PPDHM: Comparing Impacts of Donor Human Milk to Formula Supplementation on the Gut Microbiome of Full-term Infants

Sponsor
University of Calgary (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05815433
Collaborator
University of British Columbia (Other), University of Victoria (Other), NorthernStar Mothers Milk Bank (Other)
60
2
19

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to examine donor human milk (DHM) as a clinical intervention targeted at achieving beneficial microbiome signatures in full-term infants who are exposed to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) therapy during labour. Secondarily, this study aims to compare the infant health outcomes of sleep and growth between groups to assess if these outcomes are mediated by infant feeding type or potential differences in microbial signatures. Finally, this study will compare maternal outcomes of depression, anger, breastfeeding self-efficacy and breastfeeding rates between groups.

The hypothesis of this study is: that replacing formula with DHM supplementation will minimize gut microbiome dysbiosis and foster homeostasis following supplementation. In addition, it is hypothesized that improved homeostasis will promote improved sleep and growth outcomes in participant infants. Finally, mothers whose infants receive DHM will have lower depression and anger scores and high breastfeeding self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding rates compared to mothers whose infants receive formula.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Donor Human Milk - Nutritional Replacement
N/A

Detailed Description

Investigators propose to conduct a pilot clinical RCT in the postpartum hospital setting examining DHM as an intervention provided to full-term infants who are exposed to Group B Streptococcus (GBS) antibiotic prophylaxis during labour. Randomization of participant infants is currently an ethical practice because DHM supplementation is not standard practice in this population; infants receive formula if supplementation of mother's own milk (MOM) is required. Additionally, randomization will allow investigators to determine causal relationships between DHM supplementation compared to formula supplementation on the infant gut microbiome. Finally, conducting research in the clinical setting will allow for pragmatic assessment of DHM as an intervention, enhancing external validity and increasing the likelihood of its implementation into healthcare systems to improve healthcare quality.

Population: The population of interest is vaginally born, full-term infants who are exposed to antibiotics in labour through IAP and whose mothers are planning on breastfeeding.

Recruitment: Mothers greater than 37 weeks' gestation admitted to the postpartum unit who test positive for GBS and deliver vaginally will be screened for participation in the study by nurses on the postpartum unit. Approximately 20% of all pregnant mothers will test positive for GBS and Alberta Health Services protocol indicates that GBS-positive mothers are given intravenous antibiotics during labour. Only mothers who receive the complete Alberta Health Services protocol will qualify for the study. Upon recruitment and completion of informed consent, infants requiring supplementation of MOM will be randomized to the control or intervention group. Investigators will randomize 60 mother-infant dyads, providing adequate power to detect overall microbiome differences (~30 in each group).

Intervention - Donor Human Milk (DHM): Infants randomized to the intervention group will receive DHM each time supplementation is required for the first 7 days of life. The exposure time of 7 days was selected due to feasibility of DHM cost, and this is the period when breastfeeding is being established and most formula supplementation occurs. Infants in the control group will receive formula when supplementation is required (standard care). All DHM in North America is pasteurized and provided through certified milk banks regulated by the Human Milk Banking Association of North America and DHM for this study will be obtained from the NorthernStar Mothers Milk Bank (NMMB).

Data Collection, Analysis, and Outcomes: The primary outcome for this pilot study will result from comparisons of DHM to formula supplementation groups for differences in microbiome signatures, such as diversity, proportions of Bifidobacteria, and proportions of pathogenic organisms. Infant stool samples will be collected from soiled diapers at one, six and 12 weeks postpartum.

Secondary outcomes include infant growth, sleep, and breastfeeding outcomes that will be collected at one, six and 12 weeks postpartum.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
An experimental study design in which each participants will be randomized to one of two groups (intervention [DHM] or standard care/control [formula])An experimental study design in which each participants will be randomized to one of two groups (intervention [DHM] or standard care/control [formula])
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Assessors who are conducting the microbial analysis and statistical analysis will not be aware of which group is intervention and which is control. These groups will be assigned a number (Group 1; Group 2).
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparing Impacts of Donor Human Milk to Formula Supplementation on the Gut Microbiome of Full-term Infants Exposed to Antibiotics in Labour: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Donor Human Milk

Infants randomized to the intervention group will receive DHM each time supplementation is required for the first 7 days of life.

Other: Donor Human Milk - Nutritional Replacement
All DHM in North America is pasteurized and provided through certified milk banks regulated by the Human Milk Banking Association of North America. DHM for this study will be obtained from the NorthernStar Mothers Milk Bank (NMMB). The milk is pasteurized and rigorously tested according to Human Milk Banking of North America guidelines. In Canada, DHM is categorized as food or nutritional therapy and the milk bank is monitored and certified by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The product used for this study will be the same product that is provided to other hospital units (mainly the neonatal intensive care units) in Alberta and around Canada. The product will not be modified or tampered with in any way.

No Intervention: Standard Care (Infant Formula)

Infants randomized to the standard care group will receive formula each time supplementation is required for the first 7 days of life.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Infant gut microbiome - shallow shotgun metagenomics (RA) [one week postpartum]

    Relative abundance

  2. Infant gut microbiome - shallow shotgun metagenomics (RA) [six weeks postpartum]

    Relative abundance

  3. Infant gut microbiome - shallow shotgun metagenomics (RA) [twelve weeks postpartum]

    Relative abundance

  4. Infant gut microbiome - shallow shotgun metagenomics (alpha diversity) [one week postpartum]

    alpha diversity of microbiome

  5. Infant gut microbiome - shallow shotgun metagenomics (alpha diversity) [six weeks postpartum]

    alpha diversity of microbiome

  6. Infant gut microbiome - shallow shotgun metagenomics (alpha diversity) [twelve weeks postpartum]

    alpha diversity of microbiome

  7. Infant gut microbiome - shallow shotgun metagenomics (beta diversity) [one week postpartum]

    beta diversity of microbiome

  8. Infant gut microbiome - shallow shotgun metagenomics (beta diversity) [six weeks postpartum]

    beta diversity of microbiome

  9. Infant gut microbiome - shallow shotgun metagenomics (beta diversity) [twelve weeks postpartum]

    beta diversity of microbiome

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Infant Sleep [Six weeks postpartum]

    Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire - Revised Short Form - Scores on each subscale and the total score are scaled from 0 to 100, with higher scores denoting better sleep quality, more positive perception of infant sleep, and parent behaviors that promote healthy and independent sleep.

  2. Infant Sleep [Twelve weeks postpartum]

    Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire- Scores on each subscale and the total score are scaled from 0 to 100, with higher scores denoting better sleep quality, more positive perception of infant sleep, and parent behaviors that promote healthy and independent sleep.

  3. Infant Growth - weight [one week postpartum]

    Weight - in grams; weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  4. Infant Growth - length [one week postpartum]

    Length - in centimeters; weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  5. Infant Growth - BMI [one week postpartum]

    Body mass index - weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  6. Infant Growth - BMI [six weeks postpartum]

    Body mass index - weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  7. Infant Growth - BMI [twelve weeks postpartum]

    Body mass index - weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  8. Infant Growth - head [one week postpartum]

    Head circumference - in centimeters

  9. Infant Growth - weight [six weeks postpartum]

    Weight- in grams; weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  10. Infant Growth- length [six weeks postpartum]

    Length - in centimeters; weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  11. Infant Growth - head [six weeks postpartum]

    Head circumference - in centimeters

  12. Infant Growth - weight [Twelve weeks postpartum]

    Weight- in grams; weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  13. Infant Growth- length [Twelve weeks postpartum]

    Length - in centimeters; weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

  14. Infant Growth - head [Twelve weeks postpartum]

    Head circumference - in centimeters

  15. Infant feeding [one week postpartum]

    breastfeeding exclusivity - measured by 7-day infant feeding journal. Number of participants whose consume only breastmilk.

  16. Infant feeding [six weeks postpartum]

    breastfeeding exclusivity - measured by 7-day maternal recall. Number of participants whose consume only breastmilk.

  17. Infant feeding [twelve weeks postpartum]

    breastfeeding exclusivity- measured by 7-day maternal recall. Number of participants whose consume only breastmilk.

  18. Maternal Depression [one week postpartum]

    Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Screen - Range in score from 0 to 30; higher scores indicate worse outcomes

  19. Maternal Depression [six weeks postpartum]

    Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Screen - Range in score from 0 to 30; higher scores indicate worse outcomes

  20. Maternal Depression [twelve weeks postpartum]

    Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Screen -- Range in score from 0 to 30; higher scores indicate worse outcomes

  21. Maternal Anger [one week postpartum]

    LEVEL 2-Anger-Adult (PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anger- Short Form): Range in score from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating greater severity of anger.

  22. Maternal Anger [six weeks postpartum]

    LEVEL 2-Anger-Adult (PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anger- Short Form): Range in score from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating greater severity of anger.

  23. Maternal Anger [twelve weeks postpartum]

    LEVEL 2-Anger-Adult (PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anger- Short Form): Range in score from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating greater severity of anger.

  24. Maternal Breastfeeding Self-efficacy [one week postpartum]

    Breastfeeding self-efficacy scale - short form: Total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores reflecting more significant levels of breastfeeding self-efficacy.

  25. Maternal Breastfeeding Self-efficacy [six weeks postpartum]

    Breastfeeding self-efficacy scale - short form: Total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores reflecting more significant levels of breastfeeding self-efficacy.

  26. Maternal Breastfeeding Self-efficacy [twelve weeks postpartum]

    Breastfeeding self-efficacy scale - short form: Total scores range from 14 to 70, with higher scores reflecting more significant levels of breastfeeding self-efficacy.

  27. Maternal Anxiety [Baseline - (birth/enrolment)]

    State - trait Anxiety inventory: Total scores range from 20 to 80 (each for state and trait), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (higher anxiety).

  28. Maternal Anxiety [six weeks postpartum]

    State Anxiety inventory: Total scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (higher anxiety).

  29. Maternal Anxiety [twelve weeks postpartum]

    State Anxiety inventory: Total scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (higher anxiety).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
37 Weeks and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Gestation greater than 37 weeks (full-term)

  • Completion of antibiotic protocol for GBS during labour

  • Vaginal delivery

  • Intending on breastfeeding

  • Consent for infant to receive DHM

  • Working understanding (proficient in reading and understanding) English

  • Mother has provided signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use protected health information, as required by national and local regulations.

  • In the investigator's opinion, the subject mother understands and can comply with protocol requirements, instructions, and protocol-stated restrictions, and is likely to complete the study as planned.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Diagnosed with clinically significant major congenital malformation that will interfere with breastfeeding or growth

  • No intention to breastfeed

  • Receiving extended courses of antibiotics (beyond that of the IAP in labour)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Calgary
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Victoria
  • NorthernStar Mothers Milk Bank

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Meredith Brockway, PhD RN, University of Calgary

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Meredith Brockway, Assistant Professor, University of Calgary
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05815433
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RMS23-99633743
First Posted:
Apr 18, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Apr 19, 2023
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Meredith Brockway, Assistant Professor, University of Calgary
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 19, 2023