Registry Study of Genesys HTA for Treatment of Menorrhagia

Sponsor
Minerva Surgical, Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01197547
Collaborator
(none)
1,014
19
1
21
53.4
2.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a clinical registry of an FDA approved device system called the Genesys Hydro ThermAblatorTM (HTA) system (Boston Scientific). The HTA system's intended use is to be inserted, by a trained physician, into the uterus, where it will fill and circulate fluid that is warm enough to change the characteristics of the uterine lining. This is done with the anticipated result of improving menstrual bleeding symptoms.

The purpose of this FDA-mandated registry is to obtain clinical experience on the use the Genesys HTA™ system, under normal clinical conditions, and document its safety and technical reliability.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Genesys HTA
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1014 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Genesys HTA Post Approval Registry A Multi-center, Single-arm, Prospective Registry of the Genesys HTA System for the Treatment of Menorrhagia
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Genesys HTA

Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation

Device: Genesys HTA
Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation
Other Names:
  • Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Burn Rate [Day 1]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Technical Malfunctions [Day 1]

      A secondary endpoint of the Genesys HTA Post Approval Study is to assess technical complaints (i.e. disposable and hardware issues). Technical complaints are issues related to system components encountered during the procedure such as error messages, problems with the connection, power, early incomplete procedure terminations, or display/user interface, or damage to the unit.

    2. Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) [Day 1]

      A secondary endpoint of the Genesys HTA Post Approval Study is to assess Serious Adverse Device Effects. Per the approved protocol, an SADE is an adverse device effect resulting in any of the consequences characteristic of a serious adverse event, or that might have led to any of these consequences if suitable action had not been taken or intervention had not been made, or if circumstances had been less opportune.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Subject must meet the approved indication for use to be considered for this registry.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • All subjects contraindicated for the treatment of the Genesys HTA System per the
    Directions for Use will be excluded:
    1. The subject is pregnant or wants to be pregnant in the future

    2. The subject has known or suspected endometrial carcinoma or premalignant change of the endometrium, such as adenomatous hyperplasia

    3. The subject has active pelvic inflammatory disease or pyosalpinx

    4. The subject has hydrosalpinx

    5. The subject in whom a tight cervical seal cannot be established and maintained around the procedure sheath

    6. The subject has an anatomical condition (e.g. history of previous classical cesarean section or transmural myomectomy) or pathologic condition (e.g. long term medical therapy) that could lead to weakening of the myometrium

    7. The subject has an intrauterine device in place

    8. The subject has an active genital or urinary tract infection (e.g. cervicitis, endometritis, vaginitis, cystitis, etc.) at the time of treatment

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Sharp Mary Birch San Diego California United States 92123
    2 Christiana Hospital Newark Delaware United States 19718
    3 Shelnutt Obstetrics and Gynecology Athens Georgia United States 30606
    4 Health South Surgecenter of Louisville Louisville Kentucky United States 40207
    5 Wayne State University Physician Group Southfield Michigan United States 48034
    6 Seven Hills OB GYN Associates Cincinnati Ohio United States 45201
    7 Complete Healthcare for Women Columbus Ohio United States 43213
    8 Associates in Women's Healthcare Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19115
    9 Schuykill Medical Center South Pottsville Pennsylvania United States 17901
    10 Chattanooga Medical Research Chattanooga Tennessee United States 37404
    11 State of Franklin Healthcare Associates Johnson City Tennessee United States 37604
    12 Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology Bedford Texas United States 76021
    13 Central Womens Care PA Dallas Texas United States 75231
    14 Doreen Moser, DO Grapevine Texas United States 76051
    15 MacArthur OBGYN Irving Texas United States 75062
    16 Personalized Women's Healthcare Plano Texas United States 75093
    17 Ogden Clinic Ogden Utah United States 84403
    18 Old Farm Obstetrics and Gynecology Salt Lake City Utah United States 84107
    19 Milwaukee ObGyn Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53221

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Minerva Surgical, Inc.

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Thomas Bowman, M.D., Boston Scientific Corporation

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Minerva Surgical, Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01197547
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • U8088
    First Posted:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 26, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2017
    Keywords provided by Minerva Surgical, Inc.
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Genesys HTA
    Arm/Group Description Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 1014
    COMPLETED 992
    NOT COMPLETED 22

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Genesys HTA
    Arm/Group Description Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation Genesys HTA: Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation
    Overall Participants 1014
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    1013
    99.9%
    >=65 years
    1
    0.1%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    41
    (6.8)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    1014
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    1014
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Burn Rate
    Description
    Time Frame Day 1

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Genesys HTA
    Arm/Group Description Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation
    Measure Participants 992
    Number [participants]
    4
    0.4%
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Technical Malfunctions
    Description A secondary endpoint of the Genesys HTA Post Approval Study is to assess technical complaints (i.e. disposable and hardware issues). Technical complaints are issues related to system components encountered during the procedure such as error messages, problems with the connection, power, early incomplete procedure terminations, or display/user interface, or damage to the unit.
    Time Frame Day 1

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    992 patients = ITT population
    Arm/Group Title Genesys HTA
    Arm/Group Description Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation
    Measure Participants 992
    complaint - procedure stopped to prevent injury
    .6
    0.1%
    Subjects with At Least One Technical Complaint
    4.4
    0.4%
    Subjects with One Technical Complaint
    3.5
    0.3%
    Subjects with Two Technical Complaints
    .9
    0.1%
    Subjects with Three Technical Complaints
    0.0
    0%
    Subjects with More Than Three Technical Complaints
    0.0
    0%
    Subjects with 1+ Component with Tech Comp
    4.4
    0.4%
    Subjects with One Component with Technical Complai
    4.2
    0.4%
    Subjects with Two Component with Technical Complai
    .2
    0%
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)
    Description A secondary endpoint of the Genesys HTA Post Approval Study is to assess Serious Adverse Device Effects. Per the approved protocol, an SADE is an adverse device effect resulting in any of the consequences characteristic of a serious adverse event, or that might have led to any of these consequences if suitable action had not been taken or intervention had not been made, or if circumstances had been less opportune.
    Time Frame Day 1

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    992 - Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population
    Arm/Group Title Genesys HTA
    Arm/Group Description Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation
    Measure Participants 992
    Subjects with at least one Serious adverse event
    1
    0.1%
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    1
    0.1%
    Thermal burn
    1
    0.1%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Genesys HTA
    Arm/Group Description Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation
    All Cause Mortality
    Genesys HTA
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Genesys HTA
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 1/992 (0.1%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Burn 1/992 (0.1%) 1
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Genesys HTA
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 3/992 (0.3%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Clinically Non-Significant Burn 3/992 (0.3%) 3

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Meaghan Wilk
    Organization Boston Scientific
    Phone 5086834113
    Email wilkm@bsci.com
    Responsible Party:
    Minerva Surgical, Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01197547
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • U8088
    First Posted:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 26, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2017