Tailored Digital Treatment for Migraine
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Background: An individualized internet-based treatment program from a biopsychosocial perspective has been developed within the Västra Götaland region (VGR) with funds from the Innovation Fund. The treatment program is called Learn to live with migraine and goes by the abbreviation I AM (Internet Approach to Migraine). I AM is a complement to the medical treatment and focuses on pain management and learning to live as good a life as possible with the disease migraine. During the spring of 2022, I AM has been tested regarding the feasibility of primary care on 29 research subjects in a pilot RCT (DNR 2020-02359). A weighted preliminary assessment shows moderate effect size on mental health, that the participants accept the intervention, and that I AM with recruitment and care process can be carried out in a primary care context. Purpose: An overall purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of the addition of the internet-based biopsychosocial treatment I AM compared to usual treatment (TREATMENT as usual - TAU) in primary care regarding frequency and severity of migraine attacks, functional level, mental health, quality of life and employment rate with a randomized controlled trial design (RCT). An additional aim is to evaluate whether it is possible to prevent episodic migraine from developing into chronic migraine among those who have episodic migraine at the start of the study via the supplement treatment program I AM. Expected results: The greatest expected benefit of I AM is to reduce the burden and suffering of migraines for all the people affected. AM is also expected to increase the availability of treatment with a biopsychosocial perspective, have a quality-enhancing effect in terms of method and increase the patient's participation in their treatment. An environmental aspect is that neither patient nor therapist need to travel, accessibility also increases for individuals living in smaller communities who receive equal treatment.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
An overall purpose of the study is to evaluate in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) the effect of the addition of the internet-based treatment Internet Approach to Migraine (I AM ) compared to usual treatment (Treatment as usual - TAU) in primary care regarding frequency and severity of migraine attacks, functional level, mental health, quality of life and employment rate. An additional aim is to evaluate whether it is possible to prevent episodic migraine, among those who have episodic migraine at the start of the study, from developing into chronic migraine in primary care via the addition of the I AM treatment program for migraine, compared to TAU.
Question / Hypothesis Impact evaluation - primary outcomes1. What effect does I AM have, in comparison with treatment as usual (TAU) regarding the frequency and severity of migraine as well as functional capacity, mental health and quality of life, in follow-up measurement after termination, at 6 months after the end of treatment, and at 1 year and 2 years of follow-up measurement? The hypothesis is that there is an interaction effect and that the participants in I AM at follow-ups have a significantly lower degree of frequency and severity of migraine, as well as better functional ability, mental health and quality of life.2. Is there a significant difference between how many people have developed chronic migraine (measured by cut off of 15 days a month?) in the I AM and TAU groups, respectively? The hypothesis being tested is that the frequency and severity of migraine attacks is not reduced or further developed by the targeted treatment program I AM in comparison with TAU.
Process Evaluation - Secondary outcomes3. What effect does I AM have in comparison to TAU regarding flexibility and acceptance, selfcompassion, mindfulness, degree of pain sensitivitization and confidence in one's ability to engage in physical training? How does the effect of the intervention stand after 6, 12 and 24 months.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Personalised internet-based treatment "I am". Need-based internet-based treatment |
Behavioral: I am (internet approach to migraine)
I AM has a biopsychosocial perspective. Modules 1-3 and 10 are mandatory and for those who are in need of shorter support and module 1-10 is for those who have more frequent and severe migraines and want a long time of support and treatment. The rationale of the treatment assumes that we do not know why we get migraines and instead focus on becoming as good as possible at managing the migraine attacks. The focus area of the treatments cognitive-behavioral interventions is, among other things, psychoeducation, what migraine is and what happens in the body during migraines and pain, interpretation of symptoms and information processing, training to stop through mindfulness and becoming aware of assumptions that guide behavior during pain management, management of grief, worry, guilt and feelings of shame based on self-compassion, challenging avoidances in a valued direction through ACT interventions and physiotherapist-led cardio training and exercises.
Other Names:
|
| No Intervention: Treatment As Usual Control group, Treatment in primary care which is medical treatment |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) [Week 1]
Frequency and severity of migraine attacks.Two questions are added in the present study: How many migraine days per month have you had on average in the last 3 months? Estimated on a scale of 1-10 how painful the headache was. 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain. What percentage have you been employed in the last 3 months?
- Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) [post (week 8 or 20)]
Frequency and severity of migraine attacks.Two questions are added in the present study: How many migraine days per month have you had on average in the last 3 months? Estimated on a scale of 1-10 how painful the headache was. 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain. What percentage have you been employed in the last 3 months?
- Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) [6 months follow up]
Frequency and severity of migraine attacks.Two questions are added in the present study: How many migraine days per month have you had on average in the last 3 months? Estimated on a scale of 1-10 how painful the headache was. 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain. What percentage have you been employed in the last 3 months?
- Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) [12 months follow up]
Frequency and severity of migraine attacks.Two questions are added in the present study: How many migraine days per month have you had on average in the last 3 months? Estimated on a scale of 1-10 how painful the headache was. 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain. What percentage have you been employed in the last 3 months?
- Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) [24 months follow up]
Frequency and severity of migraine attacks.Two questions are added in the present study: How many migraine days per month have you had on average in the last 3 months? Estimated on a scale of 1-10 how painful the headache was. 0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain. What percentage have you been employed in the last 3 months?
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). [Week 1]
Mental health and quality of life
- Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). [post (week 8 or 20)]
Mental health and quality of life
- Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). [6 months follow up]
Mental health and quality of life
- Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). [12 months follow up]
Mental health and quality of life
- Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). [24 months follow up]
Mental health and quality of life
- Swedish version of CORE-10 [Week 1]
A broader measure of mental health in terms of well-being, symptoms, function and risk.
- Swedish version of CORE-10 [up to week 4 or 10.]
A broader measure of mental health in terms of well-being, symptoms, function and risk.
- Swedish version of CORE-10 [post (week 8 or 20)]
A broader measure of mental health in terms of well-being, symptoms, function and risk.
- Swedish version of CORE-10 [6 months follow up]
A broader measure of mental health in terms of well-being, symptoms, function and risk.
- Swedish version of CORE-10 [12 months follow up]
A broader measure of mental health in terms of well-being, symptoms, function and risk.
- Swedish version of CORE-10 [24 months follow up]
A broader measure of mental health in terms of well-being, symptoms, function and risk.
- Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale [Week 1]
Their ability to conduct physical exercise
- Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale [up to week 4 or 10.]
Their ability to conduct physical exercise
- Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale [post (week 8 or 20)]
Their ability to conduct physical exercise
- Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale [6 months follow up]
Their ability to conduct physical exercise
- Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale [12 months follow up]
Their ability to conduct physical exercise
- Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale [24 months follow up]
Their ability to conduct physical exercise
- Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [Week 1]
Conscious
- Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [post (week 8 or 20)]
Conscious
- Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [6 months follow up]
Conscious
- Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [12 months follow up]
Conscious
- Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [24 months follow up]
Conscious
- Self-Compassion Scale [Week 1]
Self compassion
- Self-Compassion Scale [post (week 8 or 20)]
Self compassion
- Self-Compassion Scale [6 months follow up]
Self compassion
- Self-Compassion Scale [12 months follow up]
Self compassion
- Self-Compassion Scale [24 months follow up]
Self compassion
- Two questions to Haskell 2007 - [Week 1]
Physical activity Physical activity
- Two questions to Haskell 2007 - [up to week 20]
Physical activity Physical activity
- Two questions to Haskell 2007 - [post (week 8 or 20)]
Physical activity Physical activity
- Two questions to Haskell 2007 - [6 months follow up]
Physical activity Physical activity
- Two questions to Haskell 2007 - [12 months follow up]
Physical activity Physical activity
- Two questions to Haskell 2007 - [24 months follow up]
Physical activity Physical activity
- Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) [Week 1]
Key symptoms associated with central sensitization
- Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) [post (week 8 or 20)]
Key symptoms associated with central sensitization
- Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) [6 months follow up]
Key symptoms associated with central sensitization
- Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) [12 months follow up]
Key symptoms associated with central sensitization
- Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) [24 months follow up]
Key symptoms associated with central sensitization
- Acceptance of the treatment [Post (week 8 or 20)]
Acceptance of the treatment Measured with its own constructed form developed for the study. The form consists of four questions: Would you recommend the processing to someone else? How meaningful have you experienced the treatment scale 1-7, as well as two open questions answered in writing: what have you got out of the treatment? What has been less good about the treatment?
- Acceptance of the treatment [6 months follow up]
Acceptance of the treatment Measured with its own constructed form developed for the study. The form consists of four questions: Would you recommend the processing to someone else? How meaningful have you experienced the treatment scale 1-7, as well as two open questions answered in writing: what have you got out of the treatment? What has been less good about the treatment?
- Acceptance of the treatment [12 months follow up]
Acceptance of the treatment Measured with its own constructed form developed for the study. The form consists of four questions: Would you recommend the processing to someone else? How meaningful have you experienced the treatment scale 1-7, as well as two open questions answered in writing: what have you got out of the treatment? What has been less good about the treatment?
- Acceptance of the treatment [24 months follow up]
Acceptance of the treatment Measured with its own constructed form developed for the study. The form consists of four questions: Would you recommend the processing to someone else? How meaningful have you experienced the treatment scale 1-7, as well as two open questions answered in writing: what have you got out of the treatment? What has been less good about the treatment?
- Other treatment [post (week 8 or 20)]
"Other treatment" is measured with the question: Have you since you finished the treatment I AM, Learn to live with migraine or since the last self-assessment received other treatment for migraine? If yes, please describe which one.
- Other treatment [6 months follow up]
"Other treatment" is measured with the question: Have you since you finished the treatment I AM, Learn to live with migraine or since the last self-assessment received other treatment for migraine? If yes, please describe which one.
- Other treatment [12 months follow up]
"Other treatment" is measured with the question: Have you since you finished the treatment I AM, Learn to live with migraine or since the last self-assessment received other treatment for migraine? If yes, please describe which one.
- Other treatment [24 months follow up]
"Other treatment" is measured with the question: Have you since you finished the treatment I AM, Learn to live with migraine or since the last self-assessment received other treatment for migraine? If yes, please describe which one.
- Bulls eye [Week 1]
Behavioral activation in a valued direction was measured with a Swedish version of Bulls eye (Lundgren, Louma, Dahl, Strohsal &melin, 2012). The self-assessment scale is divided into four areas of values in people's lives: work/education, leisure, relationships and self-care/health. The instrument has demonstrated a test-retest reliability of 0.86 and good kriterieva deaths (Lundgren, Dahl &hayes, 2008).
- Bulls eye [up to week 20]
Behavioral activation in a valued direction was measured with a Swedish version of Bulls eye (Lundgren, Louma, Dahl, Strohsal &melin, 2012). The self-assessment scale is divided into four areas of values in people's lives: work/education, leisure, relationships and self-care/health. The instrument has demonstrated a test-retest reliability of 0.86 and good kriterieva deaths (Lundgren, Dahl &hayes, 2008).
- Bulls eye [post (week 8 or 20)]
Behavioral activation in a valued direction was measured with a Swedish version of Bulls eye (Lundgren, Louma, Dahl, Strohsal &melin, 2012). The self-assessment scale is divided into four areas of values in people's lives: work/education, leisure, relationships and self-care/health. The instrument has demonstrated a test-retest reliability of 0.86 and good kriterieva deaths (Lundgren, Dahl &hayes, 2008).
- Bulls eye [6 months follow up]
Behavioral activation in a valued direction was measured with a Swedish version of Bulls eye (Lundgren, Louma, Dahl, Strohsal &melin, 2012). The self-assessment scale is divided into four areas of values in people's lives: work/education, leisure, relationships and self-care/health. The instrument has demonstrated a test-retest reliability of 0.86 and good kriterieva deaths (Lundgren, Dahl &hayes, 2008).
- Bulls eye [12 months follow up]
Behavioral activation in a valued direction was measured with a Swedish version of Bulls eye (Lundgren, Louma, Dahl, Strohsal &melin, 2012). The self-assessment scale is divided into four areas of values in people's lives: work/education, leisure, relationships and self-care/health. The instrument has demonstrated a test-retest reliability of 0.86 and good kriterieva deaths (Lundgren, Dahl &hayes, 2008).
- Bulls eye [24 months follow up]
Behavioral activation in a valued direction was measured with a Swedish version of Bulls eye (Lundgren, Louma, Dahl, Strohsal &melin, 2012). The self-assessment scale is divided into four areas of values in people's lives: work/education, leisure, relationships and self-care/health. The instrument has demonstrated a test-retest reliability of 0.86 and good kriterieva deaths (Lundgren, Dahl &hayes, 2008).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Women and men
-
18 years and up
-
diagnosed episodic or chronic migraine with or without aura 3 or more migraine days a month.
-
Access to computer / tablet or smartphone with Bankid and internet connection.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
ongoing malignant disease
-
other rarer migraine diseases such as cluster headache, basilar migraine, hemiplegis migraine, vestibular migraine and eye migraine
-
ongoing moderate to more severe psychiatric problems such as depression, anxiety disorders, neuropsychiatric conditions, psychotic disorders, substance abuse and personality disorders
-
Ongoing psychological/physiotherapeutic treatment
-
People who cannot read, speak or understand the Swedish language
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FoU primary care Södra Älvsborg | Borås | Sven Eriksonsplatsen 4 | Sweden | 503 38 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Vastra Gotaland Region
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- VGFOUREG-979683