Endoscopic Surgery for Bariatric Revision After Weight Loss Failure

Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT01871896
Collaborator
(none)
20
1
1
107
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Morbid obesity and its associated metabolic diseases are on the rise in the United States. Currently, the best treatment for obesity is bariatric surgery where both roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy offer substantial weight loss. Unfortunately, 20% of patients who undergo bariatric surgery fail to lose enough weight defined as less than 50% of excess body weight loss or regain of weight. For those patients who fail to lose weight after bariatric surgery and have failed maximal medical therapy and diet supervision, the treatment is re-operation and revision. Re-operation of the abdomen carries significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. The investigators propose to use the Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device that has already been approved by the FDA as an option for bariatric surgery revision without having to re-operate on the patient. The investigators believe that the endoscopic technique may be able to provide weight loss without having to re-operate on the patient.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Endoscopic Suturing to Create Early Satiety
N/A

Detailed Description

The most effective weight loss procedures in the United States are both roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG)where the majority are performed laparoscopically. Estimated excess body weight loss (EBWL) is >50% at the end of one year. However, nearly 20% of patients fail to meet the estimated EBWL or they may experience weight gain recidivism. The first step is nutritional counseling, medically supervised diets, and medical therapy. Surgery would be for those who still fail to lose weight despite the aforementioned efforts.

It is hypothesized that failure of weight loss for RYGB is gastrojejunostomy (GJ) dilation defined as >2 cm. Surgical treatment would require revision of this dilation. Unfortunately many of these revision procedures cannot be done laparoscopically given dense intra-abdominal adhesions. This will require conversion to an open surgery in a morbidly obese patient thus raising postoperative morbidity and mortality estimated to range between 15%-50%.

The investigators propose to use the endoscopic suturing device designed by Apollo EndoSurgery to decrease the GJ dilation to 5-6 mm thus causing restriction, delayed food transit time, and promote early satiety. These efforts will limit overall caloric intake thereby promoting weight loss.

It is thought that patients with previous SG may have a dilation of their stomach. The investigators propose a pyloric cerclage using the Apollo EndoSurgery suturing device by decreasing the opening of the pylorus thus achieving the same goals that the investigators proposed above with RYGB revision.

Endoscopic procedures are same day procedures with little morbidity and mortality when compared to laparoscopic or open bariatric surgery revision.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
20 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Apollo OverStitch for Bariatric Surgery Revision After Weight Loss Failure
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2014
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Weight Gain

Patients who previously underwent bariatric surgery who failed to lose the expected weight or regained weight.

Device: Endoscopic Suturing to Create Early Satiety
Evaluating the efficacy of endoscopic suturing for weight loss.
Other Names:
  • Endoscopic Cerclage
  • Bariatric Surgery Revision
  • Apollo EndoStitch
  • Apollo OverTube
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Weight loss [2 years]

      We will track patient's weight after their endoscopic bariatric surgery.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Resolution of Co-morbidities [2 years]

      We will track the patient's weight loss and see if their obesity-related co-morbidities resolve.

    2. Tolerance [2 years]

      We will be monitoring patient's tolerance to this procedure and evaluate their satisfaction via a short questionnaire.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Previous Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) or Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG)

    • Failure to lose >50% of their excess body weight after 1 year

    • Failure of weight loss despite maximal medical therapy and medically-supervised diets

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Esophageal Stricture

    • Marginal Ulcer at the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis

    • Non-compliance with bariatric follow-up

    • Gastric ulcers

    • Paraesophageal hernias

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of California San Francisco San Francisco California United States 94143

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of California, San Francisco

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Stanley J Rogers, MD, University of California, San Francisco
    • Principal Investigator: Jonathan T Carter, MD, University of California, San Francisco
    • Principal Investigator: John P Cello, MD, University of California, San Francisco
    • Principal Investigator: Matthew Lin, MD, University of California, San Francisco

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    University of California, San Francisco
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01871896
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EndoSurgery
    First Posted:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    May 13, 2021
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2021
    Keywords provided by University of California, San Francisco
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 13, 2021