Rotational Stability of V4C Toric Implantable Contact Lenses After On Axis Implantation Measured With OPD Scan 3

Sponsor
Yonsei University (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03391544
Collaborator
(none)
75
1
1
11.1
6.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The recently introduced toric V4c toric ICL (STAAR Surgical Company, Monrovia, CA, USA) has been designed with a 360-µm central hole to allow aqueous humor to flow without the need for an iridotomy. As far as the investigators certain, there have been not well-established prospective studies on the role of the V4c toric ICL for myopic astigmatism correction. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and rotational stability and to analyze factors that influence the rotational stability in V4c toric ICL implanted eyes prospectively.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: V4c toric ICL implantation surgery
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
75 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Rotational Stability of V4C Toric Implantable Contact Lenses After On Axis Implantation Measured With OPD Scan 3
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 28, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2018
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: V4c toric ICL implantation Group

V4c toric ICL implantation Group

Procedure: V4c toric ICL implantation surgery
The size and power of the V4c toric ICL were determined following the manufacturer's guidelines using a modified vertex formula. Emmetropia was the target refraction following surgery in all cases. Before surgery, three centration points were marked using the slit lamp while the patient, in sitting position, fixated on the center of the slit-lamp beam, which was narrowed as much as possible.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Visual outcome [6 months after the surgery]

    Evaluation of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and CDVA, manifest refraction, autorefractor-keratometer (ARK-530A; Nidek Co., Ltd.). The change of astigmatism was analyzed by the Alpins method.

  2. Refractive outcome [6 months after the surgery]

    Evaluation of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and CDVA, manifest refraction, autorefractor-keratometer (ARK-530A; Nidek Co., Ltd.). The change of astigmatism was analyzed by the Alpins method.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Rotational stability [immediately after the surgery]

    Rotational stability of the toric ICL was measured using the OPD-Scan III (NIDEK Co. Ltd., Gamagori, Japan). The rotation was defined as the difference between the intended axis and the achieved axis at each follow-up. Assuming that the adjusted axis was identical to the intended angle, postoperative rotation was automatically measured by determining the angle between the adjusted axis and alignment axis. Each measurement was performed three times by one physician, and the average of the three measurements was used in the analysis.

  2. Rotational stability [3 months after the surgery]

    Rotational stability of the toric ICL was measured using the OPD-Scan III (NIDEK Co. Ltd., Gamagori, Japan). The rotation was defined as the difference between the intended axis and the achieved axis at each follow-up. Assuming that the adjusted axis was identical to the intended angle, postoperative rotation was automatically measured by determining the angle between the adjusted axis and alignment axis. Each measurement was performed three times by one physician, and the average of the three measurements was used in the analysis.

  3. Rotational stability [6 months after the surgery]

    Rotational stability of the toric ICL was measured using the OPD-Scan III (NIDEK Co. Ltd., Gamagori, Japan). The rotation was defined as the difference between the intended axis and the achieved axis at each follow-up. Assuming that the adjusted axis was identical to the intended angle, postoperative rotation was automatically measured by determining the angle between the adjusted axis and alignment axis. Each measurement was performed three times by one physician, and the average of the three measurements was used in the analysis.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
19 Years to 45 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age 19-45 years

  • Presence of myopia with a manifest refraction spherical equivalent between -5.00 and -20.00 diopters (D)

  • Astigmatism between -0.75 and -5.00 D

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Previous ocular or intraocular surgery (other than ICL implant)

  • Anterior chamber depth from the endothelium < 2.8 mm

  • Corneal endothelial cell density < 2000 cells/mm2

  • Evidence of acute or chronic corneal infection, corneal inflammation

  • Glaucoma, amblyopia, retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, or neuro-ophthalmic disease

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Korea, Republic of 03722

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Yonsei University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Yonsei University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03391544
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 4-2017-0243
First Posted:
Jan 5, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Jan 8, 2018
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 8, 2018