LIFUP-MCI: Modulation of Hippocampal Circuitry and Memory Function With Focused Ultrasound in Amnestic MCI
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is a proof of concept/proof of mechanism study addressing the hypothesis that Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP) targeting the entorhinal cortex can
(A) successfully target and increase activity in the entorhinal cortex and functionally connected brain regions (B) improve connectivity of memory networks (C) improve memory for information (D) have a dose-dependent effect on memory and brain activity.
A secondary objective is to determine the relationship between blood-based AD biomarkers and LIFUP treatment outcomes, and the relationship between magnitude of HC volume decline and LIFUP treatment outcomes.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
-
PRÉCIS --- This is a proof of concept/proof of mechanism trial of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP) targeting the entorhinal cortex in patients with amnestic MCI. The study will integrate behavioral and multimodal neuroimaging to assess the utility, dose and duration of LIFUP to a) increase neural activity in deep neural structures and 2) to enhance memory function in patients with amnestic MCI. The intervention will randomly assign subjects to one of four dose conditions (0, 1, 2, or 3 doses). Each dose consists of six 30-second sonications, alternating with 30-second OFF blocks for a total of 6 minutes. Each participant will have two LIFUP sessions with the same condition, spaced 2 weeks apart. Sessions occur within the MRI scanner with pre-sonication ASL and rsfMRI, simultaneous rsfMRI, and post-sonication ASL. Verbal and visuospatial memory will be assessed at baseline, 48 hours after each session via Zoom, and two weeks after the last in-person session.
-
Objectives --- Imaging markers of target modulation: Use fMRI collected simultaneously with LIFUP to assess modulation of neural activity in the hippocampal region and DMN, and ASL pre- and post- LIFUP to assess direct up-regulation of ErC perfusion
Measure LIFUP changes in functional connectivity (change from grant based on reviews: the investigators initially also included cortical thickness changes; current research methods now use CT as a predictor)
Determine whether LIFUP-induced changes in ErC perfusion and ErC/DMN FC will be associated with improved learning and memory
Determine the relationship between AD risk and LIFUP-induced changes: LIFUP-induced functional changes will be associated with blood-based biomarker status (AB42/40 and Ptau217)
---Design and Outcomes --- This is an intervention assessing the effects of focused ultrasound on memory, cerebral blood flow, and functional connectivity in memory circuits in patients with MCI. Patients will be assigned to one of 4 dose groups: 0, 1, 2, or 3 doses at each LIFUP session. At an initial baseline in-person session, subjects will receive structural MRI, a premorbid intelligence test and memory pre-testing. At the second in-person visit, the subjects will undergo a blood draw, pre- and simultaneous resting-state functional MRI and LIFUP sonication, as well as pre- and post-LIFUP ASL to measure blood flow changes. Memory will be assessed remotely 48 hours after the treatment. An identical in-person MRI-LIFUP session and follow-up session will occur 2 weeks later, and a final memory evaluation will occur remotely 2 weeks after the last in-person session. Those administrating memory assessments and analyzing data will be blind to dosage group. The study design section presents a diagram and more detailed description of procedures.
--- Interventions and Duration --- At each of the two MRI-LIFUP sessions, subjects will receive 0, 1, 2, or 3 doses of LIFUP, with each dose consisting of six 30-second sonication blocks.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: LIFUP Dose Group 1 Administration of low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUP) dose level 1 to the entorhinal cortex. |
Device: Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP)
Focused ultrasound is a re-emerging neuromodulation technology. Ultrasound uses high-frequency longitudinal pressure waves to generate clinical images via refraction. At high intensities, ultrasound can be used to cause ablations (e.g. for neurosurgical pallidotomy). Low intensity tFUS can penetrate the skull and dura, thereby affecting neuron populations in the brain, likely through cellular modulation. By changing the parameters of the ultrasound such as pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle, it is possible to create potentiating or disruptive effects at the network level, without also causing tissue damage via the heating effects seen at higher intensities.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: LIFUP Dose Group 2 Administration of low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUP) dose level 2 to the entorhinal cortex. |
Device: Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP)
Focused ultrasound is a re-emerging neuromodulation technology. Ultrasound uses high-frequency longitudinal pressure waves to generate clinical images via refraction. At high intensities, ultrasound can be used to cause ablations (e.g. for neurosurgical pallidotomy). Low intensity tFUS can penetrate the skull and dura, thereby affecting neuron populations in the brain, likely through cellular modulation. By changing the parameters of the ultrasound such as pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle, it is possible to create potentiating or disruptive effects at the network level, without also causing tissue damage via the heating effects seen at higher intensities.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: LIFUP Dose Group 3 Administration of low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUP) dose level 3 to the entorhinal cortex. |
Device: Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP)
Focused ultrasound is a re-emerging neuromodulation technology. Ultrasound uses high-frequency longitudinal pressure waves to generate clinical images via refraction. At high intensities, ultrasound can be used to cause ablations (e.g. for neurosurgical pallidotomy). Low intensity tFUS can penetrate the skull and dura, thereby affecting neuron populations in the brain, likely through cellular modulation. By changing the parameters of the ultrasound such as pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle, it is possible to create potentiating or disruptive effects at the network level, without also causing tissue damage via the heating effects seen at higher intensities.
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: Sham LIFUP No administration of LIFUP. The device will be affixed to the user's head but not turned on. Additionally, if at the end of the study, the treatment has been shown to be effective, placebo subjects will be offered a free session using the optimally effective dose, if they consented to being contacted for this purpose. |
Device: Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP)
Focused ultrasound is a re-emerging neuromodulation technology. Ultrasound uses high-frequency longitudinal pressure waves to generate clinical images via refraction. At high intensities, ultrasound can be used to cause ablations (e.g. for neurosurgical pallidotomy). Low intensity tFUS can penetrate the skull and dura, thereby affecting neuron populations in the brain, likely through cellular modulation. By changing the parameters of the ultrasound such as pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle, it is possible to create potentiating or disruptive effects at the network level, without also causing tissue damage via the heating effects seen at higher intensities.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in Perfusion Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) fMRI Signal throughout Brain [40 minutes]
Perfusion ASL fMRI data will be collected before and after sonication. Analyses will assess the statistical relationship between ASL signal throughout the brain pre and post sonication.
- Changes in BOLD-related functional connectivity from baseline in fMRI brain scan to 40 minutes. [40 minutes]
Primary outcomes for proof of mechanism that may be depicted in the fMRI scans may include changes in BOLD-related functional connectivity increases within the DMN including regions functionally connected to the target. BOLD data will be collected before, during, and following LIFUP sonication. Analyses will assess any changes in BOLD signal in the brain following sonication.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in Brief Visual Memory Test Scores [48 hours]
Potential LIFUP-related changes in memory will be assessed via neuropsychological assessments including the Brief Visual Memory Tests (BVMT). Scores range from 0 to 12 and reflect recent, long-term learning, with higher scores indicating better learning.
- Change in Verbal Learning Test Scores [48 hours]
Potential LIFUP-related changes in memory will be assessed via the Rey Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) neuropsychological assessment. The RAVLT involves providing participants with 15 unrelated words and asking them to recall the word list. There are 5 trials designed to determine short-term memory and then a 30 minute delay to assess long-term memory. The total words correct in both the short- and long-term trials are used as outcome measures.
- Post-hoc biomarker analysis of APOE-4 status as a predictor of tFUS efficacy [4 years]
Biomarker post hoc analysis will determine the degree to which blood based biomarkers predict the level of effectiveness of tFUS. Analyses conducted post-data collection phase of the entire study, up to four years after study visit.
- Post-hoc biomarker analysis of plasma AB42/40 ratio as a predictor of tFUS efficacy [4 years]
Biomarker post hoc analysis will determine the degree to which blood based biomarkers predict the level of effectiveness of tFUS. Analyses conducted post-data collection phase of the entire study, up to four years after study visit. An Aβ42/40 ratio <0.160 suggests a higher-than-normal risk of having of AD and is warranted to support a diagnosis of AD (West et al 2021).
- Post-hoc biomarker analysis of plasma ptau as a predictor of tFUS efficacy [4 years]
Biomarker post hoc analysis will determine the degree to which blood based biomarkers predict the level of effectiveness of tFUS. Analyses conducted post-data collection phase of the entire study, up to four years after study visit.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
-
Amnestic MCI diagnosis
-
Age 50-90
-
English-speaking
-
Right-handed
-
Ability to provide informed consent via UBACC (Jeste et.al., 2007) procedure
-
Normal or corrected-to-normal hearing or vision
Exclusion Criteria
GENERAL
Participation in another clinical trial
Active use of prescribed medications to improve cognition and/or memory, e.g., cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, or Aduhelm
MRI Incompatibility
Weight exceeding 275 pounds
Pregnancy, suspicion of pregnancy, or attempting to become pregnant
Claustrophobia
Difficulties during previous MRIs
Top permanent retainer (bottom only is okay)
5 or more non-removable gold-teeth
Metal braces, top spacers, and/or palate expanders
Any of the following implants:
Aneurysm clips
Cochlear implants
Defibrillator
Electrodes or wires
Magnetically-activated device
Spinal cord stimulator
Infusion or insulin pumps
Implanted drug infusion device
Deep brain stimulation device
Cardiac pacemaker
Non-removable hairpieces, hairpiece extensions, and/or piercings
Facial tattoos or permanent makeup
Metal implants that are MR-incompatible, or where participant is unable to provide sufficient information to determine MR compatibility
Previous injury by metallic foreign body (e.g., bullet, BB, shrapnel) where the object entered the body and (one of the following conditions):
The metallic foreign body wasn't fully removed
Participant lacks a doctor's confirmation that the metallic foreign body was fully removed
Diagnosis of one or more of the following neurological disorders:
Alzheimer's disease
Parkinson's disease
Lou Gehrig's disease (ALS)
Multiple sclerosis
Cerebral Palsy
Diagnosis of one or more of the following genetic disorders
Cystic Fibrosis
Sickle Cell Disease
Diagnosis of one or more of the following psychiatric disorders
Psychosis
Dementia
Mental illness other than anxiety or depression
GAD and depression if they have not been controlled for at least one year (if controlled >1 year, with or without medication, they are not exclusionary)
Other Medical
Severe lung, liver, heart, and/or kidney disease/s (e.g., heart failure, liver failure, and etc...)
Diagnosis of thyroid disorder or change of thyroid medication dose within the last year
Cancer treatment/s with chemotherapy and/or radiation to head and neck
Stage 4 (metastatic) cancer
Treatment/s for:
Hepatitis
HIV
Rheumatoid arthritis
Lupus
Any autoimmune disorder
Treatment/s to prevent transplant rejection
History of substance abuse
Including alcohol, but not nicotine or caffeine
History of stroke
History of 2 or more seizures or diagnosis of epilepsy, unless the seizures occurred prior to age 5 alongside a fever.
History of brain tumor, brain aneurysm, brain hemorrhage, or subdural hematoma (transient ischemic attack not exclusionary)
History of concussion or similar head injury if any of the following were present:
Head injury requiring hospitalization
Head injury succeeded by loss of consciousness for more than 30 minutes
Head injury succeeded by amnesia, confusion, and/or loss of orientation lasting longer than 24 hours
CT scan that revealed brain abnormalities
2 or more of the following symptoms if they lasted for longer than 3 months after head injury
Headache
Dizziness
Hypersomnia or insomnia
Phono- or photophobia
Trouble with attention, memory, or staying on task
Decline in school performance
Depression and/or anxiety
Panic attacks
PTSD
Uncontrolled high blood pressure or diabetes
Heart attack within the last year
Daily use of prescribed migraine medication
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Behavior | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90024 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeles
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Susan Y Bookheimer, PhD, UCLA Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences
- Principal Investigator: Taylor P Kuhn, PhD, UCLA Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Official statement on
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
- Benedict RHB. Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised: Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 1997
- Brandt J, Benedict R. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised: Professional Manual. PAR: Florida; 2001.
- Burgess A, Dubey S, Yeung S, Hough O, Eterman N, Aubert I, Hynynen K. Alzheimer disease in a mouse model: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound targeted to the hippocampus opens the blood-brain barrier and improves pathologic abnormalities and behavior. Radiology. 2014 Dec;273(3):736-45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140245. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
- Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM Jr., Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging (3rd ed). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
- Bystritsky A, Korb AS, Douglas PK, Cohen MS, Melega WP, Mulgaonkar AP, DeSalles A, Min BK, Yoo SS. A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation. Brain Stimul. 2011 Jul;4(3):125-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Apr 1. Review.
- Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14.
- Ekstrom A. How and when the fMRI BOLD signal relates to underlying neural activity: the danger in dissociation. Brain Res Rev. 2010 Mar;62(2):233-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.12.004. Epub 2009 Dec 21. Review.
- Fontaine D, Deudon A, Lemaire JJ, Razzouk M, Viau P, Darcourt J, Robert P. Symptomatic treatment of memory decline in Alzheimer's disease by deep brain stimulation: a feasibility study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34(1):315-23. doi: 10.3233/JAD-121579.
- Greenberg BD, Malone DA, Friehs GM, Rezai AR, Kubu CS, Malloy PF, Salloway SP, Okun MS, Goodman WK, Rasmussen SA. Three-year outcomes in deep brain stimulation for highly resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Nov;31(11):2384-93. Epub 2006 Jul 19. Erratum in: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Nov;31(11):2394.
- Greicius MD, Supekar K, Menon V, Dougherty RF. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):72-8. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn059. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
- Halpern C, Hurtig H, Jaggi J, Grossman M, Won M, Baltuch G. Deep brain stimulation in neurologic disorders. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007 Feb;13(1):1-16. Epub 2006 Dec 1. Review.
- Hardenacke K, Kuhn J, Lenartz D, Maarouf M, Mai JK, Bartsch C, Freund HJ, Sturm V. Stimulate or degenerate: deep brain stimulation of the nucleus basalis Meynert in Alzheimer dementia. World Neurosurg. 2013 Sep-Oct;80(3-4):S27.e35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.005. Epub 2012 Dec 12. Review.
- Hescham S, Lim LW, Jahanshahi A, Blokland A, Temel Y. Deep brain stimulation in dementia-related disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Dec;37(10 Pt 2):2666-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 20. Review.
- Korb AS, Shellock FG, Cohen MS, Bystritsky A. Low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation device used during magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating at 3 Tesla/128 MHz. Neuromodulation. 2014 Apr;17(3):236-41; discussion 241. doi: 10.1111/ner.12075. Epub 2013 May 10.
- Laxton AW, Lipsman N, Lozano AM. Deep brain stimulation for cognitive disorders. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:307-11. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00025-5. Review.
- Laxton AW, Lozano AM. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Alzheimer disease and dementias. World Neurosurg. 2013 Sep-Oct;80(3-4):S28.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.06.028. Epub 2012 Jun 19. Review.
- Laxton AW, Tang-Wai DF, McAndrews MP, Zumsteg D, Wennberg R, Keren R, Wherrett J, Naglie G, Hamani C, Smith GS, Lozano AM. A phase I trial of deep brain stimulation of memory circuits in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 2010 Oct;68(4):521-34. doi: 10.1002/ana.22089.
- Lin WT, Chen RC, Lu WW, Liu SH, Yang FY. Protective effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on aluminum-induced cerebral damage in Alzheimer's disease rat model. Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 15;5:9671. doi: 10.1038/srep09671.
- Lyons MK. Deep brain stimulation: current and future clinical applications. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Jul;86(7):662-72. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0045. Epub 2011 Jun 6. Review.
- Mayberg HS, Lozano AM, Voon V, McNeely HE, Seminowicz D, Hamani C, Schwalb JM, Kennedy SH. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron. 2005 Mar 3;45(5):651-60.
- Murphy K, Birn RM, Handwerker DA, Jones TB, Bandettini PA. The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):893-905. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
- Okun MS. Deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):483-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1214078.
- Pachana NA, Byrne GJ, Siddle H, Koloski N, Harley E, Arnold E. Development and validation of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007 Feb;19(1):103-14.
- Pisapia JM, Halpern CH, Williams NN, Wadden TA, Baltuch GH, Stein SC. Deep brain stimulation compared with bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a decision analysis study. Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Aug;29(2):E15. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.FOCUS10109. Review.
- Rosen WG. Verbal fluency in aging and dementia. J Clin Neuropsychol. 1980;2(2):135-46. doi: 10.1080/01688638008403788.
- Sankar T, Tierney TS, Hamani C. Novel applications of deep brain stimulation. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3(Suppl 1):S26-33. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.91607. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
- Small GW, Rabins PV, Barry PP, Buckholtz NS, DeKosky ST, Ferris SH, Finkel SI, Gwyther LP, Khachaturian ZS, Lebowitz BD, McRae TD, Morris JC, Oakley F, Schneider LS, Streim JE, Sunderland T, Teri LA, Tune LE. Diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer disease and related disorders. Consensus statement of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, the Alzheimer's Association, and the American Geriatrics Society. JAMA. 1997 Oct 22-29;278(16):1363-71. Review.
- Smith GS, Laxton AW, Tang-Wai DF, McAndrews MP, Diaconescu AO, Workman CI, Lozano AM. Increased cerebral metabolism after 1 year of deep brain stimulation in Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2012 Sep;69(9):1141-8. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.590.
- Stephen JH, Halpern CH, Barrios CJ, Balmuri U, Pisapia JM, Wolf JA, Kampman KM, Baltuch GH, Caplan AL, Stein SC. Deep brain stimulation compared with methadone maintenance for the treatment of heroin dependence: a threshold and cost-effectiveness analysis. Addiction. 2012 Mar;107(3):624-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03656.x. Review.
- Vitek JL. Long-term benefit from deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: is it for everyone? Alzheimers Res Ther. 2012 May 9;4(3):13. doi: 10.1186/alzrt111.
- Yoo SS, Bystritsky A, Lee JH, Zhang Y, Fischer K, Min BK, McDannold NJ, Pascual-Leone A, Jolesz FA. Focused ultrasound modulates region-specific brain activity. Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.058. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
- Zeineh MM, Engel SA, Thompson PM, Bookheimer SY. Unfolding the human hippocampus with high resolution structural and functional MRI. Anat Rec. 2001 Apr;265(2):111-20. Review.
- IRB#21-000995
- 1R01AG073480-01
- IRB#21-000995