AlloRelapseMM: Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation vs. Conventional Therapy as Salvage Therapy for Relapsed / Progressive Patients With Multiple Myeloma After First-line Therapy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Allogeneic stem cell (allo SCT) transplantation for multiple myeloma is a potential curative treatment, but is associated with morbidity and treatment related mortality. Approved drug combinations or another autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) can be used for relapsed patients resulting in a median progression free survival up to 2-3 years.
In the current trial after first-line treatment relapsed or progressed myeloma patients with an HLA compatible donor will be randomized after 3 cycles of salvage therapy to allogeneic stem cell transplantation or to continuous conventional salvage therapy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
The primary objective of the present clinical study aims to demonstrate the superiority of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT) compared to conventional therapy for the difference in overall survival (OS) at 5 years in patients with multiple myeloma who have relapsed or progressed after first-line autologous hematopoietic stem cell therapy.
The secondary objectives are to show an improvement of progression free survival and relapse free survival after allo SCT compared to conventional therapy.
In addition, quality of life, toxicities, recurrence rates, non-relapse mortality (NRM), remission rates including minimal residual disease (MRD) and incidence of severe or life-threatening infection between the two arms are compared. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allo SCT are evaluated.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Arm A (allo SCT) Allogeneic stem cell transplantation |
Drug: Allogeneic Stem Cells
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
|
Active Comparator: Arm B (conventional therapy) Currently approved triple regimens for first relapse: carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (KRD) or elotuzumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ERD) or daratumumab/bortezomib/dexamethasone DVD) or daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (DRD) or ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (IRD) or pomalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (PVD) or carfilzomib/daratumumab/dexamethasone (KDD) Alternatively, autologous stem cell transplantation may also be performed, if sufficient stem cells are still cryopreserved. |
Drug: carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (KRD)
triple regimen for first relapse should be applied according to latest Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) version
Drug: elotuzumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ERD)
triple regimen for first relapse should be applied according to latest SmPC version
Drug: daratumumab/bortezomib/dexamethasone (DVD)
triple regimen for first relapse should be applied according to latest SmPC version
Drug: daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (DRD)
triple regimen for first relapse should be applied according to latest SmPC version
Drug: ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (IRD)
triple regimen for first relapse should be applied according to latest SmPC version
Drug: pomalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (PVD)
triple regimen for first relapse should be applied according to latest SmPC version
Drug: carfilzomib/daratumumab/dexamethasone (KDD)
triple regimen for first relapse should be applied according to latest SmPC version
Drug: Autologous Stem Cells
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Overall survival at five years after randomization [at 5 years after randomization]
The present clinical study aims to demonstrate the superiority of allogeneic stem cell transplantation compared to conventional therapy for the difference in overall survival at 5 years in patients with multiple myeloma who have relapsed or progressed after first-line autologous hematopoietic stem cell therapy.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Event-free survival at 1 year after randomization [from randomization to 1 year after randomization]
A secondary objective is to show an improvement of progress free survival and relapse free survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation compared to conventional therapy. Events are defined as: Progression or Relapse or Engraftment Failure or Death of any cause
- Event-free survival at 3 years after randomization [from randomization to 3 years after randomization]
A further secondary objective is to show an improvement of progress free survival and relapse free survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation compared to conventional therapy. Events are defined as: Progression or Relapse or Engraftment Failure or Death of any cause
- Event-free survival at 5 years after randomization [from randomization to 5 years after randomization]
A secondary objective is to show an improvement of progress free survival and relapse free survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation compared to conventional therapy. Events are defined as: Progression or Relapse or Engraftment Failure or Death of any cause
- Change from baseline in total EORTC score at 1 year after randomization [at visit Screening, at the end of cycle 3 (84 days, each cycle is 28 days) of salvage therapy, 6 months and 12 months after randomization]
The aim of the quality of life questionnaires (QLQ) is to provide a comparison between the two treatment arms. Quality of life according EORTC (European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) & Quality of Life Questionnaire - Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)) will be assessed in both groups.. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning whereas a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology/ sickness. Patients will be observed from baseline until database lock for final analysis and adjusted mean calculated at 1 year after randomization.
- Change from baseline in total EORTC score at 3 years after randomization [at visit Screening, at the end of cycle 3 (84 days, each cycle is 28 days) of salvage therapy, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after randomization]
The aim of the quality of life questionnaires (QLQ) is to provide a comparison between the two treatment arms. Quality of life according EORTC (European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) & Quality of Life Questionnaire - Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)) will be assessed in both groups. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning whereas a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology/ sickness. Patients will be observed from baseline until database lock for final analysis and adjusted mean calculated at 3 years after randomization.
- Change from baseline in total EORTC score at 5 years after randomization [at visit Screening, at the end of cycle 3 (84 days, each cycle is 28 days) of salvage therapy, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after randomization]
The aim of the quality of life questionnaires (QLQ) is to provide a comparison between the two treatment arms. Quality of life according EORTC (European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) & Quality of Life Questionnaire - Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)) will be assessed in both groups. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning whereas a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology/ sickness. Patients will be observed from baseline until database lock for final analysis and adjusted mean calculated at 5 years after randomization.
- Time to first occurrence of remission after randomization [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months, 1 and 2 years after randomization]
Patients will be followed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of first remission (partial or complete), at 2 years after randomization, is reported.
- Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year after randomization [from randomization to 1 year after randomization, an average of 1 year]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of death before any relapse at 1 year after randomization was reported.
- Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years after randomization [from randomization to 3 years after randomization, an average of 3 years]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of death before any relapse at 3 years after randomization was reported.
- Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 5 years after randomization [from randomization to 5 years after randomization, an average of 5 years]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of death before any relapse at 5 years after randomization was reported.
- Cumulative incidence of acute GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at 1 year after randomization [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months and 1 year after randomization, an average of 1 year]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of any acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD, according to Przepiorka et al.) at 1 year after randomization is reported
- Cumulative incidence of acute GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at 3 years after randomization [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months and 2 years, 30 months and 3 years after randomization, an average of 3 years]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of any acute GvHD (according to Przepiorka et al.) at 3 years after randomization is reported
- Cumulative incidence of acute GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at 5 years after randomization [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months and 2 years, 30 months, 3, 4 and 5 years after randomization, an average of 5 years]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of any acute GvHD (according to Przepiorka et al.) at 5 years after randomization is repoted.
- Cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at 1 year after randomization [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months and 1 year after randomization, an average of 1 year]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of any chronic GvHD (according to Jagasia et al.) at 1 year after randomization is reported.
- Cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at 3 years after randomization [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months and 2 years, 30 months and 3 years after randomization, an average of 3 years]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of any chronic GvHD (according to Jagasia et al.) at 3 years after randomization is reported.
- Cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at 5 years after randomization [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months and 2 years, 30 months, 3, 4 and 5 years after randomization, an average of 5 years]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of any chronic GvHD (according to Jagasia et al.) at 5 years after randomization is reported.
- Time to first occurrence of infection reported as cumulative incidence of infection with CTCAE grade 3 - 5 at 1 year after randomization [from randomization to 1 year after randomization, an average of 1 year]
The severity and/or intensity of an adverse event will be graded based upon the patient's symptoms according to the current active version of National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of any infectious complication with CTCAE grade 3 - 5 at 1 year after randomization is reported.
- Time to first occurrence of infection reported as cumulative incidence of infection with CTCAE grade 3 - 5 at 3 years after randomization [from randomization to 3 years after randomization, an average of 3 years]
The severity and/or intensity of an adverse event will be graded based upon the patient's symptoms according to the current active version of National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of any infectious complication with CTCAE grade 3 - 5 at 3 years after randomization is reported.
- Time to first occurrence of infection reported as cumulative incidence of infection with CTCAE grade 3 - 5 at 5 years after randomization [from randomization to 5 years after randomization, an average of 5 years]
The severity and/or intensity of an adverse event will be graded based upon the patient's symptoms according to the current active version of National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and cumulative incidence of any infectious complication with CTCAE grade 3 - 5 at 5 years after randomization is reported.
Other Outcome Measures
- Event-free survival at 3 and 5 years after randomization [from randomization to 3 and 5 years after randomization]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for interim analysis and the event-free survival (EFS) rate is calculated at 3 and 5 years after randomization. Events are defined as: Progression or Relapse or Engraftment Failure or Death of any cause
- Change from baseline in total EORTC score (Summary Score) at 3 and 5 years after randomization [at visit Screening,at the end of cycle 3 (84 days, each cycle is 28 days) of salvage therapy, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after randomization, an average at 3 and 5 years after randomization]
The aim of the quality of life questionnaires (QLQ) is to provide a comparison between the two treatment arms. Quality of life according EORTC (European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) & Quality of Life Questionnaire - Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20)) will be assessed in both groups. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/ healthy level of functioning whereas a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology/ sickness. Patients will be observed from baseline until database lock for interim analysis and adjusted mean is calculated at 3 and 5 years after randomization.
- Non-relapse mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization [from randomization to 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization, an average of 1, 3 and 5 years]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for interim analysis and cumulative incidence of death before any relapse at 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization is reported
- Cumulative incidence of acute GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months and 2 years, 30 months, 3, 4 and 5 years after randomization, an average of 1, 3 and 5 years]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for interim analysis and cumulative incidence of any acute GvHD (according to Przepiorka et al.) at 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization is reported
- Cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months and 2 years, 30 months, 3, 4 and 5 years after randomization, an average of 1, 3 and 5 years]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for interim analysis and cumulative incidence of any chronic GvHD (according to Jagasia et al.) at 1, 3 and 5 years after randomization is reported
- Time to first occurrence of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) [at 30 days, 100 days, 6 months, 1 and 2 years after randomization, rate of occurence at 6 months, 1 and 2 years after randomization]
Patient observed from randomization until database lock for interim analysis and until database lock for final and rate of occurrence calculated at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after randomization
- Time to first occurrence of progression [from randomization to 1, 3, and 5 years after randomization]
Patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for interim analysis and rates at 3 and 5 years after randomization are calculated; and patients will be observed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after randomization are calculated
- Time to first recurrence of relapse [at 1, 3, and 5 years after randomization]
Patients will be followed from randomization to database lock for interim analysis and rates at 3 and 5 years after randomization are calculated; and patients will be followed from randomization to database lock for final analysis and rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after randomization are calculated.
- Time to first occurrence of graft failure after stem cell transplatation [at day 30 after after randomization]
Patients are followed from randomization until database lock for interim analysis and rates at 3 and 5 years post-randomization are calculated; and patients are followed from randomization until database lock for final analysis and rates at 1, 3, and 5 years post-randomization are calculated. A graft failure is defined as no stable neutrophil count > 0.5 x 10^9/l at day 28 post-SCT.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients eligible for study inclusion must meet criteria 1- 7 at registration and all of the following criteria before randomization:
-
Multiple Myeloma
-
Age 18 - 65 years
-
A signed informed consent form must be obtained before participation in the study
-
Age 66 - 70 years, if comorbidity index according to Sorror score = 0 and ECOG ≤ 1
-
1st relapse/ progression according to IMWG criteria after first-line therapy (consisting of induction therapy followed by autologous transplantation once or twice and maintenance therapy), Additionally: meeting the need for treatment based on the SLiM criteria
-
Negative pregnancy test in female patients
-
Maximum of 1 cycle salvage therapy prior to study inclusion
-
Availability of a fully compatible stem cell donor (HLA-ident. Sibling or 10/10 MUD or 9/10 MMUD if mismatch affects DQB) after 3 cycles salvage therapy
-
CR/PR or SD according to IMWG-criteria after 3 cycles salvage therapy within the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients are excluded from the study if any one of criteria 1-6 are met at registration and if criterion 7 is met before randomization:
- Non-sufficient organ function defined as:
Bilirubin (in the absence of Meulengracht's disease), SGPT or SGOT ≥3 higher than normal values Cardiac ejection fraction ≤ 50% GFR < 30 ml/min DLCO < 50% and/or continuous oxygen dependency
-
Active hepatitis B or C infection or uncontrolled HIV infection
-
Other, active malignant disease
-
Prior treatment with allogeneic stem cells
-
Participation in a clinical trial or taking an IMP within 30 days or five times the half-life of the IMP, whichever is longer, prior to registration
-
Positive serum pregnancy test at screening and before first treatment or breastfeeding
-
PD under salvage therapy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University Hospital of Freiburg | Freiburg | Baden-Württemberg | Germany | 79106 |
2 | University Hospital Heidelberg | Heidelberg | Baden-Württemberg | Germany | 69120 |
3 | Robert-Bosch Hospital Stuttgart | Stuttgart | Baden-Württemberg | Germany | 70376 |
4 | University Hospital Tübingen | Tübingen | Baden-Württemberg | Germany | 72076 |
5 | University Hospital of Ulm | Ulm | Baden-Württemberg | Germany | 89081 |
6 | University Hospital Augsburg | Augsburg | Bayern | Germany | 86156 |
7 | University Hospital Munich ( LMU) | München | Bayern | Germany | 80336 |
8 | Munich Hospital Schwabing | München | Bayern | Germany | 80804 |
9 | University Hospital of the Technical University Munich rechts der Isar | München | Bayern | Germany | 81675 |
10 | Hospital North Nürnberg | Nürnberg | Bayern | Germany | 90419 |
11 | University Hospital Regensburg | Regensburg | Bayern | Germany | 93053 |
12 | University Hospital of Würzburg | Würzburg | Bayern | Germany | 97070 |
13 | University Hospital Frankfurt/ Main | Frankfurt am Main | Hessen | Germany | 60590 |
14 | Philipps University Marburg | Marburg | Hessen | Germany | 35037 |
15 | University Medical Center Göttingen | Göttingen | Niedersachsen | Germany | 37075 |
16 | University Hospital RWTH Aachen | Aachen | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 52074 |
17 | University Hospital Bonn | Bonn | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 53127 |
18 | University Hospital Düsseldorf | Düsseldorf | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 40225 |
19 | University Hospital Essen | Essen | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 45147 |
20 | University Hospital Münster | Münster | Nordrhein-Westfalen | Germany | 48149 |
21 | University Medical Center Mainz | Mainz | Rheinland-Pfalz | Germany | 55131 |
22 | University Hospital Halle (Saale) | Halle (Saale) | Sachsen-Anhalt | Germany | 06120 |
23 | Hospital of Chemnitz gGmbH | Chemnitz | Sachsen | Germany | 09116 |
24 | University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus | Dresden | Sachsen | Germany | 01307 |
25 | University Hospital of Leipzig | Leipzig | Sachsen | Germany | 04103 |
26 | University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein (Campus Kiel) | Kiel | Schleswig-Holstein | Germany | 24105 |
27 | University Hospital Jena | Jena | Thüringen | Germany | 07743 |
28 | Charité - University of Medicine Berlin | Berlin | Germany | 10117 | |
29 | Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch | Berlin | Germany | 13125 | |
30 | Asklepios Hospital Hamburg St. Georg | Hamburg | Germany | 20099 | |
31 | University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf | Hamburg | Germany | 20246 | |
32 | Hospital Oldenburg (AöR) | Oldenburg | Germany | 26133 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA)
- Staburo GmbH
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nicolaus Kröger, Prof. Dr., University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- AlloRelapseMMStudy