Clinical Evaluation of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02097030
Collaborator
(none)
35
1
3
1
34.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to compare the overall subjective preference of filcon II 3 daily disposable silicone hyrogel contact lenses compared to etafilcon A and nelfilcon A daily disposable conventional hydrogel contact lenses.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: filcon II 3
  • Device: etafilcon A
  • Device: nelfilcon A
N/A

Detailed Description

Double-masked, randomised, controlled crossover trial. Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydriogel lenses; all subjects wore the filcon II 3 lenses. The first randomly assigned lens type was worn for 3 days, with daily replacement, followed by 3 days of wear of the other lens type, with daily replacement.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
35 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Single-Center Clinical Evaluation of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: etafilcon A lens

Participants were randomized to either the etafilcon A or the nelfilcon A lens for three days and then both groups wore the filcon II 3 lens for three days, without washout period between lens types.

Device: etafilcon A
Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days.
Other Names:
  • Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lens
  • Active Comparator: nelfilcon A lens

    Participants were randomized to either the etafilcon A or the nelfilcon A lens for three days and then both groups wore the filcon II 3 lens for three days, without washout period between lens types.

    Device: nelfilcon A
    Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days.
    Other Names:
  • Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lens
  • Active Comparator: filcon II 3 lens

    Participants were randomized to either the etafilcon A or the nelfilcon A lens for three days and then both groups wore the filcon II 3 lens for three days, without washout period between lens types.

    Device: filcon II 3
    Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days.
    Other Names:
  • Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lens
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Overall Lens Preference - All Study Lenses [Study Exit]

      Participant's subjective response for overall lens preference after 3 days of daily disposable wear of each pair of lenses. Surveyed at exit. (4 possible ratings: Strongly prefer pair#1, Slightly prefer pair #1, Slightly prefer pair #2, Strongly prefer pair #2).

    2. Overall Lens Preference - Hydrogel vs. Filcon II 3 [Study Exit]

      Participant's subjective response for overall lens preference after 3 days of daily disposable wear of each pair. Surveyed at exit. (4 possible ratings: Strongly prefer pair#1, Slightly prefer pair #1, Slightly prefer pair #2, Strongly prefer pair #2).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Subjective Response for Comfort [Baseline and 3 day follow-up]

      Participant's subjective response for comfort measured at baseline and 3 day follow-up. (Continuous Comfort Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn/causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever)

    2. Subjective Response for Vision [Baseline and 3 day follow-up]

      Participant's subjective response for vision measured at baseline and at 3 day follow-up of daily disposable wear of lenses. (Vision Scale 0-100, 0=very blurry, 100=very clear).

    3. Subjective Response for Insertion [Baseline]

      Participant's subjective response for insertion measured at baseline. (Insertion Handling Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, 100=very easy to handle).

    4. Subjective Response for Handling (Insertion and Removal) [3 days follow-up]

      Participant's subjective response for handling (insertion and removal) measured at 3 day follow-up of daily disposable wear of lenses. (Handling Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, 100=very easy to handle).

    5. Subjective Response for Dryness [3 Days Follow-up]

      Participant's subjective response for dryness, measured at baseline and after 3 day follow-up of daily disposable wear of lenses. (Dryness Scale 0-100, 0=Cannot be worn/extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).

    6. Overall Satisfaction, Vision [3 Days Follow-up]

      Participant's subjective response for overall vision satisfaction. Measured after 3 days daily disposable wear of lenses. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.

    7. Overall Satisfaction, Comfort [3 Days Follow-up]

      Participant's subjective response for overall comfort satisfaction. Measured after 3 days daily disposable wear of lenses. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.

    8. Overall Satisfaction, Handling [3 Days]

      Participant's subjective response for overall handling satisfaction. Measured after 3 days of daily disposable lens wear. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.

    9. Overall Satisfaction, Dryness [3 Days Follow-up]

      Participant's subjective response for overall dryness satisfaction. Measured after 3 days daily disposable wear of lenses. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.

    10. Overall Satisfaction [3 Days Follow-up]

      Participant's subjective response for overall satisfaction. Measured after 3 days of daily disposable lens wear. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.

    11. Lens Fit and Performance - Wettability (Baseline and 3 Days Follow-up) [Baseline and 3 days follow-up]

      The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - wettability. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Wettability (scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=excellent, 4 severely reduced).

    12. Lens Fit and Performance - Deposits (Baseline and 3 Days Follow-up) [Baseline and 3 days follow-up]

      The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - deposits. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Deposits (scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=excellent, 4 severely reduced);

    13. Lens Fit and Performance - Debris (Baseline and 3 Day Follow-up) [Baseline and 3 day follow-up]

      The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - debris. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. (Debris scale 0-4; 0.25 steps; 0=no debris, 4=significant debris)

    14. Lens Fit and Performance - Movement (Baseline and 3 Days Follow-up) [Baseline and 3 days follow-up]

      The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - movement. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Movement (scale in millimeters).

    15. Lens Fit and Performance - Fit Acceptance [Baseline and 3 day follow-up]

      The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - fit acceptance. Measured at baseline and 3 day follow-up (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Fit acceptance (Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=Should not be worn, 4=Perfect).

    16. Lens Fit and Performance - Tightness (Baseline and 3 Day Follow-up) [Baseline and 3 day follow-up]

      The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - tightness. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Tightness (Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=Should not be worn, 4=Perfect).

    17. Ocular Health - Biomicroscopy [3 Days Follow-up]

      The investigator's objective assessment of ocular health assessed for each study Pair after 3 days wear by biomicroscopy. Bulbar and Limbal Hyperemia; Corneal Staining Type, Extent and Depth, Conjunctival Staining and Indentation. BrienHolden Vision Institute Continuous Scale: 1-4, 0.5 steps (1=Very, 2=Slight, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 40 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)

    • Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years

    • Is an adapted soft CL wearer

    • Must be able to wear their lenses at least 3 full days, 10 hours per day, assuming there are no contraindications for doing so

    • Has a CL spherical prescription between - 1.00 and - 6.00 (inclusive)

    • Has less than 1.25 D spectacle cylinder in each eye.

    • Baseline vision of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual vision correction or 20/20 best-corrected.

    • Is correctable to at least 20/25 distance visual acuity with study contact lenses in each eye

    • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease

    • Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter

    • Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 3 full days)

    • Is willing to comply with the visit schedule

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Has never worn contact lenses before.

    • Currently wears rigid gas permeable contact lenses.

    • Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (3 days per week; > 8 hours/day)

    • Has a CL prescription outside the range of - 1.00 to -6.00D

    • Has a spectacle cylinder greater than -1.25D of cylinder in either eye.

    • Has best corrected spectacle distance vision worse then 20/25 in either eye.

    • Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.

    • Is using any systemic or topical medications, (includes rewetting drops, artificial tears and allergy drops), that will affect ocular health. Occasional use is acceptable but not during the trial.

    • Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion

    • Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining

    • Has active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.

    • Is aphakic.

    • Is presbyopic.

    • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.

    • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of California, Berkeley Clinical Research Center (UCB-CRC) Berkeley California United States 94720-2020

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Coopervision, Inc.

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Meng C Lin, OD, PhD, University of California, Berkeley

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Coopervision, Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02097030
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EX-MKTG-46
    First Posted:
    Mar 26, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 31, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2020
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Single center evaluation. Thirty five subjects were recruited and 30 subjects completed the trial.
    Pre-assignment Detail Three participants were enrolled in the study but did not meet inclusion criteria, therefore discontinued before lens randomization.
    Arm/Group Title Etafilcon A, Then Filcon II 3 Nelfilcon A, Then Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days. etafilcon A: contact lens filcon II 3: contact lens Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days. nelfilcon A: contact lens filcon II 3: contact lens
    Period Title: First Intervention (3 Days)
    STARTED 15 17
    COMPLETED 14 16
    NOT COMPLETED 1 1
    Period Title: First Intervention (3 Days)
    STARTED 14 16
    COMPLETED 14 16
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Etafilcon A, Then Filcon II 3 Nelfilcon A, Then Filcon II 3 Total
    Arm/Group Description Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days. etafilcon A: contact lens filcon II 3: contact lens Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days. nelfilcon A: contact lens filcon II 3: contact lens Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 14 16 30
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    21.5
    (4.9)
    21.2
    (5.0)
    21.4
    (5.0)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    12
    85.7%
    14
    87.5%
    26
    86.7%
    Male
    2
    14.3%
    2
    12.5%
    4
    13.3%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Overall Lens Preference - All Study Lenses
    Description Participant's subjective response for overall lens preference after 3 days of daily disposable wear of each pair of lenses. Surveyed at exit. (4 possible ratings: Strongly prefer pair#1, Slightly prefer pair #1, Slightly prefer pair #2, Strongly prefer pair #2).
    Time Frame Study Exit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Strongly Prefer
    5
    35.7%
    3
    18.8%
    8
    26.7%
    Slightly Prefer
    4
    28.6%
    3
    18.8%
    7
    23.3%
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Overall Lens Preference - Hydrogel vs. Filcon II 3
    Description Participant's subjective response for overall lens preference after 3 days of daily disposable wear of each pair. Surveyed at exit. (4 possible ratings: Strongly prefer pair#1, Slightly prefer pair #1, Slightly prefer pair #2, Strongly prefer pair #2).
    Time Frame Study Exit

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    30 subjects
    Arm/Group Title Hydrogel Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A. (hydrogel: nelfilcon A, etafilcon A) (silicone hydrogel: filcon II 3) Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A. (hydrogel: nelfilcon A, etafilcon A) (silicone hydrogel: filcon II 3)
    Measure Participants 30 30
    Strongly Prefer
    8
    57.1%
    8
    50%
    Slightly Prefer
    7
    50%
    7
    43.8%
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Subjective Response for Comfort
    Description Participant's subjective response for comfort measured at baseline and 3 day follow-up. (Continuous Comfort Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn/causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever)
    Time Frame Baseline and 3 day follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Baseline
    90.3
    (15.9)
    94.1
    (8.7)
    93.2
    (9.5)
    3 day follow up
    84.5
    (12.2)
    82.0
    (16.3)
    81.5
    (20.1)
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Subjective Response for Vision
    Description Participant's subjective response for vision measured at baseline and at 3 day follow-up of daily disposable wear of lenses. (Vision Scale 0-100, 0=very blurry, 100=very clear).
    Time Frame Baseline and 3 day follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Baseline
    93.8
    (8.2)
    93.0
    (9.6)
    94.1
    (6.1)
    3 day follow up
    94.8
    (5.4)
    90.6
    (15.8)
    95.2
    (5.1)
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Subjective Response for Insertion
    Description Participant's subjective response for insertion measured at baseline. (Insertion Handling Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, 100=very easy to handle).
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    94.6
    (8.5)
    86.4
    (18.4)
    91.0
    (15.1)
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Subjective Response for Handling (Insertion and Removal)
    Description Participant's subjective response for handling (insertion and removal) measured at 3 day follow-up of daily disposable wear of lenses. (Handling Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, 100=very easy to handle).
    Time Frame 3 days follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Insertion
    92.9
    (11.6)
    74.1
    (23.6)
    91.3
    (10.1)
    Removal
    88.6
    (14.8)
    94.8
    (8.0)
    93.9
    (11.8)
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Subjective Response for Dryness
    Description Participant's subjective response for dryness, measured at baseline and after 3 day follow-up of daily disposable wear of lenses. (Dryness Scale 0-100, 0=Cannot be worn/extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time).
    Time Frame 3 Days Follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    80.6
    (16.8)
    81.6
    (19.0)
    76.4
    (21.5)
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Satisfaction, Vision
    Description Participant's subjective response for overall vision satisfaction. Measured after 3 days daily disposable wear of lenses. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.
    Time Frame 3 Days Follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Completely Dissatisfied
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Somewhat Dissatisfied
    0
    0%
    1
    6.3%
    0
    0%
    Somewhat Satisfied
    2
    14.3%
    2
    12.5%
    6
    20%
    Completely Satisfied
    14
    100%
    11
    68.8%
    24
    80%
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Satisfaction, Comfort
    Description Participant's subjective response for overall comfort satisfaction. Measured after 3 days daily disposable wear of lenses. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.
    Time Frame 3 Days Follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Completely Dissatisfied
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Somewhat Dissatisfied
    3
    21.4%
    1
    6.3%
    5
    16.7%
    Somewhat Satisfied
    5
    35.7%
    8
    50%
    9
    30%
    Completely Satisfied
    8
    57.1%
    5
    31.3%
    16
    53.3%
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Satisfaction, Handling
    Description Participant's subjective response for overall handling satisfaction. Measured after 3 days of daily disposable lens wear. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.
    Time Frame 3 Days

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Completely Dissatisfied
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Somewhat Dissatisfied
    1
    7.1%
    4
    25%
    4
    13.3%
    Somewhat Satisfied
    6
    42.9%
    3
    18.8%
    10
    33.3%
    Completely Satisfied
    9
    64.3%
    7
    43.8%
    16
    53.3%
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Satisfaction, Dryness
    Description Participant's subjective response for overall dryness satisfaction. Measured after 3 days daily disposable wear of lenses. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.
    Time Frame 3 Days Follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Completely Dissatisfied
    1
    7.1%
    0
    0%
    2
    6.7%
    Somewhat Dissatisfied
    4
    28.6%
    3
    18.8%
    5
    16.7%
    Somewhat Satisfied
    6
    42.9%
    5
    31.3%
    12
    40%
    Completely Satisfied
    5
    35.7%
    6
    37.5%
    11
    36.7%
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Satisfaction
    Description Participant's subjective response for overall satisfaction. Measured after 3 days of daily disposable lens wear. (4 point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied.
    Time Frame 3 Days Follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Subjects were randomized to wear one or the other of the conventional hydrogel lenses; all subjects wore the Clariti silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Completely Dissatisfied
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    3.3%
    Somewhat Dissatisfied
    1
    7.1%
    1
    6.3%
    3
    10%
    Somewhat Satisfied
    8
    57.1%
    9
    56.3%
    11
    36.7%
    Completely Satisfied
    7
    50%
    4
    25%
    15
    50%
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Lens Fit and Performance - Wettability (Baseline and 3 Days Follow-up)
    Description The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - wettability. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Wettability (scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=excellent, 4 severely reduced).
    Time Frame Baseline and 3 days follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Baseline
    3.5
    (0.3)
    3.3
    (0.5)
    3.4
    (0.4)
    3 days follow up
    3.6
    (0.2)
    3.2
    (0.6)
    3.5
    (0.4)
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Lens Fit and Performance - Deposits (Baseline and 3 Days Follow-up)
    Description The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - deposits. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Deposits (scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=excellent, 4 severely reduced);
    Time Frame Baseline and 3 days follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Baseline
    0.0
    (0.0)
    0.1
    (0.3)
    0.0
    (0.0)
    3 days follow up
    0.0
    (0.0)
    0.0
    (0.0)
    0.0
    (0.0)
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Lens Fit and Performance - Debris (Baseline and 3 Day Follow-up)
    Description The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - debris. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. (Debris scale 0-4; 0.25 steps; 0=no debris, 4=significant debris)
    Time Frame Baseline and 3 day follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Baseline
    0.0
    (0.0)
    0.0
    (0.0)
    0.0
    (0.0)
    3 days follow up
    0.0
    (0.0)
    0.0
    (0.0)
    0.1
    (0.6)
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Lens Fit and Performance - Movement (Baseline and 3 Days Follow-up)
    Description The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - movement. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Movement (scale in millimeters).
    Time Frame Baseline and 3 days follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Baseline
    0.3
    (0.2)
    0.3
    (0.2)
    0.3
    (0.1)
    3 days follow up
    0.2
    (0.2)
    0.3
    (0.2)
    0.3
    (0.2)
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Lens Fit and Performance - Fit Acceptance
    Description The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - fit acceptance. Measured at baseline and 3 day follow-up (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Fit acceptance (Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=Should not be worn, 4=Perfect).
    Time Frame Baseline and 3 day follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Baseline
    3.6
    (0.2)
    3.6
    (0.2)
    3.7
    (0.2)
    3 days follow up
    3.6
    (0.3)
    3.6
    (0.2)
    3.7
    (0.2)
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title Lens Fit and Performance - Tightness (Baseline and 3 Day Follow-up)
    Description The investigator's objective assessment for contact lens fit and performance - tightness. Measured at baseline (10-15mins settling) for both study pairs. Tightness (Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=Should not be worn, 4=Perfect).
    Time Frame Baseline and 3 day follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Baseline
    54.0
    (12.0)
    56.0
    (11.0)
    53.0
    (12)
    3 days follow up
    58.0
    (12)
    55
    (12.0)
    54
    (11)
    19. Secondary Outcome
    Title Ocular Health - Biomicroscopy
    Description The investigator's objective assessment of ocular health assessed for each study Pair after 3 days wear by biomicroscopy. Bulbar and Limbal Hyperemia; Corneal Staining Type, Extent and Depth, Conjunctival Staining and Indentation. BrienHolden Vision Institute Continuous Scale: 1-4, 0.5 steps (1=Very, 2=Slight, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe)
    Time Frame 3 Days Follow-up

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Only right eye data shown. Left eye data virtually identical. One subject had non-contact lens related adverse event in the nelfilcon A group. Subject temporarily discontinued and went on to complete the study.
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    Measure Participants 16 14 30
    Bulbar Hyperemia (Nasal)
    0.88
    (0.2)
    0.96
    (0.3)
    0.95
    (0.4)
    Bulbar Hyperemia (Temporal)
    0.81
    (0.3)
    0.96
    (0.2)
    0.98
    (0.4)
    Bulbar Hyperemia (Superior)
    0.63
    (0.4)
    0.64
    (0.5)
    0.72
    (0.5)
    Bulbar Hyperemia (Inferior)
    0.72
    (0.4)
    0.64
    (0.5)
    0.75
    (0.5)
    Limbal Hyperemia (Nasal)
    0.53
    (0.5)
    0.96
    (0.7)
    0.47
    (0.6)
    Limbal Hyperemia (Temporal)
    0.44
    (0.4)
    0.89
    (0.7)
    0.38
    (0.5)
    Limbal Hyperemia (Superior)
    0.38
    (0.4)
    0.68
    (0.7)
    0.30
    (0.4)
    Limbal Hyperemia (Inferior)
    0.41
    (0.5)
    0.75
    (0.8)
    0.33
    (0.5)
    Corneal Staining Type (Central)
    0.00
    (0.0)
    0.18
    (0.5)
    0.17
    (0.6)
    Corneal Staining Type (Nasal)
    0.19
    (0.8)
    0.14
    (0.5)
    0.07
    (0.4)
    Corneal Staining Type (Temporal)
    0.16
    (0.4)
    0.25
    (0.7)
    0.32
    (0.8)
    Corneal Staining Type (Superior)
    0.34
    (0.7)
    0.07
    (0.3)
    0.38
    (0.8)
    Corneal Staining Type (Inferior)
    0.50
    (1.0)
    0.50
    (0.9)
    0.67
    (0.9)
    Corneal Staining Extent (Central)
    0.00
    (0.0)
    0.07
    (0.2)
    0.08
    (0.3)
    Corneal Staining Extent (Nasal)
    0.03
    (0.1)
    0.04
    (0.1)
    0.02
    (0.1)
    Corneal Staining Extent (Temporal)
    0.09
    (0.3)
    0.11
    (0.3)
    0.10
    (0.2)
    Corneal Staining Extent (Superior)
    0.22
    (0.4)
    0.04
    (0.1)
    0.22
    (0.5)
    Corneal Staining Extent (Inferior)
    0.41
    (0.7)
    0.32
    (0.6)
    0.38
    (0.6)
    Corneal Staining Depth (Central)
    0.00
    (0.0)
    0.14
    (0.4)
    0.10
    (0.3)
    Corneal Staining Depth (Nasal)
    0.06
    (0.3)
    0.07
    (0.3)
    0.03
    (0.2)
    Corneal Staining Depth (Temporal)
    0.13
    (0.3)
    0.14
    (0.4)
    0.17
    (0.4)
    Corneal Staining Depth (Superior)
    .025
    (0.5)
    0.07
    (0.3)
    0.20
    (0.4)
    Corneal Staining Depth (Inferior)
    0.25
    (0.5)
    0.29
    (0.5)
    0.40
    (0.5)
    Conjunctival Staining (Nasal)
    0.34
    (0.6)
    1.29
    (1.2)
    1.65
    (0.9)
    Conjunctival Staining (Temporal)
    0.28
    (0.5)
    0.68
    (0.9)
    1.65
    (0.9)
    Conjunctival Staining (Superior)
    0.13
    (0.3)
    0.04
    (0.1)
    1.48
    (0.8)
    Conjunctival Staining (Inferior)
    0.19
    (0.4)
    0.64
    (0.9)
    1.55
    (0.8)
    Conjunctival Indent (Nasal)
    0.00
    (0.0)
    0.00
    (0.0)
    0.28
    (0.5)
    Conjunctival Indent (Temporal)
    0.00
    (0.0)
    0.00
    (0.0)
    0.28
    (0.5)
    Conjunctival Indent (Superior)
    0.06
    (0.3)
    0.00
    (0.0)
    0.22
    (0.5)
    Conjunctival Indent (Inferior)
    0.06
    (0.3)
    0.00
    (0.0)
    0.20
    (0.5)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame From dispense up to 3 days for each study lenses
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Arm/Group Description Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Subjects randomized to wear study pair one then crossover to study pair two. Study pairs are either filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A or filcon II 3 and etafilcon A
    All Cause Mortality
    Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/16 (0%) 0/14 (0%) 0/30 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Nelfilcon A Etafilcon A Filcon II 3
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 1/16 (6.3%) 0/14 (0%) 0/30 (0%)
    Eye disorders
    Non-lens related 1/16 (6.3%) 1 0/14 (0%) 0 0/30 (0%) 0

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The investigators will not be permitted to publish or present at scientific meetings results obtained from the clinical study without prior written consent from the sponsor.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Jose A. Vega, OD, Sr. Manager Global Medical Scientific Affairs
    Organization CooperVision
    Phone (925) 621-3761
    Email jvega@coopervision.com
    Responsible Party:
    Coopervision, Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02097030
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EX-MKTG-46
    First Posted:
    Mar 26, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 31, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2020