ESO-SPARE: Esophagus Sparring Radiotherapy for Thoracic and Cervical Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression.

Sponsor
Herlev Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05109819
Collaborator
Rigshospitalet, Denmark (Other), Danish Cancer Society (Other), University of Copenhagen (Other)
200
2
2
25.4
100
3.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is a serious complication to metastatic cancer and when diagnosed life expectancy is short. Treatment is palliative radiotherapy (RT). Early esophageal toxicity is underreported but can seriously impact quality of life (QoL).

The aim of the ESO-SPARE trial is to investigate if esophagus sparing RT can decrease patient reported esophageal toxicity without compromising ambulatory function or increase other toxicities.

200 patients with MSCC in the thoracic or cervical spine referred for RT will be randomized to either standard or esophagus/pharynx sparing RT. Subsequently participants will be followed with PROM (Patient Reported Outcome Measures) for 9 weeks. PROM-CTCAE questionnaires on upper GI toxicity and pain will be collected daily for 5 weeks and weekly for 4 weeks. Questionnaires evaluating QoL and physical function will be collected weekly for 9 weeks.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: Esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
200 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients with metastatic spinal cord compression in the cervical and/or thoracic spine are randomized into two groups. Group A receives standard radiotherapy, group B receives esophagus sparing therapy.Patients with metastatic spinal cord compression in the cervical and/or thoracic spine are randomized into two groups. Group A receives standard radiotherapy, group B receives esophagus sparing therapy.
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
The outcome of randomization is not reviled to the patient.
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
ESO-SPARE: Esophagus Sparring Radiotherapy for Thoracic and Cervical Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. A Randomized Phase III Trial.
Actual Study Start Date :
May 20, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Arm A: standard radiotherapy treatment

Patients in arm A will receive standard radiotherapy treatment for metastatic spinal cord compression.

Experimental: Arm B: esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment

Patients in arm B will receive esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment.

Radiation: Esophagus sparring radiotherapy treatment
A radiotherapy plan for metastatic spinal cord compression is conducted with specific constrains sparring the esophagus.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Early patient reported gastro-oesophageal toxicity [Measured within the first 5 weeks after treatment start]

    Measured as a peak score using CTCAE Patient Reported Outcome Measures

  2. Ambulatory function [Measured 9 weeks after treatment start]

    Preserved ability to walk will be evaluated using the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) mobility dimension. The EQ-5D includes one question for each of the five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (Level 5).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Duration of gastro-oesophageal toxicity [Assessed 9 weeks after treatment start]

    Measured as the time from an increase in gastro-oesophageal symptom score to a return to baseline

  2. Reirradiation rate - Overall survival (OS) [Assessed 6 months after inclusion of the last patient.]

    Defined as fraction of patients getting reirradiation, where the same spine levels are included in the irradiated volume

  3. Patient reported physical function [Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks]

    Patient reported physical function will be assessed using answers from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Questions regarding physical function are measured on a four-point scale (1= not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much). All EORTC QLQ-C30 answers will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.

  4. Health related Quality of life (QoL) [Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks]

    Health related quality of life measured with EQ-5D-5L European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D includes one question for each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight; moderate; severe; and extreme problems (Level 5). Health state scores are defined by combining one level from each dimension, ranging from 11111 (full health) to 55555 (worst health). A visual analogue scale indicating the respondent's own assessment of their health status from 0-100 is also included (100 = the best health you can imagine and 0 = the worst health you can imagine).

  5. Health related Quality of life (QoL) [Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks]

    Health related quality of life assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire - Cancer (QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions assessing quality of life issues using a four-point scale (1= not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much) except from the last two questions which are measured between 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent). The EORTC QLQ-C30 will be scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.

  6. Weight [Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks]

    Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks

  7. Analgesic consumption [Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks]

    Assessed Weekly over a period of 9 weeks

  8. Pain (MSCC site) [Assessed daily for 5 weeks and subsequently weekly for 4 weeks.]

    Evaluated by "Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)" The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

  9. Pain assessment (MTS site) [Best response during 9 weeks of follow-up]

    Assessment will be performed using International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints (ICPRE). A complete pain response is defined as a pain score of 0 out of 10 at the treated site with no concomitant increase in analgesic intake A partial pain response is defined as a pain reduction of 2 or more at the treated site without analgesic increase, or an analgesic reduction of 25% with no increase in pain score or 1 point above baseline. Pain progression is defined as an increase in pain score of 2 or more above baseline with stable analgesic intake or an analgesic increase of 25% with stable pain score. An indeterminate response is any response not captured in the above definitions. Analysis of pain reduction will only include patients with NPRS ≥ 1 registered at baseline. We intend to report the best response during follow-up.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Histology or cytology proven cancer

  • Referred for palliative radiotherapy of the cervical or thoracic vertebra for

  • epidural ingrowth

  • metastatic spinal cord compression

  • metastatic spinal nerve root compression

  • post-operative radiotherapy after decompressive surgery for spinal cord or nerve root compression

  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

  • Referred for the following dose prescriptions 5 Gy x 5, 5 Gy x 4, 3 Gy x 10, 10 Gy x 1, 8 Gy x 1.

  • ≥ 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Referred for > 10 fractions

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark 2100
2 Herlev Hospatal Herlev Denmark 2730

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Herlev Hospital
  • Rigshospitalet, Denmark
  • Danish Cancer Society
  • University of Copenhagen

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Anna Mann Nielsen, Principal Investigator, MD, Herlev Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05109819
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AA 2112 ESO-SPARE
  • H-20069184
First Posted:
Nov 5, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Nov 15, 2021
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Anna Mann Nielsen, Principal Investigator, MD, Herlev Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 15, 2021