Myrror: VEGF Trap-Eye in Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia (mCNV)

Sponsor
Bayer (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01249664
Collaborator
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
122
20
2
32
6.1
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

VEGF Trap-Eye will be tested for safety and efficacy in patients with vision loss due to choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia. This will be a placebo-controlled trial. 3 out of 4 patients will receive an injection of VEGF Trap-Eye into the affected eye (and repeated injections if required), and 1 out of 4 patients will receive a sham injection requiring no needle stick, but making the patient unaware of whether or not he received active treatment.

Outcome of the two treatment groups will be compared after 24 weeks. From week 24, sham patients may receive active treatment.

Total duration of the study will be 48 weeks.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Biological: VEGF Trap-Eye (BAY86-5321)
  • Procedure: No Drug
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
122 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase-3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-masked, Sham-controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravitreal VEGF Trap-Eye in Subjects With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia
Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1

Biological: VEGF Trap-Eye (BAY86-5321)
1 intravitreal injection of the experimental drug, followed by monthly re-injections if needed

Sham Comparator: Arm 2

Procedure: No Drug
Sham procedure NOT involving injection of any substance; patient´s eye is anesthetized and a syringe without needle gently pressed on the cornea

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) From Baseline to Week 24 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) [Baseline, Week 24]

    Defined study baseline range of ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in BCVA as Measured by ETDRS at Week 24 Using the LOCF Approach [Baseline, Week 24]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  2. Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by ETDRS From Baseline to Week 24 - Observed Cases [Baseline, Week 24]

    Data as observed at visit, no carrying forward from latest observation if missing data at later time points. Defined study baseline range of ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning.

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 10 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 5 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 48]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 10 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 48]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 5 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 48]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 15 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 10 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 5 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 15 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 48]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  12. Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 10 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 48]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 5 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 48]

    Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.

  14. Mean Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) From Baseline to Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    A negative number indicates improvement (reduced thickness).

  15. Mean Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) From Baseline to Week 48 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 48]

    A negative number indicates improvement (reduced thickness).

  16. Mean Change in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Lesion Size as Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) From Baseline to Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    CNV area values measured in square millimeters, each disc area is equivalent to 2.54 mm^2 on the retina; lower values represent better outcomes

  17. Mean Change in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Lesion Size as Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) From Baseline to Week 48 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 48]

    CNV area values measured in square millimeters, each disc area is equivalent to 2.54 mm^2 on the retina; lower values represent better outcomes

  18. Mean Change in European Five-dimensional Health Scale (EQ-5D) Score From Baseline to Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire based on a scale from -0.594 (worst) to 1.00 (best).

  19. Mean Change in National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Total Score From Baseline to Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    The NEI VFQ-25 total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales which are all scored from 0-100. To reach the overall composite score, each sub-scale score is averaged in order to give each sub-scale equal weight.

  20. Percentage of Participants Who Were Withdrawn From Study Drug During the First 24 Weeks [Baseline, Week 24]

  21. Mean Change in Area of Leakage From Baseline at Week 24 - LOCF [Baseline, Week 24]

    A negative change from baseline indicates improvement, ie, less leakage.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Able to read (or, if unable to read due to visual impairment, be read to verbatim by the person administering the informed consent form or a family member) and understand the informed consent form and willing to sign the informed consent form

  • Signed informed consent form. In Japan only, the informed consent form for a subject under the age of 20 years will require the co-signature of the subject's legally authorized representative.

  • Men and women ≥ 18 years of age

  • Myopia of greater than or equal to -6 D OR axial length of greater than or equal to 26.5 mm

  • Active subfoveal or juxtafoveal (within 1 to 199 μm of the center of the fovea) CNV secondary to pathologic myopia as defined by leakage on FA

  • Best-corrected visual acuity of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye at 4 meters

  • Decrease in vision in the study eye is determined by the investigator, using his/her medical judgment, to be primarily the result of the current active mCNV

  • Willing, committed, and able to return for all clinic visits and complete all study-related procedures

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Only one functional eye

  • Ocular media of insufficient quality to obtain fundus and OCT images in the study eye

  • Greatest linear dimension (GLD) of the lesion in the study eye is greater than 12 disc areas

  • Recurrent mCNV in the study eye

  • Aphakia in the study eye

  • History or presence of CNV with an origin other than pathologic myopia in the study eye

  • Ocular inflammation or external ocular inflammation in the study eye

  • Concurrent disease in the study eye that would compromise BCVA or require medical or surgical intervention during the study period

  • Any ocular disorder in the study eye that, in the opinion of the investigator, may confound interpretation of the study results

  • Significant scarring or atrophy in the fovea that indicates substantial irreversible vision loss in the study eye

  • History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye

  • Evidence at examination of infectious blepharitis, keratitis, scleritis, or conjunctivitis in either eye or current treatment for serious systemic infection

  • Vitreomacular traction or traction retinal detachment, epiretinal membrane in either eye

  • Any iris neovascularization and/or vitreous hemorrhage in either eye

  • Uncontrolled glaucoma, or previous filtration surgery in either eye

  • Prior and concomitant treatments

  • In the study eye:

  • Any prior or concomitant treatment with another investigational agent for mCNV

  • Any previous panretinal photocoagulation or subfoveal thermal laser therapy

  • Any prior treatment with photodynamic therapy

  • Cataract surgery within 3 months prior to Day 1

  • Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser capsulotomy within 2 months prior to Day 1

  • Any other intraocular surgery within 3 months prior to Day 1

  • History of vitreoretinal surgery and/or scleral buckle surgery

  • Any prior treatment with anti-VEGF agents

  • Previous use of intraocular or periocular corticosteroids in either eye within 3 months prior to Day 1

  • Previous assignment to treatment during this study

  • Uncontrolled hypertension

  • History of cerebrovascular disease or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to Baseline/Day 1

  • History of other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug, may affect interpretation of the results of the study, or renders the subject at high risk from treatment complications

  • Women of childbearing potential without contraception, women who intend to breastfeed during the study. All subjects (both men and women) of childbearing potential who are unwilling to use adequate birth control measures during the course of the study.

  • Renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant

  • Participation in an investigational study within 30 days prior to Screening/Visit 1 that involved treatment with any drug (excluding vitamins and minerals) or device

  • Known serious allergy to the fluorescein sodium for injection in angiography or Verteporfin

  • Inability to obtain fundus photographs or fluorescein angiograms of sufficient quality

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Kowloon Hong Kong
2 Nagoya Aichi Japan 466-8560
3 Nagoya Aichi Japan 467-8602
4 Urayasu Chiba Japan 279-0021
5 Matsuyama Ehime Japan 790-8524
6 Sendai Miyagi Japan 984-8560
7 Suita Osaka Japan 565-0871
8 Otsu Shiga Japan 520-2192
9 Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan 113-8519
10 Chiyoda-ku Tokyo Japan 101-8309
11 Shinjuku-ku Tokyo Japan 160-8582
12 Fukuoka Japan 812-8582
13 Fukushima Japan 960-1295
14 Kyoto Japan 606-8507
15 Osaka Japan 545-8586
16 Osaka Japan 558-8558
17 Seoul Korea, Republic of 137 701
18 Singapore Singapore 168751
19 Taipei Taiwan 11217
20 Taoyuan Taiwan 333

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Bayer
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bayer Study Director, Bayer

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01249664
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 15170
First Posted:
Nov 30, 2010
Last Update Posted:
May 5, 2014
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2014

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details The study was conducted at 20 study centers in 5 countries. Recruitment period: 17 Dec 2010 - 28 Feb 2013.
Pre-assignment Detail A total of 173 participants were screened.
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 91 31
Participants Received Treatment 91 31
Fulfilled Requirements of FAS Population 90 31
Completed 24 Weeks Treatment 83 25
Completed 48 Weeks Treatment 78 24
COMPLETED 85 31
NOT COMPLETED 6 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham Total
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 90 31 121
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
58.5
(13.7)
57.5
(12.1)
58.2
(13.3)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
65
72.2%
27
87.1%
92
76%
Male
25
27.8%
4
12.9%
29
24%
Baseline Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter scores (Letters correctly read) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Letters correctly read]
56.4
(9.8)
56.6
(8.9)
56.5
(9.5)
Baseline Central Retinal Thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) (µm) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [µm]
349.7
(91.3)
354.2
(107.2)
350.9
(95.2)
Baseline intraocular pressure (mm Hg) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm Hg]
15.2
(2.7)
15.8
(2.8)
15.4
(2.7)
Number of participants by category of time since mCNV diagnosis (Number) [Number]
>= 2 months
17
18.9%
7
22.6%
24
19.8%
< 2 months
73
81.1%
24
77.4%
97
80.2%
Baseline National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) total score (scores on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [scores on a scale]
70.47
(13.48)
72.73
(15.29)
71.04
(13.94)
European questionnaire 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) total score (score on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
0.88
(0.18)
0.88
(0.15)
0.88
(0.18)
Race (Number) [Number]
Asian
90
100%
31
100%
121
100%
White
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Baseline Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) size (disc area) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [disc area]
0.4086
(0.5028)
0.3334
(0.3413)
0.3894
(0.4666)
Baseline area of leakage (disc area) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [disc area]
0.7005
(0.6830)
0.6867
(0.5563)
0.6970
(0.6507)
Duration of disease (days) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [days]
145.6
(437.4)
177.1
(512.0)
153.7
(455.6)
Baseline axial length (millimeter (mm)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeter (mm)]
28.791
(1.524)
28.610
(1.696)
28.745
(1.564)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) From Baseline to Week 24 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Description Defined study baseline range of ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Letters correctly read]
12.1
(8.3)
-2.0
(9.7)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments Null hypothesis was equality in change from baseline to Week 24 in BCVA total letter score between Eylea and Sham.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments No adjustment on P value, this is for the primary efficacy analysis.
Method ANCOVA
Comments ANCOVA model, including treatment groups and country (country designations) as fixed effects and baseline BCVA as a covariate.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
Estimated Value 14.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
10.8 to 17.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments The difference is calculated as Eylea minus Sham. A positive value indicates Eylea showed a higher change in BCVA total score until week 24 compared to Sham.
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in BCVA as Measured by ETDRS at Week 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
38.9
43.2%
9.7
31.3%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments Null hypothesis of difference of Eylea minus Sham of 0 was tested.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0001
Comments No adjustment on P value, since this test was only conducted formally under the primary efficacy evaluation was significant.
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value 29.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
14.4 to 44.0
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments A two-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method at level 5% weight-adjusted by country (country designations) was used to conduct the superiority test.
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by ETDRS From Baseline to Week 24 - Observed Cases
Description Data as observed at visit, no carrying forward from latest observation if missing data at later time points. Defined study baseline range of ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 84 25
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Letters correctly read]
12.0
(8.4)
-0.8
(9.3)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
Estimated Value 13.1
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
9.4 to 16.7
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 10 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
63.3
70.3%
12.9
41.6%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value 50.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
35.0 to 66.0
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 5 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
83.3
92.6%
19.4
62.6%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value 64.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
47.8 to 80.3
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 48

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
50.0
55.6%
29.0
93.5%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0308
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value 21.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.9 to 40.1
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 10 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 48

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
68.9
76.6%
41.9
135.2%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0075
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value 27.0
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
7.2 to 46.8
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 5 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 48

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
87.8
97.6%
45.2
145.8%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <.0001
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value 42.7
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
23.7 to 61.6
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 15 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
0
0%
6.5
21%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1478
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value -6.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-15.2 to 2.3
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 10 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
0
0%
25.8
83.2%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0006
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value -25.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-40.6 to -11.0
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 5 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
3.3
3.7%
35.5
114.5%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value -32.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-48.1 to -16.3
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 15 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 48

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
1.1
1.2%
6.5
21%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2446
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value -5.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-14.4 to 3.7
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 10 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 48

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
1.1
1.2%
22.6
72.9%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0035
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value -21.5
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-35.9 to -7.0
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Lost at Least 5 Letters in BCVA at Week 48 - LOCF
Description Defined study baseline range of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter score of 73 to 35 letters (ETDRS equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning. Nominator = (Number of participants who maintained vision * 100); Denominator = Number of participants analyzed.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 48

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
3.3
3.7%
29.0
93.5%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0012
Comments
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter CMH adjusted difference
Estimated Value -25.7
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-41.3 to -10.1
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
15. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) From Baseline to Week 24 - LOCF
Description A negative number indicates improvement (reduced thickness).
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Mean (Standard Deviation) [microns]
-79.1
(83.7)
-4.2
(127.4)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
Estimated Value -77.9
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-108.9 to -46.9
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
16. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) From Baseline to Week 48 - LOCF
Description A negative number indicates improvement (reduced thickness).
Time Frame Baseline, Week 48

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Mean (Standard Deviation) [microns]
-83.1
(85.5)
-56.7
(119.0)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0650
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
Estimated Value -29.3
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-60.4 to 1.8
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
17. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Lesion Size as Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) From Baseline to Week 24 - LOCF
Description CNV area values measured in square millimeters, each disc area is equivalent to 2.54 mm^2 on the retina; lower values represent better outcomes
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Disc areas]
-0.2233
(0.3195)
0.3007
(0.4383)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
Estimated Value -0.4808
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.5990 to -0.3626
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
18. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Lesion Size as Assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) From Baseline to Week 48 - LOCF
Description CNV area values measured in square millimeters, each disc area is equivalent to 2.54 mm^2 on the retina; lower values represent better outcomes
Time Frame Baseline, Week 48

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Disc areas]
-0.1995
(0.4281)
-0.0111
(0.4031)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0256
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
Estimated Value -0.1346
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.2525 to -0.0167
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
19. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change in European Five-dimensional Health Scale (EQ-5D) Score From Baseline to Week 24 - LOCF
Description EQ-5D is a quality of life questionnaire based on a scale from -0.594 (worst) to 1.00 (best).
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Scores on a scale]
0.0187
(0.1749)
0.0341
(0.1723)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8690
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
Estimated Value -0.0045
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.0579 to 0.0490
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
20. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change in National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Total Score From Baseline to Week 24 - LOCF
Description The NEI VFQ-25 total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales which are all scored from 0-100. To reach the overall composite score, each sub-scale score is averaged in order to give each sub-scale equal weight.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Scores on a scale]
3.14
(10.21)
-2.58
(10.07)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0104
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference of least square means
Estimated Value 5.21
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.25 to 9.18
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
21. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants Who Were Withdrawn From Study Drug During the First 24 Weeks
Description
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Number [Percentage of participants]
6.7
7.4%
19.4
62.6%
22. Secondary Outcome
Title Mean Change in Area of Leakage From Baseline at Week 24 - LOCF
Description A negative change from baseline indicates improvement, ie, less leakage.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) at baseline (Week 0). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection. Participant received a sham injection every 4 weeks from Week 0 to Week 20. At Week 24, participants received a single 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 44 only if the Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met at a given visit, participant received a sham injection.
Measure Participants 90 31
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Disc areas]
-0.4743
(0.4839)
0.2094
(0.5088)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept or Sham, Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection or Sham
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in least square means
Estimated Value -0.6648
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.8056 to -0.5239
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame From the first study drug injection until 30 days after the last study drug injection at the latest up to week 48.
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 20) Sham Treatment (Until Week 20) Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 44) Sham Treatment Then Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 44)
Arm/Group Description Participants received a 2 mg single dose of IAI at baseline (Week 20). Following this, participants were monitored every 4 weeks and received an injection at these visits up to week 20 only if the CNV persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met, participant received a sham injection. Participants were observed until week 24. Participants in the safety population were at risk. Participants received a sham injection every 4 weeks from week 0 through week 20. Participants were observed until week 24. Participants in the safety population were at risk. Participants who continued the study drug until week 20 were monitored every 4 weeks and received a single 2 mg dose IAI at these visits from week 24 through week 44 only if the CNV persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment criteria were not met, participant received a sham injection. Participants were observed from week 24 until week 48. Participants in the safety population were at risk. Participants who continued the sham treatment until week 20 were monitored every 4 weeks and received a single 2 mg dose IAI at these visits from week 24 through week 44 only if the CNV persisted or recurred, i.e. protocol defined re-treatment criteria were met. If these re-treatment were not met, participant received a sham injection. Participants were observed from Week 24 until Week 48. Participants in the safety population were at risk.
All Cause Mortality
Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 20) Sham Treatment (Until Week 20) Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 44) Sham Treatment Then Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 44)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 20) Sham Treatment (Until Week 20) Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 44) Sham Treatment Then Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 44)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 3/91 (3.3%) 0/31 (0%) 4/91 (4.4%) 0/31 (0%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura 1/91 (1.1%) 0/31 (0%) 0/91 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
Eye disorders
Choroidal neovascularisation 0/91 (0%) 0/31 (0%) 1/91 (1.1%) 0/31 (0%)
Macular hole 0/91 (0%) 0/31 (0%) 2/91 (2.2%) 0/31 (0%)
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia moraxella 0/91 (0%) 0/31 (0%) 1/91 (1.1%) 0/31 (0%)
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage 1/91 (1.1%) 0/31 (0%) 0/91 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
Psychiatric disorders
Depression 1/91 (1.1%) 0/31 (0%) 0/91 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 20) Sham Treatment (Until Week 20) Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 44) Sham Treatment Then Aflibercept Injection (Until Week 44)
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 30/91 (33%) 8/31 (25.8%) 18/91 (19.8%) 8/31 (25.8%)
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage 7/91 (7.7%) 1/31 (3.2%) 7/91 (7.7%) 1/31 (3.2%)
Dry eye 6/91 (6.6%) 1/31 (3.2%) 1/91 (1.1%) 1/31 (3.2%)
Eye pain 6/91 (6.6%) 1/31 (3.2%) 2/91 (2.2%) 1/31 (3.2%)
Posterior capsule opacification 0/91 (0%) 0/31 (0%) 0/91 (0%) 3/31 (9.7%)
Punctate keratitis 4/91 (4.4%) 3/31 (9.7%) 5/91 (5.5%) 3/31 (9.7%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea 5/91 (5.5%) 0/31 (0%) 3/91 (3.3%) 0/31 (0%)
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster 0/91 (0%) 2/31 (6.5%) 0/91 (0%) 0/31 (0%)
Nasopharyngitis 9/91 (9.9%) 2/31 (6.5%) 9/91 (9.9%) 2/31 (6.5%)
Nervous system disorders
Headache 6/91 (6.6%) 1/31 (3.2%) 0/91 (0%) 0/31 (0%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Therapeutic Area Head
Organization BAYER
Phone
Email clinical-trials-contact@bayerhealthcare.com
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01249664
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 15170
First Posted:
Nov 30, 2010
Last Update Posted:
May 5, 2014
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2014