PanDirect: Self-care Tools and Telephone Coaching for Depression and Anxiety During Pandemics

Sponsor
St. Mary's Research Center, Canada (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04609371
Collaborator
(none)
90
1
2
6.3
14.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

During pandemics older adults with chronic physical conditions are a particularly vulnerable population for unmet mental health needs. This is a consequence of a number of factors which include decreased access to their doctors because of restrictions in visits in order to decrease risk of disease transmission and because doctors are seconded to provide medical services in areas of high priority. Since Public Health authorities worry that pandemics may be a reality of the future, this study is being operationalized during the present COVID-19 pandemic in order to see what can be learned about different ways to provide mental health care under such constraints.

The study offers evidence-based approaches to managing feelings of anxiety or depression that may have existed prior to the onset of a pandemic, or that have arisen during a pandemic. It uses principles of cognitive behavioural therapy in which participants are offered self-care tools to help them develop strategies for dealing with their various symptoms. These tools have already been shown by the team to be effective in other contexts in studies DIRECT-sc (Effectiveness of a supported self-care intervention for depression compared to an unsupported intervention in older adults with chronic physical illnesses) and CanDIRECT (Effectiveness of a telephone-supported depression self-care intervention for cancer survivors).

The present study, PanDIRECT (Assisting Family Physicians with Gaps in Mental Health Care

Generated by the COVID-19 Pandemic), aims to answer the following questions:
  1. Can these tools be used in the community care of mental health problems during pandemics?

  2. Are they acceptable to patients?

  3. Using a randomized control trial, does lay-coaching of use of these tools improve their use and patient outcomes?

  4. Do family practitioners value patient information sent to them at the end of the trial

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: self-care tools
  • Behavioral: lay telephone coaching
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
90 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Assisting Family Physicians With Gaps in Mental Health Care Generated by the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 21, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: self-care tools

Arms Assigned Interventions Experimental: self-care tools The tools are adapted from those successfully deployed in the DIRECTsc depression self-care project focusing on patients with depressive symptoms, but abbreviated to meet the needs of the proposed short-term intervention for a broader sample of patients to include those with anxiety symptoms and with minimal symptoms. Tools will include individual chapters of the Antidepressant Skills Workbook; the mood monitoring tool; a workbook on managing worry; relaxation audio files and information on exercise and healthy eating. In view of the short duration of the intervention (8 weeks), a maximum of 2 tools will be sent to each participant. An algorithm will determine which self-care tools, matched to the specific mental health symptoms reported by participants, will be sent to the participants.

Behavioral: self-care tools
self-care tools only

Experimental: coaching

Participants will receive the algorithm-determined self-care tools, matched to the specific mental health symptoms reported by participants as in the first arm. They will ALSO be offered up to 3 coach calls. Coaching by a trained lay coach will be structured and guided by a manual. Trained lay coaches will call participants in the week following delivery of the toolkit to guide them through the self-care toolkit over an 8-week period. Coaches will contact participants a maximum of 3 times, with calls expected to average 15-20 minutes. Call content will be guided by a structured coaching manual adapted from those used in the team's previous two RCTs of the self-care materials. The coaches will follow structured agendas, keep records of all contacts.

Behavioral: self-care tools
self-care tools only

Behavioral: lay telephone coaching
coaching

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Consent rate [At recruitment]

    Number of consenting participants out of total number contacted over the recruitment period

  2. Data completion rate [From recruitment launch to completion of follow-up (4 months)]

    Investigators will report on rates of missing data from baseline and follow-up questionnaires

  3. Fidelity of intervention completion [A 8 week follow-up]

    Logs and checklists will be used to evaluate completion of intervention, as per protocol

  4. Severity of depression symptoms [At baseline]

    Using the validated 9 item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Scores range from 0 to 27 - higher score indicates more severe depression

  5. Severity of depression symptoms [At 8 week follow-up]

    Using the validated 9 item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Scores range from 0 to 27 - higher score indicates more severe depression

  6. Severity of anxiety symptoms [At baseline]

    Using the validated 7 item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument. Scores range from 0 to 21 - higher score indicates more severe anxiety

  7. Severity of anxiety symptoms [At 8 week follow-up]

    Using the validated 7 item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument. Scores range from 0 to 21 - higher score indicates more severe anxiety

  8. Use of health care services [At baseline]

    Using questions developed by the team and administrative databases to assess use of hospital and mental health care services

  9. Use of health care services [At 8 week follow-up]

    Using questions developed by the team and administrative databases to assess use of hospital and mental health care services

  10. Use of the self-care materials [At 8 week follow-up]

    Using adherence questions developed by the team, not scored

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • 65+ years old

  • consented to be recontacted (participant in a previous study)

Exclusion criteria:
  • moderate to severe cognitive impairment (using BOMC a brief cognitive screen) -unable to read in English or French (self-reported); hearing impairment (as judged by research staff);

  • currently receiving counseling or psychological therapy (as these treatments may conflict with the self-care interventions)

  • currently living in a long term care or other medicalized facility,

  • presenting suicidal intent (as identified through the final item of the PHQ-9 which will be asked at screening).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 St Mary's Hospital Research Centre Montréal Canada

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • St. Mary's Research Center, Canada

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Mark Yaffe, Professor, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University and Family physician, St. Mary's Hospital Center, St. Mary's Research Center, Canada
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04609371
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SMHC-20-10
First Posted:
Oct 30, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Sep 21, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 21, 2021