MCI: Metformin in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Sponsor
Columbia University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00620191
Collaborator
Institute for the Study of Aging (ISOA) (Other), National Institute on Aging (NIA) (NIH)
80
1
2
44
1.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Hyperinsulinemia and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are important potential risk factors for cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Two thirds of the US adult population are at risk for hyperinsulinemia and T2D, and half of the population 85 years and older have AD. Peripheral hyperinsulinemia can impair the clearance of amyloid beta in the brain, the main culprit in AD. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that lowering peripheral insulin in overweight persons with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (AMCI), a transition state between normal cognition and AD, can decrease the risk of cognitive decline and progression to AD. The investigators propose to conduct a phase II double blinded placebo controlled randomized clinical trial of metformin, a safe and effective medication that prevents hyperinsulinemia and diabetes, to test this hypothesis among 80 overweight persons aged 55 to 90 years with AMCI. The main outcome of the study will be changes in performance in a memory test (total recall of the Selective Reminding Test) and the Score a test of general cognitive function used in clinical trials (the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog)). Another aim is to compare brain function in an area affected by Alzheimer's disease between the metformin and placebo group mean changes from beginning to end among 40 participants using a PET scan.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is expected to quadruple by the year 2047. There are no known curative or preventive measures for AD. Current treatment options for AD only address symptoms, and no treatments are available that focus on delaying the actual disease process. One of the currently accepted hypothesis of the pathogenesis of AD is that the main culprit is the accumulation of Aβ in the brain, and this process has become a target for treatments and preventive measures. Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been used to describe a transitional state between normal cognitive function and AD, and has thus been targeted for interventions. Persons with MCI progress to AD at the rate of nearly 10% to 15% per year. The criteria most commonly used for the definition of AD dementia from MCI. The investigators propose to use these criteria with slight modification to recruit persons for a pilot trail of AD prevention in persons with amnestic MCI.

Peripheral hyperinsulinemia (high insulin levels) potentially impair Aβ clearance, and in this study we are proposing to use metformin, an insulin lowering agent, to prevent AD by improving Aβ clearance in the brain. The insulin resistance syndrome and hyperinsulinemia are common in individuals with and without diabetes, and are related to increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes. Hyperinsulinemia predicts the development of diabetes; therefore, diabetes can be considered a consequence and a marker of past hyperinsulinemia. According to NHANES III data, more than 40% of the population over the age of 60 years has problems of glucose intolerance or diabetes, all related to insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. The investigators have found that the risk of AD in individuals without diabetes increases with increasing levels of fasting insulin, and that high insulin levels are related to a faster decline in memory scores. The high prevalence of hyperinsulinemia and diabetes (49% of the elderly in Northern Manhattan) and its biological plausibility as a risk factor for cognitive decline and AD has attracted increasing attention. In this application we are targeting hyperinsulinemia, the most important risk factor for AD identified in the elderly population of Northern Manhattan. The risk of AD attributable to hyperinsulinemia or diabetes in Northern Manhattan was 39%, and is higher in Hispanics and African-Americans, who have a higher prevalence of diabetes and insulin resistance, and will comprise the majority of our sample.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Metformin in the Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Matching Placebo

Placebo identical to metformin

Drug: Placebo
Placebo identical to metformin 2 tablets twice a day titrated from one table once a day

Experimental: Metformin

Metformin 1000 mg twice a day

Drug: Metformin
Metformin 1000 mg twice a day titrated from 500 mg once a day
Other Names:
  • Glucophage
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Total Recall Score in the Selective Reminding Test [12 months]

      The Selective Reminding Test measures verbal learning and delayed recall through a multiple-trial list-learning paradigm. Patients are presented aurally with a list of 12 words for trial 1 and are asked to recall as many as possible. For trials 2-6, there is a selective presentation of only those words not recalled on the previous trial. Trial 7 is similar to the other trials but is assessed after an 11-minute delay. The score for the selective reminding test is the unweighted average of seven individual study results (min=0 and max=84) Higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance. The total recall score from the first visit was subtracted from that of the last visit to calculate the change in score (total words recalled).

    2. Change in Score of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) [12 months]

      The ADAS-cog is an aggregate for several cognitive tests intended to provide a global cognitive score and consists of 11 tasks. The tasks (and corresponding score range)) are Word Recall (0-10), Naming (0-4), Commands (0-5), Constructional Praxis (0-5) Ideational Praxis (0-5), Orientation (0-8), Word Recognition (0-12), Language (0-5), Word Finding Difficulty (0-5), and Remembering Test Instructions (1-5). The range of aggregate scores (sum of scores) is 1 to 69, with higher scores meaning worse cognitive performance. The change was calculated subtracting the baseline score from the final visit score.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Relative Glucose Uptake (rCMRg) in the Posterior Cingulate-precuneus. [12 months]

      Change in relative glucose uptake (rCMRgl) in the posterior cingulate-precuneus measured with subscale (ADAS-Cog) from brain [18]F-labeled 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). The unit for rCMRgl is %. The results presented are absolute differences in rCMRgl, presented in % units; the change was calculated subtracting the baseline rCMRgl from the follow-up rCMRgl

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Plasma Amyloid Beta-42 [12 months]

      Change in plasma Amyloid beta-42 from baseline to 12 months

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    55 Years to 90 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion criteria:
    • Age range: 55 years to 90 years. The main rationale for this inclusion criteria is to follow the standard set by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS).

    • Memory complaint expressed by the participant and recognized by the informant. The memory complaint must represent a change from previous functioning based on information provided by both subject and informant.

    • Fluent in English or Spanish.

    • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) equal or more than 20.

    • Subjects must fulfill criteria for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Guidelines for the diagnosis of MCI: Subjects must score below a predetermined cut-off score on the logical memory II delayed paragraph recall sub-test of the Wechsler Memory Scale Revised (WMS-R) or the selective reminding test (SRT).

    • Global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score must be 0.5 at screening.

    • Subjects without a known history of diabetes or diabetes that has never been treated with medications. If diabetes is diagnosed during screening or they have a history of diabetes not treated in the last 12 months they will be excluded if their Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is > 6.5. In addition, a diagnosis of diabetes can be made if the HbA1c is 6.5% or more.

    • Overweight or obese by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) criteria (Body Mass Index (BMI) of more or equal of 25 kg/ m2).

    • No contraindications to metformin treatment.

    • Hachinski score less or equal to 4.

    • Hamilton score less or equal to 12 on the 17 item scale.

    • General cognition and functional performance such that a diagnosis of dementia cannot be made at the time of screening based on DSM-IV criteria.

    • Vision and hearing must be sufficient for compliance with testing procedures.

    Exclusion criteria:
    • Individuals with dementia

    • MMSE < 20

    • Subjects with neurologic diseases associated to neurologic deficits.

    • Subjects with current psychiatric diagnoses such as depression, bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.

    • Subjects with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure more than 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure more than 95 mmHg.

    • Subjects with a history of active cancer or cancer within last five years, with the exception of squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.

    • Subjects who for any reason may not complete the study as judged by the study physician.

    • Subjects with a known history of diabetes treated with medications.

    • Subjects with a new or old diagnosis of diabetes, never treated, with a HbA1c of more than 6.5 .

    • Contraindications to metformin: Contraindications to metformin use include a creatinine of > 1.5, liver disease by history or by elevated transaminases, congestive heart failure, and alcohol abuse.

    • Use of cholinesterase inhibitors.

    Exclusion criteria for brain imaging study:
    • Presence of diabetes, even if the HbA1c is less or equal to 6.5.

    • Inability to lie down for any reason.

    • Presence of any metallic implant.

    • Claustrophobia.

    • Any contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET).

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Columbia University Medical Center New York New York United States 10032

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Columbia University
    • Institute for the Study of Aging (ISOA)
    • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Jose A Luchsinger, MD, Columbia University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    José A. Luchsinger, Associate Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology at NYPH/CUMC, Columbia University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00620191
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AAAC7231
    • R01AG026413
    • 270901
    First Posted:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 23, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by José A. Luchsinger, Associate Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology at NYPH/CUMC, Columbia University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Recruitment was completed in 32 months (2.5 subjects a month) [38]; 1426 subjects were screened by telephone and 331 were screened in person.
    Pre-assignment Detail 1426 screened by telephone and 1095 excluded; 331 deemed eligible for in-person screen; 224 of those were excluded; 87 met eligibility criteria, 7 declined randomization, 80 were randomized
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Metformin
    Arm/Group Description placebo identical to metformin. placebo: placebo identical to metformin 2 tablets twice a day titrated from one table once a day metformin 1000 mg twice a day metformin: metformin 1000 mg twice a day titrated from 500 mg once a day
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 40 40
    3 Month Follow-up 39 39
    6 Month Follow-up 38 36
    9 Month Follow-up 37 34
    COMPLETED 33 32
    NOT COMPLETED 7 8

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Placebo Metformin Total
    Arm/Group Description placebo identical to metformin. placebo: placebo identical to metformin 2 tablets twice a day titrated from one table once a day. Participants remained on the maximum number of tolerated tablets (0,1,2,3,4). metformin 1000 mg twice a day metformin: metformin 1000 mg twice a day titrated from 500 mg once a day.Participants remained on the maximum number of tolerated tablets (0,1,2,3,4). Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 40 40 80
    Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
    64.1
    (7.9)
    65.3
    (7.0)
    64.5
    (7.6)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    24
    60%
    18
    45%
    42
    52.5%
    Male
    16
    40%
    22
    55%
    38
    47.5%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    13
    32.5%
    17
    42.5%
    30
    37.5%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    27
    67.5%
    23
    57.5%
    50
    62.5%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Asian
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Black or African American
    15
    37.5%
    11
    27.5%
    26
    32.5%
    White
    12
    30%
    12
    30%
    24
    30%
    More than one race
    13
    32.5%
    17
    42.5%
    30
    37.5%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    40
    100%
    40
    100%
    80
    100%
    APOE Epsilon 4 (participants) [Number]
    ApoE Epsilon 4 positive
    11
    27.5%
    10
    25%
    21
    26.3%
    ApoE epsilon 4 negative
    29
    72.5%
    30
    75%
    59
    73.8%
    Body Mass Index (kg/m⌃2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m⌃2]
    31.3
    (4.7)
    30.9
    (4.1)
    31.1
    (4.4)
    Hemoglobin A1c (percent HbA1c) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent HbA1c]
    6.1
    (0.5)
    6.1
    (0.8)
    6.1
    (0.6)
    Fasting insulin (IU/dl) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [IU/dl]
    13.4
    (7.6)
    16.3
    (9.5)
    14.7
    (8.6)
    Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmHg]
    132.1
    (12.4)
    130.8
    (10.9)
    131.4
    (11.6)
    Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dl]
    208.2
    (46.7)
    204.2
    (43.6)
    206.2
    (44.9)
    High Density lipoprotein (mg/dl) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mg/dl]
    58.3
    (17.7)
    51.5
    (14.1)
    54.8
    (16.2)
    Score of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) (score) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score]
    14.6
    (6.1)
    12.0
    (4.0)
    13.3
    (5.3)
    Selective Reminding Test Total Recall score (score) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score]
    36.1
    (9.5)
    34.2
    (7.9)
    35.2
    (8.7)
    Education in Years (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
    13.1
    (4.5)
    13.8
    (3.4)
    13.4
    (4.0)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Change in Total Recall Score in the Selective Reminding Test
    Description The Selective Reminding Test measures verbal learning and delayed recall through a multiple-trial list-learning paradigm. Patients are presented aurally with a list of 12 words for trial 1 and are asked to recall as many as possible. For trials 2-6, there is a selective presentation of only those words not recalled on the previous trial. Trial 7 is similar to the other trials but is assessed after an 11-minute delay. The score for the selective reminding test is the unweighted average of seven individual study results (min=0 and max=84) Higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance. The total recall score from the first visit was subtracted from that of the last visit to calculate the change in score (total words recalled).
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Metformin
    Arm/Group Description Placebo identical to metformin. placebo: placebo identical to metformin 2 tablets twice a day titrated from one tablet once a day. Participants remained on the highest tolerated dose (0,1,2,3,4 tablets). Metformin 1000 mg twice a day metformin: metformin 1000 mg twice a day titrated from 500 mg once a day. Participants remained on the highest tolerated dose (0,1,2,3,4 tablets of 500 mg each).
    Measure Participants 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
    5.7
    (8.7)
    9.4
    (8.5)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Metformin
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.05
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 3.7
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
    Value: 1.92
    Estimation Comments The difference is the value for the metformin arm minus the value for the placebo arm.
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Metformin
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.05
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments adjusted for baseline ADAS-Cog value
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 4.1
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
    Value: 1.36
    Estimation Comments The difference is the value for the metformin arm minus the value for the placebo arm.
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Change in Score of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog)
    Description The ADAS-cog is an aggregate for several cognitive tests intended to provide a global cognitive score and consists of 11 tasks. The tasks (and corresponding score range)) are Word Recall (0-10), Naming (0-4), Commands (0-5), Constructional Praxis (0-5) Ideational Praxis (0-5), Orientation (0-8), Word Recognition (0-12), Language (0-5), Word Finding Difficulty (0-5), and Remembering Test Instructions (1-5). The range of aggregate scores (sum of scores) is 1 to 69, with higher scores meaning worse cognitive performance. The change was calculated subtracting the baseline score from the final visit score.
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Analyses used an intent to treat approach with last observation carried forward
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Metformin
    Arm/Group Description placebo identical to metformin. placebo: placebo identical to metformin 2 tablets twice a day titrated from one table once a day. Participants were maintained on the highest tolerated dose (0,1,2,3,4 tablets). metformin 1000 mg twice a day metformin: metformin 1000 mg twice a day titrated from 500 mg once a day.Participants were maintained on the highest tolerated dose (0,1,2,3,4 tablets of 500 mg each).
    Measure Participants 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [score]
    -1.98
    (5.5)
    0.0
    (3.3)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Metformin
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.06
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value 1.98
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
    Value: 1.01
    Estimation Comments The difference is the value for the metformin arm minus the value for the placebo arm.
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Metformin
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.34
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments adjusted for baseline ADAS-Cog score.
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value 0.9
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
    Value: 0.91
    Estimation Comments The difference is the value for the metformin arm minus the value for the placebo arm.
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in Relative Glucose Uptake (rCMRg) in the Posterior Cingulate-precuneus.
    Description Change in relative glucose uptake (rCMRgl) in the posterior cingulate-precuneus measured with subscale (ADAS-Cog) from brain [18]F-labeled 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). The unit for rCMRgl is %. The results presented are absolute differences in rCMRgl, presented in % units; the change was calculated subtracting the baseline rCMRgl from the follow-up rCMRgl
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Out of 40 persons recruited in the imaging sub study, 33 underwent a 12 month scan (18 in the placebo group, 15 in the metformin group).
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Metformin
    Arm/Group Description Placebo identical to metformin. placebo: placebo identical to metformin 2 tablets twice a day titrated from one table once a day. Participants remained on the highest tolerated dose (0,1,2,3,4 tablets). Metformin 1000 mg twice a day metformin: metformin 1000 mg twice a day titrated from 500 mg once a day. Participants remained on the highest tolerated dose (0,1,2,3,4 tablets of 500 mg each).
    Measure Participants 18 15
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage of rCMRgl]
    0.0
    (6.0)
    2.0
    (6.3)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Metformin
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.36
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
    Estimated Value 2.0
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
    Value: 2.14
    Estimation Comments The difference is the value for the metformin arm minus the value for the placebo arm.
    4. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title Change in Plasma Amyloid Beta-42
    Description Change in plasma Amyloid beta-42 from baseline to 12 months
    Time Frame 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Metformin
    Arm/Group Description placebo identical to metformin. placebo: placebo identical to metformin 2 tablets twice a day titrated from one table once a day. Participants remained on the highest tolerated dose (0,1,2,3,4 tablets). metformin 1000 mg twice a day metformin: metformin 1000 mg twice a day titrated from 500 mg once a day.Participants remained on the highest tolerated dose (0,1,2,3,4 tablets of 500 mg each).
    Measure Participants 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [pg/ml]
    -4.40
    (23.51)
    0.69
    (18.5)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Metformin
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other (legacy)
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.34
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
    Estimated Value 5.09
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
    to
    Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Deviation
    Value: 4.73
    Estimation Comments The difference is the value for the metformin arm minus the value for the placebo arm.

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 12 months
    Adverse Event Reporting Description The adverse event data were collected during the 12 months of the duration of the trial
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Metformin
    Arm/Group Description Matching placebo placebo: matching identical to metformin 2 tablets twice a day titrated from one table once a day metformin 1000 mg twice a day metformin: metformin 1000 mg twice a day titrated from 500 mg once a day
    All Cause Mortality
    Placebo Metformin
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Placebo Metformin
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/40 (0%) 0/40 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Placebo Metformin
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/40 (0%) 3/40 (7.5%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastrointestinal symptoms 0/40 (0%) 0 3/40 (7.5%) 3

    Limitations/Caveats

    The pilot study had a small sample size and relatively short duration, both for the whole sample, and the imaging sub-sample

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Jose Luchsinger
    Organization Columbia University Medical Center
    Phone 212-3054730
    Email jal94@cumc.columbia.edu
    Responsible Party:
    José A. Luchsinger, Associate Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology at NYPH/CUMC, Columbia University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00620191
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AAAC7231
    • R01AG026413
    • 270901
    First Posted:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 23, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2020