Pulsed Radiofrequency vs Dry Needling in Myofascial Pain

Sponsor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05637047
Collaborator
(none)
22
2
17

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Myofascial pain (MPS) is the leading cause of chronic and persistent regional pain, affecting as many as 85% of the general population. A variety of treatment methods for myofascial pain have been investigated, including injection of saline, local anesthetics and steroids, dry needle, mini-scalpel, rich platelet plasma and radiofrequency ablation. Ultrasound guided dry needle (DN) and pulsed radiofrequency ablation (PRF) of the trigger point have been considered as two effective and promising treatments for myofascial pain. As far as searched, we failed to identify any study comparing the effects of DN and PRF in myofascial pain patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: pulsed radiofrequency
  • Procedure: Dry needling
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
22 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Ultrasound-guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Dry Needling in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: pulsed radiofrequency

Procedure: pulsed radiofrequency
ultrasound-guided intramuscular and interfascial pulsed radiofrequency ablation

Active Comparator: Dry needling

Procedure: Dry needling
ultrasound-guided intramuscular and interfascial dry needling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain VAS score [Postoperative six months]

    Pain evaluated by a 100mm line, 0mm indicates no pain, 100mm indicates the worst pain imaginable.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain VAS score [postoperaitve day 0 and postoperative 1 and 3 months]

    Pain evaluated by a 100mm line, 0mm indicates no pain, 100mm indicates the worst pain imaginable.

  2. NDI [postoperaitve day 0 and postoperative 1, 3 and 6 months]

    Neck disability index

  3. PHQ9 [postoperaitve day 0 and postoperative 1, 3 and 6 months]

    patient health questionnaire

  4. GAD7 [postoperaitve day 0 and postoperative 1, 3 and 6 months]

    generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7) scale

  5. Sleep status [postoperaitve day 0 and postoperative 1, 3 and 6 months]

    Likert scale 1 to 5, 1 indicates very bad, 5 indicates very good

  6. SF36 [postoperaitve day 0 and postoperative 1, 3 and 6 months]

    health related quality of life short form 36 scale

  7. Mechanical pain threshold [postoperaitve day 0 and postoperative 1, 3 and 6 months]

    Mechanical pain threshold will be tested by pressing the pain point with an ergometer for three times and calculated the mean value of the pressure.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Chronic myofascial pain (>3 months) at the neck, shoulder and upper back region

  • Have at least score of "moderate" on the pain VAS, thus a minimal clinically significant change is detectable

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Currently undergoing other pain related treatment (acupuncture, laser, infrared therapy. etc)

  • Presence or history of trauma, surgery or infection in the pain region.

  • Severe systemic disease (severe hepatic or renal dysfunction), coagulopathy or on medications affecting coagulation system.

  • Allergic to medications used.

  • Pregnant, medical background, unable to cooperate or refused to participate.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jin Wang, Doctor, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05637047
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PRFversusDN
First Posted:
Dec 5, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Dec 20, 2022
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 20, 2022