Effects of Brain Stimulation During a Daytime Nap on Memory Consolidation in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The beneficial effect of nocturnal as well as daytime sleep on memory consolidation is well-documented in young, healthy subjects. Slow wave sleep (SWS), in particular, with its slow oscillating activity have shown to enhance declarative, hippocampus-dependent memory representations. This impact of sleep on memory performance can be additionally enhanced by exogeneous induction of transcranial slow oscillating stimulation (tSOS) within the frequency range of SWS in humans (0,7- 0,8 Hz) during sleep, as has been demonstrated in young, healthy subjects. If patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI)- usually characterized by initial difficulties in hippocampus dependent memory functions - benefit from transcranial slow oscillatory stimulation (tSOS) during sleep as well has not been studied so far. The primary goal of the study is therefore to investigate the impact of oscillating current stimulation (tSOS) during a daytime nap on declarative memory consolidation in MCI patients.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 0,75 Hz stimulation transcranial slow oscilliating stimulation (tSOS)during periods of SWS |
Device: 0,75 Hz stimulation
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: SHAM stimulation SHAM stimulation during periods of SWS |
Device: SHAM stimulation
no stimulation
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Retention of declarative memories after 0.75 Hz stimulation during SWS, vs after sham stimulation during SWS [4 Weeks]
Retention between stimulation conditions (0.75 Hz during SWS, vs sham stimulation during SWS) in the declarative memory task.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Amount of Slow wave Sleep, spindels, eeg-correlates, further memory systems [4 Weeks]
Amount of slow wave sleep assessed by standard polysomnographic criteria in 0,75 Hz vs SHAM stimulation during SWS. Spindel activity during sleep indicated via several spindel parameters like number, duration, frequency of spindles; compared between 0,75 Hz and SHAM stimulation during SWS. Neuronal correlates (EEG-power in slow oscillation frequency bands induced by 0,75 Hz vs SHAM stimulation during SWS; EEG-correlates of encoding and retrieval of a declarative memory task). Performance in further memory systems (procedural), compared between 0,75 Hz and SHAM stimulation during SWS.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- amnestic and amnestic plus MCI-patients:
-
Concern reflecting a change in cognition reported by patient or informant or clinician (i.e., historical or observed evidence of decline over time)
-
Objective evidence of memory impairment; additional cognitive domains may be affected as well;
-
Preservation of independence in functional abilities
-
no dementia
- age: 50-90 years
Exclusion Criteria:
-
untreated severe internal or psychiatric diseases
-
epilepsy
-
other severe neurological diseases eg., previous major stroke, brain tumour
-
dementia
-
contraindications to MRI
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Charite CCM Neurologie Berlin | Berlin | Germany | 10117 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Investigators
- Study Chair: Agnes Flöel, Professor, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Neurologie
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Diekelmann S, Born J. The memory function of sleep. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):114-26. doi: 10.1038/nrn2762. Epub 2010 Jan 4. Review.
- Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, Marceglia S, Cogiamanian F, Barbieri S, Scarpini E, Priori A. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008 Aug 12;71(7):493-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000317060.43722.a3. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
- Mander BA, Santhanam S, Saletin JM, Walker MP. Wake deterioration and sleep restoration of human learning. Curr Biol. 2011 Mar 8;21(5):R183-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.019.
- Marshall L, Helgadóttir H, Mölle M, Born J. Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory. Nature. 2006 Nov 30;444(7119):610-3. Epub 2006 Nov 5.
- Mednick S, Nakayama K, Stickgold R. Sleep-dependent learning: a nap is as good as a night. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):697-8.
- Mednick SC, Cai DJ, Kanady J, Drummond SP. Comparing the benefits of caffeine, naps and placebo on verbal, motor and perceptual memory. Behav Brain Res. 2008 Nov 3;193(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.04.028. Epub 2008 May 8.
- Naismith SL, Lewis SJ, Rogers NL. Sleep-wake changes and cognition in neurodegenerative disease. Prog Brain Res. 2011;190:21-52. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53817-8.00002-5. Review.
- Nap-tSOS-MCI