MLX/XLX ACR Expandable Lumbar Interbody Implants
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of thoracic and/or lumbar spine surgery using the MLX and XLX ACR interbody implants as measured by reported complications, radiographic outcomes, and clinical patient outcomes. This study is being undertaken to identify possible residual risks and to clarify mid- to long-term clinical performance that may affect the benefit/risk ratios of the MLX and XLX ACR interbody implants.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Detailed Description
Patients considered for this study will have previously undergone surgery for their spinal condition according to the standard of care of the practitioner. All patients at a given site with surgeries that meet eligibility requirements will be included in the study and available progress notes, medical records, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), radiographs, and complications will be obtained from the medical records.
The safety and performance of the MLX and XLX ACR interbody implants will be assessed using the following:
-
Complications attributable to the use of the associated interbody implant as noted in surgical summaries, progress notes, and hospital records
-
Neurologic status, symptoms, and subject self-reported clinical outcomes (e.g., pain and disability), as available
-
Radiographic outcome (fusion) and description of device status from plain film radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scan(s), as available
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| MLX - Medial Lateral Expandable Lumbar Interbody System Patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion with the MLX expandable interbody implant will be included in the MLX - Medial Lateral Expandable Lumbar Interbody System cohort. |
|
| XLX ACR Interbody System Patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion with the XLX ACR expandable interbody implant will be included in the XLX ACR Interbody System cohort. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Rate of Complications [At least three months]
Rate of complications (i.e., safety) attributable to use of the associated interbody implants (MLX or XLX ACR)
- Proportion of Subjects with Improvement in Neurological Symptoms [At least three months]
The rate of improvement as compared to baseline in preoperative neurological symptoms will be measured using a standard motor/sensory neurological exam.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Proportion of Subjects with Apparent Radiographic Fusion [12 months or greater]
Proportion of subjects with apparent radiographic fusion at 12 months or greater postoperative, as imaging is available
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients who were ≥18 years of age at the time of surgery
-
Underwent spine surgery using either MLX or XLX ACR interbody implant (NuVasive, Inc.,
San Diego, CA) at:
-
One or two adjacent thoracic and/or lumbar levels for degenerative disc disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis, or
-
Any number of thoracic and/or lumbar levels for degenerative scoliosis (defined as >10º coronal curve)
-
Interbody fusion with autograft and/or allograft (i.e., cancellous and/or corticocancellous allograft bone)
-
NuVasive supplemental internal fixation cleared by the applicable regulatory body for use in the thoracolumbar spine
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of any bone graft with the associated interbody implant that is not FDA-cleared for use within interbody implants.
Examples of these include:
-
Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) (e.g., Infuse (Medtronic))
-
Synthetic bone graft extenders (e.g., AttraX (NuVasive), Formagraft (NuVasive), Mastergraft (Medtronic), Vitoss (Stryker), Actifuse (Baxter), nanOss (RTI Surgical), Fibergraft (Prosidyan/Depuy Synthes), ChronOs (Depuy Synthes))
-
Demineralized bone matrices (DBM) regulated as medical devices by the FDA (e.g., Grafton Putty/Gel (Medtronic), DBX (MTF/Depuy Synthes), Accell Evo3 (IsoTis), Propel Putty/Gel (NuVasive))
-
Peptide enhanced bone graft (e.g., iFactor (Cerapedics))
-
Previous lumbar fusion surgery at the currently treated level(s) (adjacent-level surgery is acceptable)
-
Systemic or local infection (latent or active) or signs of local inflammation documented at the time of surgery
-
Patient was involved in active litigation relating to the spine during the surgical/postoperative period (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested)
-
Inadequate bone stock or bone quality documented at the time of surgery
-
Known sensitivity to materials implanted documented at the time of surgery
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orthopaedic Specialty Institute | Orange | California | United States | 92868 |
| 2 | Lyerly Neurosurgery | Jacksonville | Florida | United States | 32207 |
| 3 | Carolina NeuroSurgery & Spine Associates | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | 28204 |
| 4 | OrthoCarolina Research Institute | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States | 28207 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- NuVasive
Investigators
- Study Director: Kyle Malone, MS, NuVasive
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- NUVA.EXP0120