LIFUP-MCI: Modulation of Hippocampal Circuitry and Memory Function With Focused Ultrasound in Amnestic MCI

Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05417555
Collaborator
National Institute on Aging (NIA) (NIH)
144
1
4
76
1.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is a proof of concept/proof of mechanism study addressing the hypothesis that Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP) targeting the entorhinal cortex can

(A) successfully target and increase activity in the entorhinal cortex and functionally connected brain regions (B) improve connectivity of memory networks (C) improve memory for information (D) have a dose-dependent effect on memory and brain activity.

A secondary objective is to determine the relationship between blood-based AD biomarkers and LIFUP treatment outcomes, and the relationship between magnitude of HC volume decline and LIFUP treatment outcomes.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP)
N/A

Detailed Description

  • PRÉCIS --- This is a proof of concept/proof of mechanism trial of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP) targeting the entorhinal cortex in patients with amnestic MCI. The study will integrate behavioral and multimodal neuroimaging to assess the utility, dose and duration of LIFUP to a) increase neural activity in deep neural structures and 2) to enhance memory function in patients with amnestic MCI. The intervention will randomly assign subjects to one of four dose conditions (0, 1, 2, or 3 doses). Each dose consists of six 30-second sonications, alternating with 30-second OFF blocks for a total of 6 minutes. Each participant will have two LIFUP sessions with the same condition, spaced 2 weeks apart. Sessions occur within the MRI scanner with pre-sonication ASL and rsfMRI, simultaneous rsfMRI, and post-sonication ASL. Verbal and visuospatial memory will be assessed at baseline, 48 hours after each session via Zoom, and two weeks after the last in-person session.

  • Objectives --- Imaging markers of target modulation: Use fMRI collected simultaneously with LIFUP to assess modulation of neural activity in the hippocampal region and DMN, and ASL pre- and post- LIFUP to assess direct up-regulation of ErC perfusion

Measure LIFUP changes in functional connectivity (change from grant based on reviews: the investigators initially also included cortical thickness changes; current research methods now use CT as a predictor)

Determine whether LIFUP-induced changes in ErC perfusion and ErC/DMN FC will be associated with improved learning and memory

Determine the relationship between AD risk and LIFUP-induced changes: LIFUP-induced functional changes will be associated with blood-based biomarker status (AB42/40 and Ptau217)

---Design and Outcomes --- This is an intervention assessing the effects of focused ultrasound on memory, cerebral blood flow, and functional connectivity in memory circuits in patients with MCI. Patients will be assigned to one of 4 dose groups: 0, 1, 2, or 3 doses at each LIFUP session. At an initial baseline in-person session, subjects will receive structural MRI, a premorbid intelligence test and memory pre-testing. At the second in-person visit, the subjects will undergo a blood draw, pre- and simultaneous resting-state functional MRI and LIFUP sonication, as well as pre- and post-LIFUP ASL to measure blood flow changes. Memory will be assessed remotely 48 hours after the treatment. An identical in-person MRI-LIFUP session and follow-up session will occur 2 weeks later, and a final memory evaluation will occur remotely 2 weeks after the last in-person session. Those administrating memory assessments and analyzing data will be blind to dosage group. The study design section presents a diagram and more detailed description of procedures.

--- Interventions and Duration --- At each of the two MRI-LIFUP sessions, subjects will receive 0, 1, 2, or 3 doses of LIFUP, with each dose consisting of six 30-second sonication blocks.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
144 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Subjects are randomly assigned to one of four treatment dosage conditions: 0, 1, 2 or 3 treatments at each MRI-LIFUP session. After 2 weeks, a second dose is administered with the same dosage level for each subject. Memory assessment occurs once at baseline and remotely after each treatment at the onset of the optimal time window (48 hours) for LIFUP-induced change based on prior data. Finally, after 2 weeks, memory is again assessed. Alternate forms are used for the primary outcome measures to avoid practice effects.Subjects are randomly assigned to one of four treatment dosage conditions: 0, 1, 2 or 3 treatments at each MRI-LIFUP session. After 2 weeks, a second dose is administered with the same dosage level for each subject. Memory assessment occurs once at baseline and remotely after each treatment at the onset of the optimal time window (48 hours) for LIFUP-induced change based on prior data. Finally, after 2 weeks, memory is again assessed. Alternate forms are used for the primary outcome measures to avoid practice effects.
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
Participants and the participants' caregivers will be blinded to arm assignment.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Modulation of Hippocampal Circuitry and Memory Function With Focused Ultrasound in Amnestic MCI
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2027
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: LIFUP Dose Group 1

Administration of low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUP) dose level 1 to the entorhinal cortex.

Device: Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP)
Focused ultrasound is a re-emerging neuromodulation technology. Ultrasound uses high-frequency longitudinal pressure waves to generate clinical images via refraction. At high intensities, ultrasound can be used to cause ablations (e.g. for neurosurgical pallidotomy). Low intensity tFUS can penetrate the skull and dura, thereby affecting neuron populations in the brain, likely through cellular modulation. By changing the parameters of the ultrasound such as pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle, it is possible to create potentiating or disruptive effects at the network level, without also causing tissue damage via the heating effects seen at higher intensities.
Other Names:
  • transcranial focused ultrasound
  • tFUS
  • LIFUP
  • low intensity focused ultrasound
  • Active Comparator: LIFUP Dose Group 2

    Administration of low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUP) dose level 2 to the entorhinal cortex.

    Device: Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP)
    Focused ultrasound is a re-emerging neuromodulation technology. Ultrasound uses high-frequency longitudinal pressure waves to generate clinical images via refraction. At high intensities, ultrasound can be used to cause ablations (e.g. for neurosurgical pallidotomy). Low intensity tFUS can penetrate the skull and dura, thereby affecting neuron populations in the brain, likely through cellular modulation. By changing the parameters of the ultrasound such as pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle, it is possible to create potentiating or disruptive effects at the network level, without also causing tissue damage via the heating effects seen at higher intensities.
    Other Names:
  • transcranial focused ultrasound
  • tFUS
  • LIFUP
  • low intensity focused ultrasound
  • Active Comparator: LIFUP Dose Group 3

    Administration of low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUP) dose level 3 to the entorhinal cortex.

    Device: Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP)
    Focused ultrasound is a re-emerging neuromodulation technology. Ultrasound uses high-frequency longitudinal pressure waves to generate clinical images via refraction. At high intensities, ultrasound can be used to cause ablations (e.g. for neurosurgical pallidotomy). Low intensity tFUS can penetrate the skull and dura, thereby affecting neuron populations in the brain, likely through cellular modulation. By changing the parameters of the ultrasound such as pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle, it is possible to create potentiating or disruptive effects at the network level, without also causing tissue damage via the heating effects seen at higher intensities.
    Other Names:
  • transcranial focused ultrasound
  • tFUS
  • LIFUP
  • low intensity focused ultrasound
  • Sham Comparator: Sham LIFUP

    No administration of LIFUP. The device will be affixed to the user's head but not turned on. Additionally, if at the end of the study, the treatment has been shown to be effective, placebo subjects will be offered a free session using the optimally effective dose, if they consented to being contacted for this purpose.

    Device: Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP)
    Focused ultrasound is a re-emerging neuromodulation technology. Ultrasound uses high-frequency longitudinal pressure waves to generate clinical images via refraction. At high intensities, ultrasound can be used to cause ablations (e.g. for neurosurgical pallidotomy). Low intensity tFUS can penetrate the skull and dura, thereby affecting neuron populations in the brain, likely through cellular modulation. By changing the parameters of the ultrasound such as pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle, it is possible to create potentiating or disruptive effects at the network level, without also causing tissue damage via the heating effects seen at higher intensities.
    Other Names:
  • transcranial focused ultrasound
  • tFUS
  • LIFUP
  • low intensity focused ultrasound
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Perfusion Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) fMRI Signal throughout Brain [40 minutes]

      Perfusion ASL fMRI data will be collected before and after sonication. Analyses will assess the statistical relationship between ASL signal throughout the brain pre and post sonication.

    2. Changes in BOLD-related functional connectivity from baseline in fMRI brain scan to 40 minutes. [40 minutes]

      Primary outcomes for proof of mechanism that may be depicted in the fMRI scans may include changes in BOLD-related functional connectivity increases within the DMN including regions functionally connected to the target. BOLD data will be collected before, during, and following LIFUP sonication. Analyses will assess any changes in BOLD signal in the brain following sonication.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Brief Visual Memory Test Scores [48 hours]

      Potential LIFUP-related changes in memory will be assessed via neuropsychological assessments including the Brief Visual Memory Tests (BVMT). Scores range from 0 to 12 and reflect recent, long-term learning, with higher scores indicating better learning.

    2. Change in Verbal Learning Test Scores [48 hours]

      Potential LIFUP-related changes in memory will be assessed via the Rey Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) neuropsychological assessment. The RAVLT involves providing participants with 15 unrelated words and asking them to recall the word list. There are 5 trials designed to determine short-term memory and then a 30 minute delay to assess long-term memory. The total words correct in both the short- and long-term trials are used as outcome measures.

    3. Post-hoc biomarker analysis of APOE-4 status as a predictor of tFUS efficacy [4 years]

      Biomarker post hoc analysis will determine the degree to which blood based biomarkers predict the level of effectiveness of tFUS. Analyses conducted post-data collection phase of the entire study, up to four years after study visit.

    4. Post-hoc biomarker analysis of plasma AB42/40 ratio as a predictor of tFUS efficacy [4 years]

      Biomarker post hoc analysis will determine the degree to which blood based biomarkers predict the level of effectiveness of tFUS. Analyses conducted post-data collection phase of the entire study, up to four years after study visit. An Aβ42/40 ratio <0.160 suggests a higher-than-normal risk of having of AD and is warranted to support a diagnosis of AD (West et al 2021).

    5. Post-hoc biomarker analysis of plasma ptau as a predictor of tFUS efficacy [4 years]

      Biomarker post hoc analysis will determine the degree to which blood based biomarkers predict the level of effectiveness of tFUS. Analyses conducted post-data collection phase of the entire study, up to four years after study visit.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    50 Years to 90 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No

    Inclusion Criteria

    • Amnestic MCI diagnosis

    • Age 50-90

    • English-speaking

    • Right-handed

    • Ability to provide informed consent via UBACC (Jeste et.al., 2007) procedure

    • Normal or corrected-to-normal hearing or vision

    Exclusion Criteria

    GENERAL

    Participation in another clinical trial

    Active use of prescribed medications to improve cognition and/or memory, e.g., cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, or Aduhelm

    MRI Incompatibility

    Weight exceeding 275 pounds

    Pregnancy, suspicion of pregnancy, or attempting to become pregnant

    Claustrophobia

    Difficulties during previous MRIs

    Top permanent retainer (bottom only is okay)

    5 or more non-removable gold-teeth

    Metal braces, top spacers, and/or palate expanders

    Any of the following implants:

    Aneurysm clips

    Cochlear implants

    Defibrillator

    Electrodes or wires

    Magnetically-activated device

    Spinal cord stimulator

    Infusion or insulin pumps

    Implanted drug infusion device

    Deep brain stimulation device

    Cardiac pacemaker

    Non-removable hairpieces, hairpiece extensions, and/or piercings

    Facial tattoos or permanent makeup

    Metal implants that are MR-incompatible, or where participant is unable to provide sufficient information to determine MR compatibility

    Previous injury by metallic foreign body (e.g., bullet, BB, shrapnel) where the object entered the body and (one of the following conditions):

    The metallic foreign body wasn't fully removed

    Participant lacks a doctor's confirmation that the metallic foreign body was fully removed

    Diagnosis of one or more of the following neurological disorders:

    Alzheimer's disease

    Parkinson's disease

    Lou Gehrig's disease (ALS)

    Multiple sclerosis

    Cerebral Palsy

    Diagnosis of one or more of the following genetic disorders

    Cystic Fibrosis

    Sickle Cell Disease

    Diagnosis of one or more of the following psychiatric disorders

    Psychosis

    Dementia

    Mental illness other than anxiety or depression

    GAD and depression if they have not been controlled for at least one year (if controlled >1 year, with or without medication, they are not exclusionary)

    Other Medical

    Severe lung, liver, heart, and/or kidney disease/s (e.g., heart failure, liver failure, and etc...)

    Diagnosis of thyroid disorder or change of thyroid medication dose within the last year

    Cancer treatment/s with chemotherapy and/or radiation to head and neck

    Stage 4 (metastatic) cancer

    Treatment/s for:

    Hepatitis

    HIV

    Rheumatoid arthritis

    Lupus

    Any autoimmune disorder

    Treatment/s to prevent transplant rejection

    History of substance abuse

    Including alcohol, but not nicotine or caffeine

    History of stroke

    History of 2 or more seizures or diagnosis of epilepsy, unless the seizures occurred prior to age 5 alongside a fever.

    History of brain tumor, brain aneurysm, brain hemorrhage, or subdural hematoma (transient ischemic attack not exclusionary)

    History of concussion or similar head injury if any of the following were present:

    Head injury requiring hospitalization

    Head injury succeeded by loss of consciousness for more than 30 minutes

    Head injury succeeded by amnesia, confusion, and/or loss of orientation lasting longer than 24 hours

    CT scan that revealed brain abnormalities

    2 or more of the following symptoms if they lasted for longer than 3 months after head injury

    Headache

    Dizziness

    Hypersomnia or insomnia

    Phono- or photophobia

    Trouble with attention, memory, or staying on task

    Decline in school performance

    Depression and/or anxiety

    Panic attacks

    PTSD

    Uncontrolled high blood pressure or diabetes

    Heart attack within the last year

    Daily use of prescribed migraine medication

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Behavior Los Angeles California United States 90024

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Susan Y Bookheimer, PhD, UCLA Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences
    • Principal Investigator: Taylor P Kuhn, PhD, UCLA Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Taylor Kuhn, Principal Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05417555
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IRB#21-000995
    • 1R01AG073480-01
    • IRB#21-000995
    First Posted:
    Jun 14, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 14, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by Taylor Kuhn, Principal Investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 14, 2022