Multidisciplinary Model to Guide Employment Amongst PLWSCI
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Spinal cord injury often results in complete or partial loss of functioning of the upper and or lower limbs, leading to the affected individual experiencing difficulties in performing activities of daily living. This in turn results in reduced participation in social, religious, recreational and economic activities (employment). Globally, there is a low employment rate (11-67%) amongst PLWSCI. In South Africa, according to Statistics South Africa, the unemployment rate of people with disabilities is estimated to be 25.2%. However, there is no information available on employment amongst PLWSCI in South Africa.
Furthermore, there is insufficient knowledge related to SCI in South Africa to enable a model to be developed and implemented. Data on the current SCI rehabilitation practices (with specific reference to vocational rehabilitation); employment status and factors (both personal and environmental); barriers and facilitators of employment amongst PLWSCI is limited. This information is needed to develop a return to work model for individuals with SCI in South Africa.
In South Africa, a legal framework exists that promotes the employment as well as assistance of people with disabilities in the workplace, such as: the Constitution of Republic of South Africa, 1996; the Employment Equity Act (EEA), 1998; the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act (PEPUDA), 2000; Labour Relations Act (LRA), 1995; Skills Development Act (SDA), 1998; Public Service Act (PSA), 1994; Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA), 1997 and the Integrated National Disability Strategy (2000). However, rehabilitation interventions provided in rehabilitation institutions are mainly medical, with limited attempts to prepare those with SCI to return to gainful employment. There is therefore a need for a well-coordinated, multi-sectorial, multi-disciplinary and multi-factorial rehabilitation intervention that will promote the employment of PLWSCI in South Africa.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
This is a cross-sectional study in which mixed methods will be used in various phases of the study. Mixed methods involve the collection and analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data in a single study. Data are collected concurrently or sequentially and integrated at one or more stages during the research process. This study will be divided into 3 phases with stages to answer the objectives.
Phase one of this study will attempt to answer objectives 1-3 of the study. Stage 1 will include a systematic review of literature to identify the most effective vocational rehabilitation interventions amongst PLWSCI. Stage 2 will determine rehabilitation services rendered to individual who sustain SCI in South Africa with an intention of identifying gaps in vocational rehabilitation practices by retrospectively analysing medical files. This phase will be concluded by a focus group to further explore current vocational rehabilitation practices rendered to PLWSCI (Stage3).
Phase two will answer objectives 4-5. Stage 1 of this phase will determine the employment status as well as factors that influence employment amongst PLWSCI. Stage 2 will determine the barriers and facilitators of employment amongst PLWSCI. Results obtained from phase 1 to 2, will be utilised to by the researcher to develop the proposed model.
The final phase will aim to develop, validate and refine the model. Stage 1 of this phase will include the researcher using the information gained in previous phases to develop the proposed model. The second stage will include a focus group to validate the content of the proposed model. The last stage will included obtaining consensus amongst the stakeholders regarding the structure and the content of the proposed model and subsequently refine it.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Rehabilitation Professionals Focus group consisting of rehabilitation professionals that will inform the study on vocational rehabilitation interventions rendered during acute to in-patient rehabilitation in KwaZulu-Natal. |
Other: Focus groups, semistructured interviews and Delphi rounds
|
| People living with Spinal Cord Injuries (PLWSCI) Focus group consisting of PLWSCI that will inform the study on the perspective of the patient on vocational rehabilitation needs or desires during acute care and in-patient rehabilitation. This group will inform the study on the employment rate amongst people living with spinal cord injuries as well as factors that influence employment. This group will also inform the study on the perceived barriers and facilitators of employment |
Other: Focus groups, semistructured interviews and Delphi rounds
|
| Stakeholders Representatives from the following departments or organisations will be invited to participate in the interviews and focus groups: Government Departments: Education Social Development Health Labour Transport Private Companies: Insurance Companies and Health Risk Management companies Non-profit Organisations QASA DPSA |
Other: Focus groups, semistructured interviews and Delphi rounds
|
| Experts A delphi technique will be used to get an expert opinion and consensus on the aspects of the model to be developed. |
Other: Focus groups, semistructured interviews and Delphi rounds
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- A multidisciplinary model to guide employment amongst people living with spinal cord injuries [18 months]
The final model will be developed using all the information gained from the Phase one and two of the study. A validation process will be done through the delphi rounds.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Systematic Review of effective Vocational Rehabilitation interventions amongst People Living With Spinal Cord Injuries [Five Months]
The review study will follow the Chocrane A journal article will be published in a peer reviewed journal.
- Rehabilitation Practices that promote employability of People Living with Spinal Cord Injuries [Three months]
Stage 2 and Stage Three of Phase one will develop a matrix or guideline of vocational rehabilitation interventions throughout the phases of rehabilitation.
- Employment and Factors that affect employment amongst People living with Spinal Cord Injuries [Five months]
Employment rates and nature of employment will be quantified using the International Labour Organisation definition of employment. The Factors affecting employment will also be quantified using the modified Life Situation Questionnaire.
- Barriers and Facilitators of employment amongst people living with spinal cord injuries. [8 months]
Interviews and focus groups will be conducted to determine the barriers and facilitators of employment amongst PLWSCI.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Phase One:
Inclusion Criteria:
• Rehabilitation professionals who are directly involved in the management of individuals who sustain SCI and have more than 1 year of working experience post community service.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Rehabilitation professionals who are not directly involved in the management of individuals who sustain SCI and have less than 1 year working experience post community service.
Phase Two :
Inclusion Criteria:
• Person who sustained injury to the spine, resulting in permanent neurological damage (complete or incomplete) and must reside in a rural, peri-urban and urban.
Exclusion Criteria
• People living with spinal cord injuries who cannot verbally communicate
Phase Three Inclusion Criteria
-
PLWSCI Injury to who resides in a rural, peri-urban and urban.
-
Rehabilitation professionals who are directly involved in the management of individuals who sustain SCI and have more than 2 years of experience post community service.
-
An individual who is full time employed in a supervisory and managerial capacity in both private and public sector, currently have subordinates who are PLWSCI.
-
A representative from the Disability Section of an insurance company that is the member of the LOA.
Exclusion Criteria
-
PLWSCI who cannot verbally communicate.
-
Rehabilitation professionals who are not directly involved in the management of individuals who sustain SCI and have less than two years of experience post community service.
-
An individual who is employed on a part-time basis and not in supervisory or managerial positions and have no subordinates who are PLWSCI.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | King Dinizulu Hospital | Durban | KwaZulu-Natal | South Africa | 4000 |
| 2 | Phoenix Spinal Rehabilitation Centre | Durban | KwaZulu-Natal | South Africa | 4068 |
| 3 | Greys Hospital | Pietermaritzburg | KwaZulu-Natal | South Africa | 3200 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of KwaZulu
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ntsikelelo Pefile, MScMedSc, University of KwaZulu
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Anderson, D., Dumont, S., Azzaria, L., Le Bourdais, M., & Noreau, L. ( 2007). Determinants of return to work among spinal cord injury patients: A literature review. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation , 27(1), 57-68.
- Bromley, I. (2006). Tetraplegia and Paraplegia. Sixth ed. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
- Catz A, Itzkovich M, Agranov E, Ring H, Tamir A. SCIM--spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 1997 Dec;35(12):850-6.
- Chan SK, Man DW. Barriers to returning to work for people with spinal cord injuries: a focus group study. Work. 2005;25(4):325-32.
- Coetzee, Z. G., C; van der Westhuizen, R; Van Niekerk, L. (2011). Re-conceptualising vocational rehabilitation services towards an inter-sectoral model. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41(2), 32-36.
- Department of Health (South Africa). (2000). National Rehabilitation Policy. Pretoria: Government Printer.
- DeVivo M, Biering-Sørensen F, Charlifue S, Noonan V, Post M, Stripling T, Wing P; Executive Committee for the International SCI Data Sets Committees. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2006 Sep;44(9):535-40. Review.
- DeVivo MJ, Biering-Sørensen F, New P, Chen Y; International Spinal Cord Injury Data Set. Standardization of data analysis and reporting of results from the International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2011 May;49(5):596-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.172. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
- Dewbury,G., Clarke, K.,Randall, D., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I. (2004). The anti-social model of disability Disability and Society 19(2). 145-158.
- Domholdt, E. (2005). Rehabilitation Research: Principles and Applications. Third ed. Missouri: Elsevier Saunders.
- Dumont RJ, Okonkwo DO, Verma S, Hurlbert RJ, Boulos PT, Ellegala DB, Dumont AS. Acute spinal cord injury, part I: pathophysiologic mechanisms. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2001 Sep-Oct;24(5):254-64. Review.
- Ekong CE, Tator CH. Spinal cord injury in the work force. Can J Surg. 1985 Mar;28(2):165-7.
- Escorpizo, R., Miller,W.C., Trenaman, L.M. (2012). Work and Employment Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Evidence, 4.0., 1-14.
- Fielingsdorf K, Dunn RN. Cervical spine injury outcome--a review of 101 cases treated in a tertiary referral unit. S Afr Med J. 2007 Mar;97(3):203-7.
- Gobelet C, Luthi F, Al-Khodairy AT, Chamberlain MA. Vocational rehabilitation: a multidisciplinary intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Sep 15;29(17):1405-10. Review.
- Hallin P, Sullivan M, Kreuter M. Spinal cord injury and quality of life measures: a review of instrument psychometric quality. Spinal Cord. 2000 Sep;38(9):509-23. Review.
- Hart C, Williams E. Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries: a reflection of changes in South African society. Paraplegia. 1994 Nov;32(11):709-14.
- Harvey, L. (2008). Management of Spinal Cord Injuries : A Guide for Physiotherapists. London: Butterworth Heinemann.
- Hess DR. Retrospective studies and chart reviews. Respir Care. 2004 Oct;49(10):1171-4.
- Higgins, J.P.T., & Green, S. (2009). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions England The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons (LTD).
- Hills, L.& Cullen, E. (2007). A study into the employment trends of individuals treated at a spinal cord injury centre. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 14(8), 350-355.
- Hsu, C. S., BA. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consesus. Practical Assessement Research and Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.
- Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC, Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Glaser E, Zeilig G, Aito S, Scivoletto G, Mecci M, Chadwick RJ, El Masry WS, Osman A, Glass CA, Silva P, Soni BM, Gardner BP, Savic G, Bergström EM, Bluvshtein V, Ronen J, Catz A. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1926-33. Epub 2007 Mar 5.
- Kidd PS, Parshall MB. Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qual Health Res. 2000 May;10(3):293-308.
- Krause JS, Carter RE, Pickelsimer EE, Wilson D. A prospective study of health and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1482-91. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.062.
- Krause JS, Sternberg M, Maides J, Lottes S. Employment after spinal cord injury: differences related to geographic region, gender, and race. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jun;79(6):615-24.
- Krause JS. Years to employment after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Sep;84(9):1282-9.
- Kroll T, Barbour R, Harris J. Using focus groups in disability research. Qual Health Res. 2007 May;17(5):690-8.
- Kroll T, Neri MT, Miller K. Using mixed methods in disability and rehabilitation research. Rehabil Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;30(3):106-13; discussion 113. Review. Erratum in: Rehabil Nurs. 2005 Jul-Aug;30(4):146.
- le Roux JC, Dunn RN. Gunshot injuries of the spine--a review of 49 cases managed at the Groote Schuur Acute Spinal Cord Injury Unit. S Afr J Surg. 2005 Nov;43(4):165-8.
- Lidal IB, Huynh TK, Biering-Sørensen F. Return to work following spinal cord injury: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Sep 15;29(17):1341-75. Review.
- Marini, I., Lee, G. K., Chan, F., Chapin, M. H., & Romero, M. G. (2008). Vocational rehabilitation service patterns related to successful competitive employment outcomes of persons with spinal cord injury. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 28(1), 1-13.
- O'Connor P. Incidence and patterns of spinal cord injury in Australia. Accid Anal Prev. 2002 Jul;34(4):405-15.
- Odendaal T. Injuries of the cervical spinal cord. The Ga-Rankuwa Hospital experience. S Afr Med J. 1991 Jul 20;80(2):75-9.
- Odendaal T. Sub-cervical spinal injuries with neural involvement. The Ga-Rankuwa Hospital experience. S Afr Med J. 1991 Sep 7;80(5):219-23.
- Office of the President (Office of the Status of Disbled People (South Africa). (1997). Integrated National Disability Strategy. Pretoria: Government Printer.
- Ottomanelli L, Barnett SD, Goetz LL. A prospective examination of the impact of a supported employment program and employment on health-related quality of life, handicap, and disability among Veterans with SCI. Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):2133-41. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0353-5. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
- Ottomanelli L, Barnett SD, Goetz LL. Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injury: 2-year results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Apr;95(4):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
- Ottomanelli L, Lind L. Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal cord injury: implications for research and vocational services. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(5):503-31. Review.
- Ottomanelli, L., Bradshaw, L.D.,Cipher, D.J. (2009). Employment and vocationl rehabilitation services use amogst veterans with spinal cord injury Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 31, 39-43.
- Paddison, S. and Middleton, F. (2005). Physical Management in Neurological Rehabilitation. Third ed. Netherlands: Elsevier.
- Powell RA, Single HM. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):499-504. Review.
- Powers, M. and Faden, R. (2006). Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Rabiee F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004 Nov;63(4):655-60. Review.
- Raine,S.,Meadows.,Lynnch-Ellerington,M (2009). Bobath Concept: Theory and Clinical Practice in Neurological Rehabilitation.1st ed. West Sussex. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
- Ramakrishnan K, Mazlan M, Julia PE, Abdul Latif L. Return to work after spinal cord injury: factors related to time to first job. Spinal Cord. 2011 Aug;49(8):924-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.16. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
- Rankin G, Rushton A, Olver P, Moore A. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy's identification of national research priorities for physiotherapy using a modified Delphi technique. Physiotherapy. 2012 Sep;98(3):260-72. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
- Rauch A, Baumberger M, Moise FG, von Elm E, Reinhardt JD. Rehabilitation needs assessment in persons with spinal cord injury following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti: a pilot study using an ICF-based tool. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Nov;43(11):969-75. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0896.
- Rauch A, Escorpizo R, Riddle DL, Eriks-Hoogland I, Stucki G, Cieza A. Using a case report of a patient with spinal cord injury to illustrate the application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health during multidisciplinary patient management. Phys Ther. 2010 Jul;90(7):1039-52. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090327. Epub 2010 May 27.
- Saulino, M. (2011). Rehabilitation of Persons With Spinal Cord Injuires. Medscape Reference. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1265209-overview#aw2aab6c12
- Schönherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Schoppen T, Eisma WH. Vocational reintegration following spinal cord injury: expectations, participation and interventions. Spinal Cord. 2004 Mar;42(3):177-84.
- Sinclair LB, Lingard LA, Mohabeer RN. What's so great about rehabilitation teams? An ethnographic study of interprofessional collaboration in a rehabilitation unit. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jul;90(7):1196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.01.021.
- Solagberu BA. Spinal cord injuries in Ilorin, Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2002 Jul-Sep;21(3):230-2.
- Somers, M. (2001). Spinal Cord Injury: Functional Rehabilitation (2 ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
- South Africa. (1994). Public Service Act no 103 of 1994. Pretoria: Government Printer.
- South Africa. (1995). Labour Relations Act no 66 of 1995. Pretoria: Government Printer.
- South Africa. (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa no 108 of 1998. Pretoria: Government Printer.
- South Africa. (1997). Basic Conditions of Employment Act no 11 of 1998. Pretoria: Government Printer.
- South Africa. (1998). Employment Equity Act no 55 of 1998. Pretoria: Government Printer.
- South Africa. (1998). Skills Development Act no 97 of 1998. Pretoria: Government Printer.
- South Africa. (2000). Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Descrimination Act no 4 of 2000. Pretoria: Government Printer.
- Stucki G. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): a promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Oct;84(10):733-40.
- Targett P, Wehman P, Young C. Return to work for persons with spinal cord injury: designing work supports. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19(2):131-9. Review.
- Tomassen PC, Post MW, van Asbeck FW. Return to work after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000 Jan;38(1):51-5.
- Umphred, D. (2007). Neurological Rehabilitation (5th ed.). St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
- Vazquez-Ramos, R. L., M; Hernandez, NE. (2007). The Delphi Method in Rehabilitation Counselling Research Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50(2), 111-118.
- Velmahos GC, Degiannis E, Hart K, Souter I, Saadia R. Changing profiles in spinal cord injuries and risk factors influencing recovery after penetrating injuries. J Trauma. 1995 Mar;38(3):334-7.
- Wilson, B., McLellan, D.L.(1997). Rehabilitation Studies Handbook.1st ed. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
- Word Health Organisation (2013). International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury. Malta. World Health Organisation
- World Health Organisation. (2002).Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.
- Zolna, J. S., J; Sabata, D; Goldthwaite, J. (2007). Review of accomodation strategies in the workplace for persons with mobility and dexterity impairments: Application to criteria for universal design Technology and Disability, 19, 189-198.
- BE499/14