Developing and Testing a Comprehensive MS Spasticity Management Program

Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development (U.S. Fed)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02170779
Collaborator
Oregon Health and Science University (Other)
40
1
2
8
5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a study to determine the impact of education and specific lower extremity stretches for MS-related spasticity. The study will evaluate the acceptance and efficacy of education and stretching using a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Spasticity: Take Control
  • Other: Usual care
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Participants have 2-4 visits depending on program assignment. All participants will have screening/baseline and follow-up visits. Participants in the intervention program will have 2 additional visits with a group of other people with MS to view and discuss the DVDs on spasticity education and stretching for lower extremity MS spasticity and then practice the stretching exercises learned. They will be asked to track exercise electronically and on paper for 4 weeks. Participants will be compensated for participation.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Developing and Testing a Comprehensive MS Spasticity Management Program
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: A Spasticity: Take Control

4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures

Behavioral: Spasticity: Take Control
4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures

Other: B Usual care

2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures

Other: Usual care
2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. MS Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12) [at average of 4 months]

    The MSWS-12 is a clinically validated and reliable tool that is flexible and simple enough to use clinically and in research. It captures patients' perspectives on their ambulatory disability on the following: standing, ability to run, need for support, moving around the home, concentration needed to walk, walking speed, maintaining balance, climbing stairs, walking distance, effort needed to walk, ability to walk, and gait. It is simple to administer and responsive to changes in patient performance over time. Individual items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale: 1 (Not at all), 2 (A little), 3 (Moderately), 4 (Quite a bit), 5 (Extremely). A total score is generated and reported on a 0 to 100 scale by subtracting the minimum score possible (12) from the patient's score, dividing by the maximum score possible minus the minimum possible (60-12, or 48), and multiplying. Higher values represent a worse outcome and greater disability.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Timed 25 Foot Walk [at average of 4 months]

    The time to walk 25 feet is strongly related to its ordinal counterpart the Ambulation Index (Spearman r=0.91) without the variability the ordinal scale reflects. The time is measured and recorded in seconds how long it takes for the participant to walk 25 feet.

  2. Timed up and go Test [at average of 4 months]

    The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test measures the time in seconds it takes to get up from a chair, walk 10 feet, turn around and return to sit in the chair. The best score of the two attempts was analyzed.

  3. 2 Minute Walk Test [at average of 4 months]

    The subject walks without assistance of another person for 2 minutes. The distance in feet the individual was able to walk in 2 minutes is then measured.

  4. Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) [at average of 4 months]

    This self-report retrospective questionnaire measures fatigue symptoms. It consists of 21 items scored 0-4 for a total score between 0 and 84 and has a coefficient alpha of 0.81. Lower scores on the MFIS indicate less fatigue.

  5. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) [at average of 4 months]

    The MSIS-29 is designed to measure the physical and psychological impact of MS. Each subscale summed separately. No total calculated. Scores transformed to have a range of 0-100. Lower scores indicate less impact, higher scores indicate higher impact.

  6. Spasticity Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale [at average of 4 months]

    The modified Ashworth Scale is a standard clinical and research method to quantify spasticity. Each of the 6 leg groups is given a scale of 0-4. 0 - Normal. No increase in muscle tone. - Mild. Barely increased muscle tone. (catch) - Moderate. Moderately increased muscle tone that can be overcome and full range of motion is possible. (catch and resistance) - Severe. Severely increased muscle tone that is extremely difficult to overcome and full range of motion is not possible. (resistance and stop) - Contracted. All groups are summed for a total score for each side of the body. Higher scores indicate greater spasticity. Lowest possible score is a 0 whereas the highest possible score for each side is 24.

  7. Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale - 88 (MSSS-88) [at average of 4 months]

    The modified MSSS-88 is a standardized self-report questionnaire to quantify subject's impact of the effects of spasticity. The 88 questions each have a possible score of 1-4. All questions are totaled for a final total scores. Higher scores indicate greater spasticity. The lowest score is 88 and the highest possible is 352.

  8. Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI II) [at average of 4 months]

    The BDI-II is a standardized self-report questionnaire to quantify depression. The BDI-II contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Answers to 21 questions added together. Higher scores indicate greater depression. Lowest possible score is a 0 whereas highest 63.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of definite MS

  • At least 18 years old

  • Able to walk 25 feet independently with common assistive devices if needed

  • Presence of spasticity by self-report interfering with usual daily activities

  • Have an email account and be familiar with using it

  • Willing to track daily exercise for 4 weeks

  • Fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

Other medical or behavioral conditions that would limit participation or completion of the study.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR Portland Oregon United States 97239

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • VA Office of Research and Development
  • Oregon Health and Science University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucinda L Hugos, MS, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
VA Office of Research and Development
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02170779
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • N1401-P
First Posted:
Jun 23, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Mar 28, 2017
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by VA Office of Research and Development
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 20 20
COMPLETED 19 19
NOT COMPLETED 1 1

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care Total
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 20 20 40
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
18
90%
18
90%
36
90%
>=65 years
2
10%
2
10%
4
10%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
53.38
(12.79)
52.83
(12.34)
53.1
(12.56)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
13
65%
16
80%
29
72.5%
Male
7
35%
4
20%
11
27.5%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
20
100%
20
100%
40
100%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title MS Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12)
Description The MSWS-12 is a clinically validated and reliable tool that is flexible and simple enough to use clinically and in research. It captures patients' perspectives on their ambulatory disability on the following: standing, ability to run, need for support, moving around the home, concentration needed to walk, walking speed, maintaining balance, climbing stairs, walking distance, effort needed to walk, ability to walk, and gait. It is simple to administer and responsive to changes in patient performance over time. Individual items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale: 1 (Not at all), 2 (A little), 3 (Moderately), 4 (Quite a bit), 5 (Extremely). A total score is generated and reported on a 0 to 100 scale by subtracting the minimum score possible (12) from the patient's score, dividing by the maximum score possible minus the minimum possible (60-12, or 48), and multiplying. Higher values represent a worse outcome and greater disability.
Time Frame at average of 4 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Measure Participants 19 19
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
72.6
(27.3)
82.2
(30.8)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.84
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Timed 25 Foot Walk
Description The time to walk 25 feet is strongly related to its ordinal counterpart the Ambulation Index (Spearman r=0.91) without the variability the ordinal scale reflects. The time is measured and recorded in seconds how long it takes for the participant to walk 25 feet.
Time Frame at average of 4 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
One subject was unable to complete this physical assessment at the visit.
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Measure Participants 19 18
Mean (Standard Deviation) [seconds]
7.6
(7)
9.4
(10.4)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.738
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Timed up and go Test
Description The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test measures the time in seconds it takes to get up from a chair, walk 10 feet, turn around and return to sit in the chair. The best score of the two attempts was analyzed.
Time Frame at average of 4 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
One subject was unable to complete this physical assessment at the visit.
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Measure Participants 19 18
Mean (Standard Deviation) [seconds]
11.23
(9.69)
13.82
(13.51)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8434
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title 2 Minute Walk Test
Description The subject walks without assistance of another person for 2 minutes. The distance in feet the individual was able to walk in 2 minutes is then measured.
Time Frame at average of 4 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
One subject was unable to complete this physical assessment at the visit.
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Measure Participants 19 18
Mean (Standard Deviation) [feet]
462.8
(150.5)
412.5
(158.7)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.638
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)
Description This self-report retrospective questionnaire measures fatigue symptoms. It consists of 21 items scored 0-4 for a total score between 0 and 84 and has a coefficient alpha of 0.81. Lower scores on the MFIS indicate less fatigue.
Time Frame at average of 4 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Measure Participants 19 19
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
41.1
(19.2)
43.5
(20.8)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.492
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)
Description The MSIS-29 is designed to measure the physical and psychological impact of MS. Each subscale summed separately. No total calculated. Scores transformed to have a range of 0-100. Lower scores indicate less impact, higher scores indicate higher impact.
Time Frame at average of 4 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Measure Participants 19 19
MSIS-29 Physical
45.6
(17.2)
52.4
(19.2)
MSIS-29 Psychological
18.2
(7.6)
20.6
(7.6)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments This analysis refers to the physical component of the MSIS-29
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.144
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments This refers to the psychological analysis for the MSIS-29.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.953
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Spasticity Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale
Description The modified Ashworth Scale is a standard clinical and research method to quantify spasticity. Each of the 6 leg groups is given a scale of 0-4. 0 - Normal. No increase in muscle tone. - Mild. Barely increased muscle tone. (catch) - Moderate. Moderately increased muscle tone that can be overcome and full range of motion is possible. (catch and resistance) - Severe. Severely increased muscle tone that is extremely difficult to overcome and full range of motion is not possible. (resistance and stop) - Contracted. All groups are summed for a total score for each side of the body. Higher scores indicate greater spasticity. Lowest possible score is a 0 whereas the highest possible score for each side is 24.
Time Frame at average of 4 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Measure Participants 19 19
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
10.8
(9.5)
10.8
(9.3)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.915
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale - 88 (MSSS-88)
Description The modified MSSS-88 is a standardized self-report questionnaire to quantify subject's impact of the effects of spasticity. The 88 questions each have a possible score of 1-4. All questions are totaled for a final total scores. Higher scores indicate greater spasticity. The lowest score is 88 and the highest possible is 352.
Time Frame at average of 4 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Measure Participants 19 19
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
165.7
(53.3)
192.4
(58.8)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.023
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI II)
Description The BDI-II is a standardized self-report questionnaire to quantify depression. The BDI-II contains 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Answers to 21 questions added together. Higher scores indicate greater depression. Lowest possible score is a 0 whereas highest 63.
Time Frame at average of 4 months

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
Measure Participants 19 19
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
9
(7.5)
11.5
(8)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection A Spasticity: Take Control, B Usual Care
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.11
Comments
Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame 2 months
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Arm/Group Description 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures Spasticity: Take Control: 4 visits: baseline, view and discuss DVDs, practice stretching, outcome measures 2 visits: baseline and given usual treatment of brochure for stretching, outcome measures Usual care: 2 visits: baseline followed by usual care of brochure for stretching then outcome measures
All Cause Mortality
A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/19 (0%) 0/19 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
A Spasticity: Take Control B Usual Care
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 1/19 (5.3%) 5/19 (26.3%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Broken arm resulting from fall 0/19 (0%) 0 1/19 (5.3%) 1
Pain and bruising from fall 0/19 (0%) 0 1/19 (5.3%) 1
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Leg spasms 1/19 (5.3%) 1 0/19 (0%) 0
Nervous system disorders
Concussion 0/19 (0%) 0 1/19 (5.3%) 1
Renal and urinary disorders
UTI 0/19 (0%) 0 1/19 (5.3%) 1
Increase in urinary urgency 0/19 (0%) 0 1/19 (5.3%) 1

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Cinda Hugos, Physical Therapist
Organization VA Research and Development
Phone 503-220-8262 ext 52338
Email hugosc@ohsu.edu
Responsible Party:
VA Office of Research and Development
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02170779
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • N1401-P
First Posted:
Jun 23, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Mar 28, 2017
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2017