Comparison of Image Quality Between "Double Low Dose" Liver CT and Standard Liver CT
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
In patients with malignancies, contrast-enhanced abdominal CT (hereafter abdominal CT) plays an important role in detecting carcinoma recurrence and assessing treatment response. In this study, we aim to investigate whether such a "double low" dose CT is feasible in patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer using a vendor-agnostic artificial intelligence-based noise reduction and contrast enhancement software.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Standard dose CT Standard dose protocol CT using standard radiation dose (120 kVp) and standard dose of contrast media, and reconstructed with commercially available reconstruction algorithm of the CT scanner. |
Diagnostic Test: Standard dose CT
CT with standard radiation dose and contrast media dose
|
Experimental: Double low dose CT Double low dose protocol CT using low radiation dose (80-120 kVp using automatic kV control program) and low dose of contrast media, and reconstructed with commercially available vendor-agonistic AI-based software. |
Diagnostic Test: Double low dose CT
Simultaneous reduction of both radiation dose and contrast media dose
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- lesion conspicuity on portal venous phase [6 months after primary study completion.]
qualitative analysis of lesion conspicuity on portal venous phase on five-point scale (higher score indicates better conspicuity). Lesion conspicuity is compared between the two arms.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- lesion conspicuity on arterial phase [6 months after primary study completion.]
qualitative analysis of lesion conspicuity on arterial phase on five-point scale (higher score indicates better conspicuity) Lesion conspicuity is compared between the two arms.
- lesion detectability [12 months after primary study completion.]
lesion detectability is compared between the two arms, compared with reference standard. Figure-of-merit was obtained.
- Radiation dose [1 month after primary study completion]
Dose-length product (mGy*cm) is compared between the two arms.
- Contrast media (CM) dose [1 month after primary study completion]
The amount of CM dose is compared between the two arms.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
colorectal cancer (CRC) patients
-
on surveillance or monitoring for liver metastasis (of CRC)
-
body mass index < 30
Exclusion Criteria:
-
any relative or absolute contra-indication of CECT
-
body mass index = 30 or more
-
diffuse infiltrative type of liver metastasis or on monitoring for too many liver lesions
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Bayer
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeong Min Lee, MD, Seoul National University Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- SNUH-2022-3274