At-home Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation During Multitasking
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The goal is to replicate in-lab results from transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) with at-home tACS.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Participants will be assessed in-lab on multitasking and sustained attention abilities. Participants will be sent home with a tACS device to be used at-home for five days while engaged in a multitasking paradigm that is different from the multitasking outcome measure used pre/post tACS. After the at-home stimulation is complete, participants return to UCSF for a final in-lab assessment of multitasking and sustained attention ability.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Verum Stimulation This group will receive 6-Hz tACS |
Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
|
Active Comparator: Frequency Control This group will receive 1-Hz tACS |
Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Multitasking Performance Cost (Neuroracer Performance Change From Baseline) [Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)]
Assessment of multitasking ability using change from baseline scores in d' cost (metric of discriminability). Discrimination performance (d') was measured for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). d' cost was then calculated as the ratio of d' during single task target discrimination task to multitask target discrimination, expressed as percentage cost.
- Single Task Performance Change [Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)]
Discrimination performance (d') was measured during single task performance for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). Performance data was collected during the single task condition.
- Multitask Performance Change [Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)]
Discrimination performance (d') was measured while multitasking for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). Performance data was collected during the multitask condition.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Continuous Performance Test RT Change (Test of Visual Attention / Sustained Attention) [Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)]
Assessment of sustained attention ability using response time (in ms) during the continuous performance test
- Continuous Performance Test RTV Change (Test of Visual Attention / Sustained Attention) [Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)]
Assessment of sustained attention ability using response time variability (standard deviation of response times in ms) during the continuous performance test
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
English speaking
-
Grade 12 or more education
-
Normal or corrected to normal vision and hearing
-
Ability to complete cognitive tasks
-
Ability to cooperate and comply with all study procedures
-
Ability to tolerate tACS
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Neurological or psychiatric disorders
-
Family history of epilepsy
-
History of seizures
-
Prior head trauma
-
Pregnant
-
Implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemaker)
-
IQ < 80
-
Taking psychotropic medication
-
Taking anti-depressants or anti-anxiety medication
-
Substance abuse
-
Color blind
-
Glaucoma
-
Macular degeneration
-
Amblyopia
-
Strabismus
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sandler Neurosciences Center | San Francisco | California | United States | 94158 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Theodore Zanto, Ph.D., University of California, San Francisco
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- 18-26268-1
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 23 | 24 |
COMPLETED | 20 | 20 |
NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 23 | 24 | 47 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
1
4.3%
|
1
4.2%
|
2
4.3%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
19
82.6%
|
19
79.2%
|
38
80.9%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
25.8
(4.6)
|
24.6
(4.2)
|
25.2
(4.4)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
12
52.2%
|
13
54.2%
|
25
53.2%
|
Male |
8
34.8%
|
7
29.2%
|
15
31.9%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
3
13%
|
4
16.7%
|
7
14.9%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
1
4.3%
|
2
8.3%
|
3
6.4%
|
White |
15
65.2%
|
12
50%
|
27
57.4%
|
More than one race |
1
4.3%
|
2
8.3%
|
3
6.4%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |||
United States |
20
87%
|
20
83.3%
|
40
85.1%
|
Single Task Performance (d') [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [d'] |
1.73
(0.63)
|
2.01
(0.63)
|
1.87
(0.63)
|
Multitask performance (d') [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [d'] |
1.03
(0.63)
|
1.20
(0.58)
|
1.12
(0.60)
|
Multitasking Cost Performance (Percent change) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Percent change] |
45.8
(0.40)
|
40.5
(0.22)
|
43.2
(0.31)
|
Continuous Performance Task RT (milliseconds) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [milliseconds] |
322
(43)
|
322
(34)
|
322
(39)
|
Continuous Performance Task RTV (milliseconds) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [milliseconds] |
76
(7)
|
65
(5)
|
71
(6)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Multitasking Performance Cost (Neuroracer Performance Change From Baseline) |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of multitasking ability using change from baseline scores in d' cost (metric of discriminability). Discrimination performance (d') was measured for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). d' cost was then calculated as the ratio of d' during single task target discrimination task to multitask target discrimination, expressed as percentage cost. |
Time Frame | Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage change of d'] |
45.3
(0.31)
|
37.9
(0.27)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Verum Stimulation, Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.55 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments |
Title | Continuous Performance Test RT Change (Test of Visual Attention / Sustained Attention) |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of sustained attention ability using response time (in ms) during the continuous performance test |
Time Frame | Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [milliseconds] |
300
(42)
|
303
(31)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Verum Stimulation, Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.51 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments |
Title | Continuous Performance Test RTV Change (Test of Visual Attention / Sustained Attention) |
---|---|
Description | Assessment of sustained attention ability using response time variability (standard deviation of response times in ms) during the continuous performance test |
Time Frame | Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [milliseconds] |
58
(26)
|
56
(21)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Verum Stimulation, Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.80 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments |
Title | Single Task Performance Change |
---|---|
Description | Discrimination performance (d') was measured during single task performance for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). Performance data was collected during the single task condition. |
Time Frame | Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [d'] |
1.99
(0.94)
|
2.70
(1.07)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Verum Stimulation, Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.02 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments |
Title | Multitask Performance Change |
---|---|
Description | Discrimination performance (d') was measured while multitasking for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). Performance data was collected during the multitask condition. |
Time Frame | Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed |
Arm/Group Title | Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [d'] |
1.17
(0.76)
|
1.79
(0.89)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Verum Stimulation, Frequency Control |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.03 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 10 months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control | ||
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/23 (0%) | 0/24 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/23 (0%) | 0/24 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Verum Stimulation | Frequency Control | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/23 (4.3%) | 2/24 (8.3%) | ||
Product Issues | ||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event | 1/23 (4.3%) | 1 | 2/24 (8.3%) | 2 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Theodore Zanto |
---|---|
Organization | University of California San Francisco |
Phone | 415-502-7322 |
theodore.zanto@ucsf.edu |
- 18-26268-1