Precision of the Magnetocardiographer for Data Aquision and Analysis.

Sponsor
Mayo Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00170014
Collaborator
CardioMag Imaging (Industry)
12
1
32
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

magnetocardiography has been extensively studied focusing on the possible clinical applications of the device. Evaluating the precision of a device is a prerequisite condition to know what are significant changes and how can these be trusted. A respectable reproducibility study for the MCG measurements is crucial for this new device to be used for clinical applications. In this study, we will focus on a critical portion of the heart cycle assessing for changes in time of the computerized analysis of this phase and comparing the analysis done by two examiners.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Magnetocardiograph
Phase 3

Detailed Description

The studies involving magnetocardiography have almost exclusively focused on evaluating possible clinical applications of the device. Leder et al saw the need for investigating the reproducibility of High Temperature Superconducting (HTS-)MCG measurements. They tested 18 healthy volunteers, stating that assessment of the reproducibility of HTS-MCGs in the normal heart is a prerequisite condition for the definition of significant levels of changes which, for instance, may be observed in serial measurements of patients suffering from acute coronary syndromes. They also pointed out the potentially strong electromagnetic interference inside a hospital, likely to be very different from the noise found in engineering laboratories where the MCGs are originally calibrated and tested. A respectable reproducibility for the MCG measurements is crucial for clinical applications. Leder et al studied the reproducibility of QRS complexes, ST segments, and T waves. They found that the reproducibility of the measurements in the depolarization phase was high, whereas the reproducibility of their repolarization readings was considerably lower. The results led Leder et al to conclude that further technical development was needed to improve signal-to-noise ratio allowing for clinical application of repolarization abnormalities for recognizing Acute Coronary Syndromes. In this study, we will focus on the repolarization phase by assessing the reproducibility of the T wave only. Comparison of scores and results based on computer analyses will provide the basis for our evaluation. Visual interpretations by the two examiners will also be compared.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
12 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
Single
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Reproducibility of Magnetocardiography Measurements Using the Cardiomag Magnetocardiograph System Model 2409 and Its Software for Data Acquisition and Analysis
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2004
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2007
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2007

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The objective of our study is to evaluate inter-examiner reproducibility in the MCG results retrieved from data acquisition and analysis by two examiners. HTS-MCG measurements will be obtained from healthy AND diseased subjects in an unshielded clinical []

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
45 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes

Age less than or equal to 45 years

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota United States 55905

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Mayo Clinic
  • CardioMag Imaging

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter A. Smars, M.D. EM, Mayo Clinic

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00170014
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 850-04
First Posted:
Sep 15, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Feb 15, 2011
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2011
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 15, 2011