Performance of Somofilcon A Over One Week in Wearers Adapted to Omafilcon A
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to determine if habitual or adapted contact lens wearers of Omafilcon A can be confidently refit into Somofilcon A lenses and be successful after one week of daily wear.
The primary outcome variables for this study are:
-
Investigator responses to refit questions;
-
Lens fit.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, single-site, dispensing, bilateral wear, open label, daily wear switch study, with the test lens (Somofilcon A) being worn for 7 (+5) days.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: somofilcon A 1-day soft contact lenses Habitual and refitted wearers of omafilcon A were refit into somofilcon A for a week |
Device: somofilcon A
contact lens
Device: omafilcon A
contact lens
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Investigator Opinion On Overall Patient Refit From Omafilcon A to Somofilcon A: Does Somofilcon A Provides Easy and Quick Refit From Omafilcon A? [1 week]
Investigator level of agreement using a Likert scale on refitting participants from omafilcon A to somofilcon A at Visit 1 (Strongly Agree, Agree, Slightly Agree, Slightly Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree)
- Investigator Assessment to Refit- Based on the Investigator Opinion and Lens Fit Outcomes, Would the Investigator Refit the Subject Into Somofilcon A From Omafilcon A? [1 week]
Investigator level of agreement on the ease of refitting participants from omafilcon A to somofilcon A using Likert scale (Strongly agree, Agree, Slightly Agree, Slightly Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree)
- Investigator Assessment to Refit - Does Somofilcon A Performs Better Than Omafilcon A Day? [1 week]
Investigator level of agreement on the ease of refitting participants from omafilcon A to somofilcon A using Likert scale (Strongly agree, Agree, Slightly Agree, Slightly Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree)
- Investigator Assessment to Refit - Does Somofilcon A Provides an Upgrade From Omafilcon A? [1 week]
Investigator level of agreement on the ease of refitting participants from omafilcon A to somofilcon A using Likert scale (Strongly agree, Agree, Slightly Agree, Slightly Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree)
- Lens Fit - Post-blink Lens Movement [Dispense and 1 Week]
Graded on a scale of 0-4, 1 step, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement.
- Lens Fit - Lens Tightness [Dispense and 1 week]
Graded using 0-100 scale (5% steps) where 0 = extremely loose and 100 = extremely tight.
- Lens Fit - Lens Deposition [Dispense and 1 week]
Graded on a scale of 0-4, with 0.25 increments, 0=no deposits; 4=deposit ≥ 0.5mm or film >75% surface.
- Lens Fit - Centration [Dispense and 1 Week]
(3 point scale: optimum, decentration acceptable, decentration unacceptable)
- Lens Fit - Lens Wettability [Dispense and 1 Week]
Graded on a scale of 0-4 with 0.25 increments, 0=excellent; 4=severely reduced.
- Overall Lens Fit Acceptance [Dispense and 1 Week]
Graded on a 0-4 point scale (where 0 = should not be worn, 4=perfect), providing a reason if Grade 2 or less
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
-
Has read and signed an information consent letter;
-
Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
-
Habitually wears soft spherical contact lenses with a power between +6.00 to -10.00D (inclusive) for a minimum 5 days per week, 10 hours per day and anticipates no difficulty wearing contact lenses for 7 days per week, 10 hours per day;
-
Habitually wears, or is able to be adequately refit into Proclear 1 Day lenses;
-
Demonstrates an acceptable fit with Proclear 1 Day and Clariti 1 Day contact lenses;
-
Is correctable to a visual acuity of 0.20 LogMAR (approximately 20/30) or better (in each eye) with the study lenses or habitual correction;
-
Manifest cylindrical spectacle refraction does not exceed -1.00DC in either eye.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Is participating in any concurrent clinical research study;
-
Has any known active* ocular disease and/or infection;
-
Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
-
Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
-
Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study;
-
Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal communication);
-
Is aphakic;
-
Has undergone refractive error surgery;
-
Is an employee of the Centre for Contact Lens Research;
-
Has taken part in another clinical or (pharmaceutical) research study within the last 7 days.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo | Waterloo | Ontario | Canada | N2L 3G1 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Coopervision, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- EX-MKTG-84
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Habitual and refitted wearers of Omafilcon A were refitted with Somofilcon A |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 77 |
Habitual Wearers of Proclear 1 Day | 2 |
Other Habitual Lens Types | 75 |
COMPLETED | 71 |
NOT COMPLETED | 6 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Overall Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Habitual and refitted wearers of omafilcon A were refitted with somofilcon A. Two participants were habitual wearers of omafilcon A; the remaining participants were habitual wearers of other lens types. One participant was excluded from all analysis due to protocol deviation and one participant was excluded from all analysis due to an adverse event. |
Overall Participants | 71 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
71
100%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
25.3
(7.6)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
52
73.2%
|
Male |
19
26.8%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
Canada |
71
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Investigator Opinion On Overall Patient Refit From Omafilcon A to Somofilcon A: Does Somofilcon A Provides Easy and Quick Refit From Omafilcon A? |
---|---|
Description | Investigator level of agreement using a Likert scale on refitting participants from omafilcon A to somofilcon A at Visit 1 (Strongly Agree, Agree, Slightly Agree, Slightly Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) |
Time Frame | 1 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Though 71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses. One participant was excluded because of three protocol deviations and other Participant was excluded because of an adverse event (non-significant ocular from Omafilcon A). |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Habitual and refitted wearers of Proclear 1 Day were refitted with Clariti 1 Day |
Measure Participants | 69 |
Strongly disagree |
1
1.4%
|
Disagree |
0
0%
|
Slightly disagree |
13
18.3%
|
Slightly Agree |
11
15.5%
|
Agree |
32
45.1%
|
Styrongly agree |
12
16.9%
|
Title | Investigator Assessment to Refit- Based on the Investigator Opinion and Lens Fit Outcomes, Would the Investigator Refit the Subject Into Somofilcon A From Omafilcon A? |
---|---|
Description | Investigator level of agreement on the ease of refitting participants from omafilcon A to somofilcon A using Likert scale (Strongly agree, Agree, Slightly Agree, Slightly Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) |
Time Frame | 1 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Though 71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses. One participant was excluded because of three protocol deviations and other Participant was excluded because of an adverse event (non-significant ocular from Omafilcon A). |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Habitual and refitted wearers of Proclear 1 Day were refitted with Clariti 1 Day |
Measure Participants | 69 |
Strongly disagree |
0
0%
|
Disagree |
2
2.8%
|
Slightly disagree |
18
25.4%
|
Slightly agree |
20
28.2%
|
Agree |
18
25.4%
|
Strongly agree |
11
15.5%
|
Title | Investigator Assessment to Refit - Does Somofilcon A Performs Better Than Omafilcon A Day? |
---|---|
Description | Investigator level of agreement on the ease of refitting participants from omafilcon A to somofilcon A using Likert scale (Strongly agree, Agree, Slightly Agree, Slightly Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) |
Time Frame | 1 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Though 71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses. One participant was excluded because of three protocol deviations and other Participant was excluded because of an adverse event (non-significant ocular from Omafilcon A). |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Habitual and refitted wearers of Proclear 1 Day were refitted with Clariti 1 Day |
Measure Participants | 69 |
Strongly disagree |
1
1.4%
|
Disagree |
3
4.2%
|
Slightly disagree |
30
42.3%
|
Sligtly agree |
19
26.8%
|
Agree |
14
19.7%
|
Strongly Agree |
2
2.8%
|
Title | Investigator Assessment to Refit - Does Somofilcon A Provides an Upgrade From Omafilcon A? |
---|---|
Description | Investigator level of agreement on the ease of refitting participants from omafilcon A to somofilcon A using Likert scale (Strongly agree, Agree, Slightly Agree, Slightly Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) |
Time Frame | 1 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Though 71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses. One participant was excluded because of three protocol deviations and other Participant was excluded because of an adverse event (non-significant ocular from Omafilcon A). |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Participants |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Habitual and refitted wearers of Proclear 1 Day were refitted with Clariti 1 Day |
Measure Participants | 69 |
Strongly Disagree |
1
1.4%
|
Disagree |
2
2.8%
|
Slightly Disagree |
19
26.8%
|
Slightly agree |
22
31%
|
Agree |
19
26.8%
|
Strongly agree |
6
8.5%
|
Title | Lens Fit - Post-blink Lens Movement |
---|---|
Description | Graded on a scale of 0-4, 1 step, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement. |
Time Frame | Dispense and 1 Week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses because of protocol deviations and adverse event.Two participants were habitual wearers of omafilcon A lenses and not necessary to dispense new lenses.They are not included in the omafilcon A dispense analysis but included in the omafilcon A 1-week analysis |
Arm/Group Title | Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. |
Measure Participants | 69 | 69 |
Dispense |
2.1
(0.5)
|
2.2
(0.5)
|
1-week |
1.9
(0.6)
|
2.0
(0.6)
|
Title | Lens Fit - Lens Tightness |
---|---|
Description | Graded using 0-100 scale (5% steps) where 0 = extremely loose and 100 = extremely tight. |
Time Frame | Dispense and 1 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses because of protocol deviations and adverse event.Two participants were habitual wearers of omafilcon A lenses and not necessary to dispense new lenses.They are not included in the omafilcon A dispense analysis but included in the omafilcon A 1-week analysis |
Arm/Group Title | Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. |
Measure Participants | 69 | 69 |
Dispense |
48
(9)
|
46
(7)
|
1-week |
51
(8)
|
47
(9)
|
Title | Lens Fit - Lens Deposition |
---|---|
Description | Graded on a scale of 0-4, with 0.25 increments, 0=no deposits; 4=deposit ≥ 0.5mm or film >75% surface. |
Time Frame | Dispense and 1 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses because of protocol deviations and adverse event.Two participants were habitual wearers of omafilcon A lenses and not necessary to dispense new lenses.They are not included in the omafilcon A dispense analysis but included in the omafilcon A 1-week analysis |
Arm/Group Title | Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. |
Measure Participants | 69 | 69 |
Dispense |
0.38
(0.54)
|
0.22
(0.33)
|
1-week |
0.60
(0.63)
|
0.36
(0.51)
|
Title | Lens Fit - Centration |
---|---|
Description | (3 point scale: optimum, decentration acceptable, decentration unacceptable) |
Time Frame | Dispense and 1 Week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses because of protocol deviations and adverse event.Two participants were habitual wearers of omafilcon A lenses and not necessary to dispense new lenses.They are not included in the omafilcon A dispense analysis but included in the omafilcon A 1-week analysis |
Arm/Group Title | Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. |
Measure Participants | 69 | 69 |
Optimum |
26
36.6%
|
40
NaN
|
Acceptable |
43
60.6%
|
27
NaN
|
Unacceptable |
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Optimum |
28
39.4%
|
35
NaN
|
Acceptable |
41
57.7%
|
34
NaN
|
Unacceptable |
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Lens Fit - Lens Wettability |
---|---|
Description | Graded on a scale of 0-4 with 0.25 increments, 0=excellent; 4=severely reduced. |
Time Frame | Dispense and 1 Week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses because of protocol deviations and adverse event.Two participants were habitual wearers of omafilcon A lenses and not necessary to dispense new lenses.They are not included in the omafilcon A dispense analysis but included in the omafilcon A 1-week analysis |
Arm/Group Title | Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. |
Measure Participants | 69 | 69 |
Dispense |
0.54
(0.66)
|
0.21
(0.34)
|
1-week |
0.83
(0.78)
|
0.42
(0.25)
|
Title | Overall Lens Fit Acceptance |
---|---|
Description | Graded on a 0-4 point scale (where 0 = should not be worn, 4=perfect), providing a reason if Grade 2 or less |
Time Frame | Dispense and 1 Week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
71 participants completed all protocol visits, two are completely excluded from all analyses because of protocol deviations and adverse event.Two participants were habitual wearers of omafilcon A lenses and not necessary to dispense new lenses.They are not included in the omafilcon A dispense analysis but included in the omafilcon A 1-week analysis |
Arm/Group Title | Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. | All participants that habitually wear omafilcon A and other contact lenses are refitted with omafilcon A for a week and then Fitted with somofilcon A for a week. |
Measure Participants | 69 | 69 |
Dispense |
3.3
(0.6)
|
3.6
(0.5)
|
1-week |
3.2
(0.7)
|
3.4
(0.7)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From dispense to completion of follow up, approximately one week for each lens, two weeks total. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A | ||
Arm/Group Description | Habitual and refitted wearers of Proclear 1 Day were refitted with Clariti 1 Day. Two participants were habitual wearers of Proclear 1 day; the remaining were habitual wearers of other lens types. | Habitual and refitted wearers of Proclear 1 Day were refitted with Clariti 1 Day. Two participants were habitual wearers of Proclear 1 day; the remaining were habitual wearers of other lens types. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/71 (0%) | 0/71 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/71 (0%) | 0/71 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Somofilcon A | Omafilcon A | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/71 (0%) | 0/71 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Jose A. Vega OD MSc FAAO |
---|---|
Organization | CooperVision |
Phone | (925) 621- 3761 |
javega@coopervision.com |
- EX-MKTG-84