Daily Disposable Comparison Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to compare the overall subjective preference between two Daily Disposable hydrogel lenses when refitted into a third hydrogel lens.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This was a two-day, randomized, non-dispensing, double-masked, contralateral study with two parallel groups. Participants were recruited into one of two groups - participants who habitually wore etafilcon A lens and participants who habitually wore nelfilcon A lens.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: filcon II 3 and etafilcon A Participants were randomized to a test and control lens for each group in a contralateral design. |
Device: filcon II 3
Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens.
Other Names:
Device: etafilcon A
Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A Participants were randomized to a test and control lens for each group in a contralateral design. |
Device: filcon II 3
Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens.
Other Names:
Device: nelfilcon A
Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Lens Preference - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A or Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [Baseline visit]
Participant's subjective response for lens preference of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A or filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A at baseline visit, following insertion, after settling 10-15mins (surveyed at baseline visit) rated by questionnaire. (5 possible ratings: Strongly prefer filcon II 3, Slightly prefer filcon II 3, No preference, Slightly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A, Strongly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A).
- Lens Preference - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A or Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [3 hours]
Participant's subjective response for lens preference of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A after 3 hours lens wear rated by questionnaire. (5 possible ratings: Strongly prefer filcon II 3, Slightly prefer filcon II 3, No preference, Slightly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A, Strongly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A).
- Lens Preference - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A or Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [6 hours]
Participant's subjective response for lens preference of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A after 6 hours lens wear rated by questionnaire (5 possible ratings: Strongly prefer filcon II 3, Slightly prefer filcon II 3, No preference, Slightly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A, Strongly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Lens Comfort - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [Baseline, 3 hours, 6 hours]
Participant's subjective response for lens comfort of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A after settling 10-15mins (surveyed at baseline visit, 3 hours, and 6 hours) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).
- Lens Comfort - Filcon II 3 and Nelficon A [Baseline, 3 hours, 6 hours]
Participant's subjective response for lens comfort of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A after settling 10-15mins (surveyed at baseline visit, 3 hours, and 6 hours) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever).
- Lens Dryness - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [3 hours and 6 hours]
Participant's subjective response for lens dryness of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A (surveyed at 3 and 6 hours after baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry 100=no dryness experienced).
- Lens Dryness - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [3 hours and 6 hours]
Participant's subjective response for lens dryness of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A (surveyed at 3 and 6 hours after baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced).
- Lens Handling - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [Baseline visit]
Participant's subjective response for lens handling of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (surveyed at baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle causes pain, 100=very easy to handle).
- Lens Handling - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [Baseline visit]
Participant's subjective response for lens handling of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (surveyed at baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, causes pain, 100=very easy to handle).
- Lens Handling (Removal) - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [6 hours]
Participant's subjective response for lens handling of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (surveyed 6 hours after baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, causes pain, 100=very easy to handle).
- Lens Handling (Removal) - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [6 hours]
Participant's subjective response for lens handling of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following removal (surveyed 6 hours after baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, causes pain, 100=very easy to handle).
- Lens Wettability - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens wettability of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.25 increments, 0=excellent wettability, 4=severely reduced wettability).
- Lens Wettability - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens wettability of filcon II 3 and nelficon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.25 increments, 0=excellent wettability, 4=severely reduced wettability).
- Lens Fit, Centration - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [Baseline]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for centration of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit) by biomicroscopy (Optimum or Decentered N T S I). N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior T/I - Temporal/Interior
- Lens Fit, Centration - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for centration of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Optimum or Decentered N T S I) N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior, T/I - Temporal/Interior
- Lens Fit, Centration - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [Baseline]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for centration of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline) by biomicroscopy (Optimum or Decentered N T S I) N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior, T/I - Temporal/Interior
- Lens Fit, Centration - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [After 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for centration of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Optimum or Decentered N T S I) N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior, T/I - Temporal/Interior
- Lens Fit, Post-Blink Movement - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for Post-Blink Movement of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (measured in Primary Gaze and recorded in 0.1mm steps).
- Lens Fit, Post-Blink Movement - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for Post-Blink Movement of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (measured in Primary Gaze and recorded in 0.1mm steps).
- Lens Fit, Tightness - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for tightness of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Percentage of tightness, 5 increments, 0-100, 0=extremely loose, 100=extremely tight).
- Lens Fit, Tightness - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for tightness of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Percentage of tightness, 5 increments, 0-100, 0=extremely loose, 100=extremely tight).
- Lens Surface Deposition - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [6 hour]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens surface deposition of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at 6 hour visit) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=no deposits, 4=severe deposits).
- Lens Surface Deposition - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [6 hour]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens surface deposition of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at 6 hour visit) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=no deposits, 4=severe deposits).
- High Contrast Visual Acuity - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of High Contrast Visual Acuity following filcon II 3 and etafilcon A insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by computerized charts. (Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision, negative values denote better vision than baseline 20/20 value).
- High Contrast Visual Acuity - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of High Contrast Visual Acuity following filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by computerized charts. (Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision, negative values denote better vision than baseline 20/20 value)
- Ocular Health, Corneal Staining (Extent) - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of corneal staining (extent) assessed at screening (before lens insertion) by biomicroscopy (Grade as a % of each zone). N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, C - Central
- Ocular Health, Corneal Staining (Extent) - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of corneal staining (extent) assessed at 6 hours by biomicroscopy (Grade as a % of each zone). N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, C - Central
- Ocular Health, Conjunctival Hyperemia - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of conjunctival bulbar and limbal hyperemia assessed at screening (before lens insertion) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.5 increments, 0=no redness, 4=redness).
- Ocular Health, Conjunctival Hyperemia - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A [Baseline and 6 hours]
The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of conjunctival bulbar and limbal hyperemia assessed at screening (before lens insertion of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.5 increments, 0=no redness, 4=redness).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
-
Has read and signed an information consent letter;
-
Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
-
Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction and the assigned study lenses;
-
Habitually wears either 1 Day Acuvue Moist or Dailies Aqua Comfort Plus contact lenses.
-
Demonstrates an acceptable fit with the study lenses
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
-
Has any known active* ocular disease and/or infection;
-
Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
-
Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
-
Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study;
-
Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit);
-
Is aphakic;
-
Has undergone refractive error surgery;
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Centre for Contact Lens Research | Waterloo | Ontario | Canada | N2L 3G1 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Coopervision, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- EX-MKTG-50
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Seventy four participants were enrolled into the study and 70 participants were randomized and completed the study. 40 were habitual wearers of etafilcon A lens and 30 were habitual wearers of nelfilcon A lens. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A | Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 43 | 31 |
COMPLETED | 40 | 30 |
NOT COMPLETED | 3 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A | Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 40 | 30 | 70 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
28
(9)
|
33.1
(12.4)
|
30.2
(10.8)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
27
67.5%
|
23
76.7%
|
50
71.4%
|
Male |
13
32.5%
|
7
23.3%
|
20
28.6%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
Canada |
40
100%
|
30
100%
|
70
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Lens Preference - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A or Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens preference of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A or filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A at baseline visit, following insertion, after settling 10-15mins (surveyed at baseline visit) rated by questionnaire. (5 possible ratings: Strongly prefer filcon II 3, Slightly prefer filcon II 3, No preference, Slightly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A, Strongly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A). |
Time Frame | Baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A | Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 30 |
Strongly prefer filcon II 3 |
1
2.5%
|
3
10%
|
Slightly prefer filcon II 3 |
14
35%
|
8
26.7%
|
No preference |
8
20%
|
10
33.3%
|
Slightly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A |
8
20%
|
6
20%
|
Strongly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A |
9
22.5%
|
3
10%
|
Title | Lens Preference - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A or Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens preference of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A after 3 hours lens wear rated by questionnaire. (5 possible ratings: Strongly prefer filcon II 3, Slightly prefer filcon II 3, No preference, Slightly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A, Strongly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A). |
Time Frame | 3 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A | Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 30 |
Strongly prefer filcon II 3 |
1
2.5%
|
3
10%
|
Slightly prefer filcon II 3 |
10
25%
|
12
40%
|
No preference |
7
17.5%
|
5
16.7%
|
Slightly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A |
13
32.5%
|
8
26.7%
|
Strongly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A |
9
22.5%
|
2
6.7%
|
Title | Lens Preference - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A or Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens preference of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A after 6 hours lens wear rated by questionnaire (5 possible ratings: Strongly prefer filcon II 3, Slightly prefer filcon II 3, No preference, Slightly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A, Strongly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A). |
Time Frame | 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A | Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 30 |
Strongly prefer filcon II 3 |
2
5%
|
5
16.7%
|
Slightly prefer filcon II 3 |
9
22.5%
|
8
26.7%
|
No preference |
7
17.5%
|
9
30%
|
Slightly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A |
11
27.5%
|
5
16.7%
|
Strongly prefer etafilcon A/nelfilcon A |
11
27.5%
|
3
10%
|
Title | Lens Comfort - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens comfort of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A after settling 10-15mins (surveyed at baseline visit, 3 hours, and 6 hours) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever). |
Time Frame | Baseline, 3 hours, 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. Habitual data collected before study lens dispensed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Habitual lens (before study lens dispensed) |
78
(18)
|
77
(20)
|
Baseline (study lens) |
84
(18)
|
90
(10)
|
3 hours |
79
(22)
|
87
(14)
|
6 hours |
75
(24)
|
83
(18)
|
Title | Lens Comfort - Filcon II 3 and Nelficon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens comfort of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A after settling 10-15mins (surveyed at baseline visit, 3 hours, and 6 hours) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain, 100=cannot be felt ever). |
Time Frame | Baseline, 3 hours, 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. Habitual data collected before study lens dispensed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Habitual lens (before study lens dispensed) |
67
(17)
|
67
(18)
|
Baseline (study lens) |
85
(14)
|
88
(14)
|
3 hours |
79
(16)
|
75
(17)
|
6 hours |
76
(24)
|
72
(23)
|
Title | Lens Dryness - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens dryness of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A (surveyed at 3 and 6 hours after baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry 100=no dryness experienced). |
Time Frame | 3 hours and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. Habitual data collected before study lens dispensed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Habitual lens (before study lens dispensed) |
72
(19)
|
70
(20)
|
3 hours |
78
(24)
|
85
(15)
|
6 hours |
75
(23)
|
82
(18)
|
Title | Lens Dryness - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens dryness of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A (surveyed at 3 and 6 hours after baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced). |
Time Frame | 3 hours and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. Habitual data collected before study lens dispensed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Habitual lens (before study lens dispensedl |
66
(20)
|
66
(19)
|
3 hours |
79
(16)
|
76
(19)
|
6 hours |
77
(21)
|
74
(23)
|
Title | Lens Handling - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens handling of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (surveyed at baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle causes pain, 100=very easy to handle). |
Time Frame | Baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. Habitual data collected before study lens dispensed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Habitual lens (before study lens dispensed) |
92
(10)
|
92
(10)
|
Baseline (study lens) |
93
(9)
|
91
(10)
|
Title | Lens Handling - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens handling of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (surveyed at baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, causes pain, 100=very easy to handle). |
Time Frame | Baseline visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. Habitual data collected before study lens dispensed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Habitual lens (before study lens dispensed) |
90
(14)
|
90
(14)
|
Baseline (study lens) |
92
(14)
|
92
(14)
|
Title | Lens Handling (Removal) - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens handling of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (surveyed 6 hours after baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, causes pain, 100=very easy to handle). |
Time Frame | 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. Habitual data collected before study lens dispensed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Habitual lens (before study lens dispensed) |
95
(10)
|
95
(10)
|
6 hours |
95
(12)
|
97
(6)
|
Title | Lens Handling (Removal) - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | Participant's subjective response for lens handling of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following removal (surveyed 6 hours after baseline visit) rated by questionnaire (Scale 0-100, 0=very hard to handle, causes pain, 100=very easy to handle). |
Time Frame | 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. Habitual data collected before study lens dispensed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Habitual lens (before study lens dispensed) |
90
(14)
|
89
(15)
|
6 hours |
94
(16)
|
94
(10)
|
Title | Lens Wettability - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens wettability of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.25 increments, 0=excellent wettability, 4=severely reduced wettability). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Baseline |
0.40
(0.73)
|
0.33
(0.57)
|
6 hours |
0.95
(0.89)
|
1.03
(1.12)
|
Title | Lens Wettability - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens wettability of filcon II 3 and nelficon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.25 increments, 0=excellent wettability, 4=severely reduced wettability). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Baseline |
0.38
(0.46)
|
0.25
(0.35)
|
6 hours |
0.93
(0.82)
|
0.73
(0.79)
|
Title | Lens Fit, Centration - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for centration of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit) by biomicroscopy (Optimum or Decentered N T S I). N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior T/I - Temporal/Interior |
Time Frame | Baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Optimum |
13
32.5%
|
13
43.3%
|
N |
0
0%
|
1
3.3%
|
T |
8
20%
|
9
30%
|
S |
2
5%
|
4
13.3%
|
I |
5
12.5%
|
3
10%
|
N/S |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
N/I |
0
0%
|
1
3.3%
|
T/S |
5
12.5%
|
1
3.3%
|
T/I |
7
17.5%
|
8
26.7%
|
Title | Lens Fit, Centration - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for centration of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Optimum or Decentered N T S I) N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior, T/I - Temporal/Interior |
Time Frame | 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Optimum |
16
40%
|
14
46.7%
|
N |
0
0%
|
1
3.3%
|
T |
9
22.5%
|
9
30%
|
S |
2
5%
|
5
16.7%
|
I |
2
5%
|
1
3.3%
|
N/S |
1
2.5%
|
0
0%
|
N/I |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
T/S |
6
15%
|
4
13.3%
|
T/I |
4
10%
|
6
20%
|
Title | Lens Fit, Centration - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for centration of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline) by biomicroscopy (Optimum or Decentered N T S I) N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior, T/I - Temporal/Interior |
Time Frame | Baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Optimum |
11
27.5%
|
14
46.7%
|
N |
1
2.5%
|
0
0%
|
T |
3
7.5%
|
2
6.7%
|
S |
2
5%
|
2
6.7%
|
I |
3
7.5%
|
2
6.7%
|
N/S |
1
2.5%
|
1
3.3%
|
N/I |
0
0%
|
2
6.7%
|
T/S |
7
17.5%
|
4
13.3%
|
T/I |
2
5%
|
3
10%
|
Title | Lens Fit, Centration - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for centration of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Optimum or Decentered N T S I) N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior, T/I - Temporal/Interior |
Time Frame | After 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Optimum |
11
27.5%
|
12
40%
|
Nasal |
1
2.5%
|
1
3.3%
|
T |
4
10%
|
4
13.3%
|
S |
4
10%
|
2
6.7%
|
I |
0
0%
|
1
3.3%
|
N/S |
1
2.5%
|
1
3.3%
|
N/I |
0
0%
|
1
3.3%
|
T/S |
7
17.5%
|
4
13.3%
|
T/I |
2
5%
|
4
13.3%
|
Title | Lens Fit, Post-Blink Movement - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for Post-Blink Movement of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (measured in Primary Gaze and recorded in 0.1mm steps). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Baseline |
0.28
(0.15)
|
0.24
(0.15)
|
6 hours |
0.30
(0.16)
|
0.26
(0.14)
|
Title | Lens Fit, Post-Blink Movement - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for Post-Blink Movement of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (measured in Primary Gaze and recorded in 0.1mm steps). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Baseline |
0.26
(0.11)
|
0.24
(0.10)
|
6 hours |
0.23
(0.08)
|
0.24
(0.11)
|
Title | Lens Fit, Tightness - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for tightness of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Percentage of tightness, 5 increments, 0-100, 0=extremely loose, 100=extremely tight). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Baseline |
48
(6)
|
50
(6)
|
6 hours |
49
(5)
|
51
(6)
|
Title | Lens Fit, Tightness - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens fit for tightness of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by biomicroscopy (Percentage of tightness, 5 increments, 0-100, 0=extremely loose, 100=extremely tight). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Baseline |
50
(7)
|
52
(7)
|
6 hours |
52
(6)
|
53
(8)
|
Title | Lens Surface Deposition - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens surface deposition of filcon II 3 and etafilcon A following insertion (assessed at 6 hour visit) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=no deposits, 4=severe deposits). |
Time Frame | 6 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
0.26
(0.27)
|
0.37
(0.47)
|
Title | Lens Surface Deposition - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment for lens surface deposition of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A following insertion (assessed at 6 hour visit) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=no deposits, 4=severe deposits). |
Time Frame | 6 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
0.27
(0.33)
|
0.30
(0.32)
|
Title | High Contrast Visual Acuity - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of High Contrast Visual Acuity following filcon II 3 and etafilcon A insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by computerized charts. (Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision, negative values denote better vision than baseline 20/20 value). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Baseline |
-0.08
(0.07)
|
-0.06
(0.07)
|
6 hours |
-0.09
(0.07)
|
-0.07
(0.08)
|
Title | High Contrast Visual Acuity - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of High Contrast Visual Acuity following filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A insertion (assessed at baseline visit and 6 hours) by computerized charts. (Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision, negative values denote better vision than baseline 20/20 value) |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Baseline |
-0.07
(0.07)
|
-0.07
(0.07)
|
6 hours |
-0.08
(0.07)
|
-0.10
(0.08)
|
Title | Ocular Health, Corneal Staining (Extent) - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of corneal staining (extent) assessed at screening (before lens insertion) by biomicroscopy (Grade as a % of each zone). N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, C - Central |
Time Frame | 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
N |
4
(8)
|
0
(1)
|
T |
1
(6)
|
1
(2)
|
S |
3
(8)
|
2
(5)
|
I |
9
(12)
|
4
(6)
|
C |
0
(2)
|
0
(1)
|
Title | Ocular Health, Corneal Staining (Extent) - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of corneal staining (extent) assessed at 6 hours by biomicroscopy (Grade as a % of each zone). N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, C - Central |
Time Frame | 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
N |
2
(5)
|
2
(5)
|
T |
1
(5)
|
0
(1)
|
S |
2
(5)
|
2
(7)
|
I |
6
(8)
|
4
(5)
|
C |
2
(9)
|
0
(1)
|
Title | Ocular Health, Conjunctival Hyperemia - Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of conjunctival bulbar and limbal hyperemia assessed at screening (before lens insertion) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.5 increments, 0=no redness, 4=redness). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and etafilcon A group which comprises of 40 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Etafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. etafilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear etafilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 40 | 40 |
Bulbar |
1.89
(0.38)
|
1.81
(0.39)
|
Limbal |
1.75
(0.47)
|
1.68
(0.51)
|
Title | Ocular Health, Conjunctival Hyperemia - Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A |
---|---|
Description | The ophthalmologist's objective assessment of conjunctival bulbar and limbal hyperemia assessed at screening (before lens insertion of filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A) by biomicroscopy (Scale 0-4, 0.5 increments, 0=no redness, 4=redness). |
Time Frame | Baseline and 6 hours |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
These results are between the filcon II 3 and nelfilcon A group which comprises of 30 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 | Control - Nelfilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. | Participants were randomized to a test and control lens in a contralateral design. filcon II 3: Participants were randomized to wear filcon II 3 test lens. nelfilcon A: Participants were randomized to wear nelfilcon A control lens. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Bulbar |
1.67
(0.46)
|
1.57
(0.29)
|
Limbal |
1.35
(0.49)
|
1.27
(0.37)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From dispense up to 2 days for each study lenses | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A | Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A | ||
Arm/Group Description | Participants wear one of their habitual brand lenses (etafilcon A) in one eye, (comparator) and one comparator lens (filcon II 3) in the other eye. filcon II 3: Participants wear one of their habitual brand lenses in one eye (comparator) and one lens of test lens in the other. etafilcon A: Participants wear one of their habitual brand lenses in one eye (comparator) and one lens of test lens in the other. | Participants wear one of their habitual brand lenses (nelfilcon A) in one eye, (comparator) and one comparator lens (filcon II 3) in the other eye. filcon II 3: Participants wear one of their habitual brand lenses in one eye (comparator) and one lens of test lens in the other. nelfilcon A: Participants wear one of their habitual brand lenses in one eye (comparator) and one lens of test lens in the other. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A | Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A | Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/40 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Filcon II 3 and Etafilcon A | Filcon II 3 and Nelfilcon A | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/40 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. There IS an agreement between the Principal Investigator and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. The investigators will not be permitted to publish or present at scientific meetings results obtained from the clinical study without prior written consent from the sponsor.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Jose A. Vega, OD, Sr. Manager Global Medical Scientific Affairs |
---|---|
Organization | Coopervision |
Phone | (925) 621-3761 |
jvega@coopervision.com |
- EX-MKTG-50