MWMMET: Muscle Energy Technique and Mulligan's Mobilization in Breast Cancer Surgery Patients

Sponsor
Cairo University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05911867
Collaborator
(none)
108
1
3
4
27.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

A recent study aimed to examine the combined effect of Mulligan and muscle energy techniques on postural changes and shoulder kinematics among women who had undergone breast cancer surgery with axillary dissection.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: combination of mobilization with movement and muscle energy techniques
  • Other: muscle energy techniques Interventions:
  • Other: mobilization with movement
N/A

Detailed Description

90 female patients who had undergone breast cancer surgery with axillary dissection were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups. Group A received Mulligan and muscle energy technique, group B received Mulligan technique only, and group C received muscle energy technique. The study measured shoulder kinematics and postural changes using a digital inclinometer for range of motion, PAS/SAPO for cervical angle, and the horizontal alignment of acromions and quick DASH for upper extremity activities. Outcome measurements were taken at three different time points: baseline, six weeks post-intervention, and eight weeks after the intervention during a follow-up assessment.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
108 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
controlled, single-blinded, and randomized clinical trialcontrolled, single-blinded, and randomized clinical trial
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
both participants and outcome assessors are blind for groups allocation and treatment modalities
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Combined Effect of Mulligan and Muscle Energy Techniques on Shoulder Kinematics and Postural Changes After Breast Cancer Surgery With Axillary Dissection: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 15, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: combination of mobilization with movement and muscle energy techniques

Mulligan technique (MWM) involves the therapist using a belt around the humeral head to guide appropriate gliding while the patient moves their shoulder actively through the range. The therapist applies pressure to the scapula in a counter direction. Regarding the cervical spine, the second technique, Cervical Self-Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAG), involves the therapist standing behind the patient and applying force to the spinous process of each vertebra using a thumb-over-thumb technique. The examiner passively abducts the arm in the horizontal plane until the first barrier to motion by applying pressure to the distal humerus. This passive stretch will be held for three seconds.

Other: combination of mobilization with movement and muscle energy techniques
The examiner passively abducts the arm in the horizontal plane until the first barrier to motion by applying pressure to the distal humerus. The participant then actively abduct the arm in the horizontal plane for a three-second active-assisted stretch. Regarding the cervical spine, the second technique, Cervical Self-Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAG), involves the therapist standing behind the patient and applying force to the spinous process of each vertebra using a thumb-over-thumb technique. The patient actively performs repeated flexion or extension of their neck, returning back to the neutral position. The passive gliding is maintained in the anterosuperior direction along the facet joint line while flexing or extending the neck throughout the range.
Other Names:
  • MWM
  • Active Comparator: mobilization with movement

    Regarding the shoulder joint, the Mulligan technique (MWM) involves the therapist using a belt around the humeral head to guide appropriate gliding while the patient moves their shoulder actively through the range. The therapist applies pressure to the scapula in a counter direction. This technique is usually performed for five sets of five repetitions with one minute of rest between sets in a sitting position. Regarding the cervical spine, the second technique, Cervical Self-Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAG), involves the therapist standing behind the patient and applying force to the spinous process of each vertebra using a thumb-over-thumb technique. The patient actively performs repeated flexion or extension of their neck, returning back to the neutral position.

    Other: mobilization with movement
    Regarding the cervical spine, the second technique, Cervical Self-Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAG), involves the therapist standing behind the patient and applying force to the spinous process of each vertebra using a thumb-over-thumb technique. The patient actively performs repeated flexion or extension of their neck, returning back to the neutral position. The passive gliding is maintained in the anterosuperior direction along the facet joint line while flexing or extending the neck throughout the range.

    Active Comparator: muscle energy techniques

    The examiner passively abduct the arm in the horizontal plane until the first barrier to motion by applying pressure to the distal humerus. This passive stretch will be held for three seconds. The examiner then instruct the participant to attempt to horizontally adduct the test arm at 25% of their maximal effort while the examiner applies manual resistance at the distal humerus to create an isometric contraction lasting five seconds. The participant then actively abduct the arm in the horizontal plane for a three-second active-assisted stretch.

    Other: muscle energy techniques Interventions:
    The examiner passively abduct the arm in the horizontal plane until the first barrier to motion by applying pressure to the distal humerus. This passive stretch will be held for three seconds. The examiner then instruct the participant to attempt to horizontally adduct the test arm at 25% of their maximal effort while the examiner applied manual resistance at the distal humerus to create an isometric contraction lasting five seconds. The participant then actively abduct the arm in the horizontal plane for a three-second active-assisted stretch.
    Other Names:
  • MET
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. digital inclinometer [6 weeks]

      ). This tool is recognized as valid and reliable for this purpose and requires the patient to move their affected shoulder in various directions while keeping their feet fixed in place

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Postural Assessment Software (PAS/SAPO) [6 weeks]

      The women participants were positioned in a comfortable stance, and anatomical markers will be attached to specific points such as the tragus and both acromions. Their photographs will be captured and later analyzed using the PAS/SAPO software to record the cervical angle and horizontal alignment of the acromions. A forward head position was identified by an angle less than 50°. This method has been demonstrated to be reliable and valid for identifying forward head positions

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Quick DASH scale [6 weeks]

      The Arabic version of the Quick-DASH questionnaire includes 11 items, which inquire about the patient's difficulty in performing physical activities related to the upper extremity, the severity of pain and tingling, and the impact of the problem on social activities, work, and sleep. Each item includes five response options, ranging from no difficulty to being unable to perform the activity. If at least 10 items are answered, their responses are added to create a raw score, which is then transformed to a 0-100 scale.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    50 Years to 65 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • female

    • between 50 and 65 years

    • limited shoulder range of motion

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • having metastases

    • lymphedema

    • traumatic or musculoskeletal disorders affecting the arm

    • not taking anticoagulants

    • not having undergone bilateral breast cancer surgery

    • not having a locoregional recurrence

    • not having vascular disorders in the affected arm

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hany Mohamed Elgohary Cairo Egypt 11432

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Cairo University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Hany M Elgohary, Delta University for Science and Technology, Gamasa, Coastal Road

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Hany Mohamed Ibrahim Elgohary, Professor Doctor, Cairo University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05911867
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • F.P.T2207005
    First Posted:
    Jun 22, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 22, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 22, 2023