Minerva Pivotal Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System Compared to Hysteroscopic Rollerball Ablation

Sponsor
Minerva Surgical, Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01569763
Collaborator
(none)
153
13
2
72
11.8
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System as compared to hysteroscopic rollerball endometrial ablation in reducing menstrual blood loss at 12 months post-treatment.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Aurora Endometrial Ablation
  • Device: Rollerball Ablation/Resection
N/A

Detailed Description

Menorrhagia is defined as menstrual bleeding in the ovulatory woman exceeding 80 ml per month. Approximately 20-25% of healthy premenopausal women have abnormal uterine bleeding. Menorrhagia can have a negative impact on a woman's lifestyle and self-perception, often leading her to seek definitive treatment. Pharmacologic treatment for menorrhagia is not always successful, and dilatation and curettage typically provides relief for only a few menstrual cycles. Traditionally hysterectomy has been the definitive treatment for menorrhagia. This clinical study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System to provide a therapeutic treatment for menorrhagia due to benign causes by ablating the endometrial lining of the uterus in pre-menopausal women for whom childbearing is complete. Subjects who are randomized to the control group will receive hysteroscopic rollerball/resection ablation. Subjects randomized to the test arm will be treated with the Aurora Endometrial Ablation System.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
153 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Minerva Pivotal Study
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 2, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation

Device: Rollerball Ablation/Resection
Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation

Experimental: Aurora Endometrial Ablation

Device: Aurora Endometrial Ablation
Endometrial Ablation using the Aurora Endometrial Ablation system

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Reduction of Menstrual Bleeding to Normal or Below Normal at 12 Months [12 months]

    Clinical success was defined as a reduction in menstrual bleeding volume to ≤ 80 ml as measured by the alkaline hematin method (AH). Clinical success was not achieved if: (1) at one year post-treatment menstrual blood loss is greater than 80ml, as measured by AH; (2) an acute failure occurred (e.g., aborted procedure, etc.); or (3) the subject required additional therapy to control menorrhagia.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Procedure Time [< 1 hour]

    Procedure time is defined as the time from device insertion to time of device removal.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
25 Years to 50 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Refractory menorrhagia with no definable organic cause

  • Female subject from (and including) age 25 to 50 years

  • Uterine sound measurement of no greater than10.0cm (external os to internal fundus) and a minimum uterine cavity length of 4.0cm

  • A minimum menstrual blood loss of ≥ 160 ml for two baseline cycles within three months prior to treatment as measured by alkaline hematin extraction; OR,

  • A minimum menstrual blood loss of ≥ 160 ml for one baseline cycle for women who either

  • had at least 3 prior months documented failed medical therapy; or

  • had a contraindication to medical therapy

  • Premenopausal at enrollment as determined by FSH measurement ≤ 40 IU/L

  • Not pregnant and no desire to conceive at any time

  • Subject agrees to use a reliable form of contraception up to the 12-month follow-up visit. If a hormonal birth control method is used for contraception, the subject must have been on said method for ≥ 3 months prior to enrollment and agrees to remain on the same hormonal regimen through the initial 12-month follow-up

  • Able to provide written informed consent using a form that has been approved by the reviewing IRB/EC

  • Subject agrees to follow-up exams and data collection requirements

  • Subject who is literate or demonstrates an understanding on how to collect menstrual blood loss products for the alkaline hematin method of analysis

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Pregnancy or subject with a desire to conceive

  • Endometrial hyperplasia as confirmed by histology

  • Presence of active endometritis

  • Active pelvic inflammatory disease

  • Active sexually transmitted disease (STD)

  • Presence of bacteremia, sepsis, or other active systemic infection

  • Active infection of the genitals, vagina, cervix, uterus or urinary tract at the time of the procedure

  • Known/suspected abdominal pelvic or gynecological malignancy within the past 5 years

  • Known clotting defects or bleeding disorders

  • Untreated/unevaluated cervical dysplasia, except CIN I

  • Prior uterine surgery (except low segment cesarean section) that interrupts the integrity of the uterine wall (e.g., transmural myomectomy or classical cesarean section)

  • Previous endometrial ablation procedure

  • Presence of an implantable (intrauterine) contraceptive device (e.g. Essure™ or Adiana™)

  • Currently on medications that could thin the myometrial muscle, such as long-term steroid use (except inhaler or nasal therapy for asthma)

  • Currently on anticoagulants

  • Abnormal or obstructed cavity as confirmed by hysteroscopy, SIS or vaginal ultrasound

  • Presence of an intrauterine device (IUD) which the Subject is unwilling to have removed at the time of the operative visit

  • Subject currently on hormonal birth control therapy (including the Mirena device) for <3 months prior to enrollment

  • Subject who is unwilling to use birth control post-ablation whether non-hormonal birth control or the same hormonal birth control therapy as before the procedure

  • Subject who is within 6-weeks post partum

  • Any subject who is currently participating or considers future participation in a research study of an investigational drug or device during the course of this investigational study

  • Any general health condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could represent an increased risk for the subject

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 New Horizons Women's Care Chandler Arizona United States 85224
2 Women's Health Research Phoenix Arizona United States 85015
3 Basinski, LLC Newburgh Indiana United States 47630
4 Cypress Medical Research Center, LLC Wichita Kansas United States 67226
5 Minnesota Gynecology and Surgery Edina Minnesota United States 55435
6 Mercy Clinic Minimally Invasive Gynecology Saint Louis Missouri United States 63141
7 Tennessee Women's Care PC Nashville Tennessee United States 37203
8 Baylor Research Institute Fort Worth Texas United States 76104
9 McMaster University/Hamilton Health Sciences Hamilton Ontario Canada L8N3Z5
10 Hôpital LaSalle Ville Lassalle Quebec Canada H8P 1C1
11 Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region Regina Saskatchewan Canada S4S 6X3
12 La Cite Medicale Quebec Canada G1W 2J5
13 Hospital Universitario, UANL Monterrey Nuevo Leon Mexico 64460

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Minerva Surgical, Inc.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eugene Skalnyi, MD, Minerva Surgical, Inc.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Minerva Surgical, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01569763
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CIP0005
First Posted:
Apr 3, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Apr 18, 2018
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2018
Keywords provided by Minerva Surgical, Inc.
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Subjects were enrolled in the clinical trial at 13 Investigational Sites in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico between March 2012 until November 2013.
Pre-assignment Detail A total of 153 subjects were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to the Minerva (Aurora) Test Group (n=102) or the Rollerball Control Group (n=51). As part of the randomization process, subjects were stratified by age, though there was no attempt to enroll an equal number into the < 40 and > 40 age groups. All 153 subjects were successfully treated.
Arm/Group Title Aurora Endometrial Ablation Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation
Arm/Group Description Aurora Endometrial Ablation: Endometrial Ablation using the Aurora Endometrial Ablation system Rollerball Ablation/Resection: Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 102 51
Treated 102 51
COMPLETED 99 44
NOT COMPLETED 3 7

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Aurora Endometrial Ablation Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation Total
Arm/Group Description Aurora Endometrial Ablation: Endometrial Ablation using the Minerva Endometrial Ablation system Rollerball Ablation/Resection: Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 102 51 153
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
42.6
(4.2)
42.5
(4.7)
42.5
(4.4)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
102
100%
51
100%
153
100%
Male
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
Canada
54
52.9%
26
51%
80
52.3%
United States
20
19.6%
12
23.5%
32
20.9%
Mexico
28
27.5%
13
25.5%
41
26.8%
Alkaline Hematin Value at Baseline (Menstrual Blood Loss (ml)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Menstrual Blood Loss (ml)]
310.2
(169.0)
301.8
(176.1)
307.4
(170.9)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Reduction of Menstrual Bleeding to Normal or Below Normal at 12 Months
Description Clinical success was defined as a reduction in menstrual bleeding volume to ≤ 80 ml as measured by the alkaline hematin method (AH). Clinical success was not achieved if: (1) at one year post-treatment menstrual blood loss is greater than 80ml, as measured by AH; (2) an acute failure occurred (e.g., aborted procedure, etc.); or (3) the subject required additional therapy to control menorrhagia.
Time Frame 12 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All Randomized subjects in whom treatment was attempted
Arm/Group Title Aurora Endometrial Ablation Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation
Arm/Group Description Aurora Endometrial Ablation: Endometrial Ablation using the Aurora Endometrial Ablation system Rollerball Ablation/Resection: Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation
Measure Participants 102 51
Number [participants]
95
93.1%
41
80.4%
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Procedure Time
Description Procedure time is defined as the time from device insertion to time of device removal.
Time Frame < 1 hour

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Subjects completing treatment
Arm/Group Title Aurora Endometrial Ablation Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation
Arm/Group Description Aurora Endometrial Ablation: Endometrial Ablation using the Aurora Endometrial Ablation system Rollerball Ablation/Resection: Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation
Measure Participants 102 51
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Minutes]
3.1
(0.5)
17.2
(6.7)
3. Post-Hoc Outcome
Title Subjects With Amenorrhea at 12 Months
Description Amenorrhea at 12 Months- Number of Subjects experiencing no menstrual bleeding
Time Frame 12 Months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Randomized subjects
Arm/Group Title Aurora Endometrial Ablation Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation
Arm/Group Description Aurora Endometrial Ablation: Endometrial Ablation using the Aurora Endometrial Ablation system Rollerball Ablation/Resection: Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation
Measure Participants 102 51
Number [participants]
73
71.6%
25
49%

Adverse Events

Time Frame 1 year
Adverse Event Reporting Description All Serious Adverse Events observed during the clinical study, regardless of relationship to the study device or procedure are reported below. All non-Serious Adverse Events considered possibly, probably or highly probably related to the device or procedure are reported below.
Arm/Group Title Aurora Endometrial Ablation Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation
Arm/Group Description Aurora Endometrial Ablation: Endometrial Ablation using the Aurora Endometrial Ablation system Rollerball Ablation/Resection: Hysteroscopic rollerball resection/ablation
All Cause Mortality
Aurora Endometrial Ablation Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Aurora Endometrial Ablation Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 5/102 (4.9%) 3/51 (5.9%)
Endocrine disorders
Thyroid Nodule 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Myeloma 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Bleeding 0/102 (0%) 0 1/51 (2%) 1
Endometritis 0/102 (0%) 0 1/51 (2%) 1
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Continued Heavy Menstrual Bleeding 0/102 (0%) 0 1/51 (2%) 1
Surgical and medical procedures
Anesthesia Related 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Aurora Endometrial Ablation Hysteroscopic Rollerball Resection/Ablation
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 14/102 (13.7%) 10/51 (19.6%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea and/or Vomiting 0/102 (0%) 0 1/51 (2%) 1
Abdominal Pain and/or Bloating 3/102 (2.9%) 3 2/51 (3.9%) 2
Constipation 0/102 (0%) 0 1/51 (2%) 1
General disorders
Weaknes, Fatigue, Sleepiness, Lack of concentration, Dizziness 2/102 (2%) 2 1/51 (2%) 1
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Backache 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Bleeding or spotting 0/102 (0%) 0 1/51 (2%) 1
Pelvic Pain 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Vaginal discharge, unpleasant smell, burning, abnormal sensation 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Endometritis or Endomyometritis 1/102 (1%) 1 2/51 (3.9%) 2
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Hematometra 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0
Dysmenorrhea 0/102 (0%) 0 1/51 (2%) 1
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Rash and/or Itching or Burning Sensation 2/102 (2%) 2 1/51 (2%) 1
Surgical and medical procedures
Fever 1/102 (1%) 1 0/51 (0%) 0

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

Investigator has the right to publish their research for non-profit and academic purposes, provided the 1st publication of results shall be in conjunction with results from all centers in this Study. If Investigator desires to publish/present data obtained by Investigator, following completion of the Study at all sites, Investigator may do so, provided a copy of proposed publication/presentation is received by Company for review/comment at least 15 days in advance of submission for publication.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Dr. Eugene Skalnyi, VP Medical Affairs
Organization Minerva Surgical, Inc.
Phone (1) 650-284-3500
Email Eugenes@minervasurgical.com
Responsible Party:
Minerva Surgical, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01569763
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CIP0005
First Posted:
Apr 3, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Apr 18, 2018
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2018