179 (3.4%) 5/181 (2.8%) 9/174 (5.2%) 24/713 (3.4%)
DIARRHOEA 8/179 (4.5%) 10/179 (5.6%) 5/181 (2.8%) 5/174 (2.9%) 28/713 (3.9%)
NAUSEA 0/179 (0%) 0/179 (0%) 29/181 (16%) 23/174 (13.2%) 52/713 (7.3%)
VOMITING 19/179 (10.6%) 19/179 (10.6%) 15/181 (8.3%) 11/174 (6.3%) 64/713 (9%)
General disorders
FATIGUE 1/179 (0.6%) 1/179 (0.6%) 47/181 (26%) 32/174 (18.4%) 81/713 (11.4%)
INJECTION SITE ERYTHEMA 71/179 (39.7%) 48/179 (26.8%) 64/181 (35.4%) 49/174 (28.2%) 232/713 (32.5%)
INJECTION SITE INDURATION 54/179 (30.2%) 39/179 (21.8%) 60/181 (33.1%) 40/174 (23%) 193/713 (27.1%)
INJECTION SITE PAIN 93/179 (52%) 91/179 (50.8%) 120/181 (66.3%) 88/174 (50.6%) 392/713 (55%)
PYREXIA 29/179 (16.2%) 34/179 (19%) 26/181 (14.4%) 26/174 (14.9%) 115/713 (16.1%)
Infections and infestations
CONJUNCTIVITIS 7/179 (3.9%) 11/179 (6.1%) 1/181 (0.6%) 3/174 (1.7%) 22/713 (3.1%)
EAR INFECTION 15/179 (8.4%) 6/179 (3.4%) 5/181 (2.8%) 3/174 (1.7%) 29/713 (4.1%)
NASOPHARYNGITIS 2/179 (1.1%) 11/179 (6.1%) 4/181 (2.2%) 4/174 (2.3%) 21/713 (2.9%)
OTITIS MEDIA 19/179 (10.6%) 24/179 (13.4%) 7/181 (3.9%) 8/174 (4.6%) 58/713 (8.1%)
PHARYNGITIS 16/179 (8.9%) 16/179 (8.9%) 18/181 (9.9%) 6/174 (3.4%) 56/713 (7.9%)
PHARYNGITIS STREPTOCOCCAL 12/179 (6.7%) 18/179 (10.1%) 17/181 (9.4%) 14/174 (8%) 61/713 (8.6%)
SINUSITIS 8/179 (4.5%) 12/179 (6.7%) 6/181 (3.3%) 8/174 (4.6%) 34/713 (4.8%)
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION 22/179 (12.3%) 21/179 (11.7%) 13/181 (7.2%) 16/174 (9.2%) 72/713 (10.1%)
VIRAL INFECTION 9/179 (5%) 13/179 (7.3%) 7/181 (3.9%) 4/174 (2.3%) 33/713 (4.6%)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DECREASED APPETITE 1/179 (0.6%) 1/179 (0.6%) 27/181 (14.9%) 16/174 (9.2%) 45/713 (6.3%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA 0/179 (0%) 0/179 (0%) 22/181 (12.2%) 13/174 (7.5%) 35/713 (4.9%)
MYALGIA 0/179 (0%) 0/179 (0%) 66/181 (36.5%) 48/174 (27.6%) 114/713 (16%)
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE 6/179 (3.4%) 8/179 (4.5%) 62/181 (34.3%) 38/174 (21.8%) 114/713 (16%)
SOMNOLENCE 54/179 (30.2%) 48/179 (26.8%) 0/181 (0%) 1/174 (0.6%) 103/713 (14.4%)
Psychiatric disorders
EATING DISORDER 26/179 (14.5%) 30/179 (16.8%) 0/181 (0%) 0/174 (0%) 56/713 (7.9%)
IRRITABILITY 55/179 (30.7%) 51/179 (28.5%) 1/181 (0.6%) 1/174 (0.6%) 108/713 (15.1%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH 22/179 (12.3%) 17/179 (9.5%) 12/181 (6.6%) 15/174 (8.6%) 66/713 (9.3%)
RHINITIS ALLERGIC 2/179 (1.1%) 10/179 (5.6%) 3/181 (1.7%) 1/174 (0.6%) 16/713 (2.2%)
RHINORRHOEA 14/179 (7.8%) 9/179 (5%) 3/181 (1.7%) 5/174 (2.9%) 31/713 (4.3%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title GSK Response Center
Organization GlaxoSmithKline
Phone 877-379-3718
Email GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com
Responsible Party:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01682876
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 205238
  • V59_57
  • 2011-004421-27
First Posted:
Sep 11, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Jun 14, 2019
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2019