Best Incision in Cesarean Section of Obese Women

Sponsor
Al-Azhar University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06032637
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
14.9
4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this comparative clinical trial is to compare Pfannenstiel incision and higher transverse supra umbilical incision techniques during elective cesarean section in morbidly obese patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is there a difference in operative time between the two incision techniques? Is there a difference in estimated blood loss between the two techniques? Is there a difference in post-operative pain scores between the two techniques? Is there a difference in wound complication rates between the two techniques? Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a Pfannenstiel incision or a higher transverse supra umbilical incision during their scheduled cesarean delivery.

Researchers will compare the Pfannenstiel incision group to the higher transverse supra umbilical incision group to see if there are differences in operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain, and wound complications.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Pfannenstiel incision
  • Procedure: Supra-umbilical transverse incision
N/A

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled trial will enroll 60 morbidly obese pregnant patients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery at gestational age ≥37 weeks. Morbid obesity will be defined as pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.

Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups (30 patients per group):

Group 1 (Pfannenstiel group): Patients will undergo a transverse infraumbilical skin incision 2-3 cm above the symphysis pubis, followed by transverse incision of the anterior rectus sheath in the same line as the skin incision, blunt digital separation of the rectus muscles, and transverse uterine incision in the lower segment.

Group 2 (Supra-umbilical transverse group): Patients will undergo a transverse skin incision halfway between the umbilicus and xiphoid process, followed by transverse incision of the anterior rectus sheath in the same line, blunt digital separation of the rectus muscles, and transverse uterine incision in the lower segment.

The primary outcome measures will be operative time, estimated blood loss, post-operative pain scores, and wound complication rates. Secondary outcomes will include length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction scores, and cosmetic results.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Difference Between Pfannenstiel Incision and Higher Transverse Supra Umbilical Incision, During Elective Cesarean Section in Morbidly Obese Patients
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Pfannenstiel incision

Patients randomized to the Pfannenstiel incision arm will undergo a transverse skin incision 2-3cm above the symphysis pubis. Subcutaneous tissue will be dissected until anterior rectus sheath is exposed. A transverse incision will be made through the rectus sheath in line with the skin incision, avoiding injury to the inferior epigastric arteries. Rectus muscles will be separated manually along midline using blunt dissection. The peritoneum will be incised transversely and the hysterotomy extended laterally with uterine traction to deliver fetus. The visceral peritoneum will not be closed. Rectus muscles will not be re-approximated. Subcutaneous tissue will not be irrigated. Subcutaneous tissue will be closed if over 2cm depth. Skin will be closed with non-absorbable suture subcuticularly.

Procedure: Pfannenstiel incision
Patients randomized to the supra-umbilical transverse incision arm will receive a transverse skin incision halfway between the umbilicus and xiphoid process, extending laterally to the semilunar lines. The subcutaneous tissue will be bluntly dissected until the anterior rectus sheath is exposed. A transverse incision will be made through the rectus sheath in line with the skin incision, avoiding injury to the superior epigastric vessels. The rectus muscles will be split manually using blunt dissection. The peritoneum will be incised transversely and the hysterotomy extended laterally to deliver the fetus. The visceral peritoneum will not be closed. The rectus muscles will not be re-approximated. The subcutaneous tissue will not be irrigated but closed if over 2cm depth. The skin will be closed with non-absorbable suture subcuticularly.

Experimental: Supra-Umbilical

Patients randomized to the supra-umbilical transverse incision arm will undergo a transverse skin incision halfway between the umbilicus and xiphoid process, extending laterally to the semilunar lines. Subcutaneous tissue will be bluntly dissected until anterior rectus sheath is exposed. A transverse incision will be made through the rectus sheath in line with the skin incision, avoiding injury to the superior epigastric vessels. Rectus muscles will be split manually along midline using blunt dissection. The peritoneum will be incised transversely and the hysterotomy extended laterally with uterine traction to deliver fetus. The visceral peritoneum will not be closed. Rectus muscles will not be re-approximated. Subcutaneous tissue will not be irrigated. Subcutaneous tissue will be closed if over 2cm depth. Skin will be closed with non-absorbable suture subcuticularly.

Procedure: Supra-umbilical transverse incision
Patients randomized to the supra-umbilical transverse incision arm will receive a transverse skin incision 3-4cm above the umbilicus, extending laterally to the semilunar lines, without panniculus retraction. The subcutaneous tissue will be bluntly dissected until the anterior rectus sheath is exposed. The rectus sheath will be incised transversely using electrocautery for hemostasis, avoiding injury to the superior epigastric vessels. The rectus muscles will be split manually along the midline using blunt dissection. The peritoneum will be transversely incised and the hysterotomy extended laterally to deliver the fetus. The visceral peritoneum will not be closed. The rectus muscles will not be re-approximated. The subcutaneous tissue will not be irrigated but closed if over 2cm depth. The skin will be closed with non-absorbable suture subcuticularly.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of surgical site wound infection [4 weeks after the surgery.]

    Surgical site infections will be assessed at the cesarean incision site and tracked for 4 weeks postoperatively. Wound infection will be defined as purulent drainage from the incision, positive culture, and/or at least two of the following signs or symptoms: pain or tenderness, localized swelling, redness, or heat. The 4-week timeframe starts on the day of surgery (day 0) and ends 28 days postoperatively. Wound infections occurring up to 4 weeks after surgery will be captured and recorded as the primary outcome measure. Wound assessments will be performed daily during the hospital stay, at the post-op visit around 2 weeks, and at the 4-week follow-up visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Operative time [during the surgery]

    Operative time will be defined as the time from skin incision to complete wound closure. It will be recorded in minutes by a study investigator observing each procedure.

  2. Hospital length of stay [From day of surgery to discharge, up to 8 weeks.]

    Hospital length of stay will be defined as the number of days from surgery until discharge from the hospital.

  3. Estimated blood loss [during the procedure]

    Estimated blood loss will be assessed by the anesthesiologist and surgeon at the end of the procedure, based on the amount of blood in the suction canister and blood-soaked sponges/lap pads.

  4. Postoperative pain [From end of surgery through 4 weeks postoperatively]

    Postoperative pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst possible pain. Patients will rate their pain level at set intervals after surgery - immediately after recovery room discharge, daily while inpatient, and at 2 weeks and 4 weeks postop during follow-up visits.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Female patients aged between 20 and 40 years.

  • Singleton pregnancy.

  • Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks.

  • Scheduled for elective cesarean delivery.

  • Morbid obesity, defined as pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2.

  • Willing and able to provide informed consent.

  • Able to adhere to study procedures and follow-up schedule.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Emergency cesarean delivery.

  • Multiple gestation (twins, triplets, etc)

  • Placenta previa or vasa previa.

  • History of more than 1 previous cesarean delivery.

  • HIV, hepatitis B/C infection.

  • Current anticoagulation therapy.

  • Immune-compromised conditions.

  • Premature rupture of membranes.

  • Pre-existing skin conditions affecting the abdomen.

  • Inability to provide informed consent.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Al-Hussein University Hospital Cairo Egypt 11633

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Al-Azhar University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muhamed A Alhagrasy, M.D., Al-Azhar University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Muhamed Ahmed Abdelmoaty Muhamed Alhagrasy, lecturer and consultant at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department., Al-Azhar University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06032637
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Obstet1222
First Posted:
Sep 13, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Sep 13, 2023
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Muhamed Ahmed Abdelmoaty Muhamed Alhagrasy, lecturer and consultant at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department., Al-Azhar University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 13, 2023