Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Stomaphyx for Transoral Incisionless Reduction of the Enlarged Gastric Pouch and Stoma
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Executive Summary
Aims and Hypotheses of the Study:
The aim of the study will be to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and early outcome of the StomaphyX procedure for reducing the enlarged gastric pouch and stoma in post-bariatric patients. The study will test a hypothesis that the StomaphyX procedure will be effective in promoting the loss of regained weight, reducing the risk for comorbidities and improving patients' quality of life.
Type of Study: Prospective non-randomized Study Duration: 12 months Number of Patients: 20
Inclusion Criteria:
18-70 years of age, BMI ≥ 35, ≥ 2 years after primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with evidence of enlarged gastric pouch volume or enlarged stoma diameter of ≥ 20 mm via endoscopy or fluoroscopy. Pts also demonstrate a weight regain of 15% of excess body weight loss.
Exclusion Criteria:
Esophageal stricture, or any anatomic conditions that preclude passage of transoral endoluminal instruments, has another causal factor for weight regain other than stoma or pouch dilatation, portal hypertension, coagulation disorders or chronic use of anticoagulants, any active medical condition that would preclude the patient from completing the study or would result in an unreasonable risk to the patient.
Intervention Treatment: Creation of multiple full-thickness plications within the gastric pouch using the StomaphyX device (EndoGastric Solutions, Inc., Redmond, WA, USA)
Evaluation Criteria Primary Outcome: Change in body weight at 6 and 12 months Secondary Outcome: Gastric pouch volume assessment, stoma diameter determination, quality of life scores, waist circumference, co-morbidity resolution Effectiveness and Safety Assessment Clinical: Weight, height, waist circumference quality of life questionnaires (Impact of Weight QOL-Lite, Eating and Weight Patterns, Three-factor Eating, Emotional Eating Scale, GI QoL, GSRS and/or PGWB) Anatomical: Upper GI endoscopy, computed tomography or barium radiography Biochemical: Blood and urine tests (glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL, LDL, uric acid) Safety: Adverse events, complications, co-morbidities, hospital stay
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: StomaphyX Group Primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with evidence of enlarged gastric pouch volume or enlarged stoma diameter of ≥ 20 mm via endoscopy or fluoroscopy. Patients also demonstrate a weight regain of 15% of excess body weight loss. |
Device: StomaphyX
StomaphyX with SerosaFuse fasteners (EndoGastric Solutions, Inc., Redmond, WA, USA) is a transoral incisionless fastening device that allows for GI tissue approximation and creation of full-thickness (serosa-to-serosa) plications.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Primary Outcome: Change in Body Weight [At 6 months comparing to baseline weight]
Body weight changes at 6 months after StomaphyX procedure comparing to baseline weight.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age 18-70 years
-
BMI 35 or greater with one or more comorbidities
-
At least 2 years post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery
-
At enrollment, has regained at least 15% of excess body weight loss
-
Enlarged Stoma Diameter
-
Enlarged gastric pouch
-
Completed successful nutritional screening and compliant with nutritional programs
-
Completed successful cardiopulmonary evaluation
-
Patient willing to cooperate with follow-up assessment tests
-
Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Esophageal stricture or any anatomic conditions that preclude passage of transoral endoluminal instruments
-
Has another causal factor for weight regain other than stoma or pouch dilatation such as non compliant with nutritional and exercise programs
-
Portal hypertension
-
Coagulation disorders or chronic use of anticoagulants
-
Any active medical condition that would preclude the patient from completing the study or would result in an unreasonable risk to the patient
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CAMIS, Royal Alexandra Hospital | Edmonton | Alberta | Canada | T5H 3V9 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Alberta
- Alberta Health services
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Arnow B, Kenardy J, Agras WS. The Emotional Eating Scale: the development of a measure to assess coping with negative affect by eating. Int J Eat Disord. 1995 Jul;18(1):79-90.
- Belle SH, Berk PD, Courcoulas AP, Flum DR, Miles CW, Mitchell JE, Pories WJ, Wolfe BM, Yanovski SZ; Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery Consortium Writing Group. Safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery: Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):116-26. Review.
- Cadière GB, Buset M, Muls V, Rajan A, Rösch T, Eckardt AJ, Weerts J, Bastens B, Costamagna G, Marchese M, Louis H, Mana F, Sermon F, Gawlicka AK, Daniel MA, Devière J. Antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX: 12-month results of a prospective multicenter study. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1676-88. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9594-9.
- Cadière GB, Rajan A, Germay O, Himpens J. Endoluminal fundoplication by a transoral device for the treatment of GERD: A feasibility study. Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):333-42. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
- Cadière GB, Rajan A, Rqibate M, Germay O, Dapri G, Himpens J, Gawlicka AK. Endoluminal fundoplication (ELF)--evolution of EsophyX, a new surgical device for transoral surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006;15(6):348-55.
- De Cocker KA, De Bourdeaudhuij IM, Cardon GM. What do pedometer counts represent? A comparison between pedometer data and data from four different questionnaires. Public Health Nutr. 2009 Jan;12(1):74-81. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008001973. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
- de Lauzon B, Romon M, Deschamps V, Lafay L, Borys JM, Karlsson J, Ducimetière P, Charles MA; Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Sante Study Group. The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 is able to distinguish among different eating patterns in a general population. J Nutr. 2004 Sep;134(9):2372-80.
- Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007 May;17(5):565-8. Review. Erratum in: Obes Surg. 2007 Jul;17(7):996.
- Elder KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric surgery: a review of procedures and outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2007 May;132(6):2253-71. Review.
- Fernandez AZ Jr, DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, Kellum JM, Wolfe LG, Meador J, Sugerman HJ. Experience with over 3,000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to leak and resultant mortality. Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):193-7. Epub 2003 Dec 29. Review.
- Gould JC, Garren MJ, Starling JR. Lessons learned from the first 100 cases in a new minimally invasive bariatric surgery program. Obes Surg. 2004 May;14(5):618-25.
- Higa KD, Boone K, Nimeri A, Tercero F, Jackson A, Khan A. Gastric bypass: increased restriction for poor weight loss. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1922-3.
- Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T. Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1,040 patients--what have we learned? Obes Surg. 2000 Dec;10(6):509-13.
- Jobe BA, O'Rourke RW, McMahon BP, Gravesen F, Lorenzo C, Hunter JG, Bronner M, Kraemer SJ. Transoral endoscopic fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: the anatomic and physiologic basis for reconstruction of the esophagogastric junction using a novel device. Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):69-76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817c9630.
- Junghard O, Wiklund I. Validation of a four-graded scale for severity of heartburn in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):765-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00313.x. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
- Kaplan LM, Klein S, Boden G, Brenner DA, Gostout CJ, Lavine JE, Popkin BM, Schirmer BD, Seeley RJ, Yanovski SZ, Cominelli F. Report of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Obesity Task Force. Gastroenterology. 2007 May;132(6):2272-5.
- Karlsson J, Persson LO, Sjöström L, Sullivan M. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Dec;24(12):1715-25.
- Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, Williams GR. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001 Feb;9(2):102-11.
- Kulich KR, Madisch A, Pacini F, Piqué JM, Regula J, Van Rensburg CJ, Ujszászy L, Carlsson J, Halling K, Wiklund IK. Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in dyspepsia: a six-country study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Jan 31;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-12.
- Matza LS, Boye KS, Yurgin N. Validation of two generic patient-reported outcome measures in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jul 31;5:47.
- Overcash WT. Natural orifice surgery (NOS) using StomaphyX for repair of gastric leaks after bariatric revisions. Obes Surg. 2008 Jul;18(7):882-5. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9452-8. Epub 2008 Apr 26.
- Sugerman HJ. Bariatric surgery for severe obesity. J Assoc Acad Minor Phys. 2001 Jul;12(3):129-36. Review.
- Thompson CC, Slattery J, Bundga ME, Lautz DB. Peroral endoscopic reduction of dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a possible new option for patients with weight regain. Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;20(11):1744-8. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
- Pro00008913
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | StomaphX |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 14 |
COMPLETED | 14 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | StomaphX |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with weight gain following VBG had endoluminal pouch reduction performed using the StomaphyXTM device in revisional bariatric surgery clinic |
Overall Participants | 14 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
46.4
(6.7)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
13
92.9%
|
Male |
1
7.1%
|
Pre-operative weight (Kg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Kg] |
119.5
(25.9)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Primary Outcome: Change in Body Weight |
---|---|
Description | Body weight changes at 6 months after StomaphyX procedure comparing to baseline weight. |
Time Frame | At 6 months comparing to baseline weight |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | StomaphX |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | |
Measure Participants | 14 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg] |
9.6
(7.9)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||
Arm/Group Title | StomaphX | |
Arm/Group Description | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||
StomaphX | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
StomaphX | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/14 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
StomaphX | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 3/14 (21.4%) | |
Surgical and medical procedures | ||
headache | 2/14 (14.3%) | 2 |
low back pain | 1/14 (7.1%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Xinzhe Shi |
---|---|
Organization | Royal Alexandra Hospital/CAMIS |
Phone | 7807356735 |
xinzhe.shi@ahs.ca |
- Pro00008913