Monitored Anesthesia Care Versus Intubated General Anesthesia for Open Heart Surgery Under Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Sponsor
ShuGuang Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05011617
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
117
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Though Cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) under epidural anesthesia in conscious patients is associated with increased risk of epidural hematoma. The investigators developed a monitored anesthesia care (MAC) platform for cardiac surgery under CPB. In the current prospective study, the investigators investigated the safety and effectiveness of the MAC platform versus intubated general anesthesia (IGA) in patients receiving elective open-heart surgery.

The study included adult patients who were scheduled to undergo open-heart surgery under CPB at Shuguang Hospital between April 2012 and December 2021. MAC consisted of local anesthesia at the site of sternotomy, sedation with dexmedetomidine, analgesia with remifentanil/sufentanil and electroacupuncture. MAC versus IGA was chosen by the patients. The investigators will investigate the safety and effectiveness of the MAC platform versus IGA in patients receiving elective open-heart surgery.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Non-intubation and monitoring anesthesia care (MAC)
N/A

Detailed Description

The detailed description of clinical trial will be published by protocol later.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
We set a blind code in case patients have adverse effects. The random code and blind code will be conducted using opaque envelopes by a "third party" independent of the study. The envelopes will be sealed and shuffled, and the assignment records will not be disclosed until the end of the study. Trial participants, cardiothoracic surgeons, anesthesiologists, outcome assessors, and data analysts will be blinded to the treatment allocation to minimize potential sources of bias. Only the nurse of the anesthesiology department (having received specialized acupuncture training) will know the participants' group allocations. However, this nurse will not know any other information about the patients.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Monitored Anesthesia Care Versus Intubated General Anesthesia for Open Heart Surgery Under Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 30, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: MAC group

Electroacupuncture was performed for two consecutive days before surgery (2 daily 30-min sessions) by a licensed acupuncturist at 4.0 mA using an alternating frequency of 2 and 100 Hz (every 1.5 seconds) (LH-202, Huawei, Beijing, China). Acupoints included bilateral Yunmen (LU2), Zhongfu (LU1), Lieque (LU7), and Neiguan (PC6). On the day of surgery, electroacupuncture started upon the completion of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine, was suspended when CPB started (to avoid interference with electrocardiogram recording) and continued until the end of surgery.

Device: Non-intubation and monitoring anesthesia care (MAC)
Non-intubation and monitoring anesthesia care (MAC) consisted of non-intubation technique, local anesthesia at the site of sternotomy, sedation with dexmedetomidine, analgesia with remifentanil/sufentanil, and electroacupuncture.

No Intervention: IGA group

Anesthesia was induced with propofol (2.0-3.5 μg/mL) by target control infusion and 0.3-0.5 μg/kg sufentanil. Tracheal intubation was facilitated by rocuronium (1.0 mg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained using isoflurane at 0.7-1.0 minimal alveolar concentration in a gas mixture of oxygen and air and remifentanil (0.05-0.2 μg·kg-1·min-1) by intravenous injection pump. Sufentanil dose was totally 2.5-4.0 μg/kg. Muscle relaxation was achieved using 1/3-1/4 of the induction dose every 40-60 min based on a train of four. Mechanical ventilation with 80% O2 in air was used. Tidal volume (7-8 mL/kg) and respiratory rate (10-12/min) were adjusted according to PETCO2 to achieve normal ventilation (PETCO2 35-45 mmHg).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. intraoperative consumption of opioids [end of the surgery, up to 48 hours after surgery]

    intraoperative consumption of sufentanil and remifentanil

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. time to drinking [through study completion, an average of 24 hours]

    The interval between the end of surgery and the first drink

Other Outcome Measures

  1. length of ICU stay [through study completion, an average of 12 days]

    the length of time about transfer out of ICU after surgery

  2. The Vasoactive-inotropic Score [end of the surgery, up to 48 hours after surgery]

    The vasoactive-inotropic score was used to evaluate the dose of various vasoactive drugs and calculated by the following formula: Vasoactive-inotropic score = dopamine (×1) + dobutamine (×1) + amrinone (×1) + milrinone (×15) + epinephrine (×100) + norepinephrine (×100) + isoprenaline (×100). The minimum value was 0 and the maximum values had no upper limit. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
    1. NYHA class II or less;
    1. expected aortic block time at ≤ 120 min;
    1. body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/cm2.
Exclusion Criteria:
    1. systolic pulmonary blood pressure > 70 mmHg;
    1. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, or simplified airway risk index > 3;
    1. Child-Pugh grade B or C liver insufficiency or renal insufficiency (24-h creatinine clearance < 80 mL/min and blood urea nitrogen > 7.5 mmol/L);
    1. coagulopathy (aPTT prolongation > 10 seconds versus normal controls, PT prolongation > 3 seconds versus normal controls, and INR > 3.0).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Shuguang Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Shanghai Shanghai China 201203

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • ShuGuang Hospital

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jianggang Song, MD, Acupuncture and Anesthesia Research Institute, Shanghai, China

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jiangang Song, Director of anesthesiology department of Shuguang Hospital, ShuGuang Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05011617
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 81603450
First Posted:
Aug 18, 2021
Last Update Posted:
May 10, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 10, 2022